Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 03:42:29 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 »
4461  Economy / Economics / Re: Resellers, agorism, and economic consequences on: May 03, 2011, 02:22:06 AM
Actually I was asking if others believe resellers are a very inefficient form of agorism.

They are not inefficient in the case of hard to get goods. Think about the benefit face to face resellers of Bitcoins bring to this market.

4462  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 02:18:04 AM
The thought of a few slackers not contributing to a good cause seems less harmful than lucky creators using government force to ransom good ideas that are otherwise free to share.

The way the government handles IP doesn't make IP bad, only the government. The same could be said about regular property.

Quote
I claim that if you abandon property, it becomes unowned and I can claim it. Leaving your bike on my lawn overnight probably isn't abandoning it but leaving it there for year definitely is. I can't draw an exact time distinction between the two but there certainly is a difference.

Without knowledge of my intent, you are simply being violent. As I said, the only thing you can rightfully do, is to remove my property from yours. Or else, what if the cumulated time I left my bike on the curb amounts to a year, can you just pick it up and call it yours?

Nevertheless, this has drifted from the original point, on which I simply give up trying to prove my point. Good night to you, sir.
4463  Other / Off-topic / Re: Osama Bin Laden dead on: May 03, 2011, 02:08:43 AM
Vote for Ron Paul.  Tongue

In 2012, I only get to choose between a bunch of socialists and an angry dwarf. gj France.
4464  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 02:07:25 AM
You own the energy, not the pattern. Also, once you release energy back into the environment it becomes unowned abandoned property.

You come up with these as we go, don't you? And still, according to your rules, I can own that environment.

Quote
Do you think you can leave your bike on my property forever and I shouldn't be able to claim it?

Who said I'd leave it in your property? And even if it was, your only right is to remove my property from yours, not to bestow it upon yourself. Or else, are you going to claim what is mine simply because you touched it?
4465  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 02:04:16 AM
If you don't know that electromagnetism is one of the four fundamental physical forces found in nature then...  Undecided

That is not what I asked of you. I asked you to document me on how the application of an electric field with a magnetic field producing a electromagnetic force normal to the plane of those two fields consists in matter. There is a clear difference between fundamental and quantum physics.
4466  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:57:51 AM
People will contribute to the best of their ability. Plenty of researchers use funds that come from voluntary, non-refundable contributions already.

Yet, if every member of the group helped instead of hoping to get the cure for free, the research would go faster.
4467  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:54:21 AM
cannot do with my own brain.

First of all, I'm not trying to control anything. Your stance that IP defenders will resort to force is oblivious to the concept that IP and non aggression are perfectly compatible. If you don't respect IP, I simply stop considering such endeavor as profitable and will naturally reduce my output of such content to strict necessary levels.

Also, in this argument, I am not trying to control what you can do or not do with your brain, since you couldn't do it without my brain coming up with it first.

The point about the chair is that modification of shape does not nullify property. The design is an energy pattern in my head. Since energy is matter, then I own this energy. The fact that it is out in the public doesn't mean you can just take it. If I leave my bike next to a wall, would you take it? According to your very own point, that matter and energy are but the same, then an original energy pattern, where ever it stands, belongs to the designer.
4468  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:42:22 AM
Yes. Don't take my word for it. Look it up.

It is your part to provide documentation on that...
4469  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:41:05 AM
Right, so radio waves are physical?

Yes. Don't take my word for it. Look it up.

How do you argue against IP if you stand by that point anyways? If all forms are of either energy, matter, or both, and that energy and matter are equivalent, then intellect is as much of a property as anything else.

Am I sucking energy from your brain like some sort of psychic vampire? No. I get energy from the food I eat. I'm not sure what you're driving at.

Simple. You own a piece of wood. You shape it into a chair and it stills belongs to you. The only thing you applied upon it is work.

I own my brain. I formulate a design with it. By your standards, it belongs to me.
4470  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:38:10 AM
How do you argue against IP if you stand by that point anyways? If all forms are of either energy, matter, or both, and that energy and matter are equivalent, then intellect is as much of a property as anything else.
Perhaps you have to reject or at least redefine property then in order to reconcile the issue.

Something of that magnitude at least, indeed.
4471  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:37:47 AM
I should add that the author suggests government subsidy (instead of patent rights which are another type of subsidy) as a model for pharmaceutic research, which I now disagree with. I still think patents are bad though.

