A couple of days ago it was $50 1:1


Which is it?

Is your 25,000 a European version for twenty-five BitCoins, or, do you have twenty-five thousand BTC?

In either case, what does - 8 - 4 mean?

Hi newbie,

I'll take BTC 0.007 to wallet address 3NEWBiE1Z6Uurw4VVDenAR9ksrZ1rwHJfE - preev.com says that's worth 50.69 at the moment, so I'll round it up for $51.00 (US$).

When the transaction has one confirmation send me a PM with your email address and I'll send the funds over.

This will be a neutral trust feedback transaction.  Offer is good for about the next ten hours only as you haven't been online in over 24 hours.

*edit* offer is now off of the table - OP still hasn't been online in the last eight hours since offer was made. (wallet is also empty - i.e. no response)

Random users I assure you...

Lutpin only trusts six users so he's disqualified from DT duties (min ten) if I'm not mistaken?  He also received negative for the multiple occasions of not paying out SigCamp participants for up to ten weeks at a time.  Other Campaign Managers have been totally dragged through the mud so Lutpin has gotten off lightly with just one slap on the wrist.

CryptoImperator hasn't even got a single user on their default trust list, so again they aren't in the race. 

Their two negative trust feedbacks are for manipulating prices, but given both are top 100 most trusted - and both have received obscene merit showers from other users (as well as they seem to be receiving glowing trust feedbacks for selling trinkets) so you probably won't get anyone to sway their opinion on those two.

---

---

My suggestion to @theymos would be any merits given prior to now be adjusted:

• 11 - 50 merits given be adjusted to just two merits
• ten or less merits be adjusted to just just one merit.

Moving forward no more than two merits can be given by one user to another user for one post (and a 24 hour (could be longer) time frame for giving the recipients any further merits).

To save headaches concerning fifty merits becoming just two and the twenty-five merits that could be given out no-longer existing, all merits given stand, just dialled down to either one or two merits.

Merit fonts would have to earn their keep and actually actively search out meritorious posts, or not give merits out at all.  Flattening the curve of obscene numbers of merits given out would quash the brazenness of those who are bumping up their gang members.

You quoted my same post twice in your post? How cool is that?

Next.

The profile Gleb Gamow was sold to user suchmoon close to two years ago and has remained inactive ever since.

---

---

The original owner Bruno died just recently after a prolonged battle with a brain tumour as mentioned by the previous poster:

---

---

I can't recall why I thought it, but for a while after this thread was created, I'd thought the OP ThrillHou was Bruno having started the thread with a mask in case the legal action went pear-shaped.

(Reserved #2)

Bump & Time for a poll:

[POLL] Should I donate the Known Alts Donation funds to Bruno's plea? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5239973.0

I'm having trouble taking a screen shot at the moment.  This is just a question about the dt1 page.  I've noticed a couple of users don't show up as DT1 or DT2, is this a thing, or is it a glitch?


Each one of these instances I've noticed it's the end of the line where (for whatever reason) there is not DT1/DT2 logo.

@tranthidung I hate to burst your bubble, but that's the very thing I was getting at in my thread:

[BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality 19 March 2020, 21:40:54

and it's Honour Roll 19 March 2020, 21:41:32

---

---

I see someone else this week has come up with the same idea.

@BitcoinGirl.Club

I hate to burst your bubble, but that's the very thing I was getting at in my thread: [BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality 19 March 2020, 21:40:54 - and it's Honour Roll 19 March 2020, 21:41:32

---

---

Someone else has also decided to do the same kind of thread this week as well.

From recollection kenzawak has given up on recovering their UID - which makes me think it was an alt - it's been tagged so should be unusable by anyone except to Troll.

---

---

Thanks for the list, there's a couple of names I've spotted and said "oh yeh, I haven't seen their names on the board for a while."

I wonder if @theymos could do a break down of IP's from places such as Italy or NY state etc??

From what I've seen of the Signature Campaigns you only have to qualify with five initial merits in the last 120 days, not a rolling 5-in-120, so if there were any merits changing hands for payment, then a user only needs those initial five.  The most obvious purchase would be a loan of five, then pay back ten (two for one) once accepted to the SigCamp.  Look for any clusters where users over time back-scratch 5-for-10 with the sender of ten being lower ranked and in a Campaign.

There doesn't appear to be any links presented as evidence of users selling their merits.  Perhaps you could give examples of users who are "hoarding" their merits, then give examples of what you would like done - public shaming, branding via tar and feathers, covered in honey and tied to an ants nest - or more likely nothing as the recipients haven't seen anything worthy of being merited.

The post appears to have been removed - you don't seem to have archived it so the poster has gotten away with whatever it was without any proof remaining.

Just so we are clear about this - I have no intentions of contacting Bruno's relatives, nore would I have phoned his number when it was made available earlier in this thread) - If there is agreement about the funds I am holding on behalf of the Known Alts Group, then I will either transfer the funds to the 1F wallet address as Bruno requested, or, if it looks as though the funds are going to remain untouched, I would look to do something else such as forward to the funeral home that posted the obituary, or at worst, the hospital that last treated him.

It might sound cheesy, but the funeral home also had a "buy a tree" link, so that might also be something worth doing.

There's been a few new members and a couple of reassigned ones over the last couple of weeks.  Is it possible to include the word "NEW" in the first column for the first week a new to the campaign joins please?  It's interesting comparing week-to-week and seeing who has ranked "up" (down the page).

---

---

Bitvest and 777Coin SigCamps have been paid out fortnightly over the last four weeks.  This may be the new normal during to the current world situation.

Disclaimer: I am currently a participant of the latter Campaign.

The website shows their address is in INdiana, so it looks like Bruno's final journey home may already be underway:

---

---

That'd be the one.  Thanks for finding it.