|
Hmm, that's odd. Softswiss casinos seem to be working properly, and Softswiss itself has some reputation. It's probably mismanagement or the casino itself is just using the name of Softswiss and isn't really a legit casino. You might wanna look that up beforehand. It might actually just be the management behind the casino itself, and Softswiss is just the developer or something similar of the sort. Tbh, might as well just opt to use other casinos that are more likely to be legit rather than others, especially since you've had an issue with not seeing their ToS.
Also in the first place, casinos were meant to scam you, just that you indirectly allow them. After all, no one can beat the house, and you're basically just paying them to have fun or have a chance to winning something bigger.
|
|
|
|
|
Well naturally, since you know the advantages and disadvantages of their habits. Like for example, I only know a paltry amount of tennis knowledge, but a player that specializes in drop and volley could easily defeat someone that has, maybe, slow speed, or can't read the enemy properly (this is just me assuming, idk if this is a fact, the only thing I really know was the drop and volley). Those kinds of things let you identify whether a match up is advantageous or not. Ofc, experience is also taken into account, but most of the time it wouldn't make much influence especially if the player themselves is really skilled. There are also a lot of factors, but knowledge of the game and of the players should be more than enough to identify who's advantageous over the other.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm more opted to believe that they're trying to make Apple believe that their stocks would go up if they bought crypto, but let's be real here, Apple ain't an idiot and I'm pretty sure they have their own analysts and whatnot. There's absolutely no need to do this nor predict this, since honestly, it'd probably just invite FOMO to those that are not really holding stocks of apple. Additionally, there isn't even an ounce of news that Apple IS buying crypto, it's more like the analyst just assumed that if Apple ever bought crypto, then they'd go stonks.
|
|
|
|
|
Err I think you're just basing "strengths" of the currency on their price, not the best idea imo. Price clearly isn't the only factor involved, though it is one imo, still it isn't that influential that all you'd need was something that can be priced higher for it to be "strong". The influence of the currency, plus the country backing it should all be taken into account. US dollar whether you like it or not, is widely used by a lot of people to transact, as well as the commonly acknowledged main currency for transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm not really. I've never really noticed whether casinos have received awards, and do cryptocasinos even have any rewards for that matter? I've barely noticed them and most of the time, I'm more opted to look at the legal matters of the casino just to make sure it's legit and that It isn't illegal for me to access it in my country. Besides rather than awards, user feedback is much more important imo, since it details almost everything that the site has to offer. Casino awards can be both vague and specific at times after all, and an award isn't necessarily enough to prove that a casino is good or not.
|
|
|
|
Seems like quite an interesting feature. Let's all be real here, the best thing about this live mic feature is the salt you or him would feel after losing. It's kinda fun to watch though, probably streamers would enjoy having something like these every now and then whenever they play or waiting for a queue. It's an interesting feature that's for sure since they're basically bringing social interaction to online. CONS:
-Trash talks (I admit I'm not used to a PVP game without TT's. I'm a hardcore DOTA1 and CS player back then and been involved in lots of gambling in many places and tournaments)
-Foul words, badmouthing (it's difficult to moderate unless there's a strong penalty)
Those aren't really cons tbh, it's actually natural to any game that is pvp. Heck, even PVE has some salt and TT when someone gets lucky with rng loot, what more of a pvp game like csgo. It's actually nice and not really that tilting once you've been in the scene for some time, though I do admit it is intimidating for beginners. |
|
|
|
|
Well, one thing is for sure, it has caused quite a surge in price in the past day which can surely be seen as a temporary pump. I'm not sure if that's healthy or not though, but I'd expect it to correct itself in the next few days. In the case of adoption though, Tesla accepting Bitcoin could be seen as a good move. Although at this point, Bitcoin might be seen as a "premium" currency of sorts, and would only be used in transactions worth big money (which hopefully doesn't happen). It's a good endorsement, yes, but I might want to see something that adopts it to everyday life though.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing that they indicate that in their Terms of services and whatnot that users are basically asking Paypal to buy and store crypto in their places. Closer to say that they are much similar to third parties, both in the sense of buying crypto and storing crypto. It can be called fake crypto, and at the same time not maybe? It highly depends on how much you actually trust private companies tbh. I'd consider it fake, though I'd still try it if given the chance.
