Sunday, April 10 to Sunday, November 13.
I don't think there is going to have a pre-season because there isn't enough time for that, since we are almost at the beginning of the championship. Less than two weeks to go...

Palmeiras next games, for example, are against Sao Paulo in Campeonato Paulista for the title, against Deportivo Táchira in Libertadores da America and then on April 10, against Ceará.

You can expect a regulation like this won't be restricted to India. Centralized exchanges and trading activity are money pots for local governments.

It's unlikely this 1% fee will impact trading volume negatively, because most traders aim and hope to make huge profit percentage, so 1% isn't a problem at first glance. After all traders end losing money, because the reality is different from the initial expectations, what doesn't make any difference for governments anyway, as they will be profiting in every cases.

As we can see it's a very unfair regulation for traders, but that won't decrease the frequency and amount of funds people are going to trade.

I'm not aware about this issue in my area, because as far as I know every gamblers are treated in the same way, doesn't matter their gender. I know respectful ladies who are casual gamblers and nobody overlook them for this reason. Quite the opposite, people in gambling industry are even more attentive and kind to these gamblers ladies.

To say the truth, what really matters in society is if people have money to spend. When they have, they are respected, when they don't have they are put in second plan.

Your analysis look pretty accurate. That is exactly what we are seeing on the currently scenario of cryptocurrency market. I'm glad the correction hasn't dragged bitcoin below. It could be much worse, if we compare btc's situation right now with past bearish markets.

It shows the market is more mature than ever, and even though investors are fearful, uncertain and doubtful, these negative emotions still don't have enough potential and power to impact bitcoin too badly.

Lol, it reminds me when Italy lost to South Korea on the world cup of 2002, by 2x1. For me this is the kind of thing which has zero chances of happening, until it finally happens for real.

It makes no sense anyway... I prefer to believe italian national team has an history of bad luck and that is all...

The good side of this event is that a lesson was learned: when Italy is the overwhelming favorite, avoid betting on them.

There is no problem in using or programming bots for hobby, testing and learning purposes, but it can't be done in competitive matches that will count for increasing players' classification in a global ranking, or to earn money against others during tournaments.

I don't know how often this kind of thing happens, but from humans, of course you can expect cheating anytime and anywhere. Sometimes it's not even for the money, but for the status, glory and fame.

It's not the first time Blockfi worries their investors. I remember when I thought about investing there last year, but the platform was unaccessible for some reason, so I just gave up on it. That was a big red alert for me.

However, it ended that it was just a technical issue that didn't cause any negative impacts for investors. Proof of that, it's Blockfi still working pretty stable by now. In my opinion this issue rewarded them with more legitimacy after all.

Now the problem with regulators is tricky, because I fear they are going to create more and more difficulties for crypto banks to operate, in order to protect the traditional banking system. Anyway, a 100$ million dollars fine isn't the end of the world for a company which holds more than 4$ billion dollars in funds.

Very detailed site containing some of the main gambling platforms disponible around. On the other hand, although there are lots of information regards crypto in general and regards the platforms themselves, I think the most important is missing there about 1xbit.

Theoretically, as a review site, you want to help gamblers to find the casino where they will have the best personal experience as possible, avoiding the problematic platforms.

Still, the only warning you give regards 1xbit is that they have a weak support service, while in fact, it should be said there are scam accusations against them, what goes much further than a simple poor support.

It's hard to prevent cheaters on online chess, at least on short run. But as far as I know, there aren't perfect crimes and sooner or later users using third party services to compete online are going to be busted and have their access to the platforms restricted (at least serious platforms).

I say that because it happened to a very popular youtuber from my country. It was a scandal where he was severely criticized on the internet, being his final attempt to create excuses he wasn't using bots, but having assistance from a "teacher" in real time, instead.

Mechanisms like KYC and forbidding recent created accounts to play competitively could highly weak cheats on this game.

If you don't want miss the train a second time, the best moment to buy bitcoin is now. 500$ looks a very low amount of money if you are going to invest that only once, what means it's hard to expect a big return in some years.

Some expect bitcoin will hit ATH and start a new bull run only between 2024-2025. Considering that, it's likely you will see 50% profit over your initial investment up to few years. That is, 250$ only. Then you should consider investing more...

Yes, hypes are like walking in circles as they are constantly repeating themselves, unless you are lucky enough to enter the hyped market on the right moment, so you can make huge profit and finally put this money into a more sustainable investment which won't put you in risk of walking in circles without reaching anywhere.

That is why it is important to spot the difference between hypes and long term projects in crypto market.

Brazil - 1500$ weekly, 6000$ monthly. Not possible to live like the king of the world, but possible to have a decent, confortable middle class life.

On the other hand, if it was a couple instead a group of five, that amount of money would be enough to raise financial standards considerably, having access to the high quality goods and services disponible around.

Anyway, if those five people are also investors and use their signature campaign wages to grow their holdings along the time, instead of spending everything, it's possible to improve life conditions through passive income within time.

I see no reason for online casinos go offline, because that would imply extra operational costs for the owners with physical structure, employees, maintenance and security. Since they can reach a wider public only by operating online, why would they spend more to reach only a localized public through a land based casino?

And if an amazing crypto casino decided to go offline, I suppose it would be more for status and power demonstration than anything else. Profitability stays in second plan on this case.

I'm not so sure about this, because during a war, the first targets are the communication channels, besides the military centers. It means the enemy will destroy television and internet signal towers plus infrastructure. It means without internet connection bitcoin is almost useless as currency. When cash fails in scenarios like this, people appeal to barter system or start begging for donations.

On this aspect, fantasy sports games are better than simulated games, because they follow the performance of each player in real life to find results for the virtual matches, so there is some unavoidable logic there making the games harder or not possible to be rigged.

Since both are based in virtual experience, fantasy sports are preferable when compared to the simulated ones category.

Nice win from Sao Paulo yesterday against Sao Bernardo by 4x1. Sao Bernardo started scoring, but Sao Paulo was able to tie the game pretty fast, and from 21 minutes on the game totally changed in favour of Sao Paulo, because Sao Bernardo had one player sent off with a red card.

For this reason it's hard to measure how strong Sao Paulo is, since the game becomes much easier when you play with 11 against 10.

Anyway, good luck for Sao Paulo now on the semi-finals of Campeonato Paulista.

Generally a gambler can spin 10 times per minute, what means in an hour it corresponds to 600 spins. Following this strategy, it would be needed to spend 3000$ for an one hour gambling session. That amount can be compared to total annual wage received by many employees in third world countries.

What many people receive in one year, a gambler playing this method would spend in one hour!

So, it's an insane amount to wage in a very short time period. Not applicable for real, without any doubts (at least for my standards).

That could explain the recent rise in bitcoin price, but also the reason why bitcoin pumps and dumps immediately in sequence, because that is common when using bitcoin as an intermediary currency to move money from one place to another. That is, the middleman between ruble and the currencies from countries which imposed sanctions on Russia.

I believe stablecoin is a good term for these currencies. 2 cents up or down don't make much difference, so they continue being stable anyway.

It would be wrong if they were called static-coins. Only then it would mean they couldn't fluctuate even a little, being a must for the price to be static.

Yes, definitely not realistic. It's not even possible to say if this bear season is going to end soon. There is a good chance we are going to enter 2023 without bitcoin recovering yet. Furthermore, bitcoin has a long path until it can finally reach 350,000$ or 450,000$.

Last ATH hit close to 70,000$ and it was pretty hard, so as we can it's a hardcore mission to reach the price predicted by the trader. Billion of dollars must be invested in btc, so we can see that happening for real. And that is something we don't see happening on short run.