Naturally, if a group of people is affected by some illness and there is no cure, it is possible they'll pool their resources to fund the research of such a cure. The question is, how many of these people will participate in the funding, knowing that they could get the cure for free once it is discovered.
4472  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:32:51 AM
Energy is physical. Basic science isn't serious enough for you?

Right, so radio waves are physical?

How do you argue against IP if you stand by that point anyways? If all forms are of either energy, matter, or both, and that energy and matter are equivalent, then intellect is as much of a property as anything else.
4473  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:15:55 AM
I produce electricity, which is immaterial, at the cost of my resources.

Electrons are physical. Matter and energy are equivalent. Your argument fails.

You're going after the energy that is loaded in those electrons...

Quote
Matter and energy are equivalent.

Keep this serious please.
4474  Other / Off-topic / Re: Intellectual Property: Intellectually Bankrupt on: May 03, 2011, 01:06:04 AM
No need for weird sci-fi examples to discuss this point.

I produce electricity, which is immaterial, at the cost of my resources. Are you legitimate to plug your stuff on my power cable without my consent? According, to the "Libertarian" ideal, you wouldn't be stealing my power cable, only the energy it conducts. We can all see this is going to end bad.

Quote
While it seems obvious that without intellectual property laws, people would be harmed through the loss of created work, what goes unnoticed are the people that are currently harmed by the very laws meant to protect others.

This isn't a valid point. You can't bring is a purely pragmatic point into a fundamental discussion. The point isn't who is harmed the most, the point is "Is the product of my mind my property".
4475  Other / Off-topic / Re: Osama Bin Laden dead on: May 03, 2011, 12:53:57 AM
Who gives a s*** about that guy. On the other hand, if it results in withdrawing the troops out of Afghanistan, then that's actually a good thing.
4476  Economy / Economics / Re: Resellers, agorism, and economic consequences on: May 03, 2011, 12:47:21 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you are saying evading taxes hurts the economy?

I think he's saying that using inefficient means to avoid sales tax hurts the economy.  And it could be true that avoiding sales tax hurts the economy (if I waste a lot of time and resources to drive to the next state to buy something to save $.50 in sales tax, I actually cause damages to myself).

I see.
4477  Economy / Economics / Re: Resellers, agorism, and economic consequences on: May 02, 2011, 11:02:09 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you are saying evading taxes hurts the economy?
4478  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: How to lower memory clock to really low speeds? on: May 02, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
5850s don't like super low memory clocks.

As for MSI AfterBurner, you're supposed lower the ram to its lowest available setting, close it, then reopen it and you'll have lower settings available.

On 5xxx series, you can use AMD GPU Clock Tool, where you simply type in the value you want and set it.
4479  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Exchange Bitcoins for Paypal safely (starting in a few days) on: May 02, 2011, 02:10:15 AM
Will this service only be for people who live in Europe?

I'm from Canada. If I sold bitcoin on bitmarket.eu for Euros or any other of your supported currencies, will I be able to deposit this to my paypal account?

If you sent euros on a Canadian dollar based account, you'll incur exchange "fees", in the form of a really poor exchange rate.

Yes that is if I sent euros. If I were to receive Euros to my Canadian account it shouldn't be a problem I wouldn't think since at the moment 1.00 EUR = 1.40390 CAD.

Does this sound right or am I missing something?

Don't quote me on that, but I think that as long as the 2 parties based on different currencies, PayPal will use their "custom" exchange rate to perform the converstion.

Here's an example with EUR/USD (that I experienced personally). EUR/USD is at 1.4817 according to google. I send 100 euros to a friend in the USA, PP uses a conversion rate of 1.4317, and my friend receives $143 instead of $148.

Next, he sends me $100, PP converts in on a 1.53 basis, i get 65.3 euros instead of 67.5
4480  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Exchange Bitcoins for Paypal safely (starting in a few days) on: May 02, 2011, 01:58:06 AM
Will this service only be for people who live in Europe?

I'm from Canada. If I sold bitcoin on bitmarket.eu for Euros or any other of your supported currencies, will I be able to deposit this to my paypal account?

If you sent euros on a Canadian dollar based account, you'll incur exchange "fees", in the form of a really poor exchange rate.
Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!