These are from a few hours ago. There's a lot of reports.
Don't worry, because reports to get through and they are looked at.
But FUD is not moderated. Spam is.
P.s: They literally don't get paid that much. It's almost considered free work from them.
They get paid a decent amount. |
|
|
|
Anyone wants to know how Poker Mavens shuffle works just play at two table at the same time, you will find something very interesting. As well try to go 100 (80/20) hands all in against the bot and see who will win 95 % of the time regardless you had better starting hand.
What range are you going all-in with? If it's not AKo, AKs, TT+ then you're losing more than half of the time. Source: Poker Equilab [after checking the all-in ranges of the bots]
Edit: so far I've made about 5x my deposit in profits. |
|
|
|
Actually im in profit.....and this has nothing to do with variance....won total less than 5% 80/20 preflop all ins....rest of them bots won....thats variance?
If you mean that the chances of winning were 4:1 then all I can say is that you're unlucky (or exaggerating). It can happen. Myself, I've won a lot of bad flips on account of not paying attention. Bots only go all-in on premium hands. Play accordingly. |
|
|
|
Hi,
Report :
-Many deleted or unconfirmed posts,
-Young account,
-Living in the USA, which as not French as a national language
This message is what I noticed, just by observing her profile.
Objectively: Activity =/= Posts, and the post count can be higher than the activity count. That's just how BCT works. Age is irrelevant. Location is irrelevant.
LAETI also said that she is from Quebec (Canada), Virginia is a state in the Southeastern United States ... this makes no sense at all
One can be born in a country and live in another.
But I will admit I caught some errors in their work. |
|
|
|
There were people mentioning that we should revert the balance to the moment before cancellation and this would be the easiest and acceptable solution for everyone, however (unfortunately) this is not technically possible, we just don't have this possibility.
This is your PM to me: If he would just agree to make one more deposit (we actually never asked to deposit 5btc, anything above 0.01btc is eligible) we would've just add his amount as a bonus as a "consolation".
Then why didn't you just send 2 BTC to his deposit address? |
|
|
|
Regardless fast cashouts this is just another scam bitcoin casino like every other. No integrity at all, no RNG ...made to take as much bitcoins as possible from people......
Seems to me that you were just drained from the variance. Don't elaborate on anything, oh no.
My withdrawal was not as quick. It took around half a day to get it confirmed but it's not too bad. (Faster than some fiat sites). But there's no way around it. Once we have enough real money players we will eliminate the bots altogether.
The worst part about the bots is that they're not on higher stakes, haha. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply. In that case, I think its best if people stop playing poker on the site. Not acting on it, could only mean they don't take poker seriously and will only act on it if people stop playing or boycotting their poker platform.
Not going to happen anytime soon. There will be new players because: a) colluders will be playing b) freeroll whores will be playing c) higher stake players (outside of colluding zones) will be playing
Why do we care if collusion is not stopped at the micro level? Because it sets a foundation of security. If NS is unable to catch the most basic colluders what makes a player feel safe at the higher stake levels? |
|
|
|
Still catching a lot of cheating going on and the 9 ring tables for .02/.04 seem to be a cesspool lately.
Chased about 6 accounts around trying to swap hands and I still find it hard to believe that Nitro can not get this figured out!
You want me to put you guys on blast again or you going actually do something?
I think you should just post the list of players to get them banned instead of mentioning how many players you caught. Probably less of a priority for nitrogen mainly because their main earnings are through their sport book and not much from other games. I think you should just read. Sadsong and I have already compiled the hand history of many, many users. Here's the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917896.msg19022379#msg19022379
I've already asked NS multiple times why known colluders (from May) have not yet been banned. It has still not been answered and was just tossed under the rug. You realize you said the same thing about Sadsong's thread, to which there were two players identified in it that are still playing to this day?
I am asking quite simply why those two have not yet been banned. The evidence is straightforward and obvious. They were colluding and folded to one another repeatedly, playing a hand fully every once in a while as to not arouse suspicion.
