This is impossible!!!

After all, we are all speculating and I was even happy to see some speculations here but only to read that you used Fibonacci retracement to get your predictions.

How possible is that? This is certainly not possible, maybe you wanted to write another strategy. As the name implies, Fibonacci "retracement" is a retracement tool that helps traders to know retracement, trend continuation or reversal. But all these must be within a price limit that has happened before, it can never predict outside of its range that long.

How come you get the values that those coins have never hit before by using Fibonacci retracement?

The tool is not even good for such predictions because it only tells where support and resistance could possibly happen, not to say the fact that it must be within the prices that have initially been witnessed by the coins. Not even the Fibonacci sequence/extension/expansion is capable of this.

This can never be possible!

It's excellent to be very careful when you choose your casino but what I've even noticed is that grace is needed here even before the so-called trusted casinos will not scam you. They are just greedy, especially when the amount won is big, and these days, I believe that it's difficult to know where to turn to, even the trusted casinos on BTT are being alleged by some of our members here which make the situation so pathetic. Well, your answer is still very good, one has to do the right research and try to follow the path of those who used the right one. Taking advice from here is good but the person should still not put absolute mind. Trying with a small deposit might also be a good idea that won't hurt much.

I was just laughing when I read the OP, everyone is just justifying what comes to their head, what happened is far from all of what was written except one. All others have been happening from days immemorial, how come they suddenly plummeted the market so much? There have been enough controversies around this and I know more theorists will come to display their conspiracy theories. What I know that really happened was the selling of $373 million worth of BTC by Elon Musk's Space X, others are merely secondary.

The amount might be small for people to doubt it in relation to such an impact, but what people don't know is that it's not about the amount of the money but the company/person behind the money. Elon Musk and anything linked to him has an influence on the crypto space, so I am not surprised about the fall after the removal of such an amount.

What you enquire about is generally referred to as "Slippage," it's a situation in which the requested price is different from the execution price. This could happen during thin market liquidity or when the volatility is high. You should plan your trades better next time.

However, it's not a condition that should persist, some brokers/exchanges use this to scam clients under the guise of slippage, so if this persists, you might want to change your dealer.

I must say I dug deeper for you on this enquiry and found out that there are only 4 countries prohibited by Binance Global itself in their term of account opening, and the countries are Canada, Malaysia, Netherlands and the United States.

If you are not a citizen of those countries and your country prohibits Binance Global, you are free to use another country's citizenship and even use either of the former and present country's IPs, they will look away as long as it's not the IPs from Canada, Malaysia, Netherlands or the United States.

Mind you, people living in the prohibited nations are still dealing with Binance Global according to the information reaching me, once they can register with another country's ID, they will switch to another country's IP.

My candid advice to you is very simple, Cryptos are getting cheap daily, I guess it's time you buy, and you may also want to diversify your portfolio. You can start DCAing from this moment, but I must warn you that at least 40% of your total investment budget should be involved by now if you wouldn't want to painfully miss out. It's just advice.

But if by any chance your speculation and gut tell you to wait, I advise you to save the money in the bank, but must be domiciled in the USD if possible in your country. Don't forget that USDT is a centralised entity, by this, it will serve the same purpose as being in the bank.

Except in the bank, you are not controlling it online yourself or putting it in the custody of a less trusted company online which indicates better safety.

I see things differently here bro, I like to be fairly judgemental rather than emotional. This is so annoying, someone entrusted such an amount in your care and you just disappeared without communication. Coming to apologize still doesn't exonerate this guy and giving the excuse of an internet connection is a simple lie.

I don't know how you guys follow cases logically, I do very well, and I frown at people playing smart. You who didn't have an internet connection received money that can't be withdrawn without internet but could not send it back to the sender when you have the internet connection.

Common!!! He would have still earned the BTC if he did the job. His intention in collecting the money was not good from the onset though he might have a change of mind now. Maybe people who know him physically are now attacking him for his bad attitude or a conscience playing guilty. That's how I see it.

