Yes. However, there's no ETA yet for that.

None of those are DT members. Don't confuse having positive trust with being a DT member. Regarding the lower two:
Woshib has too much trust too quickly. It reeks of trust farming.
aTriz was already mentioned in a thread and one or two of his ratings were pulled IIRC.

4 DT members? Which ones?

In most cases, you won't know someones true intention until it happens. I don't blame anyone who becomes a collateral victim due to unknowingly promoting or managing a scam, given that the user does not have a history of doing this.

Sounds like a scam in the making.

Accepted.

Denied.

There are no slots for full members. What are you doing?

Your post quality is horrible. Therefore, no.

Marked for an upgrade.

Post from your main account pest. Your actions are so predictable.

You're out a of luck. VitKoyn messaged me first and was the first of you to join. Both of you ranked up around the same time.

---

Unfortunately, there is no full member slot as one of our members has ranked up in the meantime. Therefore, we now have a member slot available. I'm sorry if you've wasted your time, but there's nothing that could have been done to prevent this coincidence.
In the case that such a slot gets opened in the near future, all participants who applied since my last post will be considered and reviewed.

Those rates are still better than those of misdiagnosis or false conviction, so your complaints are just noise.

Payment for Week 7 has been released: a7980e5862615f2915168892561d71099dbd95434115097faf066ac918bb2cbb.

---

1 Full Member slot has been opened.

Optimize pseudocode and use a different syntax as well  

User constantly posts in those threads.
User proceeds to complain why they were SMAS blacklisted by Lauda.
User proceeds to complain why they were neg. rated for attempting to cheat by Lauda.

Sounds familiar?

You are confusing the "Sent to" field and quotes. Example: :



Example of a quote:

---

You can:
a) Quote the words of the person that sent you a message when responding (press the Quote button rather than Reply).
b) Quote anyone from anywhere and send that quote within a PM (they have no authenticity verification and can be spoofed).
c) Send a PM to yourself and other parties are the same time.

I've wrote a small psuedo-code script as an answer to your question:

Sounds nice.

Don't confuse nemgun with the whole NVO team. They are very different people working on Xenio and NVO.

They need to hire someone to do PR or community management. I have suggested this several months ago as well.

Quoted for reference of ban evasion.

Use the proper format and provide some proof:

Continuing from the duplicate thread:

No.

Scamming is also within the rules. Should I also stop tagging people for that just because it is within the forum rules?

12 (inclunding theymos).

That is absolute bullshit and you look like a clown just for recommending something like that. Easy rebuttal:
1. a) 51% of forum users is useless as a single user could outvote all the DT members by using hundreds of accounts.
    b) Votes from random account farmers, abusers, scammers or similar are useless.
2. This is a privately owned forum, not a democracy.
3. Of course I am touchable, otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation after I busted your army of accounts.

OP is a blatant liar. I do not do such thing.

They are outright baboons, yes.

Of course I am. If requested by hilariousandco or Blazed, I'd have to remove a rating or two.

It's quite simple: That's because I am right and they agree with me.

---

Anything else? Higher reasoning requires higher levels of education, which is not something often found with these random shitposters and farmers.

The year is 2017. Normal users do not make inquiries with intent to buy or sell accounts. Normal users do not abuse campaigns. Normal users do not farm accounts. Normal users do not scam others.

Let me guess first. You were tagged for one of the following reasons:
a) You were tagged for account sales in the past 7 days.
b) You were tagged for abusing bounty campaigns with multiple accounts.

Non hacked/stolen and non bitcointalk accounts, sure.

You mean the game where I literally donate hundreds of hours while trying to make this a better place?

You mean the problem where the people who deserve red paint actually get it?

Wrong.

You can also steal from others, but that doesn't make it right.

An act of such shadiness if definitely going to help you.

That is a blatant lie. DT1 members judge and determine who to place in their trust list, or who to exclude from their list.


*insert thank you gif*.  

---

@Title: To be any kind of "judge", I'd have to be at least a DT1 member or an administrator. The closest analogy would be some kind of "assistant" to the actual judges.