Hello
We will provide you a service to convert Bitcoin To Paypal 
Do not say Scammed !!!!! Just Try To exchange a simple amount withing 5$ And you'll see the result 
Accept bitcoins to convert to Paypal Or Wester Union I'm from morocco
Just call me in Skype : slimane.achbouq Or contacte me Par email : Slimane321@gmail.com
Good luck to all

Most likely he's just taking advantage of the situation to extort some guy he knows has a lot of btc since it worked with Mr PBmining.

We live it a digital era now, its not like we need to send scouts on horse between armies to communicate. We could have a control center on the internet itself, and the internet could vote about combat strategies based on a rank system.

An anonymous , decentralized HQ, which would be based on a rank system. For example people would have to play a video game simulator about a combat situation and whomever would score the highest that score would be added to his anonymous profile, and the highest their score is the more voting rights they have, over the real army.

This would ensure that the leadership to be also a decentralized network of specialists, which would be much better than current generals, and also since they would be anonymous and decentralized, no outside influence could influence them.

But this assembly would only assemble when a full out war would happen, local problems would be dealt by the local militias.

Pretty sure FRR is always just one rate, for both offering and receiving funds. Or are you saying there ought to be two rates?

Problem would be that if you create a difference between the rate being paid and the rate being received, either Bitfinex would be stealing the difference (if the rate paid by traders is lower than the rate received by lenders) or there would be a shortfall in the funds collected and Bitfinex would have to pay to cover the difference and bring it up to the rate the lenders expect to receive (if the rate received is higher than the rate paid)

Fixed and variable rates aren't strictly comparable; you can't say with certainty that one is a "better rate" than the other because the variable rate could change at any time. A situation can be imagined where you would want to lock in a fixed rate that's slightly higher than the FRR at that moment, in case the FRR rises in the near future. That doesn't really explain why anyone would choose to take a 0.7% fixed rate over a 0.1% variable rate, but it does explain why the option exists to choose to not take variable-rate swaps.

I'm having real trouble figuring out what you mean here. For example, "one would create an FRR at the FRR for actively given swaps on the green side" is not a phrase that I'm able to parse.

I'm looking at the Margin Trade page, where there's a dropdown section titled "Margin available", which... doesn't seem to be entirely accurate, but attempts to say how much money is available for swaps. There's a checkbox labelled "Include variable rates?". I'm assuming that with that box ticked, FRR-swaps are included in the margin available for you to take from, and that with it unticked you'll instead only take swaps from fixed-rate offers.

camolist you got that answer from support? it is very confusing and lacks of technical detail, there is nothing to "guess" about a source IP address, every connection comes with a source IP address and nothing need to be forwarded...
This is the first time happening to me in about a year, and if ppl start seeing successfull logins history from FOREIGN IP addresses this is absolutely normal to start worrying and flooding email support with questions.

Ok you experienced exactly the same as me, by any chance the IP you see on logins history is "198.143.41.97" ? I already opened a ticket with them by emailing support, hope this is a bug on their system and this is not hackers... I will post some news if I figure out simething else...

When taking  a swap you can choose whether you want your demand to be matched with variable-rate swap offers or not. Which makes sense as a feature to have, because "FRR, currently 0.1%" isn't necessarily better than, say, a fixed-rate swap at 0.11%, if you expect the going rate to rise. But when someone specifies a demand for a massive amount of swap with "Don't take variable-rate swaps" checked, they can sweep out all the fixed-rate offers up to 0.75% without touching the FRR wall at all.

Possible motivation for doing so... I guess it could be an attempt to push up the flash rate. If so, it is at least a "gentler" way of moving the going rate than the old game of "It grinds slowly down for months until at 0.02% the whole FRR wall goes at once, and then the going rate jumps dramatically up to 0.75% until the wall is rebuilt"


Mostly very true - they don't last long. But if you happen to have funds repaid at the right moment it can still be worth trying to catch the spikes. I've had the rare/occasional swap last a lot longer than expected at a high rate (at least one that's still going after 2 weeks). My guess is that they're small enough quantities that the high rate passes unnoticed because the total fee remains low.

