|
You are making this too loud, yes, no one should compare Bitcoin with Fiat, but Bitcoin is not better than Fiat, and we have to balance things here. It should be noted that Bitcoin will never survive without fiat, it even has its limit of supply, and it has its times of appreciation and depreciation, so why do some people look at Bitcoin's positive side alone and turn a blind eye to its downside? Both have their pros and cons as nothing is perfect in reality.
From an economic view, I believe that someone that has planned his project to be executed between 2022-2023 by saving in Bitcoin on November 2021 will be regretting while not saving in Fiat.
This means that it's all about our planning, smartness and accurate speculation on the two, it's not by letting others believe one is supreme.
|
|
|
|
Napoli's recent form has kept somany surprised, their match with salernitana was the worst of it all Napoli's odd to win was 1.19 against salernitana odd which is 14.60 but to the greatest and unexpected even played out to be a draw, after their elimination from champions league the thought of many was for them to concentrate in their league but the results are poor.
Napoli's draw with Salernitana does not matter, i know some of their fans were disappointed because they had already started celebrating the league title even before the match started, but the draw only delayed the celebration, as it must happen and it will probably be this week. Napoli have played very well in the Seria A this season and that is why they are 18 points ahead of Lazio in second position. They are finally going to win the title after 33 years of waiting for it, the reason why they have dropped some points in the last weeks is because they are already sure that they are going to be Seria A champions and not because they are poor. The problem of Napoli being held to a draw by Salernitana is not a big problem for Napoli itself. because even with these results Napoli remains safely at the top of the standings. It's just that the disappointment that I experienced was because I bet quite a lot for Napoli in that match. Because Napoli are playing as the host and against a team that is below Napoli's level, of course it will make us confident and not hesitate to bet on Napoli. but the results are very surprising. But I'm not saying Napoli's performance has decreased in that match. but in fact Napoli's attacks were also quite active and organized in that match. it's just that the keeper and the Salernitana back line have done well. especially the goalkeeper Guillermo Ochoa who managed to save the Salernitana goal very well. In fact, I really appreciate the performance of this goalkeeper. If Napoli could not attack well and deliver what people expected from them, then there is nothing wrong is scolding them. A match that should have sealed their victory, the assertation has now been delayed, I see no excuse for that. And as you expressed, Salernitana and Napoli are not equals, they are far below them, but I guess they underrated the opponent. This has affected them in their last matches where they drew 2, lost 1 and won just 2. This can't be a lesson for them as I've noticed this with many clubs in different leagues, when they are well-established, they will begin to downplay, and many of them regret it. |
|
|
|
The sentimental analysis on the other hand relies on what other traders have analyzed and concluded through Technical and Fundamental analysis and research.
As an investor, you believe in bitcoin four year cycle and also believe in bull market after a massive bear market. If the price of bitcoin reach a very low price after a massive bear market, then use it as a analysis that the bull market is coming. Then what type of analysis is that? What you just asked is purely sentimental analysis, the bias of people as I'd explained, it doesn't have to be on data alone, it encompasses beyond it. The 4-year cycle is now a Bitcoin tradition, and no true people with Bitcoin understanding will be selling at that time when others are buying. So, anyone following their bias can replicate it even if such doesn't know anything about Bitcoin. It's just doing what the experts in the field are doing or using it to confirm yours before making decisions. I hope that answered it? Are you claiming credit for this work? I think you should provide link or source where you got this from.
Apart from data gotten from technical and fundamental analysis, you refuse to talk about the emotion of traders that also arise from same data analysed.
No it doesn't. It doesn't work as perfectly as you want it to be believed.
