I will try a bigger pagefile. The pagefile sits at the smallest possible size when the miner is in use and starting up, just like memory. I don't know why this will fix it. My current pagefile already maxes out at 8192, but sits at 1024.

In order to run 5 AMD cards you need to be on W8.1. W7 only allows 4. 6 cards requires a lot of hacking about to make it work no matter what.

Who can guess what this is:

The current win wallet version is v1.0.0.1-g32a928e.  The current mac wallet is version v1.0.0.2-g32a928e (has updated GUI).  The frequency that you stake also depends on how many coins you have in your wallet and the current difficulty.

I don't understand why you would insist on spending money in a futile mining attempt that will get you less reward than what we have proposed.  Mining PoW competitively is wasteful because all the money you are pouring into a power company and hardware could have been used to develop BCR further and do stuff like get us on more exchanges, marketing etc.... everything we do is to develop the most robust and effecient system possible, cutting away anything that disadvantages the users.

You as a miner are running a loss making operation trying to compete with other miners to get rewarded a small amount of BCR. You then in turn immediately drop it on the exchange because you will be trying to cover your costs. The price goes lower and you operation becomes even less profitable, you are stuck in a loop that is slowly shrinking and soon if we don't act it becomes a noose around the entire projects' neck.

We are making it easier to secure the network while removing the concept of competitive mining and rewards in favor of a project supportive approach.

One could argue that sometimes it is harder to get your hands on BTC, but that is exactly why we will allow bidding in as many currencies as we can. This means that we have 1) removed a resource/value leakage problem and 2) we now siphon value off other currencies in favor of our own.

Eh? The block reward may decrease per block but there will be more frequent blocks, plus the current 5 + 5 BCR each block will go, so bidders will actually get more compared to what miners get now.

And since bidding is likely to work out cheaper than mining (for those who don't get free electricity) anyone who wants to can acquire more, more cheaply, more easily. What's being discussed will improve distribution accessibility, not limit it.

It's PoW that's limiting and exclusionary to the 99.9999999999% of the world's population that can't afford the hardware and the running costs of PoW, and don't have and never will have the know how anyway.

That guy has very high speed, one rig has over 600MH/s, how could that be? FPGA?

https://www.westhash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=12&addr=1MPnrpSFBEvzDqpFpv2Fit4ktRVzkBVfdQ

When the zombie apocalypse comes, crypto wont save you... a machete might come in handy though.

Can you buy machete's with crypto?

reason why I'm not buying nvidia: amd drivers for linux are bad but the situation with nvidia is even worse.
another reason is I wanna see the r9 3XX in action before buying for the winter.

15 BNs == 3750000 off market. Plus the lost ~ 1200000 that totals almost 5 million off market.

5 + 6 ==11 that means only 4 million is in circulation now.

That's kind of interesting.  If you look at the pool line it is showing "diff 2 NF 16" but your debug output shows NFactor 17.  My miner on my system (that I know submits shares) actually shows "Nfactor: 17" in the debug output too, so that's likely inaccurate, or based on 2^NF instead of the scrypt-chacha funky math of 2^(NF+1) or something like that - it's been a while, but it's always been confusing (thanks pocopoco!).  I think you've got it working, but at that hash rate, you're likely not submitting shares, or are hitting HW errors instead of accepted shares.  

Since you did not specify buffer_size or lookup gap on the command line, the default values are going to pick ~90% of the GPU VRam it can see and a lookup-gap of 4, which is not ideal for NF=16, and is probably giving you HW errors.  What buffer size does it tell you it's allocating for the card when it starts up?  (likely need to turn debug off first)

Is it possible that it just was minign so slow that it never found any shares for submitting?  I seem to remember something about the nVidia cards supporting OpenCL (Even from the beginning), but they were horribly slow at it.  Post a screenshot of the thing mining?  That will show connection status and mining speeds and the like

Show me the output of yacminer -n, would you? Also, for Win 7, try diff OCL platforms.