My guess is he's a troll somehow related to game-protect. Maybe GP promised him a cut from any referrals or something. Newbies don't know who GP is, and nobody defends him (except for this guy). Plus look at the feedback he left me -- that's pure conspir-idiocy. He also keeps dodging my question about how he got his account. He's familiar with how the forum works, just playing dumb, of which he does a good job.

Hello sdice,

Can you please respond to this thread? You have a user that is waiting to hear back about a deal you made regarding payment of a big win.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269022

Wow, that's a huge win. I take it that they didn't stick to the deal? I will post a message on their main thread asking them if they can respond to you over here. It seems like they are willing to work with you -- hopefully they didn't change their mind.

The language in the email was pretty specific. Your coins must have been joined with coins that came explicitly from a known dark market hot wallet. Not to say you can't either

a) complete their requirements and provide a reasonable explanation, or
b) simply ask for a withdrawal and use someone else (I recommend FTX.com, they are a better version of BitMEX).

The interesting thing about BitMEX is they're not really an exchange -- they're more like an arcade or casino. You can only deposit and withdrawal BTC and nothing else. You send them your BTC, use it to buy some Fun Tokens to play with, and if you win the prize, you can cash it out for some BTC.

Either way, sounds like they didn't want your money at their casino.

Neat!

They are using CoinbasePro data for the "battle."

One last thing to be aware of: make sure the escrow being decided upon contacts you here on the forum and not telegram. Because you have provided a telegram name you will now likely get fake buyers and fake escrowers on telegram that are actually both the same scammer looking to scam you.

How did you get your account, and why did you get it? Its obviously not your account: you either bought it or hacked it. So why would you do this just to troll sportsbooks and casinos?

We should guess who the first walking facepalm will be to send them a merit.

My money is on PN7/QS

Yeah, I agree, blacklist all the morans.

Indeed, and you do good work here. I saw you already have fans that create accounts just to thank you for exposing scammers (well there was at least one). I can't understand the mindset of some of these people with absolutely no remorse for what they do, they must be pure sociopaths.

You should have just named your new account presenting_the_truth, because its what you do best, according to you, anyway.





There are 31 instances of the use of "presenting the truth" on the forum, and your various accounts wrote 26 of them, lol. Are you sure you're going to "restore some modicum of sanity"? That isn't exactly your forte.

And then coming back as side chain to reiterate what was in the PMs after bidding the forum farewell, not pleased that their malice wasn't having the effect they desired... definitely not BitcoinGirl.Club.

As far as your examples go:

1. The Medium article was published over a year after YOSHIE's post.

2. Mentioning 2 statistics from an article written in Indonesian doesn't count as plagiarism.

Oh please. This is a low blow and completely off-topic to this discussion.

Like last time and the time before it, you overlooked many of my words to draw erroneous conclusions about what I was saying; perhaps that explains it.


This is a lot of work you did, and I admittedly didn't bother to look into a comparison of AskGamblers totals for both sportsbooks. If you are using this as a metric, then obviously Sportsbet comes out favorably here, as they only have 4 complaints, 3 of which were resolved.


They apparently have a Curacao gaming license but lost the license required to operate in the U.K.


My point was they knew something was blatantly illegal and they did it anyway for the sake of making money. This is the type of mindset that guides their operation from top to bottom, which is why a number of casino review sites have them "blacklisted".

As has been mentioned, ultimately what it comes down to in situations where all we have to rely upon is the word of the parties involved in a dispute, is whether you believe the word of the casino or of the player.

I think that who is making the accusation carries big weight on this forum, as it should. If a reputable member who is known to be a pretty heavy gambler reports having been scammed, their word is going to carry more weight than 5-10 newbies. That's not to say established accounts never lie or newbies always do lie, but its a decent rule of thumb to assign greater credibility to established accounts.

Also, in the case of 1xbit, the owners (1xCorp N.V.) have something of a reputation for unethical conduct among the highest levels of business.

https://europeangaming.eu/portal/latest-news/2019/09/11/53961/liverpool-and-chelsea-cancel-agreement-with-1xbet/

https://www.igamingbusiness.com/news/1xbet-hit-400k-dutch-fine-over-unlicensed-activities

As far as I know, Sportsbet doesn't have such high-level accusations against it and is in relatively good standing with the regulators. Corruption spreads in a top-down manner, meaning 1xbit is simply likely to be more seedy based on the fact that they have a track record of putting profits ahead of ethics at the highest level.

Furthermore, I would say the net bulk of unresolved complaints scattered across the web is far greater for 1xbit/1xbet than Sportsbet, but it really depends on what kind of metrics you're going by...

So that is why I am more likely to give Sportsbet the benefit of the doubt than 1xbit. Others can disagree, and that's fine -- I am open to their reasoning. It would be boring if everybody thought alike.

 
1. Nobody cares what you think.
2. Show's over, go home, troll.

I'm going with plagiarism, though it also might be due to ban evasion.

During 2017 you used a lot of copy/paste lines to join bounties. Some of the accounts they were copied from look like they could have been your alt accounts, and many of them have been banned. It's possible you were just using the same list of copy/paste responses they were.










There are dozens of other examples just like these ones. Most of the people who engaged in this kind of copy/paste have already been banned, but you slipped through the cracks for quite a while. I know it was 3 years ago, but rules is rules.

"Sorry for the inconvenience?"

Are you out of your mind?

How could you say your goal wasn't do to any damage? Clearly it was, and that was your only goal. And it changed nothing. You changed nothing except for ruining the account and reputation of BitcoinGirl.club. Congratulations.

We're "signature honeybees" but you're the one who's too afraid to post from their main account for fear of ending up on yahoo's blacklist.

You sir are completely full of shit.