It seems to me that the experts will correct that this is one of the few real projects that the consumer really needs, and I think he will find his investors.
|
|
|
In principle, the project, if the developers do not lie, will be interesting. But, I would like to know more about how investors will steal funds? You have it written.
|
|
|
Written in the presentation of the project. "Finally, people with tokens can shop and pay. Currently, millions of new participants in the market of cryptoactive assets divert traditional savings and discretionary spending for the purchase of cryptoactive assets. Because of this influx, a significant part of the increase in the cost of tokens. "Can you name the retail chains in which I can buy, for example, the TV for your tokens?
|
|
|
They wrote about the purse. I would like to clarify. Is there hardware protection? For example, Trezor?
|
|
|
If there is a stolen money, then this is either a developer fraud, or a bad defense against hacker attacks.
|
|
|
It will not be difficult for you to describe the project in more detail. And it is difficult to solve without information. Do we need it or not? What will he give us?
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly that miners will no longer be needed in the future? What a bummer for the owners of farms. But, now ecology is in vogue.
|
|
|
I don't think averaging extreme ratings is or should be the solution.
There are 2 conflicting problems at the same time.
The first is that ratings are exaggerations. Ratings attract people who have very strong feelings about the thing they are rating. Especially if they are angry. Let's say 20 hotel customers had a bad experience. 15 of them rate the hotel 0 stars, while from the other 980 customers who thought it was OK only 5 bother rating 3 to 5 stars.
The other problem is the opposite. If you have thousands of ratings the most extreme ratings disappear in the statistics. But those extreme ratings contain the most important information. Let's say most bank customers don't really read the small print of a loan they got, they're happy enough they got it at all and rate the bank 4/5. Only 3 customers notice misleading terms in the documents and rate the bank 0 stars, but are completely averaged away by the happy customers ratings.
I am sure that any ratings can be artificially adjusted. The question is who will pay for it and how much. Conspiracy can never be ruled out.
|
|
|
Investing in funds based on trust? In my opinion there are all such projects. No project gives a 100 percent return guarantee and control of this is not possible.
|
|
|
It is written in the presentation that this is a recruiting platform that will be leading on the labor market. And painted some tattooed man. Is this a special project for tattoo artists?
|
|
|
Although the developers write that their project is the first decentralized banking platform, I can list several already those in which I participated. This is PopulTrade, MicroMoney, but, this does not mean that the project is bad. Not at all. On the contrary, I think that banking projects are the most successful. But, to be honest, I'm fed up with the same words in all presentations.
|
|
|
In principle, a normal idea. But, for some reason, recently the design of projects has become not presentable. I would like more solidity, because the design is a respect for investors.
|
|
|
"User interfaces are not user friendly. Unacceptably high commission, even up to 20% on some platforms. Lack of security. Sites ask users to postpone their krypton and fiat without depositing. Why should someone trust them? No End-2-End encryption. Private conversations must be encrypted and not accessible to third parties, even for platforms that provide services to you. Super slow support. To solve the problem, it takes up to 30 days."
But, condemning others, we must offer something of their own. Something better and more progressive and do not explain anything. What's the point?
|
|
|
When and on which exchanges and in what purses will this fork be produced? Where can I get it? How official is it?
|
|
|
Maybe it's fine, move along the path of progress, use a chain of blocks in the project. But, what taxi drivers will use crypto currency? It is more convenient for them to use FIAT. If I'm wrong, try to convince.
|
|
|
Not all games on android are equally attractive to users. The idea is certainly interesting about the purchases of users of tokens in order to play, but how can customers interest the game?
|
|
|
Not all games on android are equally attractive to users. The idea is certainly interesting about the purchases of users of tokens in order to play, but how can customers interest the game?
|
|
|
It is known that the android devices are perhaps the most unprotected from hacking and viruses of the device. How in the application the security problem is solved, especially, the application is connected with debit cards.
|
|
|
I want to ask. This wallet works with Tresor's hardware purse? How is the security of deposits ensured? What is the fee for transactions?
|
|
|
As far as I'm concerned, it's more profitable to buy coins (tokens) at the pre-sale stage. Or after the coins come on the stock exchange and fall in price, as happens in most cases.
|
|
|
|