|
gigabyte heatsink is the best at least it was so for the 970, it cover everything vram included, other gpu were not that good in terms of heatsink
i choose giga all day, but i don't know if this is still true with he new gpu
|
|
|
|
|
consider also that the 480 is bad at both lyra2v2 and neoscrypt until someone optimize it, and those algo are more profitable than eth
you have 2 good algo missed, basically the 480 is only good on one algo, which is very bad
so i see really no reason to purchase one
|
|
|
|
What pools for mining there except nanopооla?
Siamining.com will be up and running later today. If you'd like to start on the beta (and we'll do some behind the scenes changes to live) you can start here: siamining.com/testing. it will support the cuda miner version? |
|
|
|
|
i foresee that it will be around 1800 as a new peak, don't know when it will happen though
for the next halving the peak should be much higher even above 3k
|
|
|
|
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%) but the 1080 seems worst  sigh GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes! GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes! Already installed the driver, haven't checked Ethereum and Neo hash as other 'users' reported it didn't fix it. Shame on me for listening to them I guess. NeoS gets around 1000~ Mh/s on W8.1 x64. Using DJMs last build. Definitely still room for tuning. Should be closer to 1200. Watching the GPUs, none of them are 'maxed' out and sit at about 85% utilization and MCU is also at about 80% utilization. This may be a intensity issue, but I kind of doubt it considering what Pallas was saying. Intensity seems about ballpark with a little bit of testing as well. Well I installed new driver, then at some point it said I was on .38 driver again after a few restarts. Reinstalled .69 and 1070 is hashing at 600~(w10), I guess custom clean install is needed instead of express. so you fixed it now? they should do the same on win 10 like they do on win7/8 also on mcu utilization being only 80%, fb usage which is the sam eis at 80% on maxwell too, so that can not be improved No I did a clean install and its still hashing 600~, not using insider though if that matters for neoscrypt? Other algos are hashing fine though besides eth i think insider build does not matter anymore, they reverted the wddm to 2.0(check your dxdiag now to see what you have) |
|
|
|
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%) but the 1080 seems worst sigh GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes! GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes! Already installed the driver, haven't checked Ethereum and Neo hash as other 'users' reported it didn't fix it. Shame on me for listening to them I guess. NeoS gets around 1000~ Mh/s on W8.1 x64. Using DJMs last build. Definitely still room for tuning. Should be closer to 1200. Watching the GPUs, none of them are 'maxed' out and sit at about 85% utilization and MCU is also at about 80% utilization. This may be a intensity issue, but I kind of doubt it considering what Pallas was saying. Intensity seems about ballpark with a little bit of testing as well. Well I installed new driver, then at some point it said I was on .38 driver again after a few restarts. Reinstalled .69 and 1070 is hashing at 600~(w10), I guess custom clean install is needed instead of express. so you fixed it now? they should do the same on win 10 like they do on win7/8 also on mcu utilization being only 80%, fb usage which is the sam eis at 80% on maxwell too, so that can not be improved |
|
|
|
|
oh so this was the real reason for why we are getting lower payment, simply because we are no longer needed, i didn't bought all that crap thing about "bitcoin now is worth more so you receive less"
|
|
|
|
its not the problem, the problem is the perf are reduced with the thermal limits nvm, as you can see the problem was not in ccminer code mmh ok, btw are you on win 10 with those perf? |
|
|
|
yeah it's 30 here too, but just a test to see how much the oc will perform, you can try for 5 min, i doubt you will screw the fe edition |
|
|
|
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%) but the 1080 seems worst sigh GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes! GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes! oh nice, neoscrypt right? and windows 10 or 7? someone can confirm that the same perf are there for win 7? also can you try to oc +200 first and then +400 on the core? it should be able to hit almost 1300 |
|
|
|
it work good on windows 10, you can get 41MH there with a single 1070 and 27MH for etheruem, all with a very little consumption, around 140w
sooner or later will be forced to move to win 10 anyway, it's better to not be stuck with win 7 forever
