"The number you have reached has been disconnected or is no longer in service due to bomb damage.  Your call has been monitored, recorded and logged by the one-world police force operating under the name 'Strong Cities Network.'"

If neither side were on an expansionist trajectory, working together on projects where it made sense would probably happen without effort.  I'm not holding my breath for a situation where we are all holding hands and singing kumbaya (and don't even wish to see it), but I do hope for a situation where there is a 'competition of ideas' where larger nations win over smaller nations by being decent to them and making 'good deals' rather than by sending in mercenary armies to shatter them and turn them into hell-holes.

My problem with NATO, and especially as it absorbs an increasing number of unstable countries, is that you get degenerate freaks like Turkey invading other nations when they see some oil they can seize then run back to NATO mommy if/when they get resistance.  If we actually wished to get rid of ISIS, WE should be bombing Turkey since that's where most of ISIS is living at the moment.  Certainly we should not be protecting ISIS from attack with our nuclear arsenal and making a very credible threat to bring on WW-III in doing so.

One is tempted to write off your 9/11 fail as being attributable to some sort of Zionist leanings or something, especially since you (alone) seem to keep coming back again and again to the 'Jewish' aspect of it, but you don't seem to be trying to torpedo the Trump campaign like most Zionists.  So that doesn't really fit.  

Again, BADecker seems to have the most plausible hypothesis about your behavior.  That is, you just want people pointing out the multitude of super obvious proof positives that the 'official conspiracy theory' promulgated by the establishment is a sham.

As someone who is hopeful about Trump, I'm not terribly excited about this either.

OTOH, it could be read as an indication that Trump is serious about dealing with some of the upcoming problems that will almost certainly be put up.  I've noticed that he takes every opportunity to enlist the support of the military and the police.  A person with Schmitz experience will have a lot of understanding and connections into the private mercenary elements that the U.S. establishment uses to project force.  It's only a matter of time before this force projection is directed inwardly.  To me, it's only a matter of whether these forces will be controlled by Globalists or by a Nationalist.  The latter is the lesser of two evils as I see things.

My sober assessment of things is that we are in so much trouble and so deep in the hole at this point that we may never get out, and if we do manage the feat, it won't be pretty.

In a slightly more hopeful scenario, I do have some hope that Trump is serious about addressing the crony nature of our quasi-capitalist political structure.  I don't think he would talk about it as much as he does unless he were serious.  Sure, he played inside that system and played well, but it is possible stand up from the table and leave.  (A situation which I have some experience with.)  This makes his threats to change the game somewhat credible to me.  Back to Schmitz (and the various other apparent scumbags Trump has fingered), it is possible that he knows that he needs people who 'know where the bodies are buried' in fields beyond his expertise in order to have a chance at making some corrections.

Trump remains a 'hail Mary' play to me, but still much better odds than any other candidate I've seen in probably forever.  Certainly anyone who has made it to the level Trump has achieved today.  I'm still with Webb on his statement that a Trump presidency could go 'either very good or very bad.' ...with the shared caveat that a Hillary one would go very bad.

I'm more than ready to see Trump align with some people I find more to my liking, but am willing to give him a pass until he stomps the rest of the Repubicans into the dirt.  Carson dealing with the education system is to my liking at least.  And, though it probably was not the goal of the article, I find it hopeful that the media noted that the names Trump named vis-a-vis foreign policy were relative unknowns and 'were not inside either of the two mainstream establishment camps.'

I'll also add that I was shocked and delighted to see Trump be interested in diminishing NATO.  I consider this structure to be outdated and one of the most palpable threats of triggering a hot WW-III.

Wow!  That is the most rational explanation I've ever heard for Spendy's otherwise inexplicable blind-spot about 9/11 and total rejection of science.  It's really not characteristic of his identity in other areas.  I'm embarrassed not to have thought it up on my own.

Being able to think things out for yourself is pointless, frusterating, and counterproductive if your job is to implement operations as assigned by those who've installed you.  That has been the case for POTUS here in the U.S. for quite a few cycles now.

OTOH, thinking things out is actually a valuable skill for someone who is self-funded.  Given some of Trump's documented thought patterns going back a ways, I personally like the way the guy seems to think.