1. Are you kidding me? Well, if you must know, I wrote everything from my head, and the images gotten online have been referenced. 2. There is no link between emotion and sentimental analysis. It seems you don't even get the gist at all. 3. Who says it worked perfectly? I never said that, I only gave a condition that it works if used rightly. However, I made money through it while I was still struggling in trading, so it's practical, at least for me. No, I have done my research and I am quite right (as far as I know). It's just the same thing but with a little bit of twist. Market sentiments do refer to trend and emotions. But when you collect that data in a text format and analyze them, that becomes Sentimental Analysis.
When market sentiments have effects on your analysis, how can you say that is it not same as that? I know as I explained that they have some difference between them, but when you apply the formula and make decisions based on it, in the end they provide almost the same data (small ups and downs can be noticed).
One is based on other's opinion, and the other one is based on your opinion by converting other's opinions in text data format and analyzing them. So what did I say wrong here?
Don't get it twisted, you have deviated from your former reply which I corrected and you are now in line (first part), but still using the later part to confuse yourself. Market sentiment will never be the sentimental analysis, it's the real behaviour of the market. While sentimental analysis is knowing what others do so as to replicate it. They are two different things. |
|
|
|
You mixed things up in this write-up but I will try to explain in the shortest possible way. Inflation is mostly responsible for the fall of Bitcoin, and most countries' issues might not have any noticeable impact on Bitcoin unless the coin is popularly paired with their currency, that's how the market works. The exception of course is the news of adoption and retriction/ban by countries. Bitcoin can only be significantly impacted by the economies of the countries of the most popular currencies, in which the USD is number 1. Different countries issues is the reason why bitcoin is suffering price loss, when countries are not at peace with others, the whole nations suffered economic crisis, I remember when the price of bitcoin start going down was same season Russian x Ukraine start economy wars.
Point of correction, the price of Bitcoin started falling in 2021, not 2022 when the Russia-Ukraine war started. Mind you, the importance of the country that can cause the effect matters to the global economy, not just anyhow country. And on record, Bitcoin has been falling before the Russia-Ukraine war, surely, the war aggravated it as it increased global inflation as the world depends on the two countries for crude oil, vegetable oil, grains, raw materials and many more. However, the world is finding alternatives, and you can see it as the war continues, yet Bitcoin has increased in value. Bitcoin seem to remained statics because of sentiments by this countries attitude towards the resourceful digital products that would have swim financial hardship.
There is nothing like the sentiment of countries here, inflation is the main consideration, and despite the challenges the economies of most counties are facing right now, Bitcoin still managed to rise since the beginning of this year and might touch another historical peak in 2024 since there are other favourable factors to consider. |
|
|
|
Casinos seeking KYC for withdrawal are completely out of line; if they do not request KYC when funding, how can they want KYC after winning such large sums?
That's a good point but different jurisdictions can have different requirements or thresholds for when the KYC is required. On top of that, there might be different levels of verification. So it's possible that for smallish deposits only basic verification was required, but after winning big, the player might have fallen into a different threshold and was asked to complete a full verification. But even if that was the case, every player should've been properly informed of the procedures when signing up. I think the rules should be da same for deposit and withdraw. Now when someone puts 20$ and wins jackpot then he is withdrawing bigger amount then the deposit so I think is right to ask for KYC is KYC is also asked for same number if deposited. Does that mean that if I deposit 20 and win 1000 dollars then I can't withdraw but less than 20usd? I didn't know that logic, and I don't see any sense in it either, if I deposited 20 dollars and won, it's my luck, why can't I withdraw? If it is with less than 20 dollars or to withdraw more than 20 dollars, kyc must be met for both amounts, there does not have to be a rule like this, I do not see any sense in it. The kyc process is something that has to be complied with almost by obligation, everywhere in the casinos they always look for the kuyc, only a few do not require it, but due to the amount of deposit it should not be. I was curious while reading what you wrote about not allowing anyone to withdraw higher than the amount of deposit until I realize that it was because of KYC. This might be a very good decision and it's good for anyone to read te rules of the casinos before depositing their money. I know this long before I started gambling because I was trading only, and as a fact then, they (brokers) will not allow you to withdraw just $1 if you did not do the KYC even if you deposit $100,000. This is a global standard for AML, and if you are not convinced by it, then be sure you use no-KYC casino from the beginning. |
|
|
|
Frank Lampard have bad started with Chelsea loss in last five games and scoring one goals only, what huge expected by Chelsea fans when London derby today? will Lampard consistent with bad record without winning until end this season? Current standing, Chelsea not on the secure position because they has potential drop to championship if can't get any points in last several games. Usually need 41 points if want exist in Primer League this season and Chelsea has six games left in this season get minimum two points if want stay in Primer League. I don't huge expected with Frank Lampard will success give first winning for Chelsea today against Arsenal?
