Also the parameters used to run it could be important information. Might also be interesting information in debug.log

Anyway thanks for the report, but if you can, please include more information.

WRT the instamining/premining discussion. Here, a block explorer, http://explorer.anoncoin.net/

I have no problems to admit when I'm wrong or have done a fuckup. I'm just glad someone with more knowledge could learn me what my mistake was, instead of flaming I will try repair it if it's possible.

Update: A patch will be released soon after some serious code review and adjustments. The Anoncoin project will flipp protocol on a block like FeatherCoin did. More information will come the next days!

Thanks for making it clear dreamhouse. And yes, that's what happen, instamining. I see the flaw now, and that the code need to be reviewed.

Working on the blockexporer now, I'm unsure if the timezone is correct, but anyway (Check time and date I posted):


It will be live shortly.

If you read the whole thread you will notice that it was typed wrong by me, and I corrected it. The 9000 blocks where mined within few hours/days after the release. A blockexporer will soon be up, and you can see the datestamps yourself.

Here it is:

Actually, proof of me thanking him before any of this thanks discussion started. https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/commit/9e2b90f5054f057a1bf7510b9d94eb396d2dc58b

Also if you haven't noticed. all coins here are copies/forks of bitcoin.. Not a single one written from scratch.. So what is your problem?

I say forked because yes, much of the code is copied but it had to be modified to work with this client and we didn't want all of the code. If you think it's a easy job as in just copying the files to the source folder and compile, please try.. let me know when you get it working!

Yes of course I would have thanked him. And of course it's no way to prove it so it will always be a word-against-word between us. He's name will be in the about dialog in the graphical client.

So what's next now, you're gonna continue yelling about this coin beeing idiotic since it has a unique feature that comes from a patch for the original bitcoin client? You require features to be written from scratch? Note that the patch is not in the bitcoin main trunk.

The code is a implementation from giv's patch on Bitcoin. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=151181.0

Much of the code is a direct fork, but some had to be customized to suit this client. Also the original patch had some stuff that we did not want it the Anoncoin source.

Many thanks to giv contribution on the Bitcoin patch.

Ok, here we go.

Windows daemon build (With native I2P support): http://anoncoin.net/downloads/anoncoin-i2p-daemon-win32.zip
Source: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/native_i2p

Windows QT (Graphical) build will be released within the next days.

To use the daemon on I2P ONLY do the following:

1. Download and install I2P, then start it. (It will run as a daemon, so don't expect any window)
2. Wait a minute or two, then navigate to http://127.0.0.1:7657/configclients
3. Make sure to start the "SAM application bridge" (Tip: After starting it, check it for autostart and save configuration)
4. In run (enter the start menu and type run on windows Vista/7) type %appdata%
5. Open or create the Anoncoin folder
6. Create/edit the anoncoin.conf file
7. make sure to set the following options: rpcuser, rpcpassword and onlynet=native_i2p

Example:
rpcuser=someone
rpcpassword=super_secret_password
onlynet=native_i2p


Note: The I2P router uses a little time to integrate into the I2P network, so you might not get a connection before I2P have runned for about 5-10minutes.

Screendump:

The feature is here now. Currently working on adding nodes on I2P. We had a node sync without problems over I2P.

Check out the first peer.

I'll update this post soon.

./anoncoind-i2p getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "[Ii6BoKPDJUk9MKfhOhrUH-TfOHzlAIapcQpcI-~EDdDh1suhKh8fnZrFGXprblxTCa5oIWofNXfj6RqY2wrCMbgcBfeRN642T4nJE8J2xrcqk63t9qXbL5Gj5ujuYYKB3e3hjHozgOUzJNFgcmxRNMqAoBWNWepLG1v2HmO1GWXywXCV2kEG~sdn9NgRM9gjiyWtPZR8b-tIwCYQtauuz9IwaMeAQGv5xlTtXArDYxwno0T7rye4sR6Ko6qypsTZ1fxF710Wg2aZqci7VLW7onYuXj~3iWieZDIUFq~FxV3reLroKQtpcFDMkGuAlkeEkMtF-x7hrhEbWMfXJTfRa323t3qM47fAPr5MXsS2re610lBSr4pTuMyccUqnvTuu1uXkeaWIW4ngNbH96I4PUUKZu-ndbbR8VTg3gk1xoq4umRgomgxCvhv93XmJibFkwDLa5UJniqlElxi4yStyxRQSgHc039zXudKL2ioFp0XTNQ16NgfLjS7eAFBtiRxUAAAA]:0",
        "services" : "00000081",
        "lastsend" : 1370794648,
        "lastrecv" : 1370794648,
        "conntime" : 1370794642,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 11538,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "XX.XX.XX.XX:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370794658,
        "lastrecv" : 1370794661,
        "conntime" : 1370794658,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 11538,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "XX.XX.XX.XX:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370794666,
        "lastrecv" : 1370794668,
        "conntime" : 1370794665,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 11538,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

I quote you "And so you think that the coin will be a better success than if you had waited a "short time" before releasing it to code the "client improvements"?"

