It is posted in this GPG signed post that you quoted (the 3rd from the bottom line).

Great. See you in a few weeks

The loan has been funded via 53675725909630e271cbf265d834d2a600bae569a5b8b20b9edf2492ed8e4b2a

Check lowendbox.com they have many offers from various VPS providers and seem to do a fairly decent job of filtering out scammer sites.

I believe that OgNasty posted his escrow address upthread. I believe he normally charges 1% for his escrow services

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

The following additional terms would apply:
Loan amount: 200 LTC
Collateral 2.44 BTC to be held by OgNasty
Interest rate: 7% if repaid within 1 week
Interest rate: 8% if repaid within 2 weeks
Interest rate: 10% if repaid within 3 weeks
*If the loan is not repaid by 3 weeks + 2 days, then the collateral will be converted into sufficient LTC to repay me, and the difference will be returned to you (or if the value of the collateral is below an amount sufficient to repay me, you will owe me the difference). The reference exchange rate will be the lowest offer on bitfinex on the LTC/BTC trading pair
*If OgNasty agrees, he can use the BTC held as collateral to purchase sufficient LTC on an exchange to be used to repay the loan, and the balance of the BTC held as collateral can be subsequently returned to you
*LTC repayment address is: LNjsR4FNBrkAmwYEwYRqk4QdRR63QyNC8g
*The loan will be funded once OgNasty confirms receipt of the BTC held in escrow
*The terms posted in this thread are the terms of the loan, and no other terms posted in this thread will apply.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ezHB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

jonald_fyookball and I have come to an amended agreement so that the interest rate will be as follows:

7% for 1 week
8% for 2 week
10% for 3 week

If you follow his twitter, you will be able to reasonably conclude that he was extorted into signaling for SegWit.

The OP is a serial scammer. I suspect that most of his 'earnings' is from theft from others. 

If you wish to use escrow, then I would suggest OgNasty (I would ask that you cover his escrow fee). Otherwise I would ask that you send the collateral first, and when the loan is repaid to repay the loan prior to receiving the collateral back.

edit: If you are comfortable sending first, then please post or PM me a LTC address to fund the loan to and a BTC address to return the collateral to

edit2: I am signing off for the night. Please see below for a GPG signed offer for loan terms. If everything is in order, then please fund the collateral address. The offer will expire if the collateral is not sent to the below specified address by the below specified due date. I will fund the loan in the morning provided that the BTC is sent to the collateral address.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is quickseller from bitcointalk today is April 15, 2017

Borrower: jonald_fyookball (UID# 261027)
Lender: quickseller

Loan Amount: 200 LTC
Repayment amount: 214 LTC[1]
Due date April 21 2017 by 2359 Eastern Time (US)

Collateral: 2.44 BTC
BTC address lender will hold collateral in: 16diUsZz3Z9HMaP7xWGSubVbmHH1PXcVuq
BTC address collateral will be returned[2] to (less tx fee): [tbd]

LTC address to fund loan: [tbd]
LTC repayment address: LSjqeWBLJeRmYj3DcAxuqQChoJnDoBpkr5

[1] - If loan is repaid by April 22, 2017 (24 hours late), then repayment amount is 219 LTC. If the loan is not repaid by May 4 2017, then it will be converted into 221 LTC, and the balance will be returned to you (or if the value of the collateral is not sufficient to purchase 221 LTC, you will owe me the remaining amount to purchase the difference between that the collateral purchased and 221 LTC).

[2] - (see [1] and) The collateral can be exchanged into LTC upon your request via bitfinex that would be used to repay the loan (bitfinex trading fees would be covered by you).

Regards
QS

This offer will expire and will become invalid if 2.44 BTC is not send to the collateral address by 3 PM EST (US) April 15, 2017.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8T9X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

7% for 1 week (I could go to 3 weeks, but would want a higher interest rate). Interest amount would be fixed at 214 LTC, regardless of when the loan is repaid, unless it is repaid 24 hours+ after the due date.

If loan is repaid within 8 days (24 hours late), then repayment amount is 219 LTC. If the loan is not repaid within 19 days, then it will be converted into 221 LTC, and the balance will be returned to you (or if the value of the collateral is not sufficient to purchase 221 LTC, you will owe me the remaining amount to purchase the difference between that the collateral purchased and 221 LTC).

Collateral will be 2.44 BTC. The collateral will not be automatically liquidated if it's value falls below any threshold. The collateral can be exchanged into LTC upon your request via bitfinex that would be used to repay the loan (bitfinex trading fees would be covered by you).

Collateral can be held in a wallet whose private keys I control, in my bitfinex account (for quicker conversion into LTC if you wish to trade the BTC for LTC to repay the loan), or by a mutually agreed upon escrow. I will assume counter-party risk if collateral is held in my bitfinex account, I will assume responsibility to maintain the security of the BTC in my wallet, and you will assume counter-party risk if collateral is held by a mutually agreed upon escrow.

Let me know if the above terms are acceptable to you, and if not, what modifications you would propose.

What interest rate are you offering?

If you bothered to read his post you would see that the ban duration was stated

~2 days ago f2pool said they are a long term holder of btc and were not signaling for SegWit because they thought SegWit will damage Bitcoin over the long run.

They also said that they were signaling for SegWit on litecoin because they don't care about litecoin nor do they hold any litecoin. They also said they started signaling for SegWit out of fear of DDoS attacks.

Within a day of saying the above, they were the subject of a substantial DDoS attack, that was large enough to actually take them offline for about 45 minutes (their website for longer). Very shortly after coming back online they announced they will support SegWit.

Anyone exercising reasonable judgement should be able to connect the dots.

This is not true. The required fee to get a transaction confirmed has risen substantially over the past few days based on the artificial fee market. If these were low/no fee transactions then the required fee would have stayed the same.
Also not true. Even if you were to only look at transactions into and out of exchanges cold storage, then most transactions would not meet your criteria if you define "substantial sums of money" in line with the global economy.

If you look at Bitcoin transactions then almost all transactions are around your explicit definition of what Bitcoin transactions should not be.

It looks like they were DDoS'ed into signaling for SegWit.

You can do this for free with OpenVPN. DigitalOcean even has a guide on how to set this up.

For clairification, it is the opinion of f2pool that SW is trash (which is a generally accurate representation) and fear that it will do long term damage to Bitcoin, which is also likely true, especially without any increase in the max block size.

Roger Ver is well within his rights to have his opinion and to tell other who are willing to listen what his opinion is.

I think the dump was more likely associated with f2pool announcing that they do not support SegWit on btc because they want the value of their btc holdings to increase over the long run, and their subsequent DDoS attack against them by who is likely to be Blockstream.

Not everyone wants to talk politics everywhere they go.

I suspect they want their chatbot to have a more friendly non-political discussion.

If neither proposal gets sufficient support, then neither will get implemented.

At this point, I don't think there is anything remotely resembling consensus for either proposal, and neither are likely to get implemented.