Nothing can be expected from Lampard, so playing away against Arsenal of course Chelsea will suffer defeat again and again. In fact, in the previous match when Chelsea played at home and at that time Potter was still Chelsea coach, but Chelsea still lost at home with a score of 0-1. What's more, at this moment the situation and conditions experienced by Chelsea were clearly worse, because Lampard was unable to build a team properly. Therefore, I say that there is no longer any hope for Chelsea in the away match against Arsenal because at the same time, Arsenal's performance is still in good shape. So yes, it is difficult for Chelsea to get miracles and luck, because defeat is certain for Chelsea in the match against Arsenal today. You have ridiculed Chelsea so much but don't forget that they still reach the quarterfinal of UCL, even with an aggregate of 5-4 against their last opponent (Real Madrid), something Arsenal couldn't do, which makes them unpredictable. There is no lie in the fact that Chelsea is facing challenging moments, this could last longer as they seem to believe the coach is their issue, whereas adjustment of players and building their morale is. Still, I will bet that Arsenal will win this match today, but not the way you made it look as if the legs of Chelsea are tied. Don't be surprised if they even draw. |
|
|
|
Researching casinos without regular incentives is uncommon, and betting on these online casino games without bonuses is an absolute no-no. As consequently, bonuses encouraged players to put in more effort when playing casino games, checking out the odds that makes the double fold of the capital invested. Adding to the list mentioned, if something goes wrong and it is not disclosed in the thread, the OP will hold you liable because you are the one who recommended a gambling site with bonuses. Casino with wagering requirements are plenty, all you have to do is to follow the mentioned ones already and sort out the alternatives.
I'd agree, now that most of the top casinos are offering so many rewards, gamblers would prefer to play in casinos that have the same characteristics. There's nothing wrong about gamblers playing without bonuses because not all gamblers are mainly gambling for the bonuses and not all deposit bonuses are worth risking as sometimes it can even hold you back if you're not careful. Anyway, I don't see the need to blame OP as much when he's doing his best to increase the visibility of these requirements since it's a hassle to go through the casinos one by one. I avoid gambling bonuses as much as I could as the conditions of usage before the money could be withdrawn are always not palatable. This makes me wager my money and I do this with good plans and don't have issues like many would be complaining about with casinos. Also, it will be ill of anyone to blame the OP, to me, the guy is creative to have thought towards that angle, and things like this are common on the internet to help people easily select their choice. And any company that deems exposed should then adjust its terms and conditions if need be. |
|
|
|
Marseille continued their pursuit of PSG by winning 2-1 after losing the first half. Although they had plenty of shots in the first half, they couldn't get a shot on goal. For this reason, they conceded a goal on the first shot on goal. In the second half, Marseille increased the pressure and scored one goal after another.
PSG, on the other hand, suffered a 3-1 defeat at home against Lorient. Of course, Hakimi's red card played a big part in this. He left his team down to 10 men in the very early minutes and actually changed the fate of the match. Lorient, on the other hand, made the most of it and took the 3 points.