Is that a technical coin related question, or a personal question?



lol ego... Look who is talking. If you know a bit psychology you would know that in this situation it's you that got the biggest ego since you feel the need to flame other. I only answer your questions.


No. The only thing you are up to is to make this coin look bad, so good for you, continue on that. Be proud! I got coding todo, not arguing with you.

With the altcoin hype yes. The improvements have already started in the native_i2p branch.

What is it you want? Because now you're starting to get personal. It's not about the coin anymore, it's direct questions to me. Do you got a altcoin that you feel threaten about? Or are you just a person that has nothing better to do than flame other people on forums?

Anyway, this is here this discussion ends. You're so unserious that you start attacking me as a person, and not flaming the coin as usual trolls do. You're worse, so I won't go down to your level and discuss with you. I'll code instead.

Do you read what I write?

I qoute myself: "Yes, we wasted time in short words."

Meaning none.

We got TOR nodes. Among those last 500 coins, it's something. It's a NETWORK improvement, not a CLIENT improvement. And you will see client improvements in short time.

Yes, we wasted time in short words.


I don't think the hype will stop unfortunately while retards create altcoins for people in exchange for other coins.

Look at the post above, TOR nodes including a guide on howto enable only TOR..


I missread you, sorry. I thought the opposite. But where did I say I can't stand a free marked? And there you say it yourself, the altcoin hype will continue unfortunately...

Do you want to use it only via TOR?

1. Install TOR https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en

2. Put this in your config file (anoncoin.conf):
onlynet=tor
tor=127.0.0.1:9050
addnode=m6xwmit3jovw34r2.onion
addnode=aqmdzilaqayzjb6o.onion
addnode=sf2px26xdsqphkef.onion
addnode=wwniwxrykmk2wtcw.onion

On windows, simply type "%appdata%" in Run, then navigate into Anoncoin folder and create the file if it does not exist.
MARK: create it with notepad and select all files (in save dialog), and make sure it don't add a trailing .txt so the file will be named anoncoin.conf.txt

On linux (Terminal):
cd .anoncoin
touch anoncoin.conf
open anoncoin.conf

We will add more TOR nodes in short time.

From my local node:

./anoncoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "m6xwmit3jovw34r2.onion:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370630570,
        "lastrecv" : 1370630572,
        "conntime" : 1370630259,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 10840,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "aqmdzilaqayzjb6o.onion:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370630267,
        "lastrecv" : 1370630571,
        "conntime" : 1370630264,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 10840,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "sf2px26xdsqphkef.onion:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370630368,
        "lastrecv" : 1370630570,
        "conntime" : 1370630266,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 10840,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "wwniwxrykmk2wtcw.onion:9377",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1370630526,
        "lastrecv" : 1370630570,
        "conntime" : 1370630268,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Anonymous:0.7.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 10840,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

AnonCoin is clearly not a product of Hazard. Stop beeing opinionated, try be informed instead before throwing claims. This just make you look stupid.

This is the second time you flame this, first claims about viruses and now Hazard.

Check the source, do you see any Hazard commits?
https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin

Sure. Or maybe Hazard is just mad because we can code our own coin without having him to create it for us?  Mine whatever you want.

Did I say it was planned to be ready more than a month ago? Maybe it's mine or your english, but clearly that was not what I said. I said the project started. Started as in the idea came up, we were discussing it and looking on what could be improved etc. NOT as a finished project.


Yes, as you see, it flows over with coins.. The development process should have been done faster, I agree with you on that part. Used too long time discussing specs and features and what goals which is possible and not. And with all this new coins comming up, it was now or never. If you don't like the coin, don't use it. Simple solution.



That's the congress and the people with "protection and free marked overview" behind the central banks job, not mine.

Yes, I completely agree with you. Therefore we was really careful at mining the first 1000 blocks, so it didn't end up in 10k blocks instead...   The faucet have ~2500coins. The rest is spread out on the initial nodes. We will collect them and add it to the faucet when required.

Thanks, and best luck to you too!

The first 1000 was to set checkpoints. If you don't know why checkpoints is important, please read about it. You find more about it here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Checkpoint_Lockin

Blocks starts with 4.2 coins. Meaning it was 4200 coins at launch. If you wish to aquire some, visit the faucet where they are. Free for all to request once a day. Also, 200 of them was donated really fast to people using this coin.. Read the thread history if you don't believe it.

If there is doubt about the block size, check the source: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L834

Notice that it's first on block 42000 the block value rises, so it was not a attempt to have a cheat start with big valued blocks at the beginning or something retarded like that.

If doh, 2-40k blocks where mined, I would agree with you that it was premined.