No matter the color, without a link for reference it worth zero, 99% of the time.
People are desperate...

There is this post from another thread, I found it interesting. This is ambiguous but a mixer is truly legal up to a point. I guess if set up correctly the person behind is safe. They just have to shut up and take the money.. Could be interesting to check Bitmixer.io just out of curiousity

I used to spend some bitcoins with Fiverr until it stopped to use it. Well no big deal, another site get my money, no wrong feeling. Enterprises aren't really interested in BTC itself it's rather to respond to demand and/or to increase their sales. Very few are real BTC enthusiasts.

What you never know, and that's a shame, is why they leave Bitcoin once it's introduced. It cannot be a matter of volatility because, as I said, most of them convert into fiats. Is this a lack of knowledge, no adequate infrastructure or local laws.
Although on the user end everything is done to be easy to use on the business end there is still a lot to do.

You have to admit that hosting your servers in Europe may not be a good idea when you run a mixer. It's like making waves with your Tshirt "Hello, I'm here, look at me!"   I have to re-read some reports but I think it comes firstly from Macafee who snitched.
I still believe that if bestmixer got busted it's because of the lack of anonymity in its service.

Also, something I found interesting is the website displaying "bla bla bla seized.. YOU'RE NOT ANONYMOUS"
Making me think that's the first motivation was to teach a lesson to people. Including "you're not anonymous" in a text that supposed to be somehow "official text" is just using sarcasm. Why?
Why the news doesn't talk about the owner? Where is he? What are the charges?

Another thing, the same day a new mixer is introduced, I may be wrong but...got my point?...
this mixer is using cloudfare for ssl and cdn, to be sure to be hidden?

I was trying to follow your logic since banks also use their platform to help 'scammers'. I'm not talking about a bank user who disputes a bank transfer or something like that. I'm talking about the billions moving around banks on behalf the criminals, oligarchy, Trump, companies, taxes evasion or whatever it is... Hello Panama Papers.

In the same way, they used banks to do their shady activities so we can say. I'm not saying we shouldn't fight illegal activities, just that they're doing it the wrong way. Well like they currently do with fiats. Mixers will always exist as banks do.

But the point is that you need to get that some people may need to use a mixer it doesn't mean they're criminal, believe me.
Otherwise, what are your argument to be against people seeking privacy and use a mixer (considering they do nothing illegal)

Will, they shut down the whole US banks industry since the USD is the currency the most used worldwide? Only criminals use banks.

I'm not taking you a fool...
Bitcoin wasn't created to be anonymous but transparent, there is a  difference between, otherwise, privacy would have been added to the Bitcoin protocol the day 1 by Satoshi.

If you don't have the need for privacy it's maybe because we have a different culture or something else. But I could give thousands of reasons to use a mixer even if you don't do something shady.

Nothing is stopping you to use a privacy-centric cryptocurrency.
Not true, or show me a link if you have.

@AdolfinWolf
Until today I thought Dutch is a synonym of German, the funny thing is I have been to NL plenty of times  

It's called privacy @cryptoreggae and in some countries, I can guarantee you it worths a lot of money. It's not just about GAFA or your browser. It's about your whole life, but it doesn't mean you commit a crime.
It's something the Cypherpunk have been fighting for decades. (There is a good text to read 'the cypherpunk manifesto'). And when people started to think about creating a P2P currency, well before Satoshi and Bitcoin, they had privacy in mind.


.
Edward Snowden

He may have thought that the participants will not be paid seeing the site has been seized. And he maybe didn't know the user managing the campaign already has the funds for the week
From someone who wanted to create a Signature posters Union  he jumped fast in conclusion.
Scam is a word overused and I think some people use it without understand correctly the meaning

If I remember yeah it's the first.
If bestmixer has been caught it's because how the mix is done wasn't so efficient. As proof, look today. I knew it already but it suddenly remembers me all the people claiming this and that is the best ever bla bla bla.

Look they even found how many bitcoins have been mixed and how many income they were making

Here on the forum but I don't remember where. I went from topics to topics and ended on the post quoted, then I visited the website and that's how I saw it.

