Mislim da je Roobet ranije imao samo 15 postova (sad je 20 min) a to je najmanji minimum postova od svih drugih kampanja osim BestChange, 777Coin i Bitvest, a ChipMixer nema minimum postova.
E moram priznati da je ne imanje fixnog broja postova kao zahtjev odlična stvar, i fakat bi trebali i ostali manageri uvesti to. Da moja kampanja i dalje ima to pravilo već bi izletio jer redovno pišem ispod tog max broja postova koji se broje. Ovako puno manje shitpostam jer jednostavno ne moram brinuti dal sam napisao tih 25 postova što uopće nije malo i uopće nema forsiranja kad mi se neda, a za tih minimalnih 10 se uvijek nađe materijala. Kamo sreće da uopće nema minimuma kao u CM al dobro je i ovo.
|
|
|
Compared to other available audit company right now, Certik is the most famous among all since I involve on many DeFi startup project.
That's all they are, the most popular ones, exactly the same as ICObench as they are the most popular ICO tracking/scoring site too. Being audited by Certik means squat, but is often used by scammy shitcoins as pitch, to appear more legit. And exactly the same thing as ICOs were using ICOBench back in 2017, bragging about the score on their websites to attract investors. I have a friend that is working on a project, and they paid Certik shit load of money to find possible bugs in their code. Recently, they stumbled upon a major bug (luckily before hackers) in their smart contract that if exploited would completely rekt them, which Certik failed to identify. So yeah, you can pretty much ignore "audited by Certik" thing when you are DYOR on some altcoin.
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum, one piece of advice: If you plan to make a new thread about something, don't just copy/paste whole article without leaving any personal opinion on the matter, like you just did with Five New Altcoins Launch Across Coinbase’s Crypto Trading Platforms . Topics like that are redundant and serve nothing really if you don't share your own opinion as that's what forum is for. Proper way to start topic is to copy/paste paragraph or two that cover most important things, and then leave your own comment.
|
|
|
NOTE: Never invest on meme coin, copy pasted website format from know project, no audit from trusted company like Certik and make sure the Liquidity Pool was locked to avoid rug pull! Always #DYOR guys!
Just to comment on that bolded part, Certik is not trusted or reputable at all. They are basically equivalent of ICOBench and are willing to give nice score to anyone with enough money. One example: few months ago I found out that they are auditing https://coinswap.space/, some shitty DeFi platform. Problem with Coinswap is that it was the newest project of a known ponzi scheme Troncase which in the mean time collapsed (you can read more about Troncase here. Anyway, I contacted Certik, gave them all the evidence that same people control both Coinsawap and Troncase, which they of course ignored, and gave them nice rating. And now Coinswap proudly presents Certik on their website, as one of the proofs that they are legit. Hell, even that scammy shitcoin SafeMoon has 89/100 trust score on their site, that tells you everything you have to know about Certik. So, listen to your own advice, DYOR and don't trust Certik or anyone else for that matter.
|
|
|
While in Croatia we don't have any specific crypto law, you can do pretty much anything except pay taxes with it (AFAIK). So if you wanna report your trade profits, you would do it same as you would for stocks, while for example mining is taxed as 2nd income and the same would do for profits from signature campaigns (again AFAIK).
Overall, situation in Croatia is pretty good for crypto enthusiasts, especially since there are ways to legally buy/sell up to 2,000 euro worth of crypto per day from crypto exchanges without any sort of KYC but somehow I think that won't last for long and sooner or later we will be hit with more strict regulation. But well, at least we can enjoy while it lasts as i know that in many countries you can't do that anymore.
|
|
|
I've written this before, but be careful what you want, because the market reset you imagine might be the beginning of the end, because if, say, the price falls below $1000, how do you think most people would react to that?
