|
Gleb admits to tiny, tiny little red flags. Despite this he's still confident in the fact the Earth is a spinning globe.
Damn these Flat Earth trolls eh?
|
|
|
|
Less than 10,000 years.
I am confused. Science and Bible have different approach on telling how old are earth is. But the only certain thing is we are alive right now. Maybe we should focus on what we can do to help our mother Earth in keeping its reign by helping her to live more years. We already become the mere reason why we keep her in danger. The question of how old is the Earth would be good if it is gone already. Let us leave that to the scientist to figure out how old it is. But I want to believe on the simple explanation on the Bible. So yes, it is maybe less than 10,000 years.  Free from the artificial limitations the yoke of establishment scientific dogma puts on the mind I look at the available facts and they tell a fantastic story not fit for the mind of a mind-controlled sex-slave/farm-animal. You must escape the black magic NASA has used on your mind if you're truly interested in the age of the Earth. Be man not a lamb! Bonus image:  |
|
|
|
|
@BADecker,
FYI on page one of the bible the first thing it says is that we live under an artificial dome. You really need to work on your reading comprehension skills.
|
|
|
|
|
We live underneath an artificial steel dome and only the severely brainwashed person who believes we're on the surface of a spinning ball hurtling through a vacuum thinks there's no creator.
|
|
|
|
To answer this question it is necessary to examine first what a vacuum. As I understand it is the complete absence of air. But why the missile can not work under these conditions?
A rocket needs a pressurized atmosphere to push against and this doesn't work in a vacuum environment. The following video on automotive turbos does a good job of explaining the pressure concepts involved: Rocket propulsion works entirely on the principle of inertia... the inertia of the exploding fuel trying to remain moving at the same pace as the rocket but being forced to move with explosive-like force in the opposite direction by its exploding action... and the rocket being forced in the opposite direction of the exploding fuel against its own inertia. The inertia of the exploding fuel wins. Once in a while the fuel is ignited in too rapid of an explosion, and the rocket engine explodes. This is rare, now days, because rocket science has become a real art.  A day is less than 24 hours, gyroscopes don't possess the property of rigidity in space and now ignited rocket fuel doesn't create any pressure. What fascinating new aspect of science will we learn about tomorrow so that the Sun will keep rising and Earth will keep spinning? |
|
|
|
|
I can't believe it's not butter!
However, the GE tape it was recorded on was the one the GE cassette recorders came packaged with, a tell that the album was in fact fabricated; an actual bootlegger would have already used that tape up. A hoaxer on the other hand would need an old blank tape (hard to find) to record on and the one that comes with the recorder was old, but too old.
|
|
|
|
To answer this question it is necessary to examine first what a vacuum. As I understand it is the complete absence of air. But why the missile can not work under these conditions?
A rocket needs a pressurized atmosphere to push against and this doesn't work in a vacuum environment. The following video on automotive turbos does a good job of explaining the pressure concepts involved: |
|
|
|
... [clip]...
The numerous experiments that refute flat earth include:
1) Measuring The Coriolis force
2) The Cavendish Experiment
3) Eratosthenes' Calculation at various altitudes
4) The Michaelson Gale experiment
... [clip]...
1) The Coriolis effect has a cycle of 23 hours 56 minutes, the claim is that the Earth rotates every 24 hours. Clearly the motion of the stars circling above is responsible for this effect as the cycle matches sidereal time. 2) Two led balls hanging in some dudes garage is not proof we're on a sphere. The experiment is total garbage that nobody can replicate. 3) Nice that you added "at various altitudes" but the experiment still works if the Sun is a 32 mile wide disk orbiting 3k miles above a flat Earth. 4) The Michaelson Gale experiment corroborates the Sagnac effect in proving the existence of the aether. This leaves the only possible interpretation of the Michaelson Morley experiment as being a motionless Earth. We're not on a spinning ball, the Earth is a flat motionless plane! |
|
|
|
Egyptians discovered that the world wasn't flat by coincidence.
They had 2 huge obelisks on different spots seperated many KM form eachother and they discovered that arround the same time of day the shadows on those obelisks where different.
