See above.
Paranoia aborted them.

Elliott Waves, it's the homoeopathy of technical analysis

Anyway it's called sold out not bought out.

I recommend you stop complaining and face reality: As long as the infrastructure itself isn't decentralized these things are inevitable.
Problem is, every time somebody suggests building a decentralized exchange they get bullied out of it. It's the communities own fault.

If anything Adam has consistently exaggerated his targets, whenever bullish or bearish.

When looking at this bet you have to keep in mind that anybody who thought BFL would deliver more likely gave their money to them rather than to take part in this bet.
So the consensus is actually much higher than 50%, which doesn't mean the majority isn't wrong...

Put away the tarot cards and read something actually relevant.

http://www.metastocktools.com/downloads/turtlerules.pdf
No need to thank me.

Nice try, pig 

*giggle*

Only bitcoiners leave the hangar doors open when taking off with a space shuttle.  

Well, volatility based trading strategies are better than that at least, if you like to do it, fine... but don't complain if the price shoots up beyond of what you did expect.

What does it matter to you if the bubble pops now or at lets say 50? Just watch the bubble be a bubble and get back when it pops.

No new bear post today, in appreciation of the ATH.

Looks like you got mad at me for some reason.

Please don't interfere in the debate.

Well Bulls, here is your chance, make it or break it.

@Melbustus

Yes, the underlying technology Bitcoin uses has may different uses which reach far beyond what BTC currently does. What is of my concern is that a good part of the potential application would require a hard-fork just like increasing the block limit does. So that brings the potential innovator in the situation where rewriting the software from scratch to make it more extendible, versatile, or whatever becomes more and more attractive.
Some of those solutions could include a currency aspect, not directly competing with bitcoin but still making it obsolete in the context of which it is used.

We are seeing the first step in this direction with ripple, which is just a tiny one and there is a long way ahead. It is possible that Bitcoin remains relevant throughout this process, although I wouldn't bet on it.

Yes in a true SHTF situation, historically things that are appreciated the most are the things of immediate concern. That is why most goldbugs say their gold isn't for the crisis but for after the crisis.
Bitcoin in this regard is very much a gamble, and I wouldn't gamble with such a situation, though everybody is different.

You aren't very good at sarcasm.

I just wanted to show you how unlikely that is, in terms you can understand.

mega does not accept bitcoin, that is just a reseller.
that's the same thing with dominos pizza.

That's the other side of: If I am satoshi and want to buy myself a nice apartment I might just sell 1mil Bitcoin, and get back in at low single digits after I moved in resulting in a free 10mil dollar apartment.

Seriously why spend so much time hating on LTC?