Would Ross have to pay any of that considering he will be in prison for rest of his life ?
Yes. He has to pay it. If he doesn't, they take all money away from his parents and sister and leave them on the street. It is very harsh to be under the government of the US |
|
|
|
Im little tired of this 20 MB block discussion. Consensus? Of course, in theory beautiful idea but in reality someone has to do it and many people that have no technical knowledge about bitcoin are for or against, please.
Remember Coke/New Coke? That didn't work out well either. Bitcoin/New Bitcoin - is going to be a problem. This time, the death of Bitcoin is probably real. |
|
|
|
So, I've been reading all the recent threads about the 20 MB proposal and how Gavin will implement it in Bitcoin-XT. This has led to many people freaking out and discussing whether they will need to trade “Chain-A coins” for “Chain-B coins” or some of that nonsense. The problem is that people who say that don't understand how the changes will actually be applied. When a fork is about to happen, first the client is updated to broadcast a new version (I think it would be “v4”), and only after more than 90% of the network is broadcasting it, the fork will start to function. So, either the 1 MB block stays and we never see two blockchains, or the 20 MB block wins and we never see two blockchains. Please understand everything before spreading lies and FUD. But what if I spend all my BitcoinA AND then also spend all my BitcoinB - will that be 'double spending'? Will I actually get to buy twice as much stuff now? It seems like this will result in 21M X 2 bitcoins in total. I like this idea. I've been trying to find an easy way to double my money. I say go with the fork!! |
|
|
|
Well, now this is an interesting theory. If it is true it shows a significant conflict of interest by the people that oppose a bigger block size. I am not technically versed enough to make 100% sense of this but what does everyone else think?
If even a tiny bit true - very serious indeed. Can't Gavin just comment? Someone else? |
|
|
|
Nevermind the fact that you prolly get fucked in the ass by angry niggers most days. Not fun at all.
What a filth bag. Does your mother know you talk like that? Pig. |
|
|
|
|
Lets say I reference a transaction output of 1 bitcoin in my new transaction I intend to send to Alice. I send Alice .5 bitcoin and I take as change .499 leaving .001 as the mining fee. Both Alice and I will reference those outputs as new inputs on our next transaction. But how does the miner reference his .001 when he wants to spend that? He can't point to an output of a transaction hash. How is this miner fee reference in future transactions?
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I have a question regarding the Bitcoin 2.0 idea like smart contracts, digital rights etc. How is this going to work? If I understood it right, it is possible over the code "OP-Return" to implement additional data. My question now: If someone is going to exchange or store smart contracts does he has to own Bitcoins or to pay with Bitcoins? I hope you understand my question otherwise just ask and I try to be more precise. Thank you very much for an answer  Omni system uses a tiny amount of bitcoin for its transactions. So you do need a little bit. But the amount can be very small indeed. CounterParty is similar Etherium uses their own blockchain - you don't need any bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Its sad to see them fail, but many of those were never going to make it anyway.  All of them were never going to make it - and then they didn't. |
|
|
|
|
1) Mt. Gox
2) Bitinstant
3) Silk Road
4) Bex.io
5) Buttercoin
6) Brawker
7) GLBSE
8) inputs.io
9) GaW miners
10) SilkRoad#2
11) Butterfly Labs
12) CoinTerra
13) Mining ASICS Technologies (MAT)
14) Mintpal
15) ASICminer
16) Bitcoin24
17) HashFast
18) BTCT.co
19) Bittrivia
20) BitNetwork TV
21) Bitcoinica
22) Tradehill
23) Instawallet
24) AllCrypt
25) CryptoRush
26) bitlc.net
27) Intersango
28) bitbook.biz
29) PBmining
30) hashprofit
31) CryptoXchange
32) MyCoin
33) Bitomat
34) Bitp.it
35) Brasil Bitcoin Market
36) BTC Buy
37) Btctip
38) Bit-Bank
39) Bitmit
40) Sheep Marketplace
41) hashie.co
42) Moolah
43) Seals with Clubs
44) mcxnow
45) x-bt
46) Justcoin
47) Living Room of Satoshi
48) Satoshi dice
49) Brawker
50) Bitmarket.eu
51) MyBitcoin
52) Bitscalper
53) BS&T
54) FeedZeBirds
55) btcxchange.ro
56) CoinEX.pw
57) AMT
58) HashTrade
59) WBX
60) Intersango
61) Coinlenders
62) Paytunia
63) Bitfloor
|
|
|
|
Can I add Labcoin here? Copy the list. Add 'Labcoin'. Repost the list. Anyone can do it. |
|
|
|
|
1) Mt. Gox
2) Bitinstant
3) Silk Road
4) Bex.io
5) Buttercoin
6) Brawker
7) GLBSE
8) inputs.io
9) GaW miners
10) SilkRoad#2
11) Butterfly Labs
12) CoinTerra
13) Mining ASICS Technologies (MAT)
14) Mintpal
15) ASICminer
16) Bitcoin24
17) HashFast
18) BTCT.co
19) Bittrivia
20) BitNetwork TV
21) Bitcoinica
22) Tradehill
23) Instawallet
24) AllCrypt
25) CryptoRush
26) bitlc.net
27) Intersango
28) bitbook.biz
29) PBmining