As much as I see good sense in what you constructed up there, calling out JayJuanGee in your title and conclusion is uncalled for. I fully understand your plight but it's something you can call his attention to, not canvasing for his merit cycling power to be disabled. JayJuanGee is one of the best merit cyclers I know, and I don't think he sends it to those who don't share value, and it's regularly 1 merit per post. How then is it hard for anyone to overlook that?

I share your view, and here is my response that almost totally supports your view in a similar post. But it would have been fair had it been you directed it towards another person as there are countless there abusing this merit. If not more, I've seen someone sending 32 merits to a very simple and unqualified post. Why leave such people and point an accusing finger at one of the best merit cyclers who mostly gives 1 merit per post?

I think there is more to this.

As a trading-oriented person myself, I would have given you 3 merits on each part of your article if I were a merit source. This is one of the painful parts here, the trading discussion section still needs merit source, if not sources. I hope @theymos could pay attention to this and understand the reason for having more merit sources (those who truly understand the value trading) here to encourage people to post meaningful trading articles and that can bring about exciting competition. This will also develop others and themselves to earn.

Online learning has helped me to be a stable earner through trading, but without much merit for people's work here, they won't be often encouraged to share the value they know.

As for the subject, you've done well, the market could move towards the trend, retrace, reverse or without a direct (sideways/range). In any of those conditions, what will guide any trader are mainly the price action, trend strategy and the support/resistance strategy used. Also in addition to the trendline strategy mentioned, one could also add the Fibonacci tool and Elliot Wave theory, which are particularly important during the wavy, retracement and indecisive markets like sideways and range.

This explanation is nice, but one thing I will say is that the two clubs are still in their fresh season start, let them play more games before we are able to judge well. For me, I believe that Brighton is better so far judging by their first and second matches, while the first match of West Ham against Bournemouth was lucky for them to have drawn it after the opponent equalized. However, time will tell further on this, and there is also a need to give Kudos to West Ham for the job well done against Chelsea last week, who could have ever thought the math would turn that way, I am sure that a lot of betting ticket would have been cut by that winning.

If anything at all, what I discovered with the two teams is that they've developed more scoring sense and if they continue like this, it will help. Only if they are dealing with clubs with better defence like Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool and more, it wouldn't be easy for them.

It was a nice flashback when I read the OP, it's a very good one for me as I made x5 of my deposit in the first month of my gambling experience and the withdrawal was smooth as well. This experience is running to two decades now when there was nothing like cryptocurrency. I started betting in sports, football to be precise and it has been my favourite since then.

From my experience, I will always prefer it when I want to bet with huge amount or get serious about betting. Otherwise, I gamble the rest for fun, I'm careful of the money to lose, so I can't really say there has been a good experience in my casino part, it's all for the fun.

Of course, Chelsea is the favourite of people but anything can happen, this is the kind of match in which a few people get rich if it works in the opposite way. Imagine the straight winning of a sports betting site I just checked, it's 1.27 against 11, it will be more elsewhere, and that's crazy. My mind is telling me differently now, not just supporting a mindblowing winning for Chelsea but they could still win. It might be that winning would be tougher for them than people think. Chelsea has all it takes to win over Luton Town but they have to do better than their initial game. Finger crossed!

The term greed in trading is relative, you can't just conclude it for a whole trading system, and it depends on the person using the system and this is in relation to what the person does with the trading system as it is in other trading systems

Scalping is a trading system that is hyperactive on its own, this is because it requires the trader to catch regular market opportunities with a large risk in the shortest time possible. By virtue of this, successful scalpers will always make more money than regular traders.

The greed now depends on the trading plan of the trader. If such renege from the plan to earn more, then you can call it greed.

I believe Tuchel has a good reason for insisting on Hary Kane and I hope that Kane delivers to expectation, or else he will be dispended just like Sadio Mane, Bayern doesn't entertain being slack. About dominance, if not for it, I don't see a good reason why Tuchel would splash that kind of money on him, Kane deserves it though and I don't see how this would affect the financial budget of a rich and stable club. Bayern Munich is one of the few clubs that have good financial book, only that they do not like to waste money on players, just like other Bundesliga clubs. I will personally be judging the performance of Kane this season, and for now, I still give it to Sane, maybe he will justify it better over time.

