ASIC miners after just 2 month off use are electronic garbage..uselles
That is bullshit. Block eruptors still work fine for merged mining GeistGeld and CoiLedCoin, while also of course also including all the other mergeable coins in my merge just in case I luck intoa block of one of the more-difficult coins. I use larger ASIC units too, of course, but the block eruptors seldom luck into any of those whereas just the block eruptors alone can rake in GeistGeld and CoiLedCoin blocks. My Saturn is still going fine too even after hmm what is it now, five months or so? -MarkM- Sure Mark, it's all bullshit, the rest is a scam. You three are on every thread. Whats your agenda?  From left to right: Agents El Dude, MarkM, and BCX |
|
|
|
I am not specialised in ASICs nor even in proof of work mining. My interest is securing distributed ledgers and financial networks.
If that can truly be done without proof of work mining that would be great.
All this proliferation of insecure not-enough-work proof of work chains can stop and people can clone whatever actually works to secure currencies / ledgers/ financial networks of people unwilling or unable to work.
-MarkM-
Haha, how easy is that? Make it 100% premine. Give away 50% for free. Sell the other 50%. Theres your ledger. Your nightmare. An independent closed currency cycle you can't control. What you claim you are is just the opposite of what you really are. You try to prevent just distribution in every way you can. Thats your game. |
|
|
|
|
So let me explain the scam here:
50% premined and distributed without any mining.
That takes 50% out of your scam game in the first place.
Then mining starts. But you still can't run your scam, because there are too many coins out there to make a market against, with your usual scam scheme.
And the nightmare fulfills for you once a real currency cycle starts working, without anything in the middle you can control.
|
|
|
|
It's so obvious. Any coin about to make a real market, to become a full cycle working currency, a real success, is under attack by them.
That is bullshit. Scams that try to pretend that patheticly insecure amounts of hash power suffice to secure a chain are what is being attacked. If the scam has any chance of scamming lots of money out of people then that jsut makes it all the more important to put a stop to it before lots of people lose lots of money. Your claim basically seems to be that the bigger the scam the more important it is NOT to prevent it, because big scams are successful scams so should be permitted or even encouraged. These scams are deliberately trying to prevent blockchains from being secured. They refuse to enable merged mining even. They are designed not only to scam their own users but also to weaken all the other blockchains that also are trying to fool people into thinking that some puny tiny amount of hash power, so puny even a stupid meme can come up with more hash power, is enough to secure a blockchain. Basically they are trying to make scrypt untenable as a way of securing a blockchain by totally fragmenting the world's available scrypt hash power so that no chain has enough to be secure. -MarkM- Yadda yadda scam, yadda yadda bullshit.... It isn't a scam. Why you call it a scam? YOU are the scam part of the game, YOU are the scammers. Are you hired by AUR team? The so-called country coin is totally a scam. Should be dead totally. And you, scammers, should be killed. It's a scam, to scam the scammers. YOU. |
|
|
|
|
I'm glad to see you're running out of facts.
Now comes "Merged Mining". Bwahahaha.
Secondary Chain.
Again, BWAHAHAHA.
|
|
|
|
Why would I shudder? Is X11 just another pathetically vulnerable amount of hash power thus just another scam waiting for a meme to conjure up more hash power and PWN it or something?
Oh wait, are you imagining I am against methods of viably and sufficiently securing ledgers that my existing CPU, GPU, FPGA and ASIC collections cannot "mine"? As that is not the case. What I am against is insecure ledgers, such as proof of work blockchains that do not do or have (e.g. via merged mining) enough work to actually secure themselves.
If Ripple, NXT, eMunie or whatnot are actually secure that will be great. No more need for vulnerable not-enough-work blockchains...
-MarkM-
You, with your pathetical amount of ancient Scrypt hash power, will mine Flappycoin and the like, and thats about it. You can really secure that chain then, really. It'll be all yours. You will be holding the bag this time, don't you already realize that? |
|
|
|
Well I guess we won't know unless BCX's attack does in fact take place and does in fact work.
So we are reduced to awaiting the empirical evidence.
I guess we have to hope that BCX was not bullshitting but is in fact doing the attack and does in fact have enough hashpower to make it work.
-MarkM-
I'm genuinely interested. Has BCX or someone else explained the variant of the attack somewhere? I remember him writing about, but not in detail. I'd like to take a look. Thanks. Maybe if the attack works that might generate enough interest and credibility that (s)he will display the code used to do it? Meanwhile, maybe ask for more info? Such attacks have been done before, BCX has orchestrated or perpetrated successful attacks in the past apparently, or if not then was permitted by who-ever did so to claim the credit in this forum. The post above this one makes clear yet again that it is necessary to actually perform the attack, and successfully, in order for the claims that these scams are vulnerable to it to be believed. Maybe though the original discussion of the ancient attempted fix against timewarp contains explications of how the fix fails. Presumably after the fixers had already scheduled their fix and maybe not until bitcoin and litecoin had enough hashing power that it was no longer believed feasible for anyone to muster enough hashing power to succeed with the modified attack against those major hashpower chains? That the perpetrators of new coins lacking that much hash power have not continued research and pursued it to a real fix before deploying their scams simply adds more weight to the claim they were not intending to create secure blockchains, merely to make quick and easy make-a-fast-buck scams. They even actually go out of their way to ensure their chain cannot be secured, as if maybe planning ahead to the crash of their chain when they move on to the next so they can buy up all the coins of it at firesale prices then potentially some day go back to it, maybe when they run out of feasible names for new scams or something. -MarkM- Hey wanker, have a look at this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=549592.0Makes you shudder much? We are the Litecoin X11 hardfork team. |
|
|
|
I think MarcM is a bot. Spreading the same FUD on every thread. Blunt fear mongering. It's all so obvious. Just another Agent Smith. Agents can only act within the boundaries of the Matrix, and as a result, they must obey the laws set within the world of the Matrix. Here they are: ElDude, MarcM, BCX. |
|
|
|
So... this is on my Asus R9 290x Elphida flashed with the Stilt Bios running on PiMP 1.1 beta (64 bit BAMT)... Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P. Don't know if it's coincidence or what yet, I will test it on another rig, but using PiMP, but so far, it hasn't dropped after many hours running on it.... getting around 2.78 Mh/s  Oh... forgot to mention that I already tested this version of sgminer 4.1.0-96-g983e on BAMT 1.6 running on Asrock H81 Pro BTC with, but that dropped after a few mins still. Will post again after I test PiMP on another rig. Have you got a link to your bamt image that you are using? It's by the same guys (Bee) that made the older 1.3-1.5 Bamt https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2924.0Just downloading it. Since it's from Bee, does it have "donation mining" enabled, like the other distros he made? |
|
|
|
It's so obvious. Any coin about to make a real market, to become a full cycle working currency, a real success, is under attack by them.