A case in point was the Middle East 'disaster.'  Of course it is not exactly a 'disaster' for the handful of people who planned it, and in my analysis it has gone according to plan.  It's an unmitigated disaster for the people of the destabilized Middle East (or most of them) and for the people in America who are paying for it in blood, sweat, and tears.

I'd be more inclined to think that Sanders was put up as a choke artist for Hillary first and foremost, but also as a test probe in order to gauge the success of the communitarianism programming operations here in the US.  Very good demographic data came out of his candidacy, and it continues to be useful for Clinton/Soros as a scapegoat for their own extremely dirty use of the astroturf agitation using MoveOn, BLM, and probably others.

Of course Sanders himself would not be aware that he has been used like a bitch, and probably isn't smart enough to figure it out on his own.

Come up with a way to be SURE that a 'universal income' system does not turn into a totalitarian nightmare with 'inequality' like the world has never see, which will be nearly impossible to reverse, and which it is almost certain.  Do it BEFORE implementing such a solution.  We need a very strong 'poison pill' against such a thing else it seems to me completely inevitable and I'll take my chances on the Mad Max side and work toward that outcome.  Simply put, this would be a preferable way for humans live as I see it as bad as it sounds.

Let's talk a little bit more seriously about some of the concerns about Donald Trump that people may have (this being the most active thread on the guy.)  I am much more hopeful about him than I thought I would be before studying things, but concerns definatly remain.  Including the very real possiblity that I myself might have been completely chumped (though it seems unlikely given the fairly unmistakable animosity toward him from some of my most bitter enemies.)  Glad to have either pro or con information presented.

---

Even though I'm not 100% sure that Snowden is 100% legit, it does at this point seem likely...  Probably my biggest beef with Trump is his stead-fast and solid negativity toward Snowden.  Often, if one listens carefully to Trump, he is actually give a little bit of flexibility.  Not in the case of Snowden.  And if Snowden is legit, there are some very important reasons why his actions have a lot of positive rationals.

I have some serious concerns that a Trump presidency could be a lot more power-centralized authoritarian than I would like and would respect individual 'liberty' a lot less than I would like.  Generally I have heard Trump say very little about individual liberty.  Hopefully Wilikon can come up with some www-scanning goodness to put my mind a bit more at ease.

I would prefer an authoritarian nationalist regime under Trump than a one-world one under the UN, but both are pretty unpalatable to me.  I see the latter as a given on the course charted by Bush, Obama, Hillary, Gore, Biden, etc, and the same under the Republican puppets albeit perhaps a bit farther out.

---

My best hope for Trump is that he actually does see the reality and the danger of the NWO project _and_ had decided to fight it for real.  Unfortunately, to have a snowballs chance of doing so will require a great deal of cunning and a lot of trade-offs in terms of 'bringing to justice' some of the perps.  Simply uttering some stary-eyed vision of an ideal world will not get the job done.  Deals will have to be made.

As I've alluded to before, finding people who both agree in principle with the destruction of the NWO project AND have the insights and connections to pull it off will probably be necessary.  With this in mind, what do people think about the guy's trial-balloons about NATO and his foreign policy advisers.  Quite frankly, a quick glance at the names and resumes is not exactly what I would consider reassuring.  Anyone stumbled across some critical analysis of this?

I really have to wonder if there has not been some sort of physical damage to the younger generation which has interfered with their ability to express masculine characteristics in both physical and mental form.  XY people that is.  If so, it may not be reversible.  So you may be correct that Trump could not make certain people 'grow a pair' no matter what he does.

I would note that the idea of modulating sexual expression in order to achieve social goals is not a new idea.  It's been talked about and written about for at least one hundred years.  People have had a rough idea of how to do it since the phenomenon of the freemartin condition in cattle was observed.  As technology and scientific understandings progress it becomes almost trivial to do these sorts of things.  As Dr. Strangelove says, 'It requires only the will to do so."  Of course forced vaccinations and individualized medical records could streamline such programs.

Maybe the kids could be rounded up in the areas North of Damascus, stockpiled for a while, then gassed to death in order to get some photo-ops to help frame Assad for using poison gas.  Just an idea...and one which there is some evidence to suggest might interest a person like Hillary Clinton or John McCain.