Let me answer you in four-letter words, "Just Don't Try It." It's insane to even think towards this angle as people are still battling with the absolute control of their money from banks and reliable financial institutions including brokers and exchanges, you are adding salt to injury by the suggestion of a gambling site.

What if they don't give you your money back, especially when it has appreciated so well in value and they become greedy? It will be so painful. The risk is high my friend, just don't think it, not to talk of trying it.

Wallets are there for you, don't let their voodoo catch you.

Where in the altcoin section? There are others campaigning here with alternative payment methods option. Besides, I can't find a service section in the altcoin section. I don't think there is a rule that states it must be BTC payment only or advertised for BTC only. Maybe I don't know.

It's however relieving as he has added the BTC payment to it.

Thank goodness that there is a very well-experienced trader here, you would have by seeking answers further confused yourself, and probably others. Wikipedia might in their definition be right but you are wrong in the understanding and interpretation as they might define unknowingly that without further explanation, they could confuse people. I'm not here to argue, just talking based on practical experiences, and it's your choice to accept.

In plain and genesis of those terms in the financial market before cryptocurrency started causing confusion. Mirror trading and Copy trading are the same thing, the only difference is that Copy trade is provided by the broker/exchanges directly while mirror trading is provided by an external provider (third party) that bridge services between brokers/exchanges and their clients. In both, you can control your risk, manage the proportion of your trades, and even trade or close trades in your account by yourself. It's all about you, the service and the platform you are using for it.

Zulutrade was the first mirror trade I used 16 years ago, and probably the first in the service. All are copy trade services whether internal or external, but in the current dispensation, especially at this time of cryptocurrency, everyone is just labelling it what they like. But we can't blame anyone since they still offer the same service, they are for trade copying.

Who did he want to sue? I do laugh at this kind of people, just like those who filed court charges against Elon Musk, it's very ridiculous. As an adult, you are entitled to your decisions, let no one make you do what you do not want to do, and if you agree to it, then it's your burden. Investment is everywhere and both losses and winning are everywhere hanging around it, it's a risk we are all taking. If your risk has cost you loss, why blame others? Even financial advisers who have speculated wrongly to make individuals and companies suffer huge losses have not been sanctioned or sentenced talkless of someone who might not even know you exist? You think before you sink, our destinies are in our hands and no one should take the fall for our decision/agreement.

As for Dogecoin, the guy still has hope, I am certain that Dogecoin will pump in the next 1.5 years and might surpass its ATH. It's time for him to buy more.

The best antidote to gambling addiction is to first find a good purpose for that person, with that, it will be easier to be convinced, if not, it could still work if such could help by fighting it within, but in most cases, it's a harder task. Most people become gambling addicts due to desperation, they want the money by all means, and before they know it, they find themselves gambling so much and uncontrollably. I knew this in practice as I'd suffered from the addiction in the past, only that I did not cross the red line. This is despite that I'm a very cautious and careful person, yet, it crept in. This was because I was desperate to earn at that time, however changing my mindset and fighting within helped me overcome.

This is why I say two things help better and faster, and they are 1. Finding a good earning purpose for the person.
2. Such must be willing to fight within amidst help if necessary.

I don't see it in your way and most of what you even narrated are very good reasons for it to be disabled if possible. Merit earning and sharing are not all about whether or not you are established or whether you can redistribute it better, the first requirement is for you to share value through quality posts.

I've read through WO many times and posted there about two times, but the truth is you will hardly see anyone sharing value there. The thread has degenerated from what @infofront created it for.

Imagine someone who did not share value earning 32 merits in a single post. This is alarming. Should it be disabled? I say Yes if it continues like this. But No if they can return to the reason why it was originally created, and it should be better moderated with strict rules.