I stumbled across across a review of Obama Steaks:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxqsxQcJ7c

If you are among the swelling ranks of the outer party, pick one up when buying razor blades and enjoy it with a nice shot of Victory gin.

Moloch seems to be 'feeling the bern' pretty strongly.  That suggests that if your have a job, the answer is probably 'Yes'.

Whatever 'education' programs have been going on in Europe to create the environment and collapse we see over there, you can keep them.  I'd pay NOT to be educated that way (as do probably most of the 'elite') and just be left alone and I would flee to Africa or something if I had kids who were going to be forced in.  Not that our education system on this side of the pond is any better.  My sense is that the Europeans have been more malleable and the indoctrination/conditioning programs which pass for 'education' got going there earlier.  Certainly you guys fell victim to regionalization under the EU faster than we did and my research indicates that the education and the regionalization are two of multiple stepping stones toward the long desired and much talked about 'new world order'.

Oh ya, and Go Trump!  He has countless times mentioned how competitive and smart the Mexicans and Chinese and their leaderships are.  Never the Europeans for some odd reason.  He did mention in the debate today that he had always thought Merkel was OK but something went wrong with her recently and the Germans are paying a horrible price.  Both he and I share the bafflement about what the hell went wrong with her noodle?!?  Whatever it is, I doubt that Germany is going to have any better luck getting their gold out Trump then they had getting it out of Bush or Obama.  We probably sold it to China already.

I propose that Donald Trump has 'trolled his way to the top' (borrowed from tomonews) and has relatively carefully planned certain actions a couple of moves out.  One of these was the 'fascist salute' thing.  One night he did it one way which was harmless and funny.  The next night he did it a different way which was even more in harmless and fun.  Fairly quickly a bunch of left-leaning imbeciles jumped on it and tried to make it into a Hitler thing.  Trump then proceeded to make these people look petty and stupid and he continues to do it to this day.  That's how I see it at least.

Now the meat thing.  Romney started out by dis'n Trump steaks as a failed business venture.  Now the fun begins.  Trump responds with his press conference which resembled Home Shopping Network where he displayed all of the wares that Romney had hit on.  Including streaks.

Of course it is true that 'Trump Steaks' sold at the Sharper Image was a failure and defunct.  Trump seems to have purchased the steaks at a grocery, though one that one of his hotels or whatever uses for their kitchen from time to time.  Tactical error?  I argue not.  It was certain that reporters would figure out the 'scam' right away.  They even left the vendor's wrapper on the steaks just to help out.

I suggest that Trump (or someone in his campaign) realised that they could get the entire left-leaning media hyperventilating about his meat and looking like the poster child of desperate losers grasping at trivialities to smear him.  This will pay dividends as more important things come up later and people have become accustom to the idiocy of his detractors in the press.  He also may have calculated (correctly) that the Left has been completely conditioned for the war-on-cows by the agenda-21 nonsense and the sight of red cow flesh would drive them into a blind rage.

The poll is to see who agrees with me that Trump and/or his strategists are this smart.

----

As I was developing this theory, it occurred to me that a great punch-line would be something like "{Hillary|Biden|whoever} just doesn't seem to be able to keep their mind off my meat."  Sure enough, at the start of the debate tonight, Anderson Cooper just had to interject something about Trump's meat, and it wasn't even that graceful.  When I saw that, I went looking for an image of Cooper looking gay.  In doing so I ran across the fact that the guy really is gay!  I had not realized this.  My 'gaydar' never did work very well.

Reptilians have a cloaca.  Good enough for tribbing.

This whole gay thing is a pretty close match for the environmental movement.  Early on when there were genuine problems with pollution and habitat destruction driving species toward extinction and such, the environmental movement mobilized and turned things around.  Early on when there was some pretty ugly discrimination against gays, the gay rights and media and etc, took actions to 'normalize' homosexuality and attitudes moved to what I feel was the appropriate stance (e.g., 'Some natural fraction of people are homosexuals and who really cares if someone is gay?')

Both movements were, as I see it, taken over by people with a political and social engineering interest.  These engineers leveraged the momentum of these perfectly reasonable and necessary movements for their own goals and thereby turned them into a charade.  Very counterproductive.  If the legitimate people of both movements would have quit while they were ahead and rejected the usurpers, the world would have moved forward.  Now both movements are a joke and increasingly seen as a threat to humanity (by me at least.)

Oh fuck yeah!  Please, Please, Please make this mistake.

The fact of the matter is that the money flows associated with the 'science' behind 'global climate change' SHOULD be investigated.  Even this trial balloon is enough of an excuse to justify doing so if/when we have a non-globalist executive branch.  And there is a chance that that day is coming.

I'll predict it again just so I can come back and do a victory lap latter on:

 - Clinton finds herself running against Trump (only):  Charges move forward (briefly) so Clinton has an excuse to drop out and the Dems put in someone who might have a chance against Trump.  Biden's name has been floated.

 - Repubs figure out a way to get rid of Trump and put in another 'choke artist':  Lynch does nothing.

These people will stop at nothing to get whatever they and big pharma want mainlined into the systems of infants early and often.  It's creepy.

Word of advice:  The whole vaccination thing is a so crazy and there is so much information about how devistating it is to so many people that you don't want to explore that rabbit hole if you don't have a rugged constitution.

An infant's developing immune system actually does rely significantly on the mother's through breast milk.  This has been basically understood at all levels for a long while.  When I was in the military, one of the drill sergent's favorite insults was to postulate that "You must have been one of them Similac Babies" when someone was weak and sickly.