Today I experienced some strange behaviour with Bitfinex web site, screen went blank everytime a page was requested, I logued out, and logued in again after about 30 mins, and all started working ok again.
Then I went to account security / logins history and found two successfull login from an IP that it was not me, IP was from another country.
I think nothing was stolen from my account because I have two factor authentication, but I'm worried about this.
Anyone experiences something similar?, ofc I already changed my account password, but I should have some device compromised or this is some bug at Bitfinex     the password was impossible to guess btw...

Well the idea behind my decentralized militia network is that its very easy to mount a defence and very hard to mount an offence.

You need every militia leader to mount an offence to attack another country, which would expose them as powerhungy and warmongering tyrants, so they would quickly become replaced or reorganized.

But if a real threat is coming then its easy to organize them, since they all have a common goal to defend their land, so they would form a temporary coalition which would be disbanded after the war. And because it would be a defensive army , they could not threaten foreign countries with it.

Now the financing is easy, since all rich people in that land would have a good interest to protect their property, they would donate to the army to defeat the agressors, and every other person that cares about that land.

If 1 militia commits crimes agains humanity, then either those people could move, they would not be bounded to that region, or there is always a civil way of private court system to deal with, and the private court will always rule objectively, and the court orders will be enforced by the other militias too.

So we would have 2 critical networks, the army network and the court network, and whenever militia goes out of line, the hurt people can turn to the court, and the court will enforce its orders with the other non-corrupted militias.

If everything is done well, the majority of the things will never be corrupt, and the majority will always clean out the corrupt minority.

gambling is leverage trading, not bitcoin itself/

The others will stop them. There will be constant communication between each garrison, if the commander of 1 garrison starts to recruit more people than allowed or buy more weapons, with the mission to conquer the planet, then either the local people would change the leader of that garrison to a better one, or the other garrisons would come in and forcibly replace that commander, if it is found that he abused his power.

A private court system would decide on these problems and instead a big government enforcing the courts, small cooperative militias like this would enforce court orders, so if the garrison commander that abused his power is found guilty and must leave office, then the other commanders could enforce this court order with all means necessary.

I finished that optimization. It is already on github, and will ship with version 2.1.

By the way (as someone who has already lent out money at Bitfinex at rates far beyond 1%/day historically): Even if you manage to get a 0.6%/day 30d loan out there, don't expect it to last any substantial amount of time.

Of course it happens as I have shown with the screenshot. It's happening right now and nobody cares. You can also look it up on bfxdata. Seemingly because suddenly people (god knows why, it never happened before 1.5 months ago) order large amounts of money (6 figures+ multiple times) and don't include "variable" rate" to be taken which cleans the order book behind the FRR but leaves it intact. Tunneling like that should not be possible, it messes up the order book, ruins any predictability and further kills liquidity.

FRR has spiked? lol. It went from 0.02 to 0.1 Sry, but that is the same crap that was said last time when I posted about this issue. How it could potentially be clever to reserve at 0.7 (who the fuck believes this?) because FRR would run out... Of course it didn't, there is still plenty and it's still at 0.1 when the spikes regularly go to 0.7 and beyond. When was the last time FRR was over 0.2? Ages ago and exactly because shit like this is allowed. If these guys want to take out six figure offers force them to take from FRR or calculate FRR dynamically but fix it once the offer is put on the book. What's happening is seriously ridiculous and absolutely in line with all the bullshit that has happened on the swap market before.

Instead of having a liquid market that reacts dynamically to increasing supply and demand (low demand it's at 0.02-0.05, high demand it goes to maybe 0.3) we always get shit like this just because fucking BFX is too stupid to remove the fucking FRR. I'm so fed up with this shit.