PSG are still 5 points in advance of Marseille with only 5 games left. The games left for PSG are easy so I assume they could win most of them. Marseille have matches vs Lens and Lille that will be challenging so the poursuit will not be easy at all. Marseille have to win especially their game vs Lens to somehow secure the other Champions League spot, that's the important thing to achieve for them. Five points is not too much especially when you think PSG had unstable results and lose many points in the games they normally should win, I think still there is a higher chance for PSG to lose points in the fine remaining games and Marseille can even use the chance to even win the title in this season, if that happens this can be a nightmare for PSG because they spend lots of money and they got nothing in the end. 5 points may not be a big difference. Even so, PSG is still the most likely to win the title. Because each team will play only 5 matches this season. And it is unlikely that PSG will lose more than two of the 5 matches and their main rivals Marseille will win all of their matches. PSG's opponents in the upcoming matches are relatively weak. And I guess PSG will win all their upcoming matches. Marseille, on the other hand, have won all their last three matches. However, they have lost points in their previous two matches. It is very difficult for a team like Marseille to maintain the winning streak in the next 5 matches. PSG is one club that baffles me with the way they do not have wide gaps of points to lead their closest rivals despite spending so much money. With all the big stars at their disposal, losing to Lorient on Sunday didn't go down well with me, but arguably, the sendoff of Achraf Hakimi is another reason. Still, the stars there are powerful to dominate Lorient if they have their contingency plan, but see what happens? That said, 5-point trailing is so risky for the club that has lost 2 of their last 5 matches, the trust is no more there, and I have reservations at this stage. |
|
|
|
I used this type of sentiment analysis back in my forex trading days and honestly I will say that it doesn't work. I think there is more too it than just how many traders are long or short. Usually in a bull market, everyone is long, even at the top and same vice versa. If you use these sentiment analysis you will enter way too late and exit when it might reverse again.
With crypto just use liquidation data and open interest on futures with the major pairs like ETH or BTC. It will be more accurate than this sentiment analysis. You can also add some technicals to filter out some bad trades but in general, nothing is the holy grail method.
Like I've iterated, it would work if you used it well. It worked for me back in those days and I learned my trading through the commentaries of the experts I read their work. You see, the sentimental analysis approach is many but the best is to look for sites that give daily commentaries and biases, you may use other ones with percentage dashboards, but should use them to compare your own analysis first. And if they tally, you can open the trade without fear. Most people are entering into trouble with sentimental analysis because they solely rely on external sources. Still, some external sources are good, only that you just take time to verify them first. At least, I know two of them back then, and they didn't fail me, they as a matter of fact thought me part of what I know today. To make it clearer, Sentimental analysis is the act of sorting for or collecting established signals, data, market biases and commentaries of other traders/experts. This happens mostly when traders don't believe in themselves. They might want to solely rely on the external signals/data they trust or use them to confirm their own analysis.
I don't think this is what a sentimental analysis is. It contains positive, negative and neutral emotions towards the market. And based on that, many share their thoughts on the price movements. Or sometimes they say their thoughts about many crypto's future. This could be positive or negative. Because neutral doesn't have that much effect here. So from my POV, it's totally manipulating the market based on someone's personal comment. Which has nothing to do with the original analysis and doesn't rely on any data. And as they are sudden, the effect also stays for a very short period of time. Which makes it a risky choice. HODL for a long time. That's what I believe. And I enter by using TA. And sometimes sentimental analysis can also give you an advantage. But you need to be very careful if you want to use that opportunity in your favor. You are getting it all wrong, I believe you should next time consult the internet first before you correct someone on what you don't know so that you don't expose your ignorance. Sentimental analysis is what I had explained, what you are explaining might be the sentiment of the market, which is the behaviour of the market at a time, it could be called the bias and trend as well. This could be Buy/Positive, Sell/Negative or Neutral depending on the demand and supply in the market. This is in no any way related to sentimental analysis, you should know the difference. Hmm, I would like to know which user can you particularly mention, because I think I have also recently covered this topic, and if you have read it then there is a possibility if you have read it completely you might misunderstand it.