On that note, I'd say that for the price of having buy, sell, and conversion of crypto to be used to pay to other merchants is that it became more "centralized". It's basically like how the current fiat system works, but they pretty much applied it to crypto. Some may agree, some may not, after all, some value having it easy, and some value having their money be personally managed by themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think there's a limit, even realistically speaking tbh. Trading is quite similar to gambling in how you can go rich or go home in just a single instance of an event, and you can't even manipulate the process of the event hence most of the time it's just up to luck. Even if you only start a set amount, it's still quite possible to profit quite a lot in a month depending on how your trading goes. I'd actually think it's a lot more easier to just say that you could lose your entire budget in a month in trading rather than calculate how much profit you can get on trading.
|
|
|
|
|
There was absolutely no need for the article to even indicate that the man was a cryptocurrency trader lmao. Putting the description as a British man should've been more than enough. On the topic of the man though, looks like it was only a bad influence of drugs, and his collection should be legal since he was allowed to keep a collection of guns with him. Glad that it didn't escalate much to create an issue, more so that there were no accidents involved itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Huh, that's a huge hit to the industry since when someone takes the first step, it's quite possible that a lot of others would closely follow. It seems kinda stupid that they're blaming addiction to sponsorship though. It's like they're attacking the knife for being dangerous when the one who holds the knife is the dangerous one. I get the idea that removing the knife entirely out of the picture would reduce the risk, but this also indicates that others who use said knife would be impacted.
I just hope that they have proper talks about this tbh. As well as properly thinking of ideas on how to combat addiction effectively instead of band-aid ideas, which is imo, like this one.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's better to Buy instead of Convert? Biased, yes I must say since I've been influenced by how it was said and as such, would rather choose the one I'm used to rather than the other, but buy just fits the idea more rather than convert. The very basis of transactions of Bitcoin even back then already was about "Buying" BTC imo. Sure, if we were to use an altcoin or stable coin to buy Bitcoin, convert may be the better term, but if it was something like using fiat money to acquire Bitcoin, then buying is the better term. Convert is more likely to be used to similar things, hence why convert JPY to USD, and they are of the sense, essentially the same (JPY and USD are both Fiat)
|
|
|
|
|
Scam, end of story. Don't bother even leaving a bit of your attention span to sites that offer something like that. X amount of return per month is always the keyword you have to look for in most scam situations, but if you really want to make sure, look for their license, check when their site was made, scrutinize their team and the like. A lot of work, yes, but if you really wanted to make sure a site was legit, well, you have your work cut out for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Simply speaking, the value of Bitcoin is tied to the value of altcoin. The domination of Bitcoin over the crypto market is quite obvious to be seen, and most often than not, altcoins are paired with Bitcoin most of the time so traders would buy altcoin then buy Bitcoin, which shows a symbiotic relationship between the two. There's also the idea of Bitcoin being the leading coin, add that together with altcoins being measured/paired with BTC, and you'd get what we have right now.
|
|
|
|
I have used "black market" gambling in a sort of way, I gamble on crypto sportsbooks and thats not allowed in my nation, we already have sportsbooks that are legal here but their odds are nowhere near the same, they are very very bad, and they are not paying good for both sides as well, if it was just favorites with lower odds but underdogs higher odds I would understand but they are paying low odds for both sides and even the draw.
So, I do gamble on black market because places that are legit and allowed screws you over with the odds and do not pay you great deal of profit, which is why I think it is obvious that we are in a situation where black markets are a better option to gamble than real sportsbooks. Even if a place that we all love in black market ends up getting a legit license, they turn to being worse, so basically being licensed and legit makes a place worse.