win 7 is good until 2020 and I won't agree to giving up ownership and privacy for the free "upgrade" i remember there are way to remove that trash from win 10, not sure if it was possible to remove it at 100% |
|
|
|
Not available in my region, waiting for 4Gb stock  4.69w/MHs, good ! Actually, 12.32w/MHs with my poor 280x rig  a gtx 1070 is 3.7w/MH and 1060 will be the same or a bit worse, like 4 ratio 1070 is more expensive yes but who care you can sell it 3 months later and losing nothing Lets say both rigs hashes 143 mhs total. If gtx 1070 gets 3.7w/MHs according to you, then that power at the wall would be 529 watts. The rx 480 at 4.69w/MHs will be about 670 watts at the wall. That is only 141 watts difference. I don't think the start up cost of a (6) rig of gtx 1070 would justify the 141 watts difference when compared to a start up cost of a (6) rig rx 480. For me, a faster ROI is better when less capital is spent to start off with. i agree but you need to account the resale value, and almost no one mentions it when talking about roi, but it's a part of the roi itself in fact the real investment on which you need to roi is the difference between the price at which you bought the card and the one at witch you sell them later, not the initial investment also you didn't take into account the scale factor, having 3.7 at 24MH is different than having 3.7 ratio at 27MH the 1070 does 3.7 ratio at 27MH at the very least you sound stupid dude must be a lifer NVIDA or employee or something just shut up rx 480 is better for Eth and its not even close, now if youre saying you want the 1070 for mining other Algos thats a different story but your broken record act is getting annoying. Wrong also btw on resale , rx 480s are hard to find actually harder to find than 1070s right now , I checked Newegg,Microcenter and Best buy and they dont have any rx 480 for sale but guess what they have 1070s for sale by the dozen. Checking ebay the rx 480 lowest price is like $300 usd so you can actually make a profit if you want reselling them http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?&_from=R40&_trksid=p2064556.m570.l1312.R1.TR10.TRC2.A0.H0.Xr.TRS2&_nkw=rx%20480do you even research any of the BS you spew ? you didn't post any sense in your post so why i should bother? resale has nothing to do with the difficulty to buy a 480, do you know what resale is? it's when you sell your HW again so now tell me what resale has to do with the limited stock of 480? utterly stupid no-sense it seems that you misunderstood as usual like many other, i didn't imply that you can not resale your shiny 480, but that the initial cost count nothing because you can resale for almost the same price, so the fact that a 1070 cost double of a 480 count exactly zero, do you understand now? only thing that matter is efficiency and a 1070 has a better efficiency in all the algo, and also yes there isn't only etheruem out there so another reason to avoid amd which is private and all the other relevant algo are not optimized Youre just burying your self more .. If i am buying cards to mine i intial cost factors in since no one has unlimited funds. One 1070 hashing at 37 mhs is not as good as two 480 hasing at 52 mhs. In regard to other Algs two 480 will still mostly be better than a signle 1070 and as new cards they will hold thier value just as well as a 1070 so the inital investment is a moot point. All that matters is hash $/watt the fact you can buy far more hash rate with 480 cards than nvidia. Add in the fact there is no Dual miner for Nvidia and also the fact that its only on Liniux you get high hash rates makes it even a worse card to pick for mining right now. yes 37MH is lower than 52MH but 52 MH consume much more than 37MH, basically double, now scale this up to 100 gpu, and you are not considering the huge loss in electricity which you will pay 1 month later of your purchase now you will argue that you have free electricity which is bullshit to me you are probably stealing it and it's not the normal for the majority... also remember that due to the less MHs a 480 need more rig to have the same hashrate of one 1070, those more rig(more cpu more MB ssd power supply which are all expensive things that do not mine), are equal to more money invested, so you are not even saving anything in the end p.s. yes none have unlimited funds, like none have unlimited electricity so since i can consume half of you i can potentially add 2x the gpu, so takes which suits you more |
|
|
|
|
i find it hard to believe that a 380 can do 20MH at 113w, and probably not stable, so it does not count unless it can do it for more than 24 hours
and in any case a 480 can do 24MH at 105w, which is still far better, no matter the optimization or the undervolting, it's impossible to compete with 14/16nm if you have 28nm....
|
|
|
|
Is there only this "gominer" and the merged miner available yet ?