I've certainly not read your post in this regard, once a topic is similar, you might think it's you the finger is pointing to, but no one should feel this way. It's just a general conception of what I have been reading from posters regarding sentimental analysis. The main goal is for everyone interested to learn from it. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: EarnOnVictor
SegWit BTC Address: bc1q3ha87zytcxxlxuk2kwl9cnjap4h6w0f2854sjz
Merit Earned in 120 Days: 151
|
|
|
|
I've read from some forum members expressing Sentimental analysis wrongly, hence the need for me to explain it today. Perhaps, it could be useful for some people in theory and in practice. Basically, there are two types of analysis, and they are Technical and Fundamental analysis, however, they will always be the only true analytical types in trading. The sentimental analysis on the other hand relies on what other traders have analyzed and concluded through Technical and Fundamental analysis and research. To make it clearer, Sentimental analysis is the act of sorting for or collecting established signals, data, market biases and commentaries of other traders/experts. This happens mostly when traders don't believe in themselves. They might want to solely rely on the external signals/data they trust or use them to confirm their own analysis. The screenshots below should give further clues:      Does Sentimental analysis work? Yes, it does if used rightly, and I'd used it before getting to my present state in trading. All you need is to find the right channels for your information and you will be fine. The people using this analytical type can collect as much as possible data for a particular asset before they eventually use the ones with the highest number or percentage in a particular direction as their chosen signal/bias. Image sources: Online (Investing, ActionFX, FXSSI) |
|
|
|
With the correct set of data and training, it easily can. AI is pretty good with processing questions and providing answers based on that, have you used ChatGPT? If you did, you should know how it works and if it's implemented in a support chat and is trained with all the answers and data available for the casino, it can easily provide answers to questions.
And if there are questions that are not answerable by AI, they should be forwarded to a human operator. Most of the time in customer service, the questions are repetitive and almost are solvable with one solution and AI is pretty good with spinning the same text in different ways.
The chatgpt is a tool that can be given at any time to find answers to many things that we cannot do very quickly, calculations and things like that, in a game like dice where the AI can have that statistics could give us an answer to bet or how you could define what would be the number that will give, if it is lower or higher, we can use the AI in that way, but if a person wants to be given answers on how to play, it is not what will achieve, but quite the opposite, it will tell you that it cannot and that it was not programmed for it. The enthusiasm over AI, specifically ChatGPT, is going too far, without a doubt it is a useful tool and given enough time it will become more refined as years go by. But this particular kind of AI will never be able to give specific predictions about games or predict the next number on the roulette, and even if it could I doubt the developers behind it would like for their software to be used in this way, as if someone were to lose a lot of money by following those predictions this could create a lot of bad publicity for them. You are just reasonable with this, many had indicated that they want AI to predict trading and games for them, how could this ever be possible to cry out loud? It pains me for the naivety of people as though they are lame in thinking, AI is good for what it could do, but not interfering with something that can illegally make money for the users, it's not possible. Like gambling, the system's algorithm is with the house and I believe AI will never hack it, it can only try to play intelligence, but such can't still work against what is wired to mainly favour the house. My advice for gamblers like me is to have a strategy and gambling pattern and be sure to wait patiently for your lucky days. |
|
|
|
Mining is the activity that makes more Bitcoin to be available for circulation. The total Bitcoin supply would be 21 million BTC, which is the cap from the beginning and this amount is what the miners are gradually mining for a reward. Currently, about 19 million BTC has been mined so far and is in circulation for utilization. You can join for rewards if you are so desired and have what it takes to do it. The links below would help you further: 1. https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-does-bitcoin-mining-work2. https://www.bankrate.com/investing/what-is-bitcoin-miningLet me limit it there to avoid cumbersomeness. Also, some YouTube practical explanations could be helpful. |
|
|
|
Your instinct is probably based on past events. 37k is a little over half of past the 69k high. Many are comparing the current year to 2019 where the price rose slightly above half of the previous cycle. I also think 2023 is similar in scenario to 2019. If so, the price should just hit 35-37k this year and then fall again before the next halving.
