I didn't mean like esports was something very small that suddenly became bigger. I know that esports was big but at the same time the only reason why it was big was the viewers not the gamblers. Definitely esports had some gambling as well but comparing it to big guns like basketball, football, american football and even some other stuff would be naive, esports was nowhere near that level at all.

Obviously right now they are the biggest because the other ones are cancelled or postponed, which means there is no basketball, there is no football, there is no nfl and the only thing left is esports which makes it evidently bigger than everything and biggest of right now. This doesn't mean esports was nothing and now something, it just means that it was probably in top 10 but became the top one after all of this.

There is absolutely nothing about the low ticket holders to win that makes it questionable. There is just that luck involved that every ticket has a chance to win, just because you own millions of tickets doesn't suddenly make you winner automatically, it just means that 1 ticket will win and when you have millions you can have that 1 ticket, but doesn't diminish the fact that one ticket holder could still win.

Of course I understand some people might rage about the issue because they are spending hundreds of dollars on tickets and I kinda like it because my affiliates do buy tickets as well, but just because you bought millions doesn't mean you will win. I had a guy who bought 5 million tickets once and he became 9th while some guy with 77 tickets won that hand (numbers may vary, I am telling from top of my head).

Yeah, there was this famous start up person who talked about how you should have at least 1 year of costs in the pocket before you even start anything, I understand what he meant in the startup world, there are so many "ideas" or even "apps" that people sit at home and work on and make it happen, but then they ask money for it, you check it and dude has basically close to nothing at all and has the audacity to ask for money when he didn't put any of his own, why? Because it was "his baby" well your baby worths nothing if you put nothing, even facebook had early partner that made it happen before it became an investor thing.

Same with capital management, if you do not have enough to cover your one year even during losses or bear markets, you will have trouble.

Even till now there are still a lot of people who are scared to invest their money in cryptocurrency, and there are some of them who are thinking that it is already too late for them to start investing in Bitcoin.

It's only those that have the courage that are taking bold steps and investing their money in cryptocurrency without any fear. As for some, the reason why they are not investing in cryptocurrency yet is because they feel like it's going to make them quick money, and for sure, bitcoin does not give quick money, you will need to have patience to be able to benefit from it.

Esports is getting more attention just thanks to pandemic lockdown. I know that it was already big, the first ones were small time lan based games and right now we are talking about finals at stadiums and all that, so we know even before the lockdown it was getting big. These players are getting thousands of dollars as wages and they get share of the wins as well, and the team owners are losing a bit money right now because unless you win something, you are paying for the players for nothing, so it is not easy for them but they are still investing since they could make money later on. Making a brand basically is costing people a lot of money but players could change, the names stands. So, esports going to be the next big thing, I always said that and I think we see it right now even more.

I didn't mean the best league out there as in talent (which they could be right now, thinking about how awesome City and Liverpool has been in the past 2 or 3 years) but more like globally watched and financially everywhere.

Plus, it probably has a bigger history as well, football was I think either invented in UK or just got very famous in UK so they have a very big history as well. They have like 10 level of leagues as well, and its not like Sunday league, they do have Sunday league too but even the 10th league actually has pretty decent football players there, like 40 years old guy who was at 5th league, so not like some fat chubby people like me going on there.

So, I meant premier league is bigger as in the feeling of it, not the talent of players or anything like that, if you ask me it is widely known better, but that's just me, maybe I am biased because I like them so much, otherwise if you look at success I am sure there are many other leagues who are better, la liga to start, but historically they feel like much bigger and ahead of everyone else and more globally known.

That is no more day trading . If you start holding your trades then it is automatically converted into positional way of trading. Day trading as per its name implies, it should be closed within a day. Moreover, crypto markets are available all the 24 hours hence we cannot assume exactly when a day starts and ends.

But with stock trading, we are having very limited time for trading and within that time duration, we must close all our trades otherwise we must need to pay additional exchange fees. This is how day trading might have been derived out as one of method to trade. So, if you carry your position for more than 24 hours then literally you are doing short term trading. All short/long term trading are known for being profitable compared to day trading and it is again proved with your  experiences as well.

