What problems, really? From all that I have seen most of the problems were caused by (inexperienced ?) users, like not mastering basic wallet.dat/private keys knowledge, or even by previously existing computer failures, and were solved by simply re-downloading blockchain for example. Such problems happed daily in each and every other cryptocoin, BTC included.
Have I missed something?
Congratulations to the community for the support given to the less experienced users, and to the Dev team for such hard work. It's a work being done live and we are all participating, it requires hard work and the results will not simply rain down for us.
There have been small problems (see here), but the core tech is solid and exciting. Anyone calling it a failure is just trolling to cause dumping into their bids. False. the core tech is a dangerously insecure bastardization of the bitcoin protocol. end of story |
|
|
|
You dumbass chinks will do anything to weasel money from a dumbass mark. now you are doing website where you "face verify" the devs. thats just hilarious. Scamming ass chinks.
PS: to all non scamming asians my sincerest apologies. You can attribrute this unfair generalization(racial slur) to your scamming brethren, and whip their asses for disgracing race/country!
well its 5 steps better than having a dev anonymous No its not. I used my resources and the person listed on the website is not a real person, just an alias. |
|
|
|
So what are the advantages of multi signatures besides the obvious, like transparency, scam protection and easier transactions?
It has glittery design and you hear celestial songs every time you make a trasaction. But, seriously, what the hell do you need? Multi-signatures is a new revolutionary technology, it was discovered a short time ago and Bytecoin already implemented it! Keeps your money safe and sound. Isnt it enough? You dumb fuck, Multi-Sig was invented a long ass time ago by bitcoin. idiot. It just isn't available in the GUI |
|
|
|
|
cryptopaths, lost your mind? you had something's potential as to be a wise user, while investigating potential crimes you were admirable extraction of facts and spotting liars, this was true. This I was confused by your current actions, the disgrace of family name, seemingly for only attention. (i'm getting good at my fake Google Translate huh?)
|
|
|
|
|
You dumbass chinks will do anything to weasel money from a dumbass mark. now you are doing website where you "face verify" the devs. thats just hilarious. Scamming ass chinks.
PS: to all non scamming asians my sincerest apologies. You can attribrute this unfair generalization(racial slur) to your scamming brethren, and whip their asses for disgracing race/country!
|
|
|
|
You know, if theymos doesn't reply to this thread, there are alternative methods for getting his attention. Perhaps its time to re examine the supposed security fixes on the trust page.
How can you seriously think that "re-examining" security issues (sounds like you're suggesting to exploit them) would be a good way to convince theymos that you are trustworthy enough to be made a staff member? I hadn't saw that he had replied here already. That comment was innapropriate and i should not made it, so i apologize. Really, i'm just fired up about this whole situation that went down in Ferguson, MO, and vented that frustration in my post. |
|
|
|
I'm a bit sad i was left off the voting list. I'm just too stupid to even be considered i guess
I don't mean to ruffle no feathers, but you clearly weren't around to see Vlad2Vlad post on this forum. he puts ole Spoetnik to shame
I was definitely around to see you steal about 40 btc when your exchange was "hacked" though. That isn't true LOL? What part of that isn't true. Please elaborate. You said i stole 40 btc, and I didn't. What happened to the btc "lost" in your exchange then? Dig up the openex thread and read it. The original discrepancy was between the amount in the cold storage wallet and the amount shown when summing the balance table in the database. It was around 36 or 38 btc. Eventually i went through the database and found all of the malicious tx's, joining them by user and setting their balances to zero, arrived at the conclusion that the hacker was just performing sql injections of balances, then trying to sneak the withdrawals by the admins, which he was somewhat successful in doing. there's about a 1.5 btc discrepancy, plus some missing litecoins. I still have copies of the database and a backup of the server. I'm not sure how long it will take, but eventually i will be able to pay back all the users. additionally, i have to square up with the people who bought shares in the exchange. All told, its about 8 - 9 btc i think that i have assumed responsibility for. This will be last reply to you on this matter. |
|
|
|
|
Well when you're running some type of shady scheme, it's kind of an expected reaction isn't it? it would be totally different if you weren't guaranteeing profit. If you implicitly stated the risks and such, it would be different. I agree with Dooglus giving you the negative trust. If you were deleting his posts, he has a right to open a scam accusation and leave negative trust. That's how it works around here.
