Both are equally necessary and important because if you don't have money, how can you access the best education to have the best knowledge? Let's look at reality, rich families always send their children to international standard schools and must admit that those children have broader knowledge than children who only study at local schools. So it can be said that the two have a close relationship with each other because most talented people will make a lot of money , and vice versa, talented people are very good at making money.

Inter Milan position at the top of the standings is quite safe for now, the points gap that has formed with its closest competitors AC Milan and Juventus can erase fans worries. It must be admitted that Napoli cannot be underestimated, Inzaghi must be careful in determining the starting XI when facing the defending champions, in order to avoid negative results like they just experienced in the Champions League. Statistically, Inter Milan are very favorites when hosting Napoli, their chances of securing full points are very big.

We know that Napoli have also just been eliminated in the last 16 of the Champions League, in Serie A their performance is very unstable, Inter Milan has the opportunity to beat them easily. It could be said that Inter Milan is no longer untouchable in leading the top of the standings, so that Inzaghi squad can add to their Scudetto collection again at the end of the season. With full focus on Serie A, Inter Milan can do its best to secure full points in the remaining matches ahead.

Leverkusen definitely got by very thin margins at europa, which tired them out a lot, wouldn't be shocked with a surprise this week. To be fair it looks like we are going to see something that will take a while for them to recover, but meanwhile they will face many opponents and get back to europa again, so they can't rest a lot.

My suggestion would be using bench players this week, since they are too far ahead already, there is no point in trying to win, use the bench players and young players and rest your real squad, that way they could end up playing next up a lot better with their real eleven. This is a tactic that many teams use, and I believe that it would benefit them, if they keep playing their real players, they may get injured.

Charith Asalanka and Pathum Nissanka's impeccable partnership when the Sri Lankan team was on the way to victory, Bangladesh bowlers were helpless as they could not get them out. Then I remember the world's best all-rounder Shakib Al Hasan. It seemed that if Shakib Al Hasan, the world's best all-rounder, could have played in today's match, he would have broken the partnership of the two, and Shakib Al Hasan could have taken the wicket in the difficult times of Bangladesh. However, there was no shortage of efforts by Bangladeshi bowlers. But maybe the luck of Bangladesh did not cooperate. Due to which Bangladesh had to lose the match won against Sri Lanka. However, in the third one-day match, who will win the one-day series, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka? If Bangladesh wants to win, Bangladesh's opener batsmen must bat responsibly. If the openers of Bangladesh cannot bat responsibly, the series like the T20 series will be lost from Bangladesh.

It is very difficult to predict these two teams today, as two matches were played against these two teams twice in the past.  Each team was roughly equal in terms of experience, and the two matches were tied 1-1. So today between these two teams, the team that can perform better will win. So I don't find much difference between these two groups.  Peshawar Zalmi team player Babar Azam performed well in a match due to which Babar Azam's team won easily. 
But the team lost due to Babar Azam not performing well in the next match, so the unique players are less experienced except Babar Azam. So today if Babar Azam's team with Babar Azam performs well from the beginning of the game then surely Peshwar Zalmi team has a chance to win.

This is a very accurate issue, the issue of monitoring during work and preserving privacy, it is clear that the need to monitor employees during work is a matter of concern to all companies and give them a priority on the issue of the privacy of employees.

As many indicated here, I do not think that there is a privacy for employees regarding work, the administration sees its right to look at everything that its employees do, whether in offices, computers, or mobile phones, so they will not hesitate to set devices and monitoring programs for all these things.

It is assumed that employees have no things they want to hide, so they should not complain about the issue of privacy at work.

What's the essence of all the hustle and bustle and learning and reading and keeping all the sleepless night? Isn't it all about money?

What if I don't want to go through all these process, don't care if I'm a graduate or not or if I'm good at speaking good English or not buth I'm just focused on how to make the money and end up making the money, won't the end justify the means?

