i'm doing 905 with my 970, up to 1G with oc(i'm limiting it to 60% tdp) so a 1070 can do almost 1800 or 1g with oc |
|
|
|
Better is a wrong word.
In case of hash/dollar/watt it's better yeah (hurts me to say so..)
24+Mh at under 80watt..
My nano's do 23.5Mh at the same rate. So yeah, 480 is slightly better..
Greetings
24MH under 80w? no way, last time i checked it was 120w for 29 and it was an heavy modified bios and tweaking from a guy using linux, so not the normal at all 24 at 80watt (underclock).. 29 at 120watt.. why not normal? it's real.. show pic of your wattmeter(at the wall) until then i'll not believe it, last claim was 24MH 100w, which is still somehow believable... |
|
|
|
eth is profitable with 2 480x ? .
It is profitable if your electricity is low and you need to install the latest drivers to allocate the power properly. This is correct , but now is best rx480 or 380 ? . 480 is better hash/watt ratio Is 480 better than R9 nano? Better is a wrong word. In case of hash/dollar/watt it's better yeah (hurts me to say so..) 24+Mh at under 80watt.. My nano's do 23.5Mh at the same rate. So yeah, 480 is slightly better.. Greetings 24MH under 80w? no way, last time i checked it was 120w for 29 and it was an heavy modified bios and tweaking from a guy using linux, so not the normal at all Is that 80W at the wall? If so, it is quite efficient. I might buy some 470 when they come online later. only the nano does 80 with 23.5MH, no other gpu can do that, but 27 at 100w is better more density |
|
|
|
|
someone has the hashrate for a 070 with this coin? should be around 2GH with oc, but i want to be sure
|
|
|
|
eth is profitable with 2 480x ? .
It is profitable if your electricity is low and you need to install the latest drivers to allocate the power properly. This is correct , but now is best rx480 or 380 ? . 480 is better hash/watt ratio Is 480 better than R9 nano? Better is a wrong word. In case of hash/dollar/watt it's better yeah (hurts me to say so..) 24+Mh at under 80watt.. My nano's do 23.5Mh at the same rate. So yeah, 480 is slightly better.. Greetings 24MH under 80w? no way, last time i checked it was 120w for 29 and it was an heavy modified bios and tweaking from a guy using linux, so not the normal at all |
|
|
|
eth is profitable with 2 480x ? .
It is profitable if your electricity is low and you need to install the latest drivers to allocate the power properly. This is correct , but now is best rx480 or 380 ? . 480 is better hash/watt ratio |
|
|
|
Any interest in helping us sp-private miners w/ gtx1080's with neoscrypt? My 980 is getting 700kh but my 1080's are only getting in the 300's
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
no it's 1080 problem, it does the same crappy hashrate on win 7 too, on the other hand the 1070 is great, is doing 1MH on win 7, but again poor hahs on win 10 not a code problem like someone else think "cough bensam cough", but simply driver problem on win 10 side, you can tell this by the fact that on win 7 it work and win 10 not... |
|
|
|
currently most profitable are FTC, Mona, VTC and ETH, then you have some times Spreadcoin and you have a secret one called SIA, but this one has a huge variance if you don't have a proper farm, because there are no pool
at present SIA is the most profitable at least 50% higher than ethereum and other
Siacoin? Have you actually moved from mining ethereum to mining siacoins with your GPU's? Pretty much interested in trying it, gonna try it today for sure. you need many rig, so no i didn't, with 1 rig, average per block is 8 days, which is crazy enough for me to give up So you base your argument on what then when you say it's 50% more profitable than ETH? just look at the specs, price and network hash/your hash, you will be able to do an easy math i'll save you time and i say to you that it is one block every 8 days with one rig of six 970, one block is 240k coin at 100(115 actually) satoshi each, this is 0.24 btc in 8 days, which is 0.03 a day no other coin can earn you that with a single rig.... You mean solo mining only, right? What about pool mining? I'm dual mining with -dcri 70, which makes 15.x MHs for Ethereum and 532.x MHs for Siacoin with my HIS R9 280x. Am I better setting -dcri 45 with only one R9 280x? You said earlier that there are no pools for Siacoin, but I know at least one: Nanopool, which is the one I'm mining to. EDIT: My graphics card is getting too hot (~88 °C, auto fan @53%) in dual mode. What is the recommended -dcri value in my case? With -dcri 100 I'm getting 12.3 MHs/607.6 MHs. Mining only Ethereum I get 18.5 MHs. the pool was added recently, when i posted there was none or i was not aware of any pool at that time yes sia is more profitable than any other, should be around 500k satoshi per gpu, 970 or 280, i don't know if your 280 can do 1giga So I guess I am better solo mining sia by now? EDIT: You are correct, Nanopool didn't has released Siacoin pool mining until 3 days ago AFAIK. I'm now trying gominer 1.0.0, downloaded from Nanopool. Getting ~847 MHs. For those interested in mining Siacoin through Nanopool: American servers are giving errors (well, at least for me, located in South America). With eu1 server it's working smoothly. EDIT (2): Siacoin pools don't seem to be so stable at this moment, so I really am not sure if it's worth preferring to mine Siacoin instead of Ethereum. Gominer was showing numerous duplicate/rejected shares for some odd reason. you can try other pool now http://siamining.com./help, it may be more stable and payout more steady |
|
|
|
SiaMining.com went live this morning. Features:Pay-Per-Share - 3% fee - Get paid even with orphaned blocks. Long Polling support - Minimize those stale shares! Variable Difficulty - Improves network efficiency and provides more accurate miner statistics. No Account setup - Simply use your wallet address as the username for easy payouts. Worker Support - Detailed statistics of each worker. Quick Payouts - Payments every 6 hours. No waiting on block confirmations! Thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545699.0 is the 3% fee really necessary, what are the fee of the first pool? i thought high fee are there to encourage a good spread of the hash, we have already a good spread |
