You are talking about just a single house. But if you consider how many homes and gardens there are in the world for individuals, if we ALL start to grow our own crops, and I mean ALL, like everyone has a fridge, everyone has a bed, everyone has a couch, and now everyone grows their own crops, how little or big depends on the size you have, some have huge gardens, some can do it on pottery, but everyone has a tiny amount at least. That means the whole population combined would make a lot of crops combined. That would be as much as a lot of farmers, even if not all of them equal. At least would be enough to drop the prices a lot considering it all, and would be great.

That never made any sense to me at all. I understand making money is an important task of any football club but wouldn't you make more money from the sale of same players if you were champions instead? Like lets assume during a season they kept sancho and haaland and bellingham all together, like lets say this year, and then they became champions and sold those players that way, wouldn't they make more money?

This way they are just giving players away, specially with release clause and haaland situation, he could have been 100+ million easily but because of release clause he went for very cheap. All in all I find that to be a bad business management.

With this all look like now luck is not favouring Chelsea and new management because suddenly things are going against them with back to back problems and on and off the field issues they are already down in league table and this injury surely can bring bit setback for them with mostly their chance can drop to zero for the next years Champions League qualification Aubameyang which was at his best while he was serving in Barcelona suddenly out of his form and this injury mean Graham Potter's options are going limited for the best results and having good end of this season.

Now all eyes on their targets in coming transfer window because if they are able to have their required players then surely we can expect better things otherwise they could be at their worst end of recent years specially after the end of Abro era surely not good for the fans.

I guess that it could be the bonus, or it could be promotion, it could be basically anything that would give us more money than we normally would or at least the possibility of it.

Some games have 1% house edge, if they offer you something more than the 1% in return of gambling, such as 2 bucks per 100 dollars betting for example, that means they will make a loss, so there is no point in doing that, but if they ever do 10 bucks given to 1 person out of 20 type of deal per 100 dollar bet, that means it would be 0.2% only and that would still make them profit generally while some would earn more than house edge. That's the gist of every single bit of marketing any casino could ever do.

A strategy needs to be updated so that it can work all the time but you must still need to go for stoploss and technically derived target level so that a strategy will be working forever or else you can exit at small loss. The reason for having stoploss level in your trade is that no strategy is perfect against market fluctuations. So, with stoploss function, we can believe into all strategy all the times given that time to time posses are happening as well.

The simple trick here we need to consider is, stoploss should be half of what we are having as target level so that we can manage the losses at minimum against profitable trades.

AD not being available is not really the issue that people make it out to be. They were bad when he played, and they are bad without him, maybe even worse. If you ever expected them to be suddenly great and fight for a title then you must be sad that he is going to miss games.

However, even with the win streak I never trusted them to make a big leap and I believed the very best they could do would have been a first round exit, and missing a first round exit is not that much of a big miss. I would rather miss the whole playoffs instead of losing in the first round, so that I would have more time to rebuild the team and let the players rest a lot more.

I can vouch for the fact that anything a grand or lower in a third world country doesn't give you the freedom to save one third of your salary. First of all, we are living in such poverty as nations that some things are luxury to us to begin with, such as cars or the brand new iphone, or drinking starbucks everyday, these are all luxury.

The regular life stuff could be cheaper, the price of bread or rice or pasta or whatever, the life stuff, making a fettucini alfredo could be cheaper, but if I want to get the new playstation I would have to work over a month to pay for it. So we always spend more when we get some extra cash, in order to reach the western worlds life standards, and can't save.

Saying that Messi carried his team on his back to win the world cup on a game where Mbappe scored 3 goals and scored his penalty as well (technically fourth goal) is weird. I mean this guy was the only reason Argentina didn't beat France the way they beat Croatia.

The game could have been over 2-0 if he wasn't as good as he is, specially that second goal was something special, to hit the ball like that from there in a way goalkeeper would know where you are hitting and STILL can't save it, that was magical. I am not saying Mbappe is better than Messi or anything, maybe now he could be, but to say Messi is worse in general would be idiotic. All I am saying is that Mbappe is not bad neither, dude is quite great.

I think it's not really that bad, it has been holding off very well all things considered and I believe that it should go on like that for a while longer. I am not saying that it is going to end up with a higher price right away, but I am not expecting it to do greatly in the long run neither.

It should be something that is stable for a while, and to think that we have been between 15k to 25k for the past 8 or so months, I can say that it has been quite stable compared to past. People claim bitcoin is volatile, but considering the range it had for the past 8 months, plenty of investments, including stocks, had the same sort of range as bitcoin during the same period.

The Frankfurt win of last year should be on minds of everyone else. We have seen some "big" clubs last year, even Barcelona was there again just like this year, and yet Frankfurt ended up winning.

This is a cup that people nicknamed "sevillas cup" for a reason, because they won it more than anyone else, even though UCL teams drop to Europa all the time. So that should tell you how being a big club doesn't matter when you are in Europa, one bad game and you would be gone, one unlucky ball bounce and you are back at home watching rest of the tournament. This is why it's quite important to remind these big clubs to put %100 into this if they want to win it.