Of course, instincts are created based on the past events stored in our heads, that's the reality, it doesn't just show up. And I so much agree with the rest expression, what happens between 2019-2020 is being patiently studied by Bitcoin investors, which might be what will not make it rise so much in 2023 for it to be more attractive in 2024. 35-37k is a major resistance. I have my take profit orders for my short/middle term positions right there. I see a high risk that these levels will not be broken and we will realize a scenario similar to 2019, when we jumped from $4k to $14k and then fell to $5k. This is how I see the situation now. Pump just to 37k, maybe even 45k and dump back to 20k. At the same time, 45k seems unlikely to me before some solid correction or at least a longer consolidation.
Nice speculation you have there, and for you to also notice $35-37k means a great deal. I know that if the level could give up, $40-45k will be next. still many times left, there's no reason bitcoin couldn't get past that
Well, with my experience in the world of the financial market, we can't always use the time to judge, it's events/factors surrounding the asset that matters. The market you see that performed most excellently from January to March might make a bearish turn for the rest of the year, so it doesn't matter. As it is now with Bitcoin, I believe that inflation should be our focus, also, the news of regulation, liquidation and adoption by big volumes should be our focus. Well you need to realize. Who is there to buy Bitcoin at levels higher than that.
This is a very good consideration judging by the widely speculated cycle of Bitcoin moving lower before halving. And at the current levels, people are hesitant in committing their money thereby waiting for purchases at lower levels. |
|
|
|
For some matches now Tottenham never cease to concede. Today game tells how useless Totenham defense line has been in their past 3 matches. Under 20 minutes in their last game, they were already 3 goals down against Newcastle and additional 2 goals before the second half making it a total of 6 goals in one match, and today Liverpool has already scored them 2 goals under 10 minutes. Liverpool today will be enjoying a very easy play in this match which for a very long time such has not happened.
it was clear that Tottenham can not win against Liverpool in past matches Tottenham don't have any serious wins,s especially in their last five games they only had one win and Liverpool had 3 wins in their last five matches it was an easy one to predict the funny aspect is that just within the duration of five minutes they have already scored 2 goals how hilarious, and now Tottenham have scored their second goal if Tottenham should equalize then Liverpool really needs help. I beg to disagree, both teams were excellent yesterday, I don't know the perspective from which you are looking at it. You might want to make your winning preference for Liverpool to be louder if it were to be before, they are improving but things have changed and Tottenham was a very good match for them with what I see. This should be seen in their 3 goals, I don't expect anyone to say that a club that scored 3 goals is powerless against the one who barely won by a goal (4-1). And at times, what is currently happening or just happened on the pitch matters more than the last plays. |
|
|
|
Just came across this thread and I have to say that op did a good job mentioned so many important points that is helpful for both amateur and professional gamblers. Gambling responsibly is easier said than done.
Best gambling tip is to invest only what you are willing to lose so that you won't have any regrets later.
This is what you said to only invest in the amount that can afford to lose, this is where there is always a problem. Often when winning with the amount that they are ready to lose, the gambling player eventually becomes greedy, because they think that their money will take a long time to equalize, but instead the amount that they deposited will increase even more. So often in the end, winning is still a stone and regret is often in the end, so it is important to have self-discipline among ourselves as gamblers to be responsible as a player. It's a general saying that, "we should bet/trade with the amount we can afford to lose," which I believe is part of valid advice for those that want to gamble responsibly. However, what you have explained in the end is good as it's a way to keep to a good gambling practice without interfering with someone's balanced lifestyle. All responsible gamblers should always have their cautious rules/guide and must be strict to adhere to them with all discipline and determination. |
|
|
|
If one doesn't spend their crypto for purchases and wait for to spend their crypto when its price is nice, are they really considering it as a cryptocurrency or can we assume like those people are treating more like a security or investment instrument?