|
|
|
|
ok so we are still in the boat, but the mess that this is becoming is concerning me, still no reset, and again another payment is in the queue now, so two missed
|
|
|
|
currently most profitable are FTC, Mona, VTC and ETH, then you have some times Spreadcoin and you have a secret one called SIA, but this one has a huge variance if you don't have a proper farm, because there are no pool
at present SIA is the most profitable at least 50% higher than ethereum and other
Siacoin? Have you actually moved from mining ethereum to mining siacoins with your GPU's? Pretty much interested in trying it, gonna try it today for sure. you need many rig, so no i didn't, with 1 rig, average per block is 8 days, which is crazy enough for me to give up So you base your argument on what then when you say it's 50% more profitable than ETH? just look at the specs, price and network hash/your hash, you will be able to do an easy math i'll save you time and i say to you that it is one block every 8 days with one rig of six 970, one block is 240k coin at 100(115 actually) satoshi each, this is 0.24 btc in 8 days, which is 0.03 a day no other coin can earn you that with a single rig.... You mean solo mining only, right? What about pool mining? I'm dual mining with -dcri 70, which makes 15.x MHs for Ethereum and 532.x MHs for Siacoin with my HIS R9 280x. Am I better setting -dcri 45 with only one R9 280x? You said earlier that there are no pools for Siacoin, but I know at least one: Nanopool, which is the one I'm mining to. EDIT: My graphics card is getting too hot (~88 °C, auto fan @53%) in dual mode. What is the recommended -dcri value in my case? With -dcri 100 I'm getting 12.3 MHs/607.6 MHs. Mining only Ethereum I get 18.5 MHs. the pool was added recently, when i posted there was none or i was not aware of any pool at that time yes sia is more profitable than any other, should be around 500k satoshi per gpu, 970 or 280, i don't know if your 280 can do 1giga |
|
|
|
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970). The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again. They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer. I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing. Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans). In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year. Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well. and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well. this is all i care when it come to custom gpu, vrm, the damn vram need to be covered properly, gigabyte is the best there |
|
|
|
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%) but the 1080 seems worst  sigh GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes! GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes! So the GeForce GTX 1070 is about equal in hashrate to the 980ti on neoscrypt ? much more, if you oc you can potentially get 1200 already, 1MH for the 980ti is done with oc already and sp-mod private, so it's far better not to mention that the 980ti consume like 250w or more with that hashrate, the 1070 only 150w |
|
|
|
Forget everything about the AMD cards, the 1060 will enter on July 19th in thr ring and will break everything  ! I say that even if I'm an hard AMD defender, but what I saw a few minutes ago made me change my mind, at least until AMD do something better ! not sure the 480 can do 24MH with 100w with some tweak, it's impossible for the 1060 to do better, only the 1070 is better in efficiency but since not only etheruem count anymore, the 1060 might be better in other algo Phillipma said: i get 24mh for 1 card 47 mh for 2 cards I get 275 watts for entire system cards ram cpu ssd case fans, my system pull 71 watts with no mining and 275 watts with 2 cards. you need to factor 10w in those 71, for those two gpu, so they are doing 110w at full speed when mining |
|
|
|
Sorting through everything and will likely re-format the campaign. Thank you to everyone bearing with us!  so it's closed for the time being? I'm afraid this basically means that you can kiss goodbye to your unpaid posts made since last bot-reset. You can kiss goodbye to my posts too if that comforts you somehow at least they payed one, but in theory they should pay the other if they do not want a negative trust.... currently 0.06 are missed |
|
|
|
|
godshammer what kinda of algo is that? what rounds are there? i guess it's just a rehash of the already known algo
yeah i know it's a troll coin, but i want to "play" this game with the op
|
|
|
|
|
there was but it did not happent he same day, remember the last pump from 400 to current 600+, that was the halving it's good enough
|
|
|
|
The Gigabyte 1070 G1 Gaming only has 2 heatpipes and it heat up very fast, unlike the 970 that has 4 pipes. Test it out before you buy too many.
so it's more like the old 970 windforce 3 which has also only 2 and not four anyway i don't rely on the card's dissipation, i use other 3 additional fans to build the correct airflow wiht a simple tunnel effect, very effective cards alone will never cut it at current ambient temp of 31°, no matter how many they have or heatsink they have |
|
|
|
Forget everything about the AMD cards, the 1060 will enter on July 19th in thr ring and will break everything ! I say that even if I'm an hard AMD defender, but what I saw a few minutes ago made me change my mind, at least until AMD do something better ! not sure the 480 can do 24MH with 100w with some tweak, it's impossible for the 1060 to do better, only the 1070 is better in efficiency but since not only etheruem count anymore, the 1060 might be better in other algo |
|
|
|
Sorting through everything and will likely re-format the campaign. Thank you to everyone bearing with us! so it's closed for the time being? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
