My results on lbry.
750 ti with o/c :49-50 mh/s
970 with o/c : 131-132mh/s
1070 with o/c (2000mhz core):222-224mh/s
7970-280x o/c : 50-51mh/s
290 with oc :66 -67 mh/s
what is your usage on the 1070? 99%? Nvidia seems good!
What miner are you using for Nvidia cards?
there is no open source for nvidia yet, so i guess he is using the private one |
|
|
|
currently a $800 system with a single 1070 can give you around $200 per month, so roi in 4 months, but you need to remove electricity
You guys seems not understanding me... I need a mining hardware that can cost $200 or less to buy and not $200 ROI. then you mean asic because there is no desktop that cost $200 or less for mining and any asic for that price is worthless |
|
|
|
We will know if the ETH = Game over in the next few weeks. If the Ethereum survives, the price will be $50.
50? why there is no reason for it anymroe to increase so high, unless this take in consideration the upcoming increase of bitcoin, which will indirectly increase all other altcoin value in $ |
|
|
|
|
currently a $800 system with a single 1070 can give you around $200 per month, so roi in 4 months, but you need to remove electricity
|
|
|
|
I disagree.
I guess everyone has forgotten about block 74638, when somebody following the consensus rules created 184 billion BTC. A hard fork and a 51% attack were orchestrated by the Bitcoin developers in order to undo those transactions.
technically it was not an hard fork, read maxwell about the matter https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1520693.msg15301988#msg15301988there was never an hard fork for bitcoin, which explain why they don't want to do the 2MB thing... |
|
|
|
|
this can also just be that she know that if she support bitcoin more vote will come to here, not that she really care about bitcoin
before she care about bitcoin, she should understand it and i have my doubt about this...
|
|
|
|
|
if it was easy to get the value would not be so high in the first place, if you are rich you can get it easily, just buy it on any exchange
if you are aksing how to have free money then this is the wrong place....and probably there are not correct places unless, and you're basically asking how to steal money...
|
|
|
|
|
the market is finding it's place between 650-700, where i have already seen all this? oh wait in the range 450-500
same thing but with a different digit at the beginning, usually a stagnation like this indicate that another rise is coming, be prepared...
|
|
|
|
GTX 1070 is 5.25GH/s on XVC (Blake-256 8 round), pulling 150W - this gives it a MH/s/W value of 35MH/s/W.
I'd like to stress that it's 14nm. With my full-custom design on one of my 28nm FPGAs, I get 2.1GH/s at 24W - this gives it an MH/s/W value of 87.5MH/s/W.
As it is, this fight is one-sided. If they had been manufactured on the same node, it wouldn't be a fight - it would be an execution.
well not fair to compare a gpu with fpga, fpga can do well one thing at time, then you need to reprogram it, gpu can do multiple things it will consume more energy because of that, if gpu were specialized only on mining, they would be just asic, so yes it's not all about nm productive process |
|
|
|
|
again it's easy to do 240MH on fury when they consume 270w, not impressed
currently you can do 220 with a 1070 at half the wattage, if someone can check the utilizzation on lbry, if it is not 99% then there are probably some optimizations to do, otherwise not so much
i would like to see wolfo working on nivida some times, to see what he can really pull off, or if this is because you can do more with amd than nvidia...something is telling me that it is the latter...
|
|
|
|
this will remain private right? This algo is a mix of SHA-256, SHA-512 and RIPEMD-160. Very ASIC friendly provided anyone ever cares to make one for it.
not with the current capitalization |
|
|
|
thanks but why comparing the hashrate with the old djm34 version? the new one is much faster.
EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's.
EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
Just tested this r.10 with neoscrypt on my super jetstream 1070. 960 kh/s, but it IS power hungry )) pallas, could you please provide a link to best neoscrypt miner for pascal (win 7) you can try 1.8 version of epsylon3 i remember he ported the djm34 version in the last version of his miner |
|
|
|
Especially if you are generating coins for the pool more than you are earning I would definetely try solo. Someone mines a block every 14 seconds.
lol nethash is 1T, 2T, 3T, 4T you don't solomine... How many times have I seen that comment here?
i solo mine, but only when i can get block fast enough not above 1 day on average, i don't take into account luck strike, those does not count at all Have a bash at solo, I mined 2 blocks in the first 36 hours of mining with only 11Mh/s on just one HD7870, and everyone told me solo with only 11Mh/s was pointless. 10eth in less than a week.  Don't you just love it. You can always switch to a pool after a week if you don't get lucky. My best advice for you is..... take advice from people that seem happy, and ignore the miserable miners that moan and complain. You may not get rich either way but you will enjoy it all the more. But then i am only a few miles away from "GCHQ Bude" so my connection is the best in the world. http://www.cornishguardian.co.uk/north-cornwall-spy-station-centre-new-edward/story-19609712-detail/story.htmlthat is just luck, do your really that this cna be considered a good estimate of how good you can do in solo mining? onbiously not, you will get your next block in 1 month if ever unless you got those block months ago when diff was really low |
|
|
|
|
why you still have 3 different card in the same rig, do you really need the 750? not saying that that is the problem(well it might be) but i find it wacky
|
|
|
|
All the information you need is there on greaterninja's post. Don't listen to guys who never mined single block.