Those are the people who have not survived a bear period like we did, and that is why they do not know what the future holds. What we have to remind ourselves is that there are two types of new people, one is the person who checks out crypto when there is a bull run, leaves during bear, and comes back for the bull run again who just hates the bear period enough that they just sell and run away, so they will always doubt if bull run will come.

Secondly we are talking about new people who just joined on the most recent bull run, which means they have never seen the bear run before, and never experienced the recovery neither. Both those people have no idea how we always recover, and that's fine, with time they will learn.

It is true that people still do go to movies, but after the pandemic there was bound to be some drop, and I doubt it would go back to numbers it reached for a while. Cinema lived a good golden age between 2010 and 2020, but after 2020 there were lockdowns and so forth, and more and more netflix style things became known, disney plus is the most famous one, but even smaller ones like hbo and even to a point amazon prime became more and more used.

That means we are talking about multiple companies giving you a chance to watch things at home, and a lot more things to watch with high quality is now available to you within a click as well. It's harder to convince people to get out of their house and pay a months wort subscription on tickets, and maybe another for pop corn and a soda.

I feel like 30+ million would be more than enough for brighton, that's a big enough amount that they could get at least 5 players from 6 million each. I am not saying that's what they will do, they could get 2 players for 15 million each all I care but brighton is not the type of team that spends a ton of money on players, so it would be a lot of money for them if they could sell him for another over 30.

Obviously it should be open field, like whoever bids highest should get him, no idea if he has release clause, but if he doesn't then it shouldn't be Brighton deciding how much he should go, but the open market of auction style bidding should dictate his value.

It would be definitely difficult to beat any team in any cup for MU as long as they do not find a way to jell better together. They are rid of Ronaldo they wanted so much, so lets see if this works out, being in the club but not playing is not the same as not even being in the club anymore. They fired him with the intentions of being better without him and we will see if that works well for them.

I am aiming at fourth place for them, if they could ever do that then it would be awesome, if they don't then they won't get anything better than last year and what was the purpose of firing Ole if the yare going just end up not being in UCL back to back seasons.

It's normal, there are less entertaining games at UCL right now and it is normal for people to be excited about that game. United and Barcelona are both teams that used to be awesome, had a bad period, and trying to recover this year back to their good old years.

They are basically having the same issues and it should not be shocking that their fans want their teams to win not just because they like to win this time, that's true for all times but this time they want it as a sign of recovery to good times as well. One of the fanbases will be upset, one of them will lose, and that will not just be loss of a game but potential loss of hope for the recovery process as well.

I think it is a bit about the fact that crypto and casinos or crypto and exchanges are different logics to begin with when you use them. The reality is that crypto itself, like bitcoin for example, is decentralized and that means there is no central figure that controls it, we are all in control and that means we could make it work without telling anyone who we are, not even a nickname if we do not want to.

However, if we are talking about an exchange or a casino that is run by a centralized organization, there is an owner at the top, and when you use something centralized like that then you are giving all the rights to your information away, and they can ask you for anything, it could be crypto or fiat or anything else.

I think oddmakers are wrong in this case, Napoli is far superior and the only reason why they are seen as the team that "may" lose this game is the fact that they haven't lost so far and everyone thinks that they will eventually lose one day, and when they lose it's going to end up being something much bigger and Inter is a bigger club.

I believe that even though they may end up losing eventually, that is not going to be this one, maybe it will be to a good big club but it doesn't have to be now. Considering their players are rested as well, they are going to be fresh and they will end up winning this game, and the first loss will come much later on.

Bayern was not even first, they started the season very badly and there were even discussions about firing Nagelsmann as well and they managed to survive and get a win. I think it is important to have those bad periods because it allows you to see the weakness, if you keep on dominating that is great but inside that dominating there could be greatness hiding the weakness somewhere, with that bad period they saw what they needed to change and became the leader of the league.

I feel like it is much harder now to take them from leadership, they are going to be the champions all over again and should be doing quite well enough to make a difference as well, like 10-15+ points difference by the end.

It may not be a negative, but Ibrahimovic wasn't there because of his amazing goal scoring or just his talents, dude was there as a leader of the team, Ronaldo lost that with his latest United period. He didn't looked like a leader, he looked like a guy who wanted stats more than anything else and last year he played amazingly, dude even had a few hattricks.

So, it is easy to say he is not that terrible now neither, but he doesn't look like a good locker room guy and that could be an issue. Plus any great team that is fighting for UCL title would want someone with less media attention around him, and that is why it's not an easy task. I think it would be better for him to go outside of Europe for a while and then retire, or at least go back to his origins, to Lisbon if I am not wrong and just play there.

I don't think all traders will use the same indicator but there will be traders who likes to separate their selves from the crowd and will use less popular or harder indicators. In trading, there must always be a loser more than the winner or vice versa. There is no way that all are going to go in one direction as the market will lost its balance and will not be as good as before anymore.

As for the question of the OP, my response would be yes. There will always be a bad trading strategy. It may work at first or on some other times but the rest are just simply a loss. Now is there a trader who will like to use it and just incur a loss? I guess no but we must move on and make another working start.