30) hashprofit
31) CryptoXchange
32) MyCoin
33) Bitomat
34) Bitp.it
35) Brasil Bitcoin Market
36) BTC Buy
37) Btctip
38) Bit-Bank
39) Bitmit
40) Sheep Marketplace
41) hashie.co
42) Moolah
43) Seals with Clubs
44) mcxnow
45) x-bt
46) Justcoin
47) Living Room of Satoshi
48) Satoshi dice
49) Brawker
50) Bitmarket.eu
51) MyBitcoin
52) Bitscalper
53) BS&T
54) FeedZeBirds
55) btcxchange.ro
|
|
|
|
This is the list of scammers, not the list of casualty.  It's more like a mix. But now that you mention it, shouldn't there be the casualties of each scam/incident? I mean how much Bitcoins were lost in each case. Yeah, they have that list on another thread. Who cares about the distinction. Many of those scams didn't start out to be scams - they just ended up that way because of mismanagement. e.g. Gox. Probably GAW. If they started out as a pure scam - then they are not a 'company'. Otherwise, they go on the list. Do you see anyone else who belongs? 1) Mt. Gox 2) Bitinstant 3) Silk Road 4) Bex.io 5) Buttercoin 6) Brawker 7) GLBSE  inputs.io 9) GaW miners 10) SilkRoad#2 11) Butterfly Labs 12) CoinTerra 13) Mining ASICS Technologies (MAT) 14) Mintpal 15) ASICminer 16) Bitcoin24 17) HashFast 18) BTCT.co 19) Bittrivia 20) BitNetwork TV 21) Bitcoinica 22) Tradehill 23) Instawallet 24) AllCrypt 25) CryptoRush 26) bitlc.net 27) Intersango 28) bitbook.biz 29) PBmining 30) hashprofit 31) CryptoXchange 32) MyCoin (HK exchange) 33) Bitomat (Polish BTC exchange) 34) Bitp.it (mining pool) 35) Brasil Bitcoin Market (exchange) 36) BTC Buy 37) Btctip 38) Bit-Bank 39) Bitmit 40) Sheep Marketplace 41) hashie.co 42) Moolah 43) Seals with Clubs 44) mcxnow 45) x-bt 46) Justcoin 47) Living Room of Satoshi 48) Satoshi dice 49) Brawker |
|
|
|
|
The latest... Do you see any others that belong here?
1) Mt. Gox
2) Bitinstant
3) Silk Road
4) Bex.io
5) Buttercoin
6) Brawker
7) GLBSE
8) inputs.io
9) GaW miners
10) SilkRoad#2
11) Butterfly Labs
12) CoinTerra
13) Mining ASICS Technologies (MAT)
14) Mintpal
15) ASICminer
16) Bitcoin24
17) HashFast
18) BTCT.co
19) Bittrivia
20) BitNetwork TV
21) Bitcoinica
22) Tradehill
23) Instawallet
24) AllCrypt
25) CryptoRush
26) bitlc.net
27) Intersango
28) bitbook.biz
29) PBmining
30) hashprofit
31) CryptoXchange
32) MyCoin (HK exchange)
33) Bitomat (Polish BTC exchange)
34) Bitp.it (mining pool)
35) Brasil Bitcoin Market (exchange)
36) BTC Buy
37) Btctip
38) Bit-Bank
39) Bitmit
40) Sheep Marketplace
41) hashie.co
42) Moolah
43) Seals with Clubs
44) mcxnow
45) x-bt
46) Justcoin
47) Living Room of Satoshi
48) Satoshi dice
49) Brawker
|
|
|
|
Hey There, I'm fairly new to the market, and certainly no techy, but I've recently started mining BTC.
Does anyone have any insight into what this will mean for the value of Bitcoin and the profit of mining?
It means your profits will be about half as much. |
|
|
|
OOPs, bad news. Blockchain.info blocks transactions with an OP_Return as 'non standard transactions' - https://blockchain.info/rejected . Is there a better API to push transactions into? Standard node doesn't relay non-standard tx. So it never reaches mining pool. So you need to push into directly to pull, as TheButterZone sad before eligius pool allows it. When will 80byte OP_Return become standard? |
|
|
|
It should work with any language that can do HTTP POST including very low level programming languages. I think .NET is ops preferred language.
Yep. Exactly. But could somebody post an example of an HTTP POST in .Net that sends a transaction into a node (the network) - (which node?) (a permanent known node?). Please post some code which does this if you can. |
|
|
|
Yeah, I don't know how to write the WebRequest object in .Net to send to the push URL at blockr. Having trouble with the encoding and stuff. Blockchain.info has a sweet API for .Net - but then they go and block OP_Return. Why do they block OP_Return? That is totally stupid. Does any other blockchain API providers have a nice .Net code on GitHub? Holy shit this is hard. |
|
|
|
010000000128442f044ac462554b880776d3e2e33794e6fec7c1f01ee9e7e82ae66534034300000 0
006a47304402203fe2ee295c4c27b6d2d90e5aeaa83b651d2ad729d99b57fb292d4ea4e07a1d690 2
201265c12ec5bbe379c973c358738a07ee369e9237dd600ad07b7db41729b8457d012103611dc2a 5
7e244ab48a6d1b9bbb8958a0743c002d141def726cd2d2732dd01561ffffffff03c027090000000 0
001976a914c5760f778c8d2fcd0f7e8aa1a163ca8089c9fe9488ac309c3800000000001976a9140 c
c3ed93022d209d7907939a5be757db143e568c88ac0000000000000000266a24313337352054686 f
6d61732053742e2053616e2052616661656c2c20434120393230363700000000
Need to remove all spaces and carriage returns from that hex so that it is an unbroken string of characters, then it's valid. I just broadcasted it via Electrum. Nice! Thanks very much for that. OOPs, bad news. Blockchain.info blocks transactions with an OP_Return as 'non standard transactions' - https://blockchain.info/rejected . Is there a better API to push transactions into? |
|
|
|
It doesn't really matter what kind of junk you have between your legs. Ignant! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