I don't think that counts as a black market gambling, more like illegal gambling. Though they can be said to be the same, your case was that it was illegal in your country, afaik black market gambling is illegal in ALL countries. They don't have strict identity rules and what not, and only follow internal rules set up by the private organization behind that industry. I do have to agree though, casinos would sometimes just simply screw up your payments from time to time without reason, and even talking to their support at times wouldn't really provide anything substantial to fix the problem. Idk how the black market works with their service, though I'd reckon they follow the rules they set properly so as to avoid too much communication with customers. |
|
|
|
|
It might be better to understand the general movement of the market at times, so you can determine whether it would enter an uptrend or a downtrend. Ofc, there would be instances that your prediction would prove to be wrong, but that's a natural thing imo, and it'd rather instead be odd if you were always correct/wrong in reading the candles. Most of the time it's just random after all. Also try to see and find news about coins that you're investing in so you can see if the hype is building up or not, those could also be indicators of market movement.
|
|
|
|
One time in a casino I saw at the roulette table that at least 10 times in a row the number was red. Two friends of mine and me decided to go over to the table and just all our money to bet on Black with a martingale strategy. In the end we lost all, in total we saw 15 times Red and one time the 0. I m just glad we didn't have so much money left that evening to begin with.
The real life casinos are rigged in some cases so did you checked for the magnet below the table?  . 15 times getting red is quite strange because I know each time they spin the chances are basically 50% or maybe 48% since there is a green 0 on the table mostly. But even then 15 times is too much and now since you mentioned it was a real life casino, I am actually starting to think it was surely rigged. Personally I don't use martingale strategy too much but I had a losing streak of around 12 on PrimeDice long time ago and that is where I actually learned how provably fair works. Or maybe he was just that unlucky. 15 times may be a huge amount, but it isn't that realistic since in the sense that the chances of winning should reset to 50/50 every round, the chances of losing should also reset to 50. So taking that into account, assuming that you lost 15 times is weird because you lost continuously already defeats the concept of probability of dice, the probability of having a 50/50 chances of winning or losing. It isn't like the more you lose, the chances of you winning increase with the next roll after all. |
|
|
|
It's kinda rare to see a lottery where the tax is taken out before the draw occurs as most of the lottery I've seen are taxed after the winnings. There are options on most lotteries where the winner can either take all his or her winnings in one payment or be paid in a series of amount of time where the taxes are paid differently. The tax if you'd like to receive all your winnings is just one take or payment will a huge amount which is almost half or sometimes half your winnings unlike if you choose to be paid in a series amount of time where the tax is almost nothing.
Even if you think that the best choice is to not take everything in one go, but still it isn't. There are many factors that proves that and a simple google search can provide those answers. Anyway, isn't fun to receive everything and enjoy all of it.
There are countries that tax the lottery before the draw? That's kind of news for me. I've always thought that all lotteries taxed it after so that they can profit more of it. Also, isn't it the best choice just to take everything and go? And half of that as tax? Can't really believe that. I mean, the concept of a lottery of winner takes all kinda loses its meaning when lotteries just tax almost half of their winnings in one go. I'm pretty sure the house always wins, but not to that extent. |
|
|
|
I'd actually say that those are pretty good. Most traders actually end up even or even lose out by 1-2% most of the time imo, a person who profits all the time seems to be quite the trader and is staring at the market candles all the time. There's also luck involved ngl, but hey, I wouldn't diss on your effort through the use of saying your profit was due to luck. I was quite enthusiastic after my first week of trading, now I have one month, my profit is 21% (monthly), is it good? is it bad comparing to your own performance? I made mistakes, I'm curious if there is still place to do other type of mistakes in the future I am about to discover I hate when I type the wrong buying or selling price for my orders The most painful mistake was that I waited for less than 200USDT increase before filling my selling BTC order when BTC reached ~40k then dropped by 20%... Glad that you had a profit after a month. I'd suggest taking a break since having such positive results may end up in you going overboard at times and may end up in you losing everything all at once. Maybe try a demo account, and widen your portfolio for your real money and try out strategies with the demo account. |
|
|
|
|
Putting yourself in the position of someone else who has done something in the past while having the knowledge of what's going to happen in the future seems to be the one that has lesser intellect here, and not trading Bitcoin. No one bloody knows what's going to happen in the future, and saying someone has lesser intellect just based on him making a wrong judgment seems pretty stupid. By that logic, I'd guess most people would have lesser intellect then? In the end, these judgments all end up in what-if scenarios and can't really be proven. Only those in the future could possibly know if the move was right or wrong, but judging you based on that seems pretty wrong to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
