Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 03:32:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 [227] 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 ... 334 »
4521  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE: Super-lightweight HW wallets and offline data on: November 21, 2013, 01:48:21 PM
Well I think we are getting off topic here - but just wanted to add my support to etotheipi's idea as I have also created an offline tx signing system (which has no blockchain and just does signing) and it would very much benefit by knowing the tx fee.

As I use QR codes and want to keep the information transferred offline to a minimum I think something along the lines of his suggestion would be a very good idea.
4522  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How do you plan to deal with your bitcoin in feature? on: November 21, 2013, 11:19:37 AM
How do you plan to deal with your bitcoinBTC in feature?

Did you mean to say "in your bitcoinBTC feature" (as in "feature length film")?

If so I will be sure to give it a prominent role.

Cheesy
4523  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cost and Confirmation time of Bitcoin Transactions on: November 21, 2013, 11:01:42 AM
And there is another issue - in case your tx stuck, in most (in all?) clients it is not possible to increase fee. It can be done by sending same tx with different fee, but why there is no such option?

The problem is that you cannot send the same tx whilst the old one is known to the network (any attempt to do so will simply be ignored as a "double spend" attempt) so it is not something that can very easily be handled by clients (basically you have to wait until the old tx has been "forgotten" before you could send a "replacement" tx).
4524  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cost and Confirmation time of Bitcoin Transactions on: November 20, 2013, 05:02:20 PM
I use it for my automated backend and I have to drop to a lower level command to force a tx when I have funds but they are unconfirmed and I need it to go out immediately. I actually wish sendtoaddress had a [minconf=1] option with a default of 1 that would allow finer control but it doesn't.

A couple of times I have resorted to doing a "getrawtransaction <id>" then pasted the raw tx into https://blockchain.info/pushtx (and that has actually worked).
4525  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cost and Confirmation time of Bitcoin Transactions on: November 20, 2013, 04:47:58 PM
No. 19VuPF5XHfp435YBMG3f1F3oXZ9BvS2eTe is not in the wallet. You seem to be under the erroneous impression that some sort of black-art has been attempted with Bitcoin daemon that's gone awry. I'm telling you now that the only command that has been fired at BitcoinD to make it spend the Bitcoins is "sendtoaddress".

In this case I would be reporting a bug (those higher level RPC commands should not be like the raw tx ones).
4526  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I need help (transactions will not confirm) on: November 20, 2013, 03:23:42 PM
I recall that the coins will be returned if it doesn't confirm in 72 hours or something like that.

The bitcoin-qt client will keep trying to resend the tx forever until you remove it (my advice for a tx like that would be to use pywallet to delete it then wait for a day before trying to send another tx that has an appropriate fee).
4527  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cost and Confirmation time of Bitcoin Transactions on: November 20, 2013, 03:14:00 PM
Certainly right now clients should probably all be at least including the minimal fee at the moment (I changed my bitcoin-qt's setting to 0.0005 after having several very slow and later two stuck txs).

The other problem here is simply that currently (as in the current version of) Bitcoin does not scale - so until this is better resolved then there is simply nothing else that can be done (although at least if miners included closer to the 1MB of txs per block we'd have far less backlog).
4528  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: What does it mean when a transaction has -000 at the end? on: November 19, 2013, 12:15:13 PM
It's a bit annoying (and it would be good if there was an option to remove this *feature*) but the -000 (or -001 or other number) is the "vout" for the transaction item listed (am assuming the reason is if you send to more than one address that you end up with one transaction item for each although I haven't actually tested that).
4529  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin-QT sent transaction not working or just delay on: November 19, 2013, 12:10:07 PM
If your transaction is not showing up on blockchain.info then it hasn't been broadcast to the network.

Your client will periodically attempt to resend it but if it needs a fee and doesn't have one (possible if your bitcoin-qt isn't up to date) then it simply won't be forwarded by any peer (and therefore will never even make it to a miner).

If this is the case then you could use "pywallet" to remove the offending transaction from your wallet or if you don't think you're up to doing that then you are probably best to ask for someone to help out.
4530  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bad news for BTC-devs!? on: November 19, 2013, 09:31:32 AM
If that argument is allowed, then why should it not be possible through the camera. An adversary generates a "magic" QR code (same as the magic audio or USB hijack), which causes the camera to create some sort of malicious code that causes the offline computer to be infected.