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit sad i was left off the voting list. I'm just too stupid to even be considered i guess
I don't mean to ruffle no feathers, but you clearly weren't around to see Vlad2Vlad post on this forum. he puts ole Spoetnik to shame
I was definitely around to see you steal about 40 btc when your exchange was "hacked" though. That isn't true LOL? What part of that isn't true. Please elaborate. You said i stole 40 btc, and I didn't. |
|
|
|
I'm a bit sad i was left off the voting list. I'm just too stupid to even be considered i guess
I don't mean to ruffle no feathers, but you clearly weren't around to see Vlad2Vlad post on this forum. he puts ole Spoetnik to shame
I was definitely around to see you steal about 40 btc when your exchange was "hacked" though. That isn't true |
|
|
|
And that was all made possible because bitcoin had first mover advantage, use your head man.
It's called innovation and sooner or later an altcoin is going to make it big on innovation because bitcoin is to scared to. Some altcoins have already seen very good success, Bitcoin could increase it's worth past the point that it's already at if it just accepted this.
after 3 years of litecoin and 2 years of lots of altcoins, all i see is pump and dump coins that last 3-6 months, and a bunch of dice games. I think your purposefully turning a blind eye to the innovation happening with altcoins. I think he is turning an insightful eye towards the fact that most of these "innovations" are mere headlines designed to attract the attention of the easy marks. It really is like san franscisco in 1849. There were a few dudes who hit gold and made good money in 1848. By the time 1849 rolled around, the scene was full of vultures and speculators and theives and the only ones making money were the ones selling picks and shovels. You can call this the "first mover" advantage if you want. But none of these altcoins have a large enough community to matter. In fact, if you say btc is slow to innovate the protocol consider the fact that the bitcoin community is large enough that any changes have to be resonably consider and carefully considered because there is a lot of work that has been done and no one wants to screw that up because of an ill-thought out idea which seemed like an "improvement" untill it was realized that it wasn't one all too late. /thread |
|
|
|
except he messaged the world during the dorian scandal. so we know that 1. the creator is not dorian and 2 the creator is still alive.
end of.. now can someone report this speculative FUD spreading off topic joke and get it placed where it belongs. it seems that cryptopaths is getting bored and now just talking jibberish..
Did he really? I thought that was fud and just dismissed it can I see this anywhere? Top comment second page http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source?id=2003008%3ATopic%3A9402&page=2#commentsReply by Satoshi Nakamoto on March 7, 2014 at 1:17 I am not Dorian Nakamoto. Wasn't that debunked already? I believe it was alleged that someone else had access to satoshi's account on that website |
|
|
|
Giveaway threads are not allowed on this forum.
I had no idea there was such a thing as a "Legendary" account level here. I thought the highest you could go was "hero member". Its a new thing the admins did a week or two ago. |
|
|
|
|
You know, if theymos doesn't reply to this thread, there are alternative methods for getting his attention. Perhaps its time to re examine the supposed security fixes on the trust page.
|
|
|
|
I think the majority of the coins that have some level of value have value because of speculators.
This. |
|
|
|
"HUGE"  that made me choke laughing.. it's true i can't deny it hahahaa and mudda is the man he don't deserve to be on the list  anyway i hope i win i am eager to find out what my prize is !!!! and cryptopaths if i don't get a prize so help me god you will pay.. i will might DDOS you until you pay me  hmm i wonder if i can bribe the mods here to edit his Poll to, "who is the most Awesome guy in crypto ?" i am clearly the winner.. i am the decider ! hell i even voted for myself hahahah  some guys are just jealous of mystique and allure and they need to try spoil my milk shakes cryptopaths has struggled for a while at accepting that i am a searing white hot comet of awesome ! when your this good at Crypto.. they call you Spoetnik  so there you all have it.. my opinion (the correct one) .. i await my prize now !don't keep me waiting either cryptopaths.. ya never know what might happen i recall you whining about getting DDOS'd on the Operation Shitcoin topic way back oh and here is an interesting picture notice the shout out to R3wt  and if you think that is fake then Google it dude wtf, not my twitter. everyone knows i'm @1337pose  |
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit sad i was left off the voting list. I'm just too stupid to even be considered i guess
I don't mean to ruffle no feathers, but you clearly weren't around to see Vlad2Vlad post on this forum. he puts ole Spoetnik to shame
|
|
|
|
The only reason Bitcoin is more valuable then other altcoins is first mover advantage. It's the truth if you compare bitcoin to a lot of alt coins on the technical side Bitcoin is lacking heavily. If the Protocol was updated to do something more like a lot of altcoins do I feel this is what would truly make the Bitcoin price sky rocket.
That's one opinion. Another opinion might be that the these supposedly "superior" or "innovative" altcoins are in fact dangerously insecure bastardizations of the bitcoin protocol. |
|
|
|
someone interested in few coins?
wow pretty much every thread i see you in you have coins for sale.... is that all you do? no, he also launches shitcoins and flashmines them. |
|
|
|
|
hah, eastereggs are cool!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
