...
Bitcoin did not fail even if its worth 1$ . Price doesn't matter.
... Good point. The idiots who bought @ $1k just don't get it. |
|
|
|
...Forget about the profits you had for a moment and just watch this bear market...
Of all the goofy trading strategies, this one comes closest to guaranteeing loss. Impressive. |
|
|
|
|
This is 100% guaranteed to be the first ever profitable offering on Havelock.
Trust me.
~Happy Investing!
|
|
|
|
Go ahead troll dumpers, prove me wrong. Let's see this epic selloff you keep squawking about. Otherwise, this is the bottom. falllling, I'm waiting.   Image courtesy of NeoBee, Bitcoin's premiere bank. |
|
|
|
...China will claim to have defeated Bitcoin and will then point at the dollar. The USD will crumble faster than Bitcoin.
   Face the facts. |
|
|
|
...China will claim to have defeated Bitcoin and will then point at the dollar. The USD will crumble faster than Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
dead cat bounce brah...
Google bitcoin dead cat bounce results = About 24,400 results (0.29 seconds) Schrodinger's version: "A cat is placed in a box with..." Bitcoin version: "A dead cat is placed in a box with..." That's not a dead cat bounce. It's a financial term, not a physics term. It's been used by bitcoin trolls thousands of times and they are always wrong. Aaaah, got it! And all this time I thought we were talking about this:  |
|
|
|
MS is still operating. They have lowered their expenses. As long as they are providing a service to their customers we don't see any reason why the MS fund should be closed.
gg, Havelock, gg  |
|
|
|
dead cat bounce brah...
Google bitcoin dead cat bounce results = About 24,400 results (0.29 seconds) Schrodinger's version: "A cat is placed in a box with..." Bitcoin version: "A dead cat is placed in a box with..." |
|
|
|
Good news everyone! Trend reversal! Huge green candles in 3 min MACD!!1!  |
|
|
|
what's next, 345 or 375?
*345
 |
|
|
|
[wall-0-text]
[wall-0-typical-bs] Yes dear. Of all the people losing their shit in this thread, I enjoy you the most   |
|
|
|
[wall-0-text]
"This, indeed, is despair."--Soren Kierkegaard |
|
|
|
Competition only leads for the best fitted miners, like nature.
So yes, the system was designed around this concept.
It depends on what you wish to succeed--Bitcoin or "best fitted miners." But yeah, if megamines kill Bitcoin, it doesn't deserve to survive. |
|
|
|
-There always were and always will be people exploiting loopholes in laws and regulations. Like Bitcoiners managing to circumvent AML and taxation for a while. That's why teh law is in constant flux, constantly updated by your betters to better serve you, criminal scum. -Duration can not be extended indefinitely. The ability to extend patents/copyrights is also in flux to best serve you, earthling. -We are neither innocent nor corrupt. We is [were/are/will be]. Stop thinking. It gives your flesh a sour aftertaste. ~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords. [earthling ruining its flavor over nothing] |
|
|
|
Why so much hate from the farmers?
The system was designed that way for every miner to compete, not for everyone in the world have equal amount of coins... The system wasn't "designed" with megafarms in mind. If anything, the system was "designed" to allow anyone with a CPU to participate in the network, incentivizing random_d00d to join the Bitcoin ecosystem. Megafarms broke that. Claiming that megafarms help to secure the network borders on absurd. Concentrating so much hashpower solves a nonexistent problem, while creating a real ones: greater centralization and entities with both financial incentive and capacity to corrupt the network. TL;DR: foxes guarding the chicken coop. You act as if mega CPU farms wouldn't exist if ASICs didn't come around... Back with CPU farms we had botnet issues, those people are even greedier since they are using other's resources completely for their own gain. I'm not saying that CPU megafarms are impossible, only that megafarms of any kind are undesirable. |
|
|
|
mebby...  |
|
|
|
Why so much hate from the farmers?
The system was designed that way for every miner to compete, not for everyone in the world have equal amount of coins... The system wasn't "designed" with megafarms in mind. If anything, the