All of them are a far stretch, which is the point I was trying to make.

There is no "code" transmitted via QR - just an unsigned raw tx (which you can check before signing).

So it is not a question of malicious code - there is *no code* at all.
4531  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bad news for BTC-devs!? on: November 19, 2013, 09:23:33 AM
QR codes have a pretty limited capacity but I have been experimenting with animated QR codes (like a flipbook of codes) for passing larger amounts of data.

I use an old e-book that has a built in "slideshow" function for all the photos in a directory - currently am only using it with my offline computer (to move new addresses to the online computer) but am thinking of buying another one for the online computer (as they are dirt cheap devices).
4532  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BTCchina on: November 19, 2013, 09:10:37 AM
Anyone else have an idea on this? I tried to deposit coins and they now have over 50 confirmations. Looks like the price might be artificially high if people are having problems moving coins and selling them on the exchange. All the exchanges are so out of whack it is hard to get a good idea on an "average price."

It appears they are delaying deposits until long after they are being made (and this could be being done on purpose to try and prevent a crash although I'm sure they wouldn't say so).
4533  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bad news for BTC-devs!? on: November 19, 2013, 09:07:21 AM
The offline computer wouldn't trust the online computer.   The online computer is simply used for blockchain data and to broadcast the offline signed transaction. 

Exactly - I use QR codes for the CIYAM Safe and it does feel a lot safer to be completely "air-gapped".
4534  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Google Authenticator on a smartphone on: November 19, 2013, 02:32:22 AM
do you have then to each time declare which site you are using in your smartphone or the popping number is valid for both sites?

It shows multiple numbers on the main screen (mine currently has 3).

You just need to make sure you add each new account with its secret key (can be done via QR code assuming your phone has the software).
4535  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Google Authenticator on a smartphone on: November 19, 2013, 02:16:04 AM
Authenticator handles multiple accounts so should be no problem with that (and yes I have tested it with more than one website).
4536  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Why did this transaction send bitcoins back to itself? on: November 18, 2013, 01:49:47 PM
It just looks like the "change" was sent back to the original address (easy to do using "Coin Control" or by rolling your own "raw transaction").
4537  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Double spend of bitcoin? How is that possible, please explain with simple words? on: November 17, 2013, 11:58:47 AM
but how to pay for transaction fee?

There should be a setting in your Bitcoin client for a "minimum transaction fee" - I would advise setting that to at least 0.0001 and perhaps to 0.0005 to get a higher than average priority (if an even higher fee is required the client should warn you and get you to accept adding that fee before the transaction is sent).
4538  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Double spend of bitcoin? How is that possible, please explain with simple words? on: November 17, 2013, 08:55:33 AM
0-confirm means the tx is valid but hasn't been included in a block yet.

And important to note that a "0 confirmation" tx could end up disappearing altogether despite being "valid" if it has not managed to gain sufficient priority after a certain amount of time (which generally occurs due to no fees being paid for the tx) - so I would recommend you always at the very least wait for 1 confirmation.
4539  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Double spend of bitcoin? How is that possible, please explain with simple words? on: November 17, 2013, 08:50:23 AM
So 6 confirmations usually is enough right? For example if I have 6 separate computers running bitcoin client and connected at the same ISP and when i transfer bitcoins, lets say, to Bob, is it possible to force those 5 computers to make confirmation for my transaction and that way make coin transfer faster?

Your computer(s) is/are irrelevant as only "miners" are involved in constructing new blocks which are the "confirmations".

So just be patient and wait - and for smaller amounts (especially in person) I myself am normally satisfied with just one or two confirmations.

Also try not to get too excited about the price - it tends to go up and down quite a bit when you decide to get on board the "Bitcoin ride". Smiley
4540  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: "This connection is untrusted" - bitaddress.org on: November 17, 2013, 08:44:55 AM
The bitaddress page should be downloaded from the repository and run offline in just about every scenario one can envision:
https://github.com/pointbiz/bitaddress.org

Yes - do this (same goes for brainwallet.org).

To download just click on the "Download ZIP" button on the right side of the page.
Pages: « 1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 [227] 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 ... 334 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!