That is bullshit. Scams that try to pretend that patheticly insecure amounts of hash power suffice to secure a chain are what is being attacked. If the scam has any chance of scamming lots of money out of people then that jsut makes it all the more important to put a stop to it before lots of people lose lots of money. Your claim basically seems to be that the bigger the scam the more important it is NOT to prevent it, because big scams are successful scams so should be permitted or even encouraged. These scams are deliberately trying to prevent blockchains from being secured. They refuse to enable merged mining even. They are designed not only to scam their own users but also to weaken all the other blockchains that also are trying to fool people into thinking that some puny tiny amount of hash power, so puny even a stupid meme can come up with more hash power, is enough to secure a blockchain. Basically they are trying to make scrypt untenable as a way of securing a blockchain by totally fragmenting the world's available scrypt hash power so that no chain has enough to be secure. -MarkM- Yadda yadda scam, yadda yadda bullshit.... It isn't a scam. Why you call it a scam? YOU are the scam part of the game, YOU are the scammers. |
|
|
|
Damn I really want this FUD to keep going on to scoop up the cheap coins. But your uselessness is way too evident. And it's wasting everyone's time to pay you any attention 1. There was no fork due to 51% attack. Fork at 5400 was planned since weeks 2. Time warp attack was solved as it was there in the Litecoin as well. That fix is incorporated in Auroracoin source too Here's the diff for that https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/b1be77210970a6ceb3680412cc3d2f0dd4ca8fb9This is as low as I will go to name calling. But you all (the one's claiming attacks) are clearly losers. They are very desperate, because they see their ASIC investments going down the drain. They didn't expect any resistance in their plan. Let's prove them wrong. It's so obvious. Any coin about to make a real market, to become a full cycle working currency, a real success, is under attack by them. |
|
|
|
|
This is obviously another good reason for any coin to change algos NOW.
Any coin you decide is a scam is prone to a 51% attack now by some sick butt fucks like you.
YOU are the threat to the glory idea. We once again need to make people like YOU the bagholders.
All we need to do now is just change algos for those coins.
This will secure the blockchain, nothing else.
You scream SHIT all day, because so much market cap went into those coins you don't and won't control.
And if you can't control it, you try to destroy it.
And the 50% distribution scheme is just about your own personal ASIC nightmare.
Get lost you sick fucks and try your Blitzkrieg scheme somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
I just started again with a fresh copy of BAMT 1.6.
It comes with an sgminer for X11, but it crashed.
But it showed temp and fanspeed.
Who made that version? Bit confusing already.
Now I installed yours and the one from badman and it runs but doesn't show temp/fanspeed... and has the 10% drop of course.
Gonna try BAMT 2 later on, with 64bit ubuntu.
you need to put the adl drivers in /sgminer/ADL_SDK/ there is a readme in the folder telling you where to get them Thanks, it's even included in the BAMT 1.6 distro. I recompiled and ran, and now it's crashing again after a minute! A build without those headers runs stable. |
|
|
|
|
I just started again with a fresh copy of BAMT 1.6.
It comes with an sgminer for X11, but it crashed.
But it showed temp and fanspeed.
Who made that version? Bit confusing already.
Now I installed yours and the one from badman and it runs but doesn't show temp/fanspeed... and has the 10% drop of course.
Gonna try BAMT 2 later on, with 64bit ubuntu.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, changed nothing for me too.
Could swapping/buffering be a driver issue then?
Loading/unloading something for the chained algos?
I've looked thru changed files on the system and was astonished how much I/O fglrx actually does.
|
|
|
|
|
I have the drop also on 290s TRI-X.
Just an idea:
Could it be the slow I/O speed of the USB thumbdrive?
How does it work? How long is each algo running?
Maybe the process swaps resources and waits for slow disk I/O
|
|
|
|
|
And if I see it coming - there is a new threat on the horizons for plain Scrypt:
Multi Coin Hashing
I just heard about it today and would be grateful to be enlightened wether it's possible.
Trying the same hashes for multiple coins.
You can piss away your fucking blockchain if this works and got ASICs coming your way.
|
|
|
|
|
Lets find an agency. How about the BSA - the Bolockchain Security Agency
Bwaha was a typo - decided to leave it - security - you already suck at arguments.
A heroes member sucking at security. Where were you, when all the Bitcoins got stolen.
But, but, but I'm marc m...
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, summer is coming. I'm doing HIRO (HIC) atm and I repeatedly check my rigs for work status.
I'm sensing they are idle, just to find out they are full on.
This, and more of it please!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
