LAUNCHED!!! ENJOY!!!
lol where is the hashrate |
|
|
|
just a fake
Thank you Notice to everyone.. Do not support this coin. It literally took them 5 minutes to copy it. It serves no purpose to them besides making a quick buck. You mean like most clone coins ? |
|
|
|
I will look at the new PascalCoin source code 1.4.3 and update our wallet with the changes in the next few hours...
Turbo pascal is relaunching with those time drift changes btw Yeah I know. I think those that are upset about my launch should just mine that coin instead since I don't think relaunching is the right thing to do because many people besides these miner cheaters were also mining this coin. And I don't think its fair to them to do a relaunch. It would be just wasted hash power. Here what I said earlier regarding relaunching Situation is very similar to what happened to ETH during the DAO hack and with ETC being created.
As much as I would think its fair to do another relaunch, I won't for a few reasons. One being that there are a numerous amount of nodes now and I only control one of them, so even if I wanted to do a relaunch I couldn't unless most of those nodes upgraded to the new wallet with a fresh blockchain. Second is that "CODE IS LAW" ideology where even though those miner cheaters did cheat, they didn't actually do anything wrong because it was all in the code.
So even if I did try to relaunch, half the nodes might not agree and there would be a "Pascal Lite Classic" formed AND by relaunching it makes the coin not immutable which is what the basic principle of decentralized cryptocurrencies is all about. This coin was launched mostly for fun and I tried to keep it fair unlike those other Pascal scam clones with premine and instamining. I am learning programming and thought it would be a good place to start with. I also got nothing out of this either, I haven't mined any coins either besides the 10 blocks before the launch and all those I donated away. So I would be the one to benefit the most from a relaunch however I won't do it because its just not fair to others. Any eta on uploading the new wallet chain |
|
|
|
I will look at the new PascalCoin source code 1.4.3 and update our wallet with the changes in the next few hours...
Turbo pascal is relaunching with those time drift changes btw |
|
|
|
Is it possible to solomine PASCAL Lite with sgminer?
I got dobble the hashrate with sgminer vs psacalcoinminer when I mined PASCAL (POOL mining).
No one ever posted how to solo mine with sgminer would be nice if someone could, only way i kno is using jar proxy with pascalcoinminer and yeah the hashrates are low |
|
|
|
|
laatency is growing now , up to 300 ms on the nodes any solutions ?
|
|
|
|
Very entertaining, I saw PascalClassic, now PascalLife, what are you kidding me, or you prikolko create a new name and forking this coin many times, as for me it's not funny, it's complete insanity, stop doing it
suposedly pascal classic failed and actually there is nothing wrong with alt coins and clones , thats what the whole cryptocurrency space is about, the coin with the best development wins |
|
|
|
Block 715 mined by kontik had a fake timestamp again. What an evil guy...  edit: Block 721 just now too. Block 723 mined by him had a legit timestamp. his node should be blocked or something this guy is a real jerk |
|
|
|
This sudden increase in price shook me badly was not ready to see this happening. Any solid reason for all this increase as developer by himself was amazed which was shown by some circulated tweet by him. What is the real reason of all this increase or just market manipulation by whales.
this one is not even listed on exhcanges as far as i know |
|
|
|
Developers LogYes these miners really took advantage of the "fair" launch. I must admit I did launch it prematurely, I wish I had another day or two to work out quirks but when "TurboPascal" launched earlier and got INSTA-mined 1000 blocks within 1 hour, I figured to launch it fairly as soon as possible. I already fixed the Genesis block issue and the "TESTNET" was very successful, no issues. I launched at exactly 4PM EST as promised and when I launched only 13 blocks were mined. I mined 10 with different rigs to make sure it was working. The other 3 were people who managed to sneak in connecting and mined 3 blocks before the official launch, they had the test version which doesn't check for Genesis block and just cleared their APPDATA, so I shut the node down before others took advantage. Almost all the 10 blocks that I mined in the pre-launch I donated to the miners who had issues mining their first block. Then little did I know that the original PASCAL code has a bug that you can easily take advantage of if you got large hash power. The bug is related to this piece of code unixtimediff := UnivDateTimeToUnix(DateTime2UnivDateTime(Now)) - Bank.LastOperationBlock.timestamp;
If (unixtimediff<0) then begin
WhyNot := 'Invalid Last Block Time';
exit;
end; It basically doesn't send your block to the network if your computer clock is behind the last block mined. Whether Albert fixed this in the original version I am not sure. He added "node banning" that happens when you submit blocks according to this line if Not IsValidTime(connection_ts) then begin
DisconnectInvalidClient(false,'Invalid remote timestamp. Difference:'+inttostr(FLastKnownTimestampDiff)+' > '+inttostr(CT_MaxSecondsDifferenceOfNetworkNodes));