From what I see both are using getwork which is not the most optimal way for (pool)mining ... But i'll have a look again.
there is the cudaminer also with two fork |
|
|
|
So the nanopool is the only public pool out there?
and it's not working with cuda also pointless Looks like this coin is getting MURDERED by huge mining farms.
#1 miner on nanopool is sending 500GH/s. That's like over 500 GPUs.
Looks like the difficulty will double by next adjustment in a few days.
it depend some gpu can do 2GH so those could be "only" 250 |
|
|
|
Segwit was in April. This posts are just FUD.  no it's not in play right now, only in testnet it seems which is pointless, it was already tested, if there is not enough consensus not all node will run it |
|
|
|
Not available in my region, waiting for 4Gb stock 4.69w/MHs, good ! Actually, 12.32w/MHs with my poor 280x rig a gtx 1070 is 3.7w/MH and 1060 will be the same or a bit worse, like 4 ratio 1070 is more expensive yes but who care you can sell it 3 months later and losing nothing Lets say both rigs hashes 143 mhs total. If gtx 1070 gets 3.7w/MHs according to you, then that power at the wall would be 529 watts. The rx 480 at 4.69w/MHs will be about 670 watts at the wall. That is only 141 watts difference. I don't think the start up cost of a (6) rig of gtx 1070 would justify the 141 watts difference when compared to a start up cost of a (6) rig rx 480. For me, a faster ROI is better when less capital is spent to start off with. i agree but you need to account the resale value, and almost no one mentions it when talking about roi, but it's a part of the roi itself in fact the real investment on which you need to roi is the difference between the price at which you bought the card and the one at witch you sell them later, not the initial investment also you didn't take into account the scale factor, having 3.7 at 24MH is different than having 3.7 ratio at 27MH the 1070 does 3.7 ratio at 27MH at the very least you sound stupid dude must be a lifer NVIDA or employee or something just shut up rx 480 is better for Eth and its not even close, now if youre saying you want the 1070 for mining other Algos thats a different story but your broken record act is getting annoying. Wrong also btw on resale , rx 480s are hard to find actually harder to find than 1070s right now , I checked Newegg,Microcenter and Best buy and they dont have any rx 480 for sale but guess what they have 1070s for sale by the dozen. Checking ebay the rx 480 lowest price is like $300 usd so you can actually make a profit if you want reselling them http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?&_from=R40&_trksid=p2064556.m570.l1312.R1.TR10.TRC2.A0.H0.Xr.TRS2&_nkw=rx%20480do you even research any of the BS you spew ? you didn't post any sense in your post so why i should bother? resale has nothing to do with the difficulty to buy a 480, do you know what resale is? it's when you sell your HW again so now tell me what resale has to do with the limited stock of 480? utterly stupid no-sense it seems that you misunderstood as usual like many other, i didn't imply that you can not resale your shiny 480, but that the initial cost count nothing because you can resale for almost the same price, so the fact that a 1070 cost double of a 480 count exactly zero, do you understand now? only thing that matter is efficiency and a 1070 has a better efficiency in all the algo, and also yes there isn't only etheruem out there so another reason to avoid amd which is private and all the other relevant algo are not optimized |
|
|
|
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
http://sia.nanopool.org/oh tnx didn't know that there was one, but the diff is even higher now, almost on par with other top altcoin, in terms of profit it does not work with the cuda version |
|
|
|
|
i received the payment of one week only, still missing the second week and we are heading toward the third(monday)
|
|
|
|
I've decided to give you some insight to what perf looks like on stock 1060  and what about power consumption? 1060 vs 1070 TPD is 120W vs 150W so it seems 1070 may looks better in efficiency... 92w at 20mhs eth and up to 120w on other algos 20MH on lyra2v2 with only that speed seems not good, a 970 do the same with 20w more, so i think you need to oc it to squeeze more serious hash without increase too much the wattage |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
