Bitcoin Forum
July 08, 2024, 02:15:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 [211] 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 ... 330 »
4201  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [FLASH AUCTION] 2oz .999 Silver NastyFans Minted Seat & 1oz Silver Binary Round on: October 08, 2017, 09:15:48 PM
.003
4202  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lauda gave me a negative feedback. on: October 08, 2017, 12:35:00 AM
There's no way to verify the fact that you bought the account. You could simply be saying that you bought the account when in reality you own the twitter account along with the bitcointalk accounts Omegasun and grim07, which gave trust to one another.
It's like the scenario where someone claims that their BCT account was hacked. There's no way to prove it.
4203  Economy / Reputation / Re: I been given negative feedback for no important reason on: October 07, 2017, 10:46:40 PM
Why would anyone give a negative feedback for no particular reason. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people who think that they can get away with anything that they want to do. Let’s not tolerate this kind of behavior.
Why would anyone not read the thread and instead just comment based on the title. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people that think that they can get away with any bullshit vague and general post that they want to type. Let's not tolerate this kind of behavior.

Roll Eyes
4204  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [30-Minute Auction] 1oz Frosted Gold Highlighted Bitcoin Binary Round on: October 06, 2017, 11:32:46 PM
.0078
4205  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ICO][BKB] BetKing Bankroll Token - Tokens distributed to your account on: October 06, 2017, 07:16:48 AM
Why I cant log in on my account?
Would you care to describe what the problem is so that your question can be answered more clearly?

(Have you made an account on betking.io before?)
(Did you try to use email when the dropdown menu was set on username?)
(Are you trying to log into betking.io with a bounty account?) etc.
4206  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Phissing on: October 05, 2017, 03:46:23 PM
Please remove the URL in the post as per the rules of the forum. Either place them in:
Code:
code
... or make a bolded warning NOT to open the link (which should not be a hyperlink but rather plaintext).
Also, what's the point of this thread? This is on slack.
4207  Economy / Services / Re: Bitsler Signature & Avatar Campaign (Rates Changed)(up to .0375/week) on: October 05, 2017, 11:53:36 AM
He only gives me an offer to join this great signature campaign without checking account details correctly and after one-year now he has wake up to tell this account is linked to another account.

Like this may be other mistakes also he is doing. Double check his work or find another person who got time to do these things correctly.

Because of his mistake I lost my account today.
So are you mad that you didn't get tagged immediately? If we can get past the fact that yahoo overlooked your account history when he added you then it is still possible to state that he has yet to make a mistake in this entire scenario. Since your account was tagged after the discovery of the linkage to klf, it makes sense to only tag the account now.
4208  Other / Meta / Re: Regards to a mobile version for this forum. on: October 04, 2017, 03:50:37 PM
Wait for the new forum coming some time in the future (maybe). Roll Eyes
What's wrong with the UI on mobile? Sure, you would have to zoom in to press some buttons for navigation but for the most part, it's not that bad and it's more or less the same experience as on a desktop.
4209  Other / Meta / Re: Why script?!? before I could visit with noscript on. And I was happy. on: October 04, 2017, 03:35:37 PM
nice, many thanks for the solution.

do you know why captcha was needed?
It was for security purposes. Theymos included the captcha to prevent brute-force attempts using multiple IP's which would in a sense negate the wait period that one has when they use a single IP for login attempts. Read this thread for some more details.

Recently someone has taken to using 5000+ IPs to bypass rate-limits and try many passwords. Therefore, it is now required to solve a captcha when logging in. JavaScript is required for this. I know that several forum users like to use NoScript, but I am not aware of any high-quality (ie. not OCR-able) captcha services/libraries which don't require JavaScript. You can maybe enable JS just for the login page, and then disable it again afterward.

There are a few people who use automated bots which need to login. Contact me with a description of your bot, and if it seems reasonable, I will give you a key which will allow you to bypass the captcha.

Let me know if you see any bugs.

And there are a lot of captcha threads that have popped up.
4210  Other / Meta / Re: My account got stolen on: October 04, 2017, 03:27:31 PM
-snip- I purely talk administrative stuff about my old account which has been stolen without my consent. So stop post hunting and be relevant.
Just PM them again. They're busy people. Eventually you'll get it sorted out -- but don't spam them.
4211  Economy / Reputation / Re: Yahoo gave me a unfair feedback because of his mistake on: October 04, 2017, 06:36:02 AM
Which is already sort out and it wasn't even the attention of the site. All because someone didn't read well.
The bolded part is false. The real underlying issue was not because of reading messages, but rather the way the bonus was dealt with. But that's not relevant to this topic.
FJNunez is focusing on one situation that happened and extrapolating that to a ridiculous degree.

It's as if I were to state: "Since you are getting married tomorrow we can conclude that you will have one husband tomorrow. If you are getting one husband every day as seen by the data, then you will be married to seven husbands by next week!"