Eth is really fast coin, if you have a reliable network connection with low latency you will find blocks. I earned better solo than pool with only 100MH when nethash was 0.5TH.
well now it's 9x higher, also factor in the diff that it isn't linear with the hash, but probably higher so you most likely need more than 9x your old hashrate, which was 100MH |
|
|
|
The last 24hours. 1 GB of lbry payed out around $38.352 ( http://yiimp.ccminer.org/ on the column to right in the library column you see the actual payout for 1 ghash) So if your miner mined at 78MHASH you would earn 3 bucks. Djm34's 2 gtx 980's is only hashing @ 39MHASH each. To reach 10$ per card you need 260MHASH. And this is doable on the 1080 with proper coding. given the real earnings a gtx 1080 on yiimp at 250MH/s should get 5.9$/Day, gross. Suprnova calculator it's way off. With an hashrate of 940MH, yeasterday on suprnova it earned 35 coins.. Something's wrong there, as always. that was my suspect as well supernova estimate seems wrong or not on par with the block features of adding 1 coin on the reward for each additional 100 blocks gtx 1070 is doing 0.007-0.01 btc/day with public available open-sourced miner on public pool. What is the reason to mess with libry?
where is the open source miner? damn told before: a gtx 980 does around 190MH/s
$7.3 per day on the old Horse. Not bad. yeah but consumption is prolly very bad in that case, not below 200w for sure don't remember but I think the 980 is only 180W (running at 120% tdp)... that makes it mostly below 200W probably the 1070 is not fully optimized, if a 980 cna do 190MH, a 1070 should be above 200MH |
|
|
|
The last 24hours. 1 GB of lbry payed out around $38.352 ( http://yiimp.ccminer.org/ on the column to right in the library column you see the actual payout for 1 ghash) So if your miner mined at 78MHASH you would earn 3 bucks. Djm34's 2 gtx 980's is only hashing @ 39MHASH each. To reach 10$ per card you need 260MHASH. And this is doable on the 1080 with proper coding. given the real earnings a gtx 1080 on yiimp at 250MH/s should get 5.9$/Day, gross. Suprnova calculator it's way off. With an hashrate of 940MH, yeasterday on suprnova it earned 35 coins.. Something's wrong there, as always. that was my suspect as well supernova estimate seems wrong or not on par with the block features of adding 1 coin on the reward for each additional 100 blocks gtx 1070 is doing 0.007-0.01 btc/day with public available open-sourced miner on public pool. What is the reason to mess with libry?
where is the open source miner? damn told before: a gtx 980 does around 190MH/s
$7.3 per day on the old Horse. Not bad. yeah but consumption is prolly very bad in that case, not below 200w for sure |
|
|
|
The last 24hours. 1 GB of lbry payed out around $38.352 ( http://yiimp.ccminer.org/ on the column to right in the library column you see the actual payout for 1 ghash) So if your miner mined at 78MHASH you would earn 3 bucks. Djm34's 2 gtx 980's is only hashing @ 39MHASH each. To reach 10$ per card you need 260MHASH. And this is doable on the 1080 with proper coding. the difference is amazing between maxwell and pascal, one 1070 can do 200MH, when a single 980 only 40MH too much discrepancy |
|
|
|
still missing 2 weeks
I got 1 week payment. What I don't know is if new rate took effect and it was possibly included the bonus. So as of now paid or possibly paid: 1) 7/4 - Just paid 2) Coins_Bank Bonus mentioned - Possibly paid Unpaid so far is one week but once we hit tomorrow I believe we will be back to 2 weeks again. So it's going to take a 2 payment's or 1 big paymment, meaning more then 1 week payment put in hot wallet. 1) 7/11 - Unpaid And I am just guessing on some of it I'm sure Marco can clear it up much more then my guessing. And bot reset which is nice to see. So thanks Marco! Hopefully we get caught up that would be nice. yeah the second missed payment is expected for tomorrow, but since the bot resetted today i counted it for today |
|
|
|
|
not less than 800, not sure about being worth more than 1k, because at that point it will scale up to 2k, if we talk abotu a stable value
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
