Τρομερή τεχνική ανάλυση όπου προβλέπει ότι έρχεται το Σαββατοκύριακο.

Funds locked by a Moeser-Eyal-Sirer vault are accessible by one of two keys: a hot key, intended to reside on-line, and a cold key that is intended to be kept safely off-line and only used for recovery purposes. Under normal circumstances, the hot key is used to create a transaction that spends coins from the vault, but whether the hot key or the cold key is used, funds spent from the vault must first pass through a time lock that holds the funds for some fixed period of time, for example, 24 hours. The idea being that if a malicious party gets hold of the hot key, they must publicly broadcast this time-locked transaction on the blockchain before they can take ownership of the funds. This gives the vault owner 24-hours to detect that their funds are being moved by a malicious party and recover those funds. This is where the cold key come in.

During the 24-hour time lock period, the script allows the funds to be redirected to another address using the cold key. However, even when the cold key is used to redirect the funds, that transaction must pass through another 24 hour time lock. The cold key can be used to redirect the funds again during this second time lock, and so on. The idea here is that even if the malicious party gets hold of the cold key, they still cannot get access to the funds. The owner and the malicious party can continue to use the cold key to redirect the time locked funds back and forth between addresses. As long as they both remain active the funds will remain caught in this vault loop indefinitely.

A Moeser-Eyal-Sirer vault is composed of two scripts. The first script is the main vault script that locks the funds with the hot and cold keys. The second script contains the 24-hour time lock which allows the cold key to be used to redirect the funds. Because this second script can redirect the funds back to the same 24-hour time locked script, we call this the script the vault loop script.

Εσύ αυτό κατάλαβες;

Ανεβάζω τα εβδομαδιαία διαγράμματα τεσσάρων ανταλλακτηρίων, τα πάνω είναι Btc-e, Bitstamp και κάτω Huobi, BtcChina συμπέρασμα ότι μόνο στα κινέζικα υπάρχει αύξηση όγκου  προφανώς οι Κινέζοι για δικούς τους λόγους στηρίζουν το Bitcoin ένας λόγος μπορεί να είναι ότι θέλουν να πουλήσουν τα asic που κατασκευάζουν.

TheShadowBrokers is having special trick or treat for Amerikanskis tonight. But first questions.
Why is DirtyGrandpa threating CIA cyberwar with Russia? Why not threating with NSA or CyberCommand? CIA is cyber B-Team, yes? Where is cyber A-Team? Maybe threating is not being for external propaganda? Maybe is being for internal propaganda? Oldest control trick in book, yes? Waving flag, blaming problems on external sources, not taking responsibility for failures. But neverminding, hacking DNC is way way most important than EquationGroup losing capabilities. Amerikanskis is not knowing USSA cyber capabilities is being screwed? Where is being “free press”? Is ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX negligent in duties of informing Amerikanskis? Guessing “Free Press” is not being “Free as in free beer” or “Free as in free of government influence?

Στα μόνα ανταλλακτήρια που υπάρχει αύξηση του όγκου συναλλαγών είναι τα κινέζικα Huobi  και BtcChina αυτά που βλέπω στα άλλα Btc-e, Bitstamp ο όγκος παραμένει χαμηλός στα επίπεδα του 2013 και μάλιστα με πτωτική τάση.
Επίσης το μερίδιο του  Bitcoin στο σύνολο της αγοράς των crypto-currency συνεχώς μειώνετε καθώς τα altcoin ισχυροποιούν την θέση τους παρόλο το χτύπημα που δεχτήκαν χθες.