There's no reason that FJNunez should be complaining about a 24-hour delay in payments, which was an isolated case. Why not complain about the scores of ICO bounty campaigns which don't give a shit about campaigner post quality?
4212  Other / Meta / Re: How It was a off topic reply? Help me Understand! on: October 04, 2017, 06:30:30 AM
Because your reply has nothing to do with anything. If you had any knowledge of how transaction fees worked, then you would not have answered with such an inane reply. Tx fees would have almost nothing to do with the transaction, especially considering transactions range in sizes and hence the sat/byte would be different. One would want to maximize sat/byte for a quicker transaction [to a point] and thus keeping the same static fee would be a bad choice
Technical Support is more strict on their replies since they require you to have some knowledge of the topic.
4213  Other / Meta / Re: what Sizes for design in forum ? on: October 04, 2017, 01:38:41 AM
If you mean the bbcode for changing sizes (or what sizes are available to you) then you can simply play around with:
Code:
[size=Npx][/size] or [size=Npt][/size]
where N can be used as a modifier for the size. An example of the size bbcode on size 30pt was used in this post. You can quote and see the behind-the-scenes to get a better understanding of how it works.
4214  Other / Meta / Re: Trust numbers ??? on: October 03, 2017, 07:41:15 PM
Yes, I know. Tried out, but what does -2 mean? Bad rating by vip or similar?
You should read up on how trust works. There are DT1 and DT2 members who are trusted by "DefaultTrust" and DT1 members, respectively. Each user by default has DefaultTrust in their trust list and that is why DT1 and DT2 ratings are the most impactful.

A -2 trust means that a DT1 or DT2 member has given red trust to a user (or you). Note that this is only for users who have yet to modify their trustlist.
4215  Other / Meta / Re: Trust numbers ??? on: October 03, 2017, 04:49:52 PM
Then the rest of the good ratings are untrusted and thus do not affect the trust score. Hence the only thing affecting the trust score is the one negative rating. If you want to personally see the untrusted ratings reflected in the user's trust score then you can change your trust settings respectively.
4216  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ICO][BKB] BetKing Bankroll Token - Tokens distributed to your account on: October 03, 2017, 04:01:03 PM
lol the bounty program is no results ? then how the fuck you can get that big much amount on pre-ico huh
Correlation is not causation. Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
If I did a small advertising campaign of person-to-person communication about an upcoming product and it [the product that is] gained worldwide recognition, was it through my advertising that it spread?

Certainly, there was some impact from the bounty but considering its length, we do not have an accurate sample size to determine anything.
This is all ignoring the butthurt tone of yours.
4217  Economy / Reputation / Re: Klf ( Legndary) try to buy an account ( HACKED ACCOUNT) on: October 02, 2017, 06:16:45 PM
Listen, when i provide  you the account link, he immediatly receive  negative trust from Lauda,  5-10 minutes just  after sent you the link ...

So its obvious, you  reported me To lauda in order to destroy my account .. So i destroyed your account too  

Lauda, i hope one day you will be arrested, some people here  will take legal action against you if you continue to destroy the reputation of others
Yeah. Lauda will be arrested for sending out negative trust to an account you don't own. Roll Eyes

What legal action will be taken? It's not slander. It's not libel. And who the fuck is going to really care about a 'negative trust' on an internet forum? What a waste of time. Roll Eyes
4218  Economy / Gambling / Re: BTCKINGS - bitcoin only poker site on: October 02, 2017, 05:29:34 PM
I initiated a withdrawal over 25 hours ago... I've checked blockchain.info, and nothing seems to be pending. I hope I don't have to wait much longer. I love BTCkings but c'mon...

This seems like an issue
One that's been resolved. Scroll up, it's been credited. This is what happens with manual withdrawals, of course. The user was simply caught between withdrawal times (if there is a daily period of time for that and you miss it by a few minutes then you'd have to wait the whole 24 hours) and due to fluctuations between intended withdrawal periods [we are human after all] the situation arose. Nothing big.
4219  Other / Meta / Re: Lauda is hacked??? on: October 02, 2017, 02:20:39 AM
What happens to Lauda when the account sale is not forbidden on the forum. Tell me if you are forbidden to exchange accounts on the forum. Besides, I did not take an account.
Since when do people wait until after the action is taken to punish behavior that they find shady/scammy? If you are about to shoot up a school but at the last second (while you have everything prepared by the way) decide not to because you see that you'll be stopped, are you simply given a pat on the back and go off scot-free? You had the intention to buy the account and without the negative trust, you were going to continue on with it.
4220  Economy / Reputation / Re: Yahoo gave me a unfair feedback because of his mistake on: October 02, 2017, 02:17:07 AM
Don't buy accounts? Simple as that.
Pages: « 1 ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 [211] 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 ... 330 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!