You guys keep blowing me away with all of these applications, it's almost impossible to just pick one of you but this time the decision fell on giving Globb0 a chance.
We are once again FULL & CFNP!
Thanks for taking the time to look through the applications. I wouldn't like to manage just one campaign, so to do multiple campaigns simultaneously is saying something.
|
|
|
Hey IB, that bitch Lauda booted me from second place of most recognized. Do you have a secondary sort on those now? Lauda and I are both 967, but Lauda is ranked before me. Is it profile name, profile id or just sql default? If the latter, then I assume we will bounce back and forth between 2/3 on refreshes. https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostrecognized(I noticed the report can't be accessed from the main page title anymore...) There are many instances of profiles having the same rank on the various lists. If I can make a suggestion for the group to consider - say three people hold the rank of 21 e.g. instead of giving the next user the rank of 22, the next user is actually rank of 24: Name Score Rank
Alice 1234 20 Bob 1202 21 Hank 1202 21 Sue 1202 21 Fred 1138 24 I think various sports such as the Olympics use that style of ranking. Thanks for reading.
|
|
|
Third time's the charm as they say: Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361 Current amount of posts (including this one): 5,375 How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 79 SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: 33ibycyDdL1U8Jx56qTLDRjApNMLCDePaT
|
|
|
Is there any way to scroll past JollyGood's thousands+ distrusts? https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx(It just goes on-and-on...)
I also can't search any user name on that page.
|
|
|
That was a Joke, you do not need to check the writing part.
I am happy with bi weekly payments,the amount looks bigger than once a week payment.
I would be preferred to be told that there is a variation to the terms of the Signature Campaign from either the Campaign Manager or the owner of the campaign, or, at the very least, an announcement that payments are delayed.
|
|
|
There goes your "L" theory
I just don't understand. Previously, everyone ru DT1 who added a user be.open to the trust list, get ~. And now he's back in DT1. So what was the point of all this fighting with other people's trust lists? Then why be.open isn't on the blacklist for DT1? Couldn't anybody alert theymos about this?
The DT gangs that Troll the forum will look in the mirror and see a shadow that must be put down. Kind of sad really. Be your own self and decide for yourself who you trust or distrust and don't let them influence you - it's only for their own gain, not yours.
Okay, guys! I deleted my review! And I also removed be.open from my trust-list!
bones261 is another one who rolled over and played dead when told to. Must be embarrassing (being you) grovelling to the DT Trolls.
|
|
|
I tried unsuccessfully overnight to join their new Signature Campaign. What struck me was those chosen typically had just five or six merits and their post numbers where barely into the thousands. My own merit count in the last 120 days stands at 79 and my post count is close to 5,400. It's not sour grapes - the Campaign Manager can choose as he pleases, but I'm wondering if there's a connection between the CM and the previous games? OP: You've been monitoring these shill game sites, - have they used the same CM? Are the participants of the SigCamp's the same users (ie shill accounts)??
|
|
|
If you change these to this code: [img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-0.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-1.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-2.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-3.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-4.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-5.png[/img]
[img]https://8coins.org/media/dapp-builder-6.png[/img] They should now work for you. Regards,
|
|
|
You could always run the SigCamp yourself and have a middleman/escrow hold the funds that you want to use as payment for the campaign. It's a lot of work, but as Yahoo said, you'll end up with the cheapest Campaign Manager if aren't prepared to pay for what you want.
|
|
|
Am applying for the available slot: Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361 Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 5,365 SegWit BTC address for payouts: 3BMkzAjBerXVuZNiXyrkuTriHLpT1WJDuZ EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 79
|
|
|
5% extra for every week delayed, ka ching! 🤑😈
There's nothing in writing that I can see to suggest a 5% compensation for late payment - and it didn't happen last time either.
|
|
|
Where was the distasteful joke in all of this ??
While it's true I found the prank slightly distasteful, I was then interested to read the methodology employed in "spreading" the fake disease. As theymos said it could be used as a study of interactions of totally random people in a completely safe environment.
|
|
|
That confirms it; theymos apparently thinks it's funny to joke about a disease outbreak that (by my guesstimate) will probably directly kill at least a million people
If you choose to see-as-evil acts which were clearly done in the spirit of fun & good faith, then you're creating demons for your personal living hell... Well - we are talking about Fauxpup after all...
This years' April Fool's Day prank may have been in bad taste, but as theymos pointed out in his thread on the subject: Note that I designed this "forum virus" to be easy-to-implement and interesting; my goal was not to create any sort of realistic coronavirus model. I suppose it could perhaps serve as an illustrative example of some general concepts, though, such as exponential spread. I do recall a couple of years ago the prank was the word Bitcoin which was inverted, but otherwise was an unremarkable year. Another year (??last year??) was a KYC prank with very dubious questions.
|
|
|
...
You "Quote from: xvids on February 16, 2017, 07:29:00 PM" doesn't have a corresponding URL - can you fix up you OP to reflect the link your quote is referring to please?
|
|
|
Let's get the party started! Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361 Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 5,362 BTC address for payouts: 369CLEotw9nrMWFBFX4CrkRBZwr9iwgh2p Earned merit in the last 120 days: 79
|
|
|
*Withdrawn*
(I didn't see the "share on social media" requirement)
|
|
|
Just a suggestion to any mods that might be reading - once there is confirmation that Bruno has logged off for the last time, perhaps this thread be locked to avoid any trolling by others?
|
|
|
I am a little confused about how many accounts Bruno had been maintaining, so I remain somewhat unclear about what my various interactions would have been with him over the years.
The ones that are almost certainly Bruno: - Phinnaeus Gage - held as collateral by darkstar_ at one point
- Gleb Gamow - sold to suchmoon
- YuTü.Co.in
- AGLD - although the link I have is inconclusive now.
I won't post the ones that are thought to be him as well. No point dwelling on that now.
|
|
|
Hi LoyceV, Just thought your readers might like to know that as well as paying little or next to no (1sat) fees to consolidate their transactions, they can also rebroadcast their transactions via the websites listed in this thread: [Guide] Broadcast Your RAW Transaction BTC & Alts coinsThanks for reading.
|
|
|
I believe still you could keep them in list, because still they would accept an offer which would pay more than their current campaign since they are free to leave any campaign at any time.
I couldn't agree more which is why I added this prior to my last edit on the 23rd of March: Long Term offers better than the current campaign will be considered. (No offers as yet) A few of the signature campaigns are now being run week-to-week and are paused on day seven then a day or two restarted - some people are leaving their signatures intact and reapplying. The campaign is effectively getting free advertising up to ten days for seven days pay.
|
|
|
|