You're right. It is difficult for us to understand the new information from the first time. Therefore, the OPTHERIUM project team regularly publishes news and articles, so that we can explain everything.
In the context of investing in the crypto. When new terms or denotations are used (like Multi-Decentralized Private Blockchains Network ™, MultiSecure Transactions ™, Dynamic biometrics ™), you need to understand what it is. Otherwise, you risk losing your funds from not understanding what you are doing. For example, before I tied my life to crypto, I took the time to understand what are blockchain, crowdfunding, security in crypto.
|
|
|
The BTC is old, heavy, slow. The altcoins are so light and fast that some of those are quickly carried away by the wind so that you do not notice what it was ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) .
|
|
|
If someone comes up with something new and useful, then this altcoins wants to have all the exchanges. Most coins and tokens have not proved their worth, so it's right that the team pays for the listing. DOGE for free was listed on the exchange? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
I think that the essence of these all "multi" is that every product of the team will immediately perform many functions.
This is certainly understandable from the meaning of this word. But in the context of the project, such explanations do not clarify anything and create an even more unclear.
|
|
|
I'm close with programming. But this explanation with the "multi" really looks fun. And it's not clear.
|
|
|
Day trading is difficult now when altcoins are in a bear market. Unless you are very accurate in predicting the temporary bottoms, you have a higher chance of bag holding coins which may continue dropping. Another issue is the lack of liquidity if you are trading large amounts during this summer where many people have cashed out.
If there is an opportunity to play down (short), then you can earn good money in a falling market. Of course, most of the assets are HTB, but the main ones, such as BTC, ETH on some centralized exchanges, may be shorted. Yes, the liquidity on the cryptomarket is too low. As far as remember, I did not trade more than 1000$. And it was hard. Only with a capitalization of more than 1000 million, liquidity will be minimally acceptable. It would be desirable, not due of new startups, but by the development of existing ones.
|
|
|
Investors do not buy ETH for participation in ICO. A teams want to get cash from the ether, till it's not cheaper. Now few investors, many startups. When get a new hype, and new money will go on the market to participate in ICO, then we will able a new growth. But we have to consider that there are NEO, NEM, EOS and other platforms.
|
|
|
Of course, a large number of altcoins has already exceeded rationality. It would be nice if there were official forks with a constant improvement of BTC, but without preserving the old branch of the blockchain. In addition to BTC, a few dozen altcoins would suffice.
|
|
|
This has already been discussed. Investors on the commission will not save. Investment activity does not require frequent transactions. A small commission is beneficial in the retail sector and in the services sector, since there can be many transactions per unit of time.
|
|
|
Yes, the time for investment is pretty good. If the fall continues, it will not be as much as it has been until now. It is a pity the money ran out ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
No one wants to lose a piece of meat without a fight. The best, mild scenario, this integration is crypto in the banking system. Will the cryptocurrency keep its qualities while doing this?
|
|
|
It's just perfect, the commission is not that big, but it's good that it can be even smaller.
When there is an opportunity to save, many users will want to take advantage of this opportunity. So the purse of this project will be used by many people. Most likely so. For those who have a lot of transactions, savings can be significant. It is necessary to notice that the devs of many cryptocurrencies tend to reduce the fee for the transaction to a minimum (it can not exceed a fraction of a percent). Therefore, first of all, the convenience of the purse. Then the savings on the fee compared to other wallets.
|
|
|
Trade is a large field of knowledge. Before you start trading you need: Read a few books. Then understand that in trade suits you. Take a thousand charts and carefully study them. Based on the information gathered, create your own trading system. Start trading on paper to get a stable plus. It will be months, maybe years. If you act intuitively, there is a high probability that you will fail. This is very superficial. Maybe you changed your mind ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ?
|
|
|
My first signature was DepiOnion. Then there was a fraudulent project in which I participated for 3 to 4 days. When I found out, I laughed and found something better. If I had to take part in a fraudulent project for a long time, I would have cursed ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) them and started looking for something else. This can and should be relate calmly. Lost some time, but life continues, there is experience, now we more strong ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) .
|
|
|
The commission is quite acceptable for users, especially considering that for larger amounts it will be less.
A half % is a very acceptable commission. Usually it is more. For operations inside the system, this can be very useful for small amounts. Cooperating with retail chains, services, only thanks to a small commission it possible capture the world. Of course, when crypto will be used in all areas.
|
|
|
Safe storage is an urgent issue. To keep a lot of wallets is irrational and just uncomfortable. In this case, multi-currency wallets are used.
What is the irrationality of storing our funds in different wallets? Yes, it's not as convenient as a multicurrency wallet. But to lose everything at once, even if it was protected by biometric protection, is much worse than a lost small part.
|
|
|
|