The idea of creating completely new forum software was backwards. It has been in development for several years, cost several million USD so far and is still not that close to completion. Plus, there are some very drastic changes and downsides to it (JS anyone?).
Think of Theymos taking the latest version of SMF and spending $1.5M to modify that... it would have been the perfect software.  I agree. The latest SMF isn't that bad, and with the amount of money that has been invested in the *new forum software* it could have been extensively customized and secured. |
|
|
|
The idea of creating completely new forum software was backwards. It has been in development for several years, cost several million USD so far and is still not that close to completion. Plus, there are some very drastic changes and downsides to it (JS anyone?). What to upgrade to and how to keep the Forums history alive?
Most of the forum history is garbage from 3rd world spammers anyways.  |
|
|
|
Bounty manager was not Visale, it was Avirunes and jamalaezaz that handled the bounty promotion in the start but failed to record any work done and we refuse to pay them because they did not do their work and non of them try to force us pay them despite their reputation because we are right. All the people who participated for social media and blog campaign that have records were paid. Wait, are you saying Jamal and Avirunes scammed you by not doing the work that they were hired for? Lauda, Avirunes told me he was ordered to cease the counting, I can post his messages to me, since I have contacted him during the campaign. But I rather have his agreement on it before i open up pm's Yes, that would help. Are you sure that those PMs are not *supposed to be* private? Maybe you should ask Avirunes first, just in case. |
|
|
|
You're one of the best bounty manager...
Is this supposed to be a bad joke? |
|
|
|
Bounty manager was not Visale, it was Avirunes and jamalaezaz that handled the bounty promotion in the start but failed to record any work done and we refuse to pay them because they did not do their work and non of them try to force us pay them despite their reputation because we are right. All the people who participated for social media and blog campaign that have records were paid. Wait, are you saying Jamal and Avirunes scammed you by not doing the work that they were hired for? |
|
|
|
I have cryptos but would rather leave them earning and I can't get additional funds in yet due to weekly limits.
You need to acquire Bitcoin to purchase the bot and you can bypass any weekly limits by using localbitcoins or similar. |
|
|
|
Anyway to buy gunbot with PayPal or Credit Card as not able to fund with crypto at mo... Cheers
No. Why would you buy the bot when you don't even have funds to trade with? |
|
|
|
The error message mentioned buying a copper membership in order to be able to send additional messages, but I do not see where to purchase that. Please let me know the best way to communicate with Lauda. Thank you.
You can do that here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=credit;promote. I've sent you a PM containing an additional method of contacting me. |
|
|
|
OP has been tagged and whoever decided to buy an account to give fake credibility to a campaign is an outright idiot.
I guess your neg trust didn't make much of a difference for OP as we still can see the affect of monbux's positive trust from the outside but not yours, and for people to know the threat they must see the negative trust from the outside without having to open his profile and check the untrusted section which is where your rating is placed right now. So maybe someone else from DT2 should tag this account to make it clear for users. Already contacted monbux to remove it. she will get a slap when i pay to all the members of this campaign. i'm going to challenge lauda. If my campaign goes successful and i pay to all the users every week. She will remove that neg trust from me. If i didnt run this signature i swear on Jesus. That ill pay maximum 2 btc here to lauda.
I don't care one bit whether your campaign is a scam or not. The project account also deserves a negative rating for being involved in these practices. I'll PM them to see how they will respond. |
|
|
|
i dont know friend. your resorting to personal attacks makes me feel like you have ulterior motives here.
There is no personal attack, and rejecting an argument just because it contains a personal attack is a fallacy. but perhaps youre right.
Yes. and on the other hand, perhaps youre wrong
No. but your over generalizations and use of extremities makes me feel like perhaps you are "the latter adjective"
I am not even remotely generalizing. Most people, with a brain, are more likely to claim that 99% [even 99.9% (e.g. Andreas Antonopoulos)] of ICOs are scams. Intentional or unintentional is irrelevant.
all in good fun friend, merely wanted to discuss it a bit, but not if it means im going to be insulted personally.
Then stop blatantly promoting this shit platform. |
|
|
|
i suppose assuming the founders of the project are involved in some sinister plot to scam everyone is one argument.
They do not have to be in any kind of plot. >90% of the released ICOs so far are scams, this includes Ethereum ("Code is law".LOL). A platform that helps the creation of more ICOs, will naturally lead to more scams (hence my statement). I think making sweeping statements about "greed" is a bit misguided and definitely feels like it has some passionate negative connotation behind it.
Greed, ignorance and stupidity. Those are the three reasons for which the crypto market is so highly inflated. Do you really think that people are buying Ripple (or were buying Ripple) because they understand the idea, read the Whitepaper and know how it works? If you do, then the most latter adjective would suit you. I mean, who in their right (and educated) mind would such centralized garbage? Oh right, nobody. |
|
|
|
first to market is pretty critical here tho, woulsnt you agree?... why would i use a new platform when i already use one that works - and its incredibly easy.... easy enough for any neckbeard to do it. why would i change... i dont think i would.
Here's a better question for you: Why would I use CoinStarter, a random platform run by randoms, whose main purpose is to get more people scammed by fraudulent ICOs (naturally, more ICOs -> more fraudulent ICOs)? Here's a hint: I wouldn't and neither would anyone not led by their greed. |
|
|
|
Answer to thread title: No. With this many platform members, CoinStarter has a tremendous advantage over any other platform on the market today.
I can register 151, 001 active accounts on my platform and have tremendous advantage over CoinStarter. |
|
|
|
Warning - This users last post occurred over two years ago, their email and password was recently changed. This indicates this is a bought account. Furthermore the quality of their English in their last post since the purchase has changed from what it was previously, indicating a different owner.
OP has been tagged and whoever decided to buy an account to give fake credibility to a campaign is an outright idiot. |
|
|
|
Bump......Thought there was a bid after Lauda, hmm maybe Im mistaken, anyway Lauda in the lead with .075btc bid on this piece. 2 days left.
There was, but it looks like it got pulled(?). |
|
|
|
I will beat any price and use an escrow.
There's a minimum allowed sale price (AFAIK, or at least per those escrow terms), so this statement can't be correct. |
|
|
|
I'm thinking about posting a FAQ sticky about everything you need to know about forum activity since we get half a dozen threads every day asking the same things like "how do I rank up" or "why is my activity stuck" etc.
This is pointless unless you instantly trash those threads on sight. So is there everything else I missed or any corrections?
After quickly going over it, it seems very well laid out and written. I'll have to take a closer look to spot something, but my main point was above. |
|
|
|
two questions:
1. is it possible to switch to an other exchange without buying a new license?
Not anymore AFAIK. 2. the xmas-special is still valid? it was extended but till when?
Till the 7th of January. |
|
|
|
They're not changing the addresses for security, but for anonymity.
No. It's the case for both. Until you spend from an address, you aren't showing your public key to anyone. That is *fine* for now as there is no security flaw in Bitcoin or the relevant algorithms (we can ignore ASICBoost). So what happens when ECDSA is compromised, let's say due to a quantum computer? Any address that was reused, and still has funds on it, is unsafe. Given the exploit, someone could reverse engineer the private key from that public key.
Tl;dr: It's both for privacy and security. Address re-use is not recommended. Avoid where possible. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