The players in question are samony and flaxuz. They were identified back in May and it is July now.
|
|
|
|
I just noticed that your tables allow duplicate IPs. By ticking that off you can probably eliminate basic colluders. I was hesitant to post this given that (what I suspect are) the bots are really, really easy to take money from. (I won't say my strategy, but it's simple enough after a couple hundred hands of analysis)
Any reason why the chat is disabled, by the way? |
|
|
|
Correct because if you cancel the bonus after two rolls you won't lose your whole balance. Just a small amount. The locked balance is getting bigger while rolling. So get your stats right first before starting such sad site  I bet my entire balance two times. Two rolls. I win one and I lose the subsequent one. Locked balance goes up past my balance. I'm now forced to play. So get your stats right before starting such sad site  |
|
|
|
how people can say about this site as scam, this site is one of the most trusted sites i ever know, never have problems with bonus or deposits or withdrawals, so if some one donīt want to play with a bonus just dont claim it and itīs done, why allways make a problem for little things..
cheers!!
You can't read.
Our bonus policy was like this from the very beginning already for about 8 months and no one had a cancellation problem before.
That's a ridiculous line of thinking. You can't just shrug off the first incident like it means nothing. That's like justifying a ponzi site when the first person doesn't receive their deposit. "They've been paying out for years and this is the first time something happened!" No. |
|
|
|
|
There's already been so much discussion about this it's uncanny. You should have searched before posting and you would have realized that the donation amounts were back when it was to keep the forum running. Now with ads they're not necessary but since it is a Bitcoin-based forum, the prices stay the same, in terms of Bitcoins.
And don't beg.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears that regardless of whether the site is betking.io or not, links do not open when posted in the chatbox.
Also, test.betking.io counts as an external link.
When logging off from an account, all actions (financial and user interactions) are from the new account but one is still able to chat in the account they were previously logged-in if it's in a new window.
|
|
|
|
Is there someone who has an idea of how to provide (create) a provably fair system for relations between the investors and casino ?
Thanks
THIS POST IS ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT PROVABLY FAIR IS A SCAM THE SERVER HAS CONTROL OVER WINS AND LOSSES NOT THE DICE or any random num gen. thank you for confirming you are a crook Thank you for proving that you're an idiot that can not read. 1) necropost 2) Baryom is asking for a provably fair system between investors and the casino, not between gamblers & the casino. The provably fair system on their site is functional and existent but he is asking for a way to prove that the site is not fooling future investors by manipulating the bankroll. You have a real problem with provably fair mechanisms, don't you? |
|
|
|
Reporting posts actually does something? What does the "83%" imply? 17% of your reported posts getting removed? 83% posts getting removed?
Do you actually notice any decrease in spam by reporting, or is it just an extra way to kill time?
Also, are you German or does the Pearls quote actually exist in the English language as well?
If you bothered to search in Meta you would find that 83% is the amount that were deleted. And reports are useful. |
|
|
|
-chunks-
Taken from your AICOIN thread.  de primes was changed to "de bountry" and AICPIN was just some translation error from Google attempting to autocorrect.
And how are you going to tell me you didn't pump the entire thing into a translator when you have this in the post? https://archive.is/BFbLh#selection-559.0-559.32[Taille = 14pt] [couleur = bleu]
|
|
|
|
If they donate anything to charity, it should be from the 7btc the user was ahead. If the user isn't refunded his 2btc deposit and they use that to donate to charity, i will never adjust or remove my rating.
OP should just be given 2 BTC. That was the user's intention, anyway. Their bonus terms were flawed and 100% in the houses favor. They are blatantly trying to screw you as a player if you accept the bonus. If your bonus is cancelled and you lose all your balance, then that shouldn't even be given as an option.
Bolded is true. I'll clear up the misconception which I myself believed.
The way it works is that the locked balance is subtracted from the player's current balance. The locked balance increases with gross profit but does not decrease with any losing wagers. What this means is that if someone bets their entire balance twice, winning and losing, then upon cancellation the locked balance will be greater than their current balance thus resulting in the entire balance being wiped. |
|
|
|
Hello there !
Once again, and because JohnUser is one too, I'm an English to French translator. It means my answer on this thread is not as valuable as the one from a french member not involved in bounties & translations.
Still, I can only confirm this person (LAETI) is not speaking a single word of french. I can't believe she actually opened a thread rofl.
It would be nice to see some frenchies here to confirm :-)
I've only done a couple years of French as a second language and can confirm that the quality is pretty bad. I only took a look at the first thread JohnUser posted here: that was enough.
Now you know how native English speakers feel about these non English speakers when they come to the English section and shitpost all over it.
Imagine if high-paying signature campaigns prioritized a local board |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