If you notice, bitcoin markets usually trade with high volatility which provides enough room for skilled traders to profitably day trade. But, people slowly move to margin trading from day trading in sport markets, which adds another layers of complications in their trading and obviously ending up in crying out in this forum for wrong approaches.

There are quite simple bots that could actually make you a decent amount of money but very rarely that people are forgetting about. Like you can have a bot that buys periodically between 8k to 4k, so you buy each 500 dollars it goes down, buy at 7.5k, buy at 7k, buy at 6.5k and so forth until it lastly buys at 4k. It also sells all of it at 8k back.

Does this happen frequently? Not it doesn't and I really can understand it, however it also wouldn't hurt to have that neither, even if its rare to happen, at least it happens and that is why some bots are better than the others, it doesn't make you rich, it is not a get rich quick, but at least it guarantees profit, just doesn't tell you how long it will take for you to make a profit that way since it may take a second or a year.

Watford is one of those teams who have a very good solid championship level team but when it goes to premier league it just becomes very hard to be stable. I mean think about it, we are talking about probably the biggest league in the world, sure la liga, Bundesliga, ligue 1, serie a all of that are awesome but premier league might be the biggest of them all, at least right now it is like that, at one point 10 years ago Barcelona was winning ALL the games and we may consider la liga bigger, but right now I think its premier league.

So to have a team on premier league, and to stay there forever, like at least a decade if not more, would take YEARS of success back to back in order to build that culture into a team. Like I am not expecting arsenal to ever relegate, even if they play horribly.

Probably e-sports are going to be the future of entertainments which will obviously lead to have the boom of online casino/betting platforms. But, I am not thinking it will be possible to have gambling as a legal thing when theaters and amusement parks are not safe to operate. Governments may not think like gambling cannot be the right replacement for theaters, amusement parks and any other crowd gathering based entertainments.

In my country gambling is prohibited due to traditional values. So, I guess my government may not think about legalizing online gambling just for the reason of people are not having sufficient entertainment sources. But, I expect online gambling may enter into big growth in coming months in country as well due to easier and high speed internet availability.

It had happened to me as well. I had experienced such heart pumping thrills while gambling and while trading stocks. When you are too excited or got too much of panic then you may see how frequently your heart starts beating. Basically, it is not good for health of our heart as it may lead sudden cardiac arrest and other heart related problems. If we think about the outcome of gambling is worth than our life then probably we may not gamble forever.

At the same time, the essence of entertainment of gambling is, experiencing its thrills and suspense. But, it should be within a limit. This limit definitely vary person to person. Moreover, our heart is becoming weak over experiencing such thrills along getting old. So, avoiding gambling may save our life. Because, definitely both fun seeking and money seeking ambler will get suffered, no one could escape.

Even if gambling houses will be adding such limiting feature, I believe gamblers will start abusing it by having multiple account or by changing IP addresses or by holding accounts in multiple gambling houses. I guess until gamblers do have a strong will about restricting themselves, no one could save them from addictions. I guess only gamblers need to work on such limiting thing and definitely not the houses.

For these things alone, people are thinking about gambling and other entertainments. But, unfortunately your suggestion is also a valid one. We need gambling for relaxing and again to escape from addictions, again we need another level of relaxation to skip addictions.

It will be possible only when gamblers realize. But, I agree with OP at least for finding time to realize, we must work on having a limiting feature in gambling houses.

Seth was highest % in the three point shooting one season I think, a better shooter when you consider efficiency because Seth is only taking shots when he feels like he is open and he can shoot. Steph is not like that because he is the main scorer of a 5 time finals team, so obviously Steph will shoot a lot more and that includes crazy shots that we all know Steph very well about. Dude shoots from almost the logo time to time and he makes them more than other players as well so that is why he can do it.

I compare seth with klay more, they are both shooters and purely that, a shooter. I still would want to see Seth at warriors though, think about putting Steph and point guard and Seth at shooting guard and Klay at small forward. That would basically be ideal for them and I do not know how two brothers would play together, it will be either awesome or would be very bad.

