Ok guys, just got home from Florida and back to my workstation. Sorry about the week long absence, but it will be worth it. Just let me work on some stuff now that I'm back ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) Will be trying to push through a fix that I'm hoping will go live across the network and fix these errors without you guys needing to do anything. Staking appears to have been unaffected on both my local machines and all the GorillaStake servers I checked I have reproduced and diagnosed the problem; confident I can fix it fairly easily
|
|
|
where are the coins? Lost 218 million coins from my wallet
Lost? Did you run repairwallet? Do you see them going out under transactions? If not, then you never had those 218 million. eyes yet see, it was 438 million, 220 million left. Tried and rescan and repairwallet. repairwallet gives your true balance
|
|
|
Well I think it's almost time to just put all 3 of these coins on one network...
|
|
|
I actually don't have any, I gave them all away in trivia Go ahead and let someone else take it over. I need a playground to test exploits for my coins anyway ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) You actually don't have any now you have dumped them all, brought the price down from 2k sat before you take over you put your spotty name to it and it crashes into the abyss like all your coins do. That is a coincidence isn't it. the 1 sat club built by spots, why even call them coins they are junk and you act like you are still in a playground. Also where is the proof they actually got given away and not just given to yourself which would not surprise me.... The proof is in IRC logs. Just because you were too dense to participate doesn't mean it didn't happen. I literally could not care less if you think I dumped them lol the opinion of all you assholes in this thread means nothing to me
|
|
|
If repairwallet came back true, then the balances for the addresses in that wallet.dat are accurate
You can type getinfo to bypass UI display but repairwallet returning true means nothing is mismatched
|
|
|
If repairwallet came back true, then the balances for the addresses in that wallet.dat are accurate
|
|
|
And just to clarify...clients on 1.0.1 will deem all 2.0.2 blocks as invalid and vice-versa, even if they are 'connected' to each other. This is the same as shitty alts showing BTC or LTC peers
|
|
|
There are no forks. One of the seed nodes is a checkpoint server so it will verify each block whenever you open your client
The block explorer may have a frozen daemon or something, I don't know, but the network itself is not in trouble
If balances are incorrect, use repairwallet. If there is still a difference you can import private keys manually into a fresh wallet.dat
No. Anyone on 1.0.1 is now on their own chain with other 1.0.1 clients
We can ban by updating protocol versions, but there is no reason to make people update again since they are not an issue if you're on 2.0.2
If you are still on 1.0.1, you've had more than a month to update. Now you're fucked. Anything after block 360k will not show up, as everyone else is on the correct version
Forks chains same thing right? Who runs the explorer? Was looking into how it works a few weeks back and read that it binds to a wallet. Is the wallet the explorer is bound to version 2.0.2? Silly question but explorer is not accurate. Ok, well, there's no accidental forks then ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) dasource runs the explorers for all 3 of my coins
|
|
|
I, and many, many others, have been using this coin for months without issue. If you manage to get into problems, there is a 95% chance it's a local issue
|
|
|
ffs spots you are an ugly bastard... i guess we have something in common after all.
Lol please. It's hard to take pics with the sun right in my face so I make weird expressions. That's where the rocket was so I didn't have much of a choice in angles, but I am very good looking usually ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Call me ugly again and the nudes start getting posted! Lol...or we can be friend in real life and I'll just steal your girl to prove it. Believe it or not, I'm one charming bastard in person ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif)
|
|
|
There are no forks. One of the seed nodes is a checkpoint server so it will verify each block whenever you open your client
The block explorer may have a frozen daemon or something, I don't know, but the network itself is not in trouble
If balances are incorrect, use repairwallet. If there is still a difference you can import private keys manually into a fresh wallet.dat
|
|
|
Just took a nice shot of our viewing site. Lots of news crews are here, just saw AP and Reuters setting up near us, too ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoD5B7bZ.jpg&t=663&c=kRZ_29aDmSdtiQ) The actual rocket is above the girl in white's shoulder, straight across the bay If the image doesn't come up, here's a link: http://imgur.com/oD5B7bZI've also posted it on Twitter (@PurePoS) - I highly suggest following me for updates in the next day or so as I'll be going through pics and videos soon
|
|
|
The reasons we were told were because of the anvil and thick cloud rules near the 0 and -20 degrees points. The weather seemed really nice, it was pretty surprising. About six minutes before launch it was a go, but it was an instantaneous launch because of trajectory for this mission. That means it either launches at that exact second or not at all. There is 0 wait time for things to change
Thanks for the links, I'm glad some of you are getting excited and are interested in this!
I don't know if you found how you could send your name on Mars some years ago. It was a NASA program. They sent a DVD holding millions of names of those who signed up. I was also one of the few people who solved the secret codes of NASA and I still hold the certificates. I remember it took weeks to solve them. http://www.planetary.org/explore/projects/redrover/mars-spacecraft-dvd.htmlhttp://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2010/2718.htmlAh damn, I missed that. That's really awesome
|
|
|
Awesome stuff, Been there and done that myself. Don't forget to go bankrupt buying a weightless bag of astronaut ice cream <("<) Lol my gf and son are the ones spending money. I'm actually not in the public visitor's section, but with all the media at the press site so there's nothing to spend money on here anyway except at the employee store. I'm not sure that my clearance badge will get me in there lol maybe I'll try today ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
The reasons we were told were because of the anvil and thick cloud rules near the 0 and -20 degrees points. The weather seemed really nice, it was pretty surprising. About six minutes before launch it was a go, but it was an instantaneous launch because of trajectory for this mission. That means it either launches at that exact second or not at all. There is 0 wait time for things to change
Thanks for the links, I'm glad some of you are getting excited and are interested in this!
|
|
|
Do I seriously need to add peer banning rules or are you guys going to pay attention to what version you have...?
If I need to hold your hand this much, maybe coins aren't for you
I am on the correct version from the day you released it. 4 days ago I found more balls than what I actually had and wallet displayed that I had low disk space where i have more than 50GB. I fixed balls balance with repairwallet. 12 hours ago again, I had the same problem which was fixed by closing and opening the wallet. So, I am not sure if it's a correct/incorrect version matter. I highly doubt it is. Without being at home to test, it's hard to say for sure, but I originally tried telling people it was related to storage and was basically ignored The old clients will not accept new blocks and new ones will not accept old, obviously. They are hard forks, so pretty much a completely different chain after block 360k
|
|
|
|