I sometimes feel that some of these ideal process that has been accepted by the majority of the people in the society as a part to be taken to greatness is too complex. I mean, we can just learn how to read and write and focus on how to make money. Those who want to become engineers can choose to do so but those that don't want to pass through those route shouldn't be seen as less of a person because at the end of the day, it's mostly all about money.

When asked whether it is better to invest or save, we might say why not both? Everyone has different opinions on this issue and many opinions are useful. Sometimes we invest, sometimes we save, depending on the circumstances of the time. Acting according to our needs does not always make us do the same thing, so I agree with what you say.

Sometimes we can choose to invest and sometimes we can choose to save. If you know when it is a good time to invest or when it is a good time to save, you can do both.

It's hard to believe that despite greenwood's bad story in manchester united and now there are multiple clubs have ben callling to buy him from manchester united which is very good progress from him caused by i though greenwood's career have already ended. I read a few weeks ago that Barcelona was interested in recruiting him as a new striker, and el blaugrana had made direct contact with United's representative about the possibility of him being recruited as a new striker but still no update regarding whether barcelona will buy him or not. Another rumor has surfaced, this time from Atletico Madrid which is telling public about their interest to recruit him as a new striker. I can understand it since atletico madrid must also regenerate its players. Some players are getting olders and they may not capable enough to compete in la liga.

Diego simeone took him as one of potential striker to be recruited. Greenwood is still young enough and a very good striker. People were only underestimating him due to the his scandal but it doesn't remove the fact that if green wood was a good player.
It can be seen from how greenwood was able shining again after he had got scandal that was almost destroying his career. Despite his previous scandal, Greenwood has received some demands.

Greenwood is rediscovering his best performances. I think that if club is only need his skills to play as a striker and it's not about his previous scandal.

I feel like L2 in bitcoin is actually a terrible thing, or at least it has been so far if you followed up with what's going on with Ordinals. It has caused the transaction fee of bitcoin to be giant, and that is not the way we want this to go.

I understand that it may feel like an innovation, and it is an innovation that's true but is it a development for the better? Is it an improvement on what we already had? So far it is not, just because people could have Ordinals doesn't mean that's a good thing. Maybe in the future we will figure out a way to use it for better, but so far we have used it for totally useless stuff and we paid it with higher transaction fees, it is not a trade that was worth having and that's an issue.

Strictly speaking, we are just in a pre-bullish phase because almost only bitcoin is bullish and the market as a whole hasn't had too many spikes. But I agree with you, during bull season news is almost unimportant, especially FUD, almost no one cares so it doesn't affect the market too much. The FUD launched in a bull market is not intended to drag the market down, its main purpose is to scare the weak hand and dump the price. Therefore, weak hands will often sell and regret it immediately because the market will recover very quickly.

I think this should speak volumes about the couch of Manchester United. He was definitely a fraud. And at this point, I believe the Manchester United owners also know that very well. It's just that they want money and the ideology of the owners and Manchester United seems to be similar. And also for some reason they really like him.

Otherwise, I do not say any reason why he should still be the coach of Manchester United. You can have problems with one player. That is acceptable. But when you have problems with half of the squad, it is definitely not a good look, right?

People are getting good vibes these days. For sure, a lot of people want to get a hold of some satoshis because of the current market trend. And I am pretty sure, a lot will say to themselves that if it is too late to jump on this market.
Do remember, the capability to invest on this market depends on your financials.

But my question is why do they need to control the bitcoin network ? They are an investment fund and their main goal is profit so they will manipulate the price of bitcoin and that is what they want . I think they don't care about the bitcoin network or the outstanding features of bitcoin like decentralization or privacy...what they want is just the price of bitcoin and how they can make maximum profit from it.
We always talk about the bitcoin revolution, the decentralization of bitcoin, but what we care about most is the price of bitcoin, we are just like them but not too many people dare to admit this.

Otherwise, I do not say any reason why he should still be the coach of Manchester United. You can have problems with one player. That is acceptable. But when you have problems with half of the squad, it is definitely not a good look, right?