Someone posted this link but I can't open it
https://www.fiod.nl/the-fiod-and-the-public-prosecution-service-take-money-laundering-machine-for-cryptocurrencies-offline/

edit:
@dbshck
the picture looks fake to me maybe I am too much used to see the usual USA pages but this one makes me think he created one in a hurry. ugly

edit:
@OmegaStarScream
thanks

What's going on with this mixer

Am i the only one noticing that the domain has been seized?  is this known yet?[/url]

When a site is seized it's supposed to display the famous page "seized by abcd jurisdiction". However, the site is currently displaying 404 Not found. Are people worried just for maintenance (which could be just this) or there is something and the site is really seized??

Weird the site disappears, the exact same day another one is created

Edit:
The site has really been seized
http://archive.is/MymVC
https://i.epvpimg.com/nbzRbab.png


https://www.fiod.nl/the-fiod-and-the-public-prosecution-service-take-money-laundering-machine-for-cryptocurrencies-offline/

I don't know what the article is talking about but I haven't seen the $6,300 price during the past week (but move on). We got a $1,000 decrease during, what? 24 h? Bitcoin can do this within 12h or less, we all noticed recently the 'high volatility' coming back like during the ATH but it almost stopped once we got the $8,000 check the article graph (except during a day).
And I don't think it can be explained just with the CME Futures as the article points out. It started in April, not 2 weeks ago.

True, the salaries are re-evaluated but not in relation to the inflation and the cost of living and this is the problem.
It is pointless to give an employee $10 more per month when he needs $40 more to live because the prices have gone up. (Prices increase by 20% but the salary on 10%, you see the problem). Not even talking about people working for a salary not based on a minimum wage and so never re-evaluated.

That's what I often say when I see people claiming "Bitcoin is the best investment". I know a lot of them have lost money during the crash.
Since I don't hear them anymore to say the same. A lot of people aren't so used with investments generally speaking I think.

Bitcoin is, in my opinion, far to be a store of value. SOV. is supposed to be a 'store your value' so your capital, how a cryptocurrency, volatile like BTC is, can help someone to 'store a capital' to avoid the risk to lose a %

Nice to see another mixer.
If I may suggest,
- you should consider changing the typeface. The site design is clean but the current typeface breaks your design.
- Javascript is required otherwise people can't even open the site :/
- I am puzzled as for using Cloudfare as SSL and CDN too, the SSL certificate isn't a full SSL, just a flexible that belongs to CloudFlare (randomssl.cloudfare.com) and there is no encryption between (?) .

No matter, It will still remain a centralized currency that works the same way as it is currently. Just a new (digital) currency that uses cryptography. But it will remain the currency of the government and not of the people.
Government budgets are so complex that you need several doctorates in everything just to find how you will maintain your economic plan for the next year.

C'est la question que j'avais posé une ou deux fois pour savoir comment les autres comptaient faire mais sans réponse. Pour ma part, j'ai décidé de ne pas déclarer un compte si je ne suis pas un utilisateur vérifié KYC. Ils auront qu'a me donner la preuve que j'ai un compte chez X ou Y. Je leur dirais que je suis famous et beaucoup de gens utilisent mon nom. Et si ils me sortent l'adresse IP je dirais que je me suis fais piraté
Si tu veux pour ton compte cloturé si tu veux vraiment le déclarer ben tu donnes ton adresse email et tu leur dis de se demerder avec. Tu fais un peu le beto qui comprend rien souvent ca marche.

Sinon pour revenir aux déclarations, j'ai lu il y a quelque jours que en dessous de 9k euros par an il n'y avait pas besoin de déclarer et/ou payer un impot sur la plus value, je me rappelle plus faudrait que je retrouve l'article.

The money is based on debt. What I got is if it wasn't possible to borrow money from banks the economy could not even exist. Too easy for governments and central banks to print money when its the population that will suffer from the result. I don't think people in Zimbabwe have a great life there. Too easy to charge people more taxes and to ask them to work longer. (to get almost nothing for your retirement as a 'bonus'))
At least with Bitcoin & its limited supply, you can't create unlimited bitcoins and can't produce counterfeit bitcoins.

NP. Years back there were more alternatives like ecoin (aka Wirex) but I don't know at all now since the site changed a lot, maybe it still has this option. There is a thread about Wirex here maybe you can ask in. Also sorry but I just remember about Advcash too, with Visa/Mastercard transfers out.