Basically, with vaccinations, the whole population outsources their health as it relates to immunity to the government.  The ecological factors at play over generations is utterly fascenating for those who enjoy science and numbers, but the TL;DR version is that we as a population become increasingly reliant on 'the system' for survival and protection.  This is exactly what the system wants for obvious reasons.  In the mean time more and more of us become mysteriously sick with weird ailments that cannot be cured but can be treated at significant expense which makes big pharma/med a gigantic amount of money.  It's pure unadulterated evil!

I've posted this already on various threads, but it's so worth contemplating that I'll do it again:


I muse that 'injunctions' could map to such things as mandatory vaccinations of mandatory curriculum a-la 'common core'.

Here was an interesting comment on that vid:

I find the idea that it is better to resolve a home invasion problem through intimidation than through maiming to be quite rational.  The idea that the potential to intimidate (or maim) by use of firearms stops a majority of potential problems before they start is, to me, obviously a good thing and clearly effective.

Greatest GIF ever for common core.  Notice the creepy apparatchik out in the hall keeping an eye on his his charges (both the indoctrinator and the indoctrinatees)?  Substitute him with the more modern form (an algorithm running in some corporate cloud) and you've got common core.

The girl obviously needs some re-education, but that would have been identified and dealt with back in pre-kindergarten.

...telling you to.

Actually, quit wasting your time and energy on Bernie at all.  The Democrat franchise of Establishment, Inc. dealt with him (aka, fucked him raw) at the appropriate time in the process.  He's goneski and their made [wo]man is installed.

It's to late for the less organized Republican franchise.  They'll have to lick their wounds for another 4 years and try to learn from their mistakes.  Don't matta to Establishment, Inc of course, except that they have the nuisance of trying to clean up after the Republican's mess.

I started trying to figure out Trump a few days ago.  When I sink my teeth into something I refresh youtube with a 'newest first' filter as one of the tabs I have open to see what people are pumping out (and to capture things before they are memory-holed which happens more and more lately.)

One interesting thing I noticed is that in a search for the string 'trump' there is not very much.  Not nearly as much as one would expect.  In order to overcome this challenge I can change the string to something like 'clinton' and pull up things with 'trump' in the title even but which don't show up on a search for 'trump'.

Right now there is a liberal show (which I'm listening to the Taabi part) live.  The next two are 5 hours old.  Then 12 hours old.  Then there is one which has been at the top of this list for days by a user named 'Donald Trump'.  The text that I can see says: "If you vote for me, I promise I will destroy I mean make America great again. ..." so it is safe to assume that it is not in fact 'the Donald'.  It has a big fat 'subscribe' button in the summary which does not show up for other vids.

Looks a lot like the tech sector is expressing their disdain for Trump in a way which is unusually transparent.  Time will tell if it bites them in the ass to be doing such things...or doing them in an obvious manner at least.

An alternate theory is that people who put up 'trump' content are not smart enough use keywords like 'clinton' folks, but even then there would need to be a 'glich' in the indexing algorithms to miss the string in the media title and description text.

I remember thinking that Hafez al Assad was pretty impressive in facing the challenges as well as he did.  Bashar didn't even want the job and only took it because his brother died.  When he took over I knew that his challenges would exceed even those of his father and I thought to myself on day one of his presidency that he was going to be challenged even more than his father and it would be unlikely that he, or anyone else, would be up to the task.  I suspect that he was lucky to have his adversaries underestimate him, but holding out and holding Syria together until this day is a testiment to his capabilities on their own merit as well.

The point you make about the strength afforded by organizing in a secular manner is a good one.  That takes one huge opportunity to 'divide and concur' away from the adversary.  It is a thing that I hope will be recognized by 'the masses' as we watch the elite try to guide us forward.  Witness their population mixing strategies as expressed by various 'immigration' policies as one example.

So do the soldiers of our minion quasi-nations in Europe.  That is to say, they go and fight where they are told to by US executive power.  I guess that makes some sense since there is not much left of the former nations to defend as they fold into the EU.


What's the difference between today's modern police state of France and the Vichys?

Answer is: - you guessed it.

When one gets to the point of needing self defense, the situation is utterly serious and it would be unwise for most people to be making less than a 100% effort to defend themselves.  Bonking a home intruder on the head with a frying pan makes for good comedy on TV but has a very good chance of working out poorly for the defender in real life.

Arguments for less-than-lethal ammo can be made both ways (and have on this thread.)  I personally still keep that as an option, but it is mostly because my biggest threats are against large animals which I don't normally wish to kill, and I can switch over in less than one second.  As long as I can keep my head together in an emergency situation which hopefully I'll never be in.

WhatHuh?  I'm nearing 50 and am still fairly strongly conditioned to feel some combination of guild/shame/fear about saying anything which could be construed as negative toward 'the Jews'.  That usually translates into saying nothing at all.  It's probably part of a strategy and a design.  Thinking back, it probably has something to do with the endless discussions about the holocaust and such that the school curriculum was saturated with.

Now it could be that Sanders and other Jews feel some discomfort that people may feel things about them that they are restricted from expressing.  That's a trade-off.  Whatever the case, all of the 'hostility' does not seem to have kept Sanders from office and eventually doing amazingly well in a run for the presidency.  Plenty of other Jews have overcome these tremendous obstetricals to meet success as well it seems.  I guess Jews are unusually superior in some ways or they've been overplaying the disadvantages dealt to them here in the U.S.  I suspect there is an element of both at work here.

I'll guess that Trump is like:  "Oops.  Did I get 'hacked'?  Oh golly gee, whatever am I going to do?"

The idea that Trump is a RINO is neither big news nor is it necessarily something without an upside.  Especially when he's up against Clinton.  That this 'hack' happened at this time mainly tells me that Trump has stopped bothering to worry about the remainder of the 'republicans.'

Voicemail hacks are as old as the hills.  If Trump doesn't have better IT security by this time I seriously doubt that he would have gotten this far.  I'm not buying it.