+1 Honestly, majority of people that are thinking stuff like "I wish I knew about Bitcoin when it was very low" would be scared shitless if BTC drops below $1,000 and would probably thinking about selling what they have instead buying more. I remember last year when BTC was around ~9k and I had to urgently sell some so I asked all of those friends that were pestering me in the late 2017 when price was around then ATH, and none were interested. Naturally, year later when BTC went over 40k same people contacted me again, asking if I am willing to sell some.
|
|
|
Thing I wish I knew at the begininng? I wish I knew that there is nothing wrong in first having fraction of Bitcoin, but I can slowly accumulate. If I knew that, I wouldn't waste my early crypto days on shitcoins. Then again, friends around that started around the same time were newbies too so I didn't really have anyone trustworthy to give me couple of advices.
2nd thing I wish knew more about is importance of security and all the dangers that lie, as back in 2017 I was a victim of phishing attack and lost almost everything. I guess it was just a school a had to pay.
|
|
|
@Rikafip, I almost sent you a PM about this delay. But thank goodness you did in the second week. Let me get some good point from the July update from the latest update that I will pin to my thread. Haha no worries even if you sent as some other people were asking me about it (looking at @fillippone ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ) . This delay was unplanned, but even though it looks like it was big, as a matter of fact it wasn't as the earliest I could do it was August 6th because if I did it earlier, I would miss data for a couple of days at end of the month. Hopefully next month real life doesn't get in a way of my forum activity.
Two charts in the July overview ("Merits" and "Merit senders and receivers") are updated with the missing Pilipinas info.
|
|
|
Mozda da stavis neku uputu "Kako kupiti prvi BTC", i objasnjenje da imati BTC ne znaci da moras imat 1 cijeli BTC. Vidim da to ekipu oko mene najvise buni, jer misle da je 1 BTC najmanja denominacija
Dobra ideja, i da to je standardna zabuna kod njubova. Ja za tako neke guidove i nemam bas trenutno vremena, pa ako ti ili netko drugi ima volje, dobro bi nam to doslo ovdje. Hvala, dodano u prvi post.
|
|
|
Croatian board has always been near the bottom of the chart when it comes to merit/post ratio. I am glad that has changed.
Yep, it was pretty much obvious from that first monthly overview I made that our local board was seriously undermerited considering our activity, overall post quality and pretty much spam free board. All that is changed ever since we got two new merit sources, so no excuses anymore ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) .
I am going to piggyback some of your graph for my post: [Meta] Andamento sezione italianaWondering what happened in the dutch local board: maybe @El duderino_ got into a merit frenzy? Be my guest! Regarding unusually high Dutch board merit/post ratio, you are right about @El duderino_, he indeed pushed their ratio. Then again, these things happen on lower activity boards, as few good posts that get a lot of merit can really inflate the numbers.
Excellent data dump and presentation, Rikafip! Lately I've been wondering about merit distribution on the local boards, and everything you presented in your last post pretty much answers every question I had, so thank you.
I am glad to hear that you find it useful and that I am not doing it only for myself, even though I actually enjoy making these charts as It's completely different from my usual forum activity, and I only do it once per month so it became kind of ritual for me. I wish there was some way I could help out with handing out merits in local sections, but I don't speak any of the languages. If I were to be willing to trust a trusted member reporting an unmerited post that was worthy of merit (in their opinion) and merit it myself, do any of you think that would present a major issue? The only reason I want to do this is because I know some boards don't have their own merit sources (or simply enough merits to go around). If I could inject a bunch of merits into a local board, hopefully they'd continue to circulate among the members there.
Good idea, bad idea?
To be honest, I don't see any major issues with that approach. Alternatively, you could use Google Chrome or any other browser with built in translation tool to quickly check out if post you are about to merit makes sense. After all, it is not unusual for merit sources to visit local boards of the language they don't speak, as some of them helped our local board (Croatian) many times and chimed in with a couple of merits. There is also another way that you could help undermerited boards; choose one of them, and using Merit Dashboard you can see their most merited posts/threads in any time frame you set as chances are that most merited posts are at least, so you don't waste too much of your time looking around. For example, Pilipinas board seems very undermerited lately, with only 27 merits shared while having more than 700 posts written. If you look at Merit senders/receivers chart, they also have very high amount of users being part of the merit system, relative to their very low amount of merit shared. So, this is how that looks like, and you could to the same for any other board. Anyway, just an idea that might help you. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FDyN8P1bk%2FScreenshot-2021-08-13-at-20-38-10-Bitcointalk-Merit-Dashboard.png&t=663&c=ZcZk03IouGlK1Q) Source: https://public.tableau.com/shared/4HT6WY9MP?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_linkEdit: seems like I completely forgot to include Pilipinas board in couple of those charts. Gonna sort that out asap!
|
|
|
New month, new brief monthly overview of the local board activity, this time with a slight delay due unforeseen circumstances. All charts were made with the help of @DdmrDdmr and his Merit DashboardCommunities marked with * don't have their own local boards. Post activity per local board during July 2021When you compare this chart with the June 2021, you will see that there is not much difference; Turkish at the top, followed by German, Portuguese and Italian, and all the other boards didn't experience any dramatic changes either, with the Indonesian board being the only exception here, but looking at Merit Dashboard it seems that last month's low number was due high amount of deleted posts. Another board that was affected with the same thing and is missing from this chart is Russian local board; albeit being probably on par with the Turkish board in therms of post activity, they once again had huge amount of deleted/archived posts. Just wanna stress that it's nothing to worry about and these things happen, especially on the very active boards. Merit shared per local board during June 2021Due recent adjustment in merit sources smerit allocation, this chart looks different, as expected. What's interesting though is that not all local boards were affected; looking from percentage pov, Atrabic board is the biggest gainer this month (from 56 during 6/2021 to 285 during 7/2021 ) followed by Indonesian (62-230), Croatian (66-242) Russian ( 944 -2867 ) and Portuguese (210-372). What surprises me though is that it seems like both Turkish and German board didn't get any extra smerit, at least not looking at this chart. Merit senders and receivers per local board during July 2021As expected, numbers here went up, especially "receivers" in the Russian local board, which is of course good thing, more people being part of the merit system. Merit/Post ratio per local board for June 2021Not a surprise that blue color dominates on this chart, with the pretty much standard names at the top. It will be interesting to see whether local boards keep up these numbers in the months to come, as I hope that boards will become a little bit more active once summer is over. The most active members during July 2021 per local boardLast but not the least, list of the most active people that are keeping their locals alive. This time I decided to add 3 most active communities without local boards; Pakistan, Nigerian and Bangladesh. As always, list is made using the data from @TryNinja ninjastic.space List is made using the data from @TryNinja ninjastic.space
|
|
|
Un ringraziamento speciale anche a @rikafip, che con il suo thread funge da "pungolo" per pubblicare questo. (questo mese, appunto, in ritardo). Innanzitutto, ci scusiamo per l'utilizzo di Google Translate. Hai ragione, sono in ritardo con la panoramica delle mie bacheche locali. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Il piano era di pubblicarlo lo scorso fine settimana, ma ho dovuto ritardare a causa di circostanze impreviste. Sono tornato in pista, quindi puoi aspettarti la panoramica oggi pomeriggio o domani. A proposito, una panoramica fantastica ed estremamente dettagliata del tuo locale, come sempre!
|
|
|
Hi fillippone, Do you know if this thread of yours was translated into Croatian? I can see that Rikafip mentioned about wanting to have that resource in the local boards, but I don't remember seeing the thread in the Croatian sub. Did anyone tell you that they translated it? Rikafip?
As @tranthuding said, I already translated the topic, and you even commented there and share one resource (that I just added to the first post). Regarding this topic, it proved it be useful in real life too. Few months ago my younger brother wanted to dive in crypto and didn't really knew where to start, so I just shared him topic. Few weeks later, he shared this topic to the couple of his buddies that wanted in as well ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
Tema updejtana sa korisnim rijecnikom kripto pojmova, hvala @Pmalek. Slobodno sherajte jos koji resurs, pogotovo ako je na hrvatskom jer toga bas fali.
|
|
|
I'm wondering how many active members there are on the Bangladesh local board. Anyone have any idea or at least a rough estimate? If there aren't that many, then the board wouldn't need its own merit source. But if there are, then it's clear that there aren't enough merits being spread around. Those numbers are abysmal, but that's assuming that the section has a lot of active members and they're making good posts.
According to https://ninjastic.space, 21 member were active in the last month (from July 9th till August 9th) and they wrote ~60 posts combined which is not a lot. 1. Rahman11 [8]2. Review Master [8]3. Jontokhan65 [6]4. Little Mouse [6]5. Malam90 [6]6. A_L [4]7. Anaul93748 [4]8. Saniati [4]9. Jilapikhamu [2]10. abdurrahman99 [2]11. trendmark3482 [2]12. Belal01 [1]13. BitCoinDream [1]14. PARVIZ_1988 [1]15. Rafisr [1]16. Rb48 [1]17. Samzvai [1]18. Shofiqul22 [1]19. holahola2021 [1]20. israt1@ [1]21. mdashik46 [1]Bangladesh topic used to be quite active, but sometimes at the beginning of this year their numbers started going down. First time I included in my brief monthly overview of the local boards activity they had ~240 posts written, and for the last few months their average number is around ~50. It's a steep decline and not a good thing if they wanna get their own merit source or local board.
AFAIK, no other thread has got its dedicated Merit source (I may be wrong though) so far. So, I doubt whether my Merit Application will ever be accepted. A Local Board request for Bangladesh is pending for 3+ years. Nigerian local thread does have merit source (CryptopreneurBrainboss) but he didn't become one by applying to be their merit source, but for Altcoin and Beginners and Help boards. I think your chances would be much better if you were more active on the forum, both in Bangladesh thread and in English part of the forum. I mean, in the last few years you wrote less than 100 posts, so no wonder that theymos is hesitant to give you a merit source status.
|
|
|
it is just me, or in the Received Merits Subsection II graph, I can only see the merits in Meta, even if I select other boards?
It's not just you, I just checked it out and exactly the same thing happens to me, no matter the browser so I guess its just some glitch.
|
|
|
Why, you are going to buy twitter account instead of creating your own? He probably needs account for some service, and a few years old account looks more a little bit more legit than a rand new one. But yeah, it is imho waste of money but to each his own. Also, operating multi account is against the twitter's policy. Correct me, if I am wrong.
Not really, Twitter doesn't really care about one user having several accounts. As a matter of fact, you can have up to 10 accounts registered on the same phone number Note: You can have the same phone number associated with up to 10 Twitter accounts.
|
|
|
We do not have anything conclusive to link these accounts but what is for sure is that no football fan using this forum or any other would misspell iconic players names such as Ronaldo (Portuguese Cristiano or Brazilian el Fenomeno), Maradona, Pele, Cantona, Zidane, Beckham, Henry, Zola, Lampard, Gerrard, Van Basten, Maldini and others including Kevin De Bruyne and blame it on autocorrect or copy and paste. Those are probably seen by the majority as lame excuses trying to get themselves out of a situation they find themselves in.
It's not so uncommon for some names to be misspelt. Good example of that is Laszlo Hanyecz, which many here write as "Lazlo". @jamyr even started the thread about it, asking people to stop writing name of that iconic person from bitcoin history wrong. If I were to reply to a post where the name of a player was misspelt I would make sure it was correct when I replied and I am sure others would just as can be seen by many subsequent posts where Kevin was mentioned as Kelvin. Since when do members need to copy and paste a reply? The rest of us usually click on the 'Quote' button and type and why would I then need to type the misspelt name myself? . There are examples when someone writes "Lazlo" and the other person replying to that post makes the same mistake even though he probably knows that the correct name is "Laszlo". So I guess it all depends on the person. Your case would be stronger if for example they regularly exchange merit among themselves, which from what I could see is not the case here. Forum does have very capable investigators so if there is something to be found here they probably will, and if it turns out that you were right and that one person is behind all those accounts, he did helluva job.
|
|
|
The following members have mentioned him as "Kelvin" instead of "Kevin". These accounts are making the same error that football fans should not be making:
There is actually one more account that did the same thing. If he decides to go to Manchester City he will have to compete with Sterling, Mahrez, De Bruyne, Fernandinho, Silva, Rodri, Zinchenko and Gundogan for a midfield position.
Zinchenko is a left full-back, Fernandinho plays at the backline he was converted from DM to CB last season where he performed so well, Sterling, Mahrez and Silva are wingers and Grealish would have no business on the wing, Rodri is no better than Grealish so this leaves the midfield wide open for Grealish, Kelvin and Gundogan to operate so I don't see any challenge for Grealish if the deal went through. Just briefly looking at their posting style, few observations: -gabbie2010 tends to write very long sentences, rarely using full stop, not leaving spacing. -when quoting, CryptocurencyKingm Mistafreeze and BlackVireuse are not making any spacing before they wrote an answer (I am doing the same thing for example) -Harkorede is using punctuation marks and does make spacing when quoting -another thing that connects all these accounts is that users are Nigerians, based on some of their posts, or being active in Nigerian local thread. Another interesting thing is that @Harkorede is misspelling the name of another famous person, Kevin Durant, on several ocassions. Great call! But it wasn't never an easy one!
Finally the Bucks are heading for the eastern finals, but you've gotta give Kelvin Durant some huge credit, man's a freaking legend. He literally had too much to do, and the last air ball from the Nets could easily be attributed to fatigue, just as one of the commentators said.
Dunno, all this is still kinda flimsy to connect these accounts and it would be good to get more evidence before jumping to conclusion, like connection via adresses or use of the same social media accounts.
|
|
|
User: i_am_pk_praveenArchived post https://archive.fo/hW9ie On May 22, 2010, a Bitcoin developer named Laszlo Hanyecz bought what may have been the most expensive meal in human history when he paid someone 10,000 Bitcoins to pick up and deliver him two pizzas from Papa John’s.
Given that one Bitcoin is now worth more than $30,000, those pizzas cost, in retrospect, somewhere north of $300 million.
Nowadays, of course, no one would think of shelling out Bitcoin for something as mundane as a pizza without thinking first about how much money they might be giving up in the future.
In the years since Hanyecz’s splurge, Bitcoin has gone from being an interesting experiment in decentralized finance to being the best-performing asset of the decade, rising more than 10,000,000% since 2010 and jumping 220% last year alone.
There’s a Bitcoin ticker on every finance website.
Legendary investors like Paul Tudor-Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, and Bill Miller speak approvingly of its prospects, and companies like Square and MicroStrategy have invested their corporate cash into Bitcoin....
Original source On May 22, 2010, a Bitcoin developer named Laszlo Hanyecz bought what may have been the most expensive meal in human history when he paid someone 10,000 Bitcoins to pick up and deliver him two pizzas from Papa John’s. Given that one Bitcoin is now worth more than $30,000, those pizzas cost, in retrospect, somewhere north of $300 million.
Nowadays, of course, no one would think of shelling out Bitcoin for something as mundane as a pizza without thinking first about how much money they might be giving up in the future. In the years since Hanyecz’s splurge, Bitcoin has gone from being an interesting experiment in decentralized finance to being the best-performing asset of the decade, rising more than 10,000,000% since 2010 and jumping 220% last year alone. There’s a Bitcoin ticker on every finance website. Legendary investors like Paul Tudor-Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, and Bill Miller speak approvingly of its prospects, and companies like Square and MicroStrategy have invested their corporate cash into Bitcoin
|
|
|
|