Indeed, it is a positive development that businesses have started accepting crypto currencies as form of payment, but still it is in early stage and many merchants are reluctant to accept them.. The decision to spend or hold crypto assets is a personnel decision, however I am not inclined to start spending my crypto assets at this stage. This is because I firmly believe that my digital asset will appreciate many folds in coming months and years. We should continue to get ready for more adoption of cryptocurrency in the near future, and if you would agree with me, it might be slow but the business number is increasing yearly. That said, it will be so painful if someone could not spend their crypto at a reasonable price but be spending it at lower prices. This present price of almost $30k is still nice, what of those that would have forwardly spent theirs around $15,500 last year? They can't feel good about that now as the price doubled a few months after. Lastly, as we all wait for the big Bitcoin event next year, no one should be dumping theirs, we should find a way to buy more and keep it for over a year (a good investment opportunity). |
|
|
|
Nope, I never blame anyone for my gambling losses because I always responsible with all of my bet.
I think this mother and son are looking a loophole how to get their money back, so he choose to create a fake story. I have seen such kind case in my country where an employee create a fake story where he got robbed when he want to go to bank for distributing the salary to every employees in his company. The truth is he store those money in his house lol.
This particular case of the OP is pathetic, such people should be severely sentenced as they are evil and should not be appreciated in society. How can someone be so callous and dubious blaming a financial institution for the money they actually spent themselves? Well, it's still difficult for me to believe such a story despite being a practical case as they pleaded guilty. People are just evil, this is beyond gambling blames to me. |
|
|
|
They have performed very well, but it is not over yet for them. Arsenal is a good example for a team that destroys their own performance by dropping so hard. I didn't expect Arsenal to win every single game, but when somebody said that they wouldn't win for four games in a row, I would not have believed that either. That's a sad ending for a season that went so well for them.
I think that you can also try to see the difference between arsenal and newcastle. Arsenal had very big pressure now caused by arsenal was always aiming to win the game. Manchester city is now having the biggest chance to win the trophy. Arsenal had no choice other than getting win or it will be losing the trophy. It's quite different that was able playing the game without burden caused by newcastle was only aiming for the top 4 while at the same time arsenal is looking for a trophy. It will be very disappointed if arsenal will go home without trophy. arsenal's level is still far compared with manchester city. City was placed in the second place but the problem is if city had enough resources to win the trophy. Arsenal must only win the game until the last match in EPL. Yes I think you described it quite well. Arsenal didn't really have a chance against Manchester City and on a perfect day Haaland doesn't score once, but three or four goals given the chances he had against Arsenal. You could say that the 4-1 didn't even reflect how the game went. Haaland will certainly respect that, the day was not just multiple goals day for him, he did well also, and other shining days are ahead for him. As for Arsenal, nothing was played on that day, Man City dominated them. But I will not say this wasn't expected as Arsenal of the beginning and towards the 3 months to the end of the season is not the Arsenal we are seeing now. This is why I would say that luck and good psychology are important in football. What has really changed in the squad of Arsenal, I don't seem to see anything, so why play this way if not psychologically? |
|
|
|
|
This is my instinct rather than a professional analysis.
Did I hear someone say instinct does not work in trading? My friend, it does work. My trading instinct works 90%, especially for long-term trading because I live my life in the world of trading, even what happens in trading is being seen in my dreams at times, so trading is more than what we think.
That aside, this is an instinct, not a dream or anything. I've been having this instinct since November 2022 when Bitcoin was still challenged and facing bearish pressure. However, the first part is fulfilled by the market changing trend and moving closer to the levels.
Do you guys believe it would surpass $35k-37k this year?
Although Bitcoin is currently bullish and no speculation is perfect, still, this is tough task, for me, despite getting closer to the levels daily.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