end; However the node banning wasn't tight enough to ban these miners because the blocks were still too close together. And there was a small numbers of nodes at the time. So they could of hosted a node, moved the clock up on their node and the difference would be further apart. And they knew exactly what clock to set their computer at manually to not get banned. I notice this issue when solomining the original PASCAL Coin however didn't think much of it. Right now this is less of an issue and when the block time finally stabilizes at 300 seconds it will be a non-issue for sure. That's probably why Albert just left the original code the way it was because it was harder to perform with a larger network. Regarding the "RELAUNCHING". Situation is very similar to what happened to ETH during the DAO hack and with ETC being created. As much as I would think its fair to do another relaunch, I won't for a few reasons. One being that there are a numerous amount of nodes now and I only control one of them, so even if I wanted to do a relaunch I couldn't unless most of those nodes upgraded to the new wallet with a fresh blockchain. Second is that "CODE IS LAW" ideology where even though those miner cheaters did cheat, they didn't actually do anything wrong because it was all in the code. So even if I did try to relaunch, half the nodes might not agree and there would be a "Pascal Lite Classic" formed AND by relaunching it makes the coin not immutable which is what the basic principle of decentralized cryptocurrencies is all about. I also contacted OCMiner to see if we can get a Suprnova pool going, i'll let you know if I get a reply. Since the difficulty now is higher than what PASCAL Coin's difficulty was before it got launched on Poloniex. Thanks for the wrapped up explanation, where is all this hash power comining from, pascal diff is still as high as ever and moneo , eth,zcash and dcr the current hot GPU coins are holding steady |
|
|
|
|
funny thing is this network is more stable for me than the pascalcoin network, nodes stay up constantly I dont see discovering servers all the time
also my latency is way lower 100 ms vs thr 200 on the pascalcoin network , thats sad actually.
|
|
|
|
|
finally found a block
but the strange thing is it says i have two blocks ? none of the miners list the blocked mined on the proxy whats up with that
|
|
|
|
I missed the train.. Seems it's hard to find block with my 5 480 gpu.. Big miner dominated the Blocks!
You need to believe!  You should be able to find a block every 2-3 hours. The GPU scene has gotten crazy indeed though, this kontik guy must have 100 miners running with 3+ GPUs judging by the names... Hashrate is rising incredibly fast, 53GH right now, half an hour ago it was 32GH. Shame that people think they should suck the fun out of shit coins! LOL 70 GH for just a copy coin is pretty crazy, they will get tired of wasting that hash though. Thought it would be fun to mine a few blocks for fun, but I will check back later. All of those miners are cheater, they are manipulating the clock, that's why other miner don't even hit the block.. I suggest that the dev reset it again and set a restriction.. Well he said earlier that he will make it fair to all miners, why this dumbass is now dominating the solo mining.. Seems that they are only hitted the blocks.. There should be a re-leaunch this kontik fool and bawahhaa bascially are eating all the blocks they have been from the start so yukky |
|
|
|
|
how may confirms does it take on POW mining ? seems to be over a day waiting for payouts on Suprnova
|
|
|
|
|
how do you solo mine with sgminer ?
|
|
|
|
how many chances you have to find the block with 10 x 470 rx?
10 RX470 = 5GH/s = less than 1 change in 1.7 days mininng is weird i got 4 blocks in two hours this morning with only 20 of my rigs now with 35 rigs i see no blocks mined in 4 hrs |
|
|
|
|
does the pascal mining have to use its own proxy ? or can you point it to the opencl proxy
|
|
|
|
yesterday was 1.2 THs network hashrate, today is 2.4 THs ... over one day so much interest ... soon will be not profitable
SO if you mine blocks they can be taken from you before they go green ? |
|
|
|
If you pay 400$ (and buy the pandaminer directly on the panda miner site) you get the OS and the ROM, each rig will cost you only 30$ afterwords. Thats totally fine I would say. i Agree to buy the pandaminer with the OS and ROM as one package its expensive but as long as you buy the panda miner by urself its totally okay.
So the rom mod is a one time purchase, after that you pay only for the licence per pandaminer to run the OS ? Yes I would think so  Ok so basically you can buy 2 images, 1x with only the OS (free) , 1x with the OS + bios mod (free + 400$), and after that you only have to pay for the OS licence (30$ ish) per pandaminer you use the OS image on. That make more sense Would be something if i would charge 400 for every pandaminer That wouldn't be very fair now would it? thats not a bad deal, assuming you are buying at least 3 pandas to spread the cost |
|
|
|
claymores miner have dual-mining capability by that it justifies the fee.
sgminer-gm performs worse than genoils miner which has no fee either.
either make the kernel public or get lost.
few ppl dual mine anymore claymores fee is barely justifiable |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
