Hi everybody, I don't have a lot of experience with crypto: but I am curious how you think about this theory: Elon Musk regularly tweets about Dogecoin. Elon Musk has a net worth of 172 billion I see in Google. I think that's a little less now, but still a lot  . I see that Dogecoin is in 17th place with a market cap of 6.2 billion. Why would Elon Musk tweet so much about Dogecoin? It seems that everything he touches turns to gold. If he bites into something, it will be a success: left or right. Suppose if Elon Musk were to pump 40 billion into the Dogecoin, Dogecoin would be the 3rd largest altcoin in the world with a market capitalization of 46 billion. And then he was proved right again. And well done again. I wouldn't be surprised he does this. And maybe he wants to reward everyone who buys Dogecoins for following up on his tweets? After buying, he may well combine Dogecoin with his other business activities. Maybe a strange theory: that's why I'm also curious how you think about this. What theories are you talking about? In your words, I see naivety, in which I want to believe like a fairy tale. It doesn't work that way, he has 172 billion dollars, this does not mean that he can pump Dogecoin up to 46 billion. In theory, this is possible, but rich people don’t think so, they wouldn’t be rich if they were giving away their money. |
|
|
|
|
##PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION##
Bitcointalk Username: MishaSER
Telegram Username : @duminikaser
Campaign : Facebbok Twiter linkedin
Spreadsheet # : 64 64 45
|
|
|
|
So okay guys, help me out here. How is it BSC is also using ETH addresses and I'm reading if sushi moves to AVAX, people won't have to change their address as well.
Aren't these supposed to be completely different chains?
And why is everyone MOVING instead of just improving the current platforms? I don't get it.
Are you saying that it will be difficult for people to switch to another blockchain that is different from Ethereum? Who said that the system is not improved, it is a long process. |
|
|
|
|
I think we need to look for new projects with an excellent team and make our way to their whitelist, as we see such projects in general do x10 and even x20.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, do not miss this project because it will be a competitor of Trust wallet. Accordingly, staking will be available in this wallet, and if I understand correctly, Binance spot trading is integrated there. And also receiving various tokens for holding SFP.
Guys, if you remember in the past there was an airdrop, I want to warn you that now the 2nd round has started. 2nd round in applications on the phone.
|
|
|
|
Can anyone explain with the recently sold Beeple NFT in particular, what exactly was being sold? Is the artwork itself stored in the ether ecosystem on the blockchain, or is the token a hash of the artwork, or is the name of the artwork in the metadata of the token? I have not found any articles that explain it.
Also where do I find what rights are conveyed with the token? What would allow the buyer to re-sell it?
As I understand it, Beeple is the copyright holder of this picture, and even after the sale, he is also the owner of this picture. This is how I understand the contract https://www.christies.com/pdf/onlineonly/ECOMMERCE%20CONDITIONS%20OF%20SALE%20-%20NEW%20YORK-8Mar21.pdf |
|
|
|
Honestly, the bounty campaigns have been better lately, but I don't think they are of much value compared to the past, I don't think there will be many newcomers starting this job to be in this space because it really doesn't yield much good results.
That's because most of the projects that create bounty campaigns are projects that are already running. not a new project that started their sales. of course, the allocation will not be as big as what the new project says with their tokens that don't have a value on the market yet. but at the very least, there weren't so many project scams around at the moment. I think it's enough to entertain the bounty hunter in choosing a project. The success of the bounty projects in 2017 cannot be ignored, you say that the value of the tokens was not known, but then we received $ 100-200 for social networks for subscriptions and videos + $ 500. Yes, now there are fewer scammers, but all attention is focused on NFT and projects on Polkastarter and DAO. |
|
|
|
|
Guys, I recently read the news that BNB was added to the Brave browser as a reward, I downloaded the browser and I can't find this option.
|
|
|
|
I've heard about this unfortunate incident, it's really annoying that when I was holding some coins up there, every announcement was alerted as soon as this serious happening. I think things might calm down in the near future, and also some good opportunities for people to be able to buy CAKE at a low price, I also buy myself some CAKE, to be honest. Unwanted attempts to happen in this market sometimes it is not a bad thing but also offers some opportunities.
To be honest, the price did not drop much, this is a standard chart without any anamalies, perhaps this news was not significant, thank God, now everything is available and metamask does not define it as phishing. |
|
|
|
This is very strange, it seems to me that no one had time to buy at 0.1 in 30 seconds, large holders did it on purpose to show such a large increase. I will give up my words if someone from ordinary traders show their history where he managed to buy at $ 0.1. I think this is a smart PR move. an absurd pump indeed. $ 0.1 to the current price, is certainly a question of how that could be. I'm sure like you, this is a situation that the developer deliberately creates. they are building a market, and I think a game with the big bucks can do all of this. I heard something from the major players made a mistake and placed the wrong buy order, do you know if this is true? I read about this in various amateur telegrams. |
|
|
|
|
##PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION##
Bitcointalk Username: MishaSER
Telegram Username : @duminikaser
Campaign : Facebook Twiter Linkdin Video
Spreadsheet # : 9111 6040 439 277
submit your erc-20 wallet address : 0x9496eDE978c60D78DcAa392b046624bbeaAF0777
|
|
|
|
This is very strange, it seems to me that no one had time to buy at 0.1 in 30 seconds, large holders did it on purpose to show such a large increase. I will give up my words if someone from ordinary traders show their history where he managed to buy at $ 0.1. I think this is a smart PR move. |
|
|
|
|
Of course I heard the news about PancakeSwap, but I didn't know that Cream was also attacked. Ksati, I can’t go to both sites, my metamask says that it’s not safe. They should probably turn to metamask if they really control their sites.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
