|
Am facut un calcul si oferta este destul de buna in cazul in care se achizitioneaza pachetul VIP M, si cu bonus dublu.
Ca sa fiu mai exact:
1 000GH/s +200GH/s (bonusul de 10% dublat) = 1200GH/s. La pretul de $550 ar veni 0.4583 $/GH, adica 0.00183 BTC/GH (cu pretul de referinta 1BTC=250$).
Momentan pe hashnest 1GH = 0.0019811BTC, pentru Antminer S7.
Diferenta ar fi la maintenance fee care pe hashnest este de 0.0005796 USD/Gh/day si pe Starthash este de 0.000624 USD/Gh/day, ceea ce inseamna ca pe hashnest GH'ii vor avea un timp de viata mai lung. Este foarte greu de calculat care oferta este mai avantajoasa, depinde de multi factori imposibil de estimat (cresterea dificultatii, evolutia pretului btc/usd..)
Un alt aspect important este ca pe hashnest poti sa vinzi puterea de calcul oricand vrei si in plus la sfarsitul duratei de viata a minerilor (a se citi atunci cand consuma mai mult decat produc) poti sa ceri sa primesti echipamentul fizic, cu toate ca sansele sunt de 99% sa platesti mai mult pe transport si fee`ul perceput pentru "handling" decat costa echipamentul (asta daca nu locuiesti langa minele hashnest).
Per total eu o consider o oferta de bun simt, chiar buna as putea spune in mometul de fata, aliniata cu preturile actuale (aici exceptam ponzi'urile care au preturi de 0.0001 btc/GH si fara maintenance fee).
Oricum eu unul mai astept sa vad cum evolueaza preturile pana sa ma apuc iar de minat.
Succes.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. It was not hacked and now everything it`s fine.
I don`t know what happend.
|
|
|
|
|
Whai is the support email? because I can`t log into my account.
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't i log to my account???
|
|
|
|
|
Item: Asus high end laptop (ROG Series)
Grade of interest: 3
Number of items: 1
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
I'll make sure to double and triple check before posting anything so I don't end up embarrassing myself again.
|
|
|
|
Well, I just won 777 games, not 790.
So now, not only that it doesn't makes sense, but I think you should check your calculation and compare it with my bet history of my last 1686 games, bacause I had 777 wining games and 909 loosing games. I don't know zhere you come up with the 790 wining games bacause the reality is different.
That's not true. The 1686 games you're talking about is between 1931456 and 1933142 (inclusive), which means you should have won: https://gist.github.com/RHavar/f5d1cdc76d916e15688aPlease check them all, because I guarantee you won them all, and I can guarantee there's 790 of them. I checked both the provably fair, and the database. Every single game you should have won, you won. All 790 of them. I checked my script again and I found an error on the counting part, I have missed something. Also from the total number of games some wining games were not recorded. I apologize that I rushed on some conclusion based on wrong data. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I just won 777 games, not 790.
So now, not only that it doesn't makes sense, but I think you should check your calculation and compare it with my bet history of my last 1686 games, bacause I had 777 wining games and 909 loosing games. I don't know zhere you come up with the 790 wining games bacause the reality is different.
-edited-
I had an error when recording data from game.
|
|
|
|
"
!prob >= 2.06
Shiba: Probability of ≥2.06: 47.814538%
"
So this means in 1000 games 478 should be wins and 522 looses. This is a 44 difference (522-478=44)
In 1686 games this means that 806 (805.9 to be exact) should be wins and 880 should be looses. This is a 74 difference.
The reality:
I played 1686 consecutive games with 2.06 cashout point.
The results: 777 games won and 909 games lost. This is a 132 difference.
The difference of 132 is nearly double as it should been, 74.
This is pure matematics and probabilities. The deviation is way to big. A 10% - maxim 20% could call normal because of the variance, but nearly double?? I have made many tests with randon numbers and this is not normal.
The conclusion: I think the game it's NOT FAIR.
Edited: By the way, the last game ID thai I played is 1933142, and the first I guess is 1933142-1686.
I don't quite understand, you've made a net profit of 4.9 bitcoins, and never had any problems with withdrawing them, and still think it's unfair? I must be a really, really shitty scammer. Anyway, the hash of game 1933142 was efe51340f3f8744d90d3c9ac349745a4aeddee2852eddbddcc4fee47c7d1a79c, as you probably saw on your screen. So why don't you try plug that into this 3rd party provably fair verifier: https://jsfiddle.net/1L1uqcgv/6/embedded/result/And you'll notice, the outcomes will have matched what you saw. This is because I don't gamble. I just use mathematics. The conclusion is based on probabilities. If it was a deviation by let's say 20%, I could call it normal, but a deviation of 89,18%!! It's way way way to big to call it normal. By the way, the games were played to test a script I wrote. And I'm talking about all the games, not just one game. -edited-
I had an error when recording data from game. |
|
|
|
|
"
!prob >= 2.06
Shiba: Probability of ≥2.06: 47.814538%
"
So this means in 1000 games 478 should be wins and 522 looses. This is a 44 difference (522-478=44)
In 1686 games this means that 806 (805.9 to be exact) should be wins and 880 should be looses. This is a 74 difference.
The reality:
I played 1686 consecutive games with 2.06 cashout point.
The results: 777 games won and 909 games lost. This is a 132 difference.
The difference of 132 is nearly double as it should been, 74.
This is pure matematics and probabilities. The deviation is way to big. A 10% - maxim 20% could call normal because of the variance, but nearly double?? I have made many tests with randon numbers and this is not normal.
The conclusion: I think the game it's NOT FAIR.
Edited: By the way, the last game ID thai I played is 1933142, and the first I guess is 1933142-1686.
-edited-
I had an error when recording data from game.
|
|
|
|
|
Adica pretul pietei vrei sa zici. Pai si ce'i asa bun? Si copia de buletin ce treaba are?
|
|
|
|
|
Ce cantitate si ce inseamna pret foarte bun?
|
|
|
|
|
No, it`s not working... Loading forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Primedice Username : BongMong
accound is older than 180 days.
Thx, Stunna.
|
|
|
|
|
Dupa cum se vede din titlu, cumpar laptop, platesc cu btc. Bugetul e discutabil in functie de configuratie.
Specificatii minime:
CPU: intel i7 4720HQ (minim)
video: Nvidia GTX 970m (minim)
diagonala: minim 17''
RAM si HDD, nu conteaza atat timp cat suporta minim 16Gb RAM si poate fi pus SSD.
Daca are cineva vreun laptop care se incadreaza si vrea sa`l vanda, PM sau post aici.
|
|
|
|
|
As the title says, I want to buy a laptop and pay with btc. The budget is around 5.5 BTC and might go a little higher if it`s worth it. I prefer EU seller, but you cand post your offer if it`s a really good one, even if you are from outside EU.
Some specs demands (please don`t waist my time, or yours if you can`t meet the minimum requirements):
- CPU: intel 17 4720HQ or higher.
- video: Nvidia GTX 970m or higher.
- screen size not lower of 17.3''
For the RAM and Hdd I have no requirements, only that it cand be upgraded to SSD.
Feel free to pm me, or post your offer here. Escrow is mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
O intrebare: Bitcoin_bar de pe canal este acelasi Bitcoin_bar care a participat si promovat mega scam`ul XPY?
|
|
|
|
...
Where do you see a scam?
...
Here  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