That must be a very smart decision a crypto adopter may take in their life time. If you were available some 3 years back to enlighten me about the importance of sticking only with bitcoins or may be with few other highly established altcoins, I probably richer by at least 5 bitcoins right now. Yes, I have spent more than 5 bitcoins and its total worth now is less than 1 bitcoin. At least 2 to 4 coins perform as per my expectations then I may recover my capital but there cannot be enough reward for 3 years of patience.

It would be always better to go with bitcoins but I decided to multiply my bitcoin stash through altcoins. Still, I did not invest with brand new tokens nor coins, but unfortunately even old coins also faced bad times. I still believe into waves and lick to perform well in coming days. But, I never recommend anyone to risk with them.

Dominance will probably be fixed. I don't know when and I don't know how it will happen but I am 100% sure it will happen. When the time comes altcoins will start going up. At one point bitcoin will go up so much that people will realize that they can't make profit from bitcoin. Now in that situation there is two options, most commonly and almost all the time bitcoin drops to a level that dominance will drop, that is the most common one.

Second one however is very rare and I can remember like 2 or 3 times before. Altcoins could increase to level with bitcoin, people could see they won't make money from bitcoin, so they will move that money to altcoins to make more profits. However do not hold your breath about that, it is really a rare thing to happen so I can't say it could happen that quickly.

They won champions league last year, they have already won it, there is no coming back from that and nobody can cancel that. Even on the worst of the situations Liverpool doesn't get the league title this year which they totally deserved because they were having a record breaking games and record breaking points probably, so that would be sad, but even on that horrible situation for them, nobody is taking away their champions league champions title at all, that was last year and done with.

I do believe the leagues will resume eventually, but even if they do not, European cups will be played next year, and leagues will have to send some teams, you reckon they won't send Liverpool? There is no way they won't send them, so the worst case in my mind is nobody wins champions league this year, that's it.

In my 22 years of using internet, I guess blockchain.com(.info) is the only services where I have that key based authentication. I registered with them by 2013 and at that time itself they were providing key based authentications still not sure why no other service providers not copied such a thing.

Authentication type is just the security measurement and it has nothing to do with anything gambling. I guess OP must be studying the opinions of this gambling community which might be leading to implement the most preferred way of authentication method in an upcoming online crypto casino. Probably I would be expecting eagerly another services to long in with key based authentications.

Unfortunately right now we are having lots of smart contracts (dapps) based the things in the markets which might be working against what we are your expectations on EOS. Yes, BNB could be the future leader among dapps whereas ethereum still staying stronger in this particular segment. So, you can expect lots of competitions among devs to which platform for their token economy.

I heard EOS is backed by Chinese devs which may act like a big supporting thing as per what we had observed with neo kind of China based projects. But clearly for big ROI, must attract investors world wide as just once country will not be enough but China has rapid growth in crypto adopting which may go at any direction beyond our predictions.

Don't be rushing in making any conclusion about bitcoin for assuming like it has reached its goal. Because as per many experts that bitcoin just started its journey towards stars after reaching the moon. It is going to be an endless journey for bitcoin because there are lots of stars in our galaxy so we cannot expect at any time like bitcoin has reached its goal. It will continue growing in its value over the times.

Coming back to any other altcoins, if you're expecting some other altcoin to be copying bitcoin to have value then you will end up only in disappointment because there are less possibilities for any other coin to have such value like bitcoins at any time in future. I mean altcoins may value like what bitcoin is today but cannot match bitcoins at any given point of time.

For example, bitcoin valued $1000 in 2013 and ETH reached that level in 2018. Currently bitcoin is valuing around $9000 and some other coin may value $9000 by 2023/2025 but bitcoin may value in millions at that times.

There has been always some confusion about the understanding of how market deciding the value of a commodity; even supply and demand are playing big role in deciding price level of a commodity, the circulating supply (so far mined bitcoins for the case of what we discussing here) is the actual thing we need to consider because total supply is just the number as it is practically not possible to how all the supply to be available for trading against the demand.

So, coinmarketcap and total supply are just number which has nothing to do with current price level for bitcoins. If a whale will be deciding to bump all their stash then bitcoin market will definitely face a huge downfall of price levels. This applies for all trade-able things not just limited to bitcoins.