The story of the NK-33/RD-180 engine is really amazing for people interested in this kind of thing.  Here's a documentary about it:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMbl_ofF3AM

I really think that no matter how things turn out, the Trump phenomenon will end up undoing several years worth of Leftist indoctrination implanted by schools.  This because over the course of the remainder of the election cycle there is no way to keep a lid on the utter bullshit and inversion of truth being promulgated by the media.  The way the 'progressive' machine works is to make sure that the minions stay boxed into a set of information channels and are pretty much physiologically incapable of break out them.  I suppose the 'regressive' do this also, but I would not know first hand.  (I suspect less because if they are regressive in the first place they somehow missed out on some of the early programming.)  Anyway, if/when this thing comes down to Trump vs. whoever the dems choose all of these chickens will come to roost for a lot of people.  It's just to much time and Trump is to interesting to keep the cooker from boiling over.  And when it does, it will open a lot of currently closed eyes.

American tradition is to offer the delivery person a bong hit.  At least here on the Left coast.  In my experience, few refused.  Don't try this with the robot or you are likely to be reported to the authorities.

I wonder how long it will be before these delivery robots are offering to take care of your monthly mandatory vaccinations along with the complementary packets of crushed red peppers and parmesan cheese.

...ahead of schedule, under budget...and he got the Russians to gladly pay for it.

Something interesting made it through youtube's filter and into the results of my search for the string 'trump':

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Bt6b8PPP0

If this guy is faking some made-up thing, he's one of the more skilled actors I've seen in a while.

What the guy is saying aligns fairly well with what I could determine about the Trump rallies by observing things as carefully as I can.  It is as obvious as the nose on one's face that what the media across the spectrum is selling is a load of bullshit, but if one looks a little more closely then a more clear picture starts to come into view.  Even so, I didn't expect the disruptors to be as numerous and as active as the guy describes.

In spite of his being the weakest candidate they could find, Sanders still gave her a pretty good run for her money.  That speaks volumes about the weakness of her candidacy.

Fortunately for the Dems, Hillary can bail any time she needs to.  Lynch simply needs make some noise about the e-mails and Hillary can duck out and preserve a modicum of dignity.  What she'd need it for I have no idea.

So you choose Hillary now that you've finally come to understand that we were right and Sanders never had a snowball's chance?

Well put in spite of it being fairly clear that English is not your first language.

I believe that citizens cannot make rational decisions based on false information.  I believe that the United States embarked in earnest on a series of efforts in the Middle East and in other parts of the world which did not serve the interests of the citizens at large, and I believe that the 9/11 false flag was the kingpin which made this possible.  As long as people remain are vulnerable to these types of psychological operations, they and our nation will be at risk for the same type of misfortune going forward.

I have a somewhat nuanced view of these things.  I believe it to be most likely the case that we would have experienced an economic collapse probably 10 years ago had we not 'done' Iraq.  So, it is at least arguable that it was 'in our best interest', but I would take the counter-point.  Had we experienced a collapse 10 years ago, we would probably be in the re-building phase now.  We did not 'stop' a catastrophe but rather simply kicked the can down the road.  We also did extreme damage to our place in the world which will be forever damaging to many millions of Americans and non-Americans alike.  To put it in metaphysical terms, we 'sold our soul'.  Or, considering Vietnam and like operations, at least we made another scheduled transaction.

Trump's no-brainier for Secretary of Defense:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFsQtlRqq6E

I've been universally impressed with Maj. Gabbard for being a straight talker in every interview I've seen.  And as a former military myself, I strongly agree with her stance that we should not be fighting unethical and counter-productive wars to enrich a few elites.  Also, of course, that we should take care of the soldiers who were damaged by past leaders who had no compunction about doing this.  If Trump is to be believed, his stance is pretty similar.

I don't care if the woman is a Hindu or a vegan or whatever.   She might even be a decent choice for VP if Trump need to fight and win against a Republican sponsored dedicated choke artist for the purposes of installing Hillary.

---

BTW, can a VP be a naturalized citizen?  I mean, there is an argument to be made that if he/she assumed the presidency it would break the (possibly already broken) rule about the president being born in the U.S.  It does strike me that if Lieberman held dual US and Israeli citizenship, that is a much more compromising position in the real world.  It did back in the Gore/Lieberman days, and that was before most of us realized just how much of a threat to the nation he was.  Or what a threat Gore was for that matter.