And there for the world should be round/roundly.
Those were Greeks, the ancient Egyptians knew the world was flat. Also as coincidence would have it, the obelisk experiment also works if the Sun is a 32 mile wide disk that orbits 3k miles above a flat Earth. |
|
|
|
It seems Namecoin may have a future after all...
Namecoin solves the endless DNS problems that many users have. It also reduces the lookup time. The problem with Namecoin is not the technology itself but the marketing. None of the webbrowsers support it by default so the average internet user do not have any knowledge about it (they don't know about dns either). I don't think they will install an extension for something they don't understand. It's hard for Namecoin to reach the mass market. There has always been a market for the tech-minded people but that doesn't solve the problem mentioned above. See how fast we get browser support when the UN starts saying "OK, we're redirecting x, y, z.com to confabulation.com because we feel their viewpoints are hateful and, discriminate against homosexuals and the mentally insane". |
|
|
|
If they sent two rovers up at the same time, they wouldn't have to make simulations. Why not? One rover could photograph the other. As it is, real rovers are way too expensive to make, just to send up two of them, just to be crowd pleasers.  Flat Earth - NASA Clowns (The Curiosity Mission Hoax)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_c_-evUe2I |
|
|
|
That's akin to BobLawblaw demonstrating his magic gyroscopic physics to the world. In order to save the spinning ball he has to say that small gyroscopes don't exhibit the property of rigidity in space.
You can measure the rotation of the earth with a small gyroscope. It is just not easy you have to take great care to eliminate all sources of error you also need a setup that is accurate. These folks from a university in Finland wrote up a nice paper on how to measure the Earth’s rotation rate using a low-cost MEMS Gyroscope small enough to fit on your desk. http://www.tkt.cs.tut.fi/research/nappo_files/Symposium_Gyro_Technology_2010_web.pdfCoinCube is throwing up some scatterbrain experiment that proves nothing other than the experimenters are picking up some subtle 23 hours 56 minute signal (sidereal star rotation) with a computer chip gyro. The Earth rotates ones every 24 hours according to spinning ball theory, this is not an argument it's a distraction. Did you guys even read the article? The angle of a gyroscopic gimbal changes 90° in relation the flywheel over a 6 hour period if Earth is rotating. Do you not see, you are stating that a 112g precision crafted gyroscope running at 1200 RPM does not remain rigid in space in order to save the spinning ball? Damn right it's a conspiracy! |
|
|
|
That's akin to BobLawblaw demonstrating his magic gyroscopic physics to the world. In order to save the spinning ball he has to say that small gyroscopes don't exhibit the property of rigidity in space. Go on, call me dunce again you fucking retard! edit: This also reminds me of BADecker who I forced into arguing that a day is actually 23 hours and 56 minuets long in order to save the spinning ball. "time to buy a watch, that's what time it is!" |
|
|
|
You've done nothing to prove my 112g flywheel can't be influenced by Earth's 24 hour rotation
I thought I was pretty clear that a 112g flywheel is not sensitive enough to be affected by Earth's gravity and centrifugal force. ...[clip]... I can put a nail in this coffin right here. A) centrifugal force is a fictitious force, the true force is the centripetal force. B) the density of an object vs. its medium determines whether it rises or falls and the density of the Earth is not relevant to the gyroscope. C) the gyroscope's flywheel has what's called rigidity in space and over the course of 6 hours the gyroscope's gimbal undergoes a 90° change in orientation if the Earth is rotating. D) the gyroscopes gimbal can be attached to the hour arm of an analog clock (24 hour) to simulate perfectly the rotation of the Earth (a 90° change in orientation over 6 hours). E) GAME OVER |
|
|
|
Instead of believing in this nonsense, knowledgeable people know that the Earth goes up with constant acceleration of 9.81 m / s - that's why any abandoned objects fall down to the same acceleration. And do not worry about what will happen when the planet reaches its maximum speed - most likely, it will never happen. Checkmate your theory of relativity, Albert!
Please try not to regurgitate the controlled opposition nonsense from the Flat Earth Society, the Earth is motionless! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
