Thanks for the sports picks
|
|
|
Not as much as I'd like to have.
|
|
|
Nice site, and good write up
They play pretty fair and don't mind the imitation. It is after all the biggest form of flattery. Thank you, Alan. I am flattered.
|
|
|
Thanks, i will place a bet.
|
|
|
Is it open source? I dont think it is.
|
|
|
Reserved. I like the look of the slots
|
|
|
Looks like you sent me a few bitcoins earlier (thank you, btw!) but I do have one complaint... is there some code that automatically bets your account balance when reloading the blackjack page? I loaded up 0.02+ more BTC a few minutes ago, and assumed (I know, bad idea) the site kept my last bet when I pressed "Deal", then realized my wager was my entire balance I just loaded (much to my disappointment, considering I lost...). If this is the case, it might be nice to maybe make the automatic bet when the page reloaded to be the minimum bet so the same doesn't happen to anyone else.
Let me look into this. I've also sent you a PM to further investigate this. Props to Victorhing - most reputable casino owner I've dealt with on the site so far. Quick reply to my problem and he even refunded the money I lost even though I told him he didn't have to. Coinroyale is the place to be! Victorhing - you should look at adding 3 card poker Roulette would also be very cool
|
|
|
Take a look at Bitcoin Reviewer's CoinRoyale review and leave your own rating of the casino! The graphics are very attractive, and we did not encounter any lag or bugs.
|
|
|
Once you actually think about things, a scam is pretty easy to spot.
This is obviously a scam because it works too smoothly. A real funds-pooling poker operation would never pay out a % on a random deposit made on any random hour of the day. They would need a cutoff time to take the whole balance to casino tables. To account for all of this, it would be a massive amount of work.
Next, it is unlikely that there would be absolutely no mismatch between what is deposited and what the players manage to wager. There would be problems; they would have a % win on what they managed to wager and that would have to be diluted among the deposits they didn't manage to wager. They would end up talking about this.
Then there's the aggressive referral system. 10%? Right.
Then, they claim to make "through reviews of bad hands." This is possible, but would take ages and is really impractical. No "pros" would allow themselves to have their plays reviewed by "managers."
Then, there's the neato uniform distribution of losses, almost 4-1-4-1-4-1. No two consecutive loss days. Right.
Then, there is no blog. That's where all the minor problems that an actual operation (of anything) would have been reported.
Then, there are the typos.
Then there's the claim of "best poker players in the world" that I didn't spot, which is ludicrous.
And of course, if you already knew about HYIP, you would pattern-match the +/- percentage scheme to other scams. A legitimate business would never adopt a scheme that would pattern-match so directly to known scam schemes.
The human race is intriguing. :-)
Here's their ad banner: It says "Invest in the world's best poker team". It is obvious that they are lying.
|
|
|
Good luck to everyone participating
|
|
|
everything hosted on free hosting with free domain(000webhost). u didn't even pay for domain, how u want me to trust u if u even didn't put any money upfront by buying domain? smell pumped traffic. can u show screenshot from analitycs source of your traffic?
thanks
weebly is a free web host. He's not using 000webhost.
|
|
|
You're not cool enough. Sorry mate Didn't you promise to leave the forum, and never return?
|
|
|
Cool concept. I wonder if it will ever take off.
|
|
|
Watchdogs ... love the interactive enviroments GTA + Uplink
|
|
|
What sort of penetration are we talking about here?
|
|
|
There are many legitimate (i think) pay per install programs out there. The ones that come to mind are OpenCandy, iLivid, and other downloads that you get "recommended" through ads/installers.
|
|
|
|