Yet have not seen any rule about minimum deposit, cash outs are minimum 5000 chips. With no freerolls and only just a few bots the server died. It's in the FAQ. https://archive.is/Xn6uM#selection-771.0-771.41 If it's not enforced then that's good: nobody likes losing money due to dumb terms and conditions. I'm not sure about their maximum deposit of 5 BTC -- you would most likely confront the owner with that if you were to put that kind of money in there. Here's an image of the Q&A though.
So many poker sites, and most these under ~100 online players pokerrooms have all this problems. BOTS. Its a lot of bots inside pokereconomy and without good strong customer support it will be a bad for all the players at the site. And trust me, good bots will beat 95% of the players. These are not good bots. And the problem is with player traffic. You can avoid bots but you won't really find many players willing to bet their chips. Maybe 10 in total. |
|
|
|
Did you just say that without researching part of my post which you think I added just to make my post looks longer?  Unfortunately, you are not being articulate enough with your replies and thus a degree of cohesive communication is lost. The primary clause, "I don't see this as spam" is not linked well with the secondary, "something we can't say for that announcement thread (or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section)". The principal idea that is missing for me here is the fact that your attention was redirected toward the creator of the announcement thread. A better wording would be something along the lines of, "I don't see this as spam however the same cannot be said regarding the announcement thread: there were five unnecessary threads created by Net5ky which all comprised of the same details." |
|
|
|
It doesn't mean that a person will have to go to prison for the conspiracy of a murder. Am I right @actmyname No. If you have the intent and were going to proceed with the murder but were stopped by a police officer right before you did it, does that excuse you of all guilt? You were willing to go through with it... until you were caught. Enjoy your red paint. |
|
|
|
Wow, those are pretty serious accusations. If you really got scammed by someone or as you say lauda himself, then you should've verified it first that it is really him and gathered a bit more than enough believable evidences that could give credibility to your accusations. Because these types of accusations can destroy an image of a person. So better make sure you are actually accusing the right person first before you go out and post this kind of stuff. Consider putting yourself in someone else's shoes before you do something. It's fake. If you had put the slightest amount of attention to any of posts, including OP's, then you would have come to the realization that it's clearly dubious evidence. The Slack user is clearly not Lauda due to the severe number of grammatical mistakes and if that weren't enough the screenshots come from the side of 'Lauda'. |
|
|
|
Account trading is untrustworthy. Due to this, Lauda is absolutely within their rights to give you a negative trust for it. As the account isn't sold to me, so I believe I don't deserve this negative. I had the intention of committing murder. I told people that specifically on this day and with this tool I would murder this individual. I conspired to commit murder. Now, do you think that people are going to wait until after the murder to stop you?
It's not the act, it's the intention. And you were a participant in an account trade. It just didn't go through... from what you're saying. |
|
|
|
OK, we had to discontinue the freerolls, we were losing too much on those over time. And now the freeroll nuts show their true colors and leave, having never played on an actual table on the site. I do see some new individuals so I suppose that you managed to attract some. (Though H4T may have referred a lot of them). |
|
|
|
From all spam you decided to report this one user asking for a job. Spam is relative and so is action, but the thread is an inquiry. I don't see this as spam, something we can't say for that announcement thread(or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section). Did you just insert that part in to make your post look longer?  Clearly, the post is unwarranted given the announcement. Though it is likely that the owner of the ICO would want the product to reach more demographics, there was simply no request nor any intention of requesting it in the future within the first post. |
|
|
|
|
"I was not buying the account to scam anyone it's just that my account is having enough activity to become a legendary member but it haven't yet become one.... So it is very frustrating for me. "
You ever see the Hero Members at 1k+ activity like deisik that were waiting to become Legendary? If you've been patient enough to post for 2 years then what's a couple more months? [on average]
You wanted to get a Legendary account for the signature, right? Yeah... managing more than one account in signature campaigns usually declines the post quality exponentially. If it's likely that you'd spam/scam then why condone it?
|
|
|
|
|
"I can be quite if i am given a cut."
"Reply me and i shall go forth."
Also not to state the obvious but Lauda is the person taking the screenshots LOL
|
|
|
|
So, 37 million spins on the same table you would expect around 1 million occurrence for each number
but if you did 37 million spins on 37 million different tables, there will be no "equal" distribution of occurrences for all numbers But you also do another spin before you even get to a table which does give an equal distribution for the occurrence. Supposing all users allow the client seed and server seed to be randomly generated, you would end up with a finite number of tables (also when the client seed is custom, but this prevents any user interaction) in which there are the same results. The chances of being seated at any table are equal to one another. I suppose in the grand scheme of things you WILL have a majority of these tables {begin with / consist of} a single number more frequently than the others but the randomness of any one system of client and server seed + nonces will result in randomness. Along with this, any 'fixed results' via each table are still technically randomly generated due to the hex string via the hash. Hence what you see in the bigger picture is an overview of the variance of the generation of all permutations. |
|
|
|
-snip-
And again, when you change your key or they change theirs, you are switching to a different system too.
The probability should be the chance of getting a specific outcome among other possible ones from THE SAME SYSTEM and PrimeDice obviously lack this. If you want to write it like such then take a view at the bigger system outside of this. Each player is given a randomly generated server seed and randomly generated client seed. Upon the change of a client seed, the server seed is again randomly generated, hashed and spit out to give to the user. We can consider each of your systems a 'result' since it will return the same value. Thus with the randomness of generation, each user has the same probability of getting the same results.
Consider this, as well. There's a finite number of permutations for server and client seed. Each server and client seed combination results in a chain of results for wagering (because of nonces). That means that you're randomly given a chain of results. Pass this kind of thinking to as if you were rolling a die with a series of numbers on it. |
|
|
|
I have absolutely read the thread, I just have no idea what Diamond Poker is or where to go to play it. And have you gone to Stake.com and looked at the games tab, where Diamond Poker is literally the 6th on the list? |
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity, where do you actually get 5 of a kind from? I don't think you linked the site or where to play or anything.. I don't think you read the thread or anything. hey Hui... is this for diamond poker? I dont really get it :/ In diamond poker if you get 5 of a kind (and it wins, that is doesn't tie) then you can post it here. That's it. Here's my post. If it wasn't clear enough as well, it's also in the first post. Right here: 5-of-a-Kind Challenge! (Diamond Poker) |
|
|
|
Why havent you post the whole conversation?? Because it's irrelevant to the fact that the bonus terms were missing information; the conditions did not display the whole truth. Now you are saying here you had the same so that you cancelled the bonus. I told you there how you could unlock it safe without any risk. 'without any risk' is misleading. It's still risky, every single time a user places a wager. In fact, regardless of whatever strategy is implemented, there is still a -57.1 LTC ev associated with the remaining wager amount. (According to the old conditions and the chatlog) |
|
|
|
Exactly they added alt coins like BURST so why can't they add BitcoinCash also? I understand some times like PrimeDICE which are purely BTC and BTC only.
But adding Bitcoin CASH would be very easy for them, improved transaction fees and speed. Why not add it. Including the option to deposit in BCH would show support in the coin. A lot of support in BCH could end up in a flip where BTC is overtaken by the former. After all, an increased block size limit is a bit of an incentive now that we are seeing nearly $5 fees on normal transactions. |
|
|
|
|
Hey, can you provide any collateral? Please, it's for something quite important.
Brand new account. No specific repayment date. No specific purpose. No details on how to pay back. Sounds like a great opportunity for me! (Except there's no address for me to send my $200 to)
|
|
|
|
BUT,
The numbers being generated based on the keys used for each side has a probability of lower or higher than 33, so what keys are being used are the ones that decides if you are going to get the probability you are promised or not. Still not completely clear on your question. The probability is simply based on math. If you want a payout of Nx (that is, for example, 1.5x, 2x, 3x) then the probability of winning will be the reciprocal multiplied by (1 minus the house edge). This means that for a payout of Nx on PD, the probability will be 1/Nx * .99.
Client and server keys are only used to generate the number randomly. Any winning conditions are set by the player. |
|
|
|
hey Hui... is this for diamond poker? I dont really get it :/ In diamond poker if you get 5 of a kind (and it wins, that is doesn't tie) then you can post it here. That's it. |
|
|
|
|
There are activity periods. If the latter friend did not post in the new activity period (or refrained from overlapping with the other in any way) then they would not gain the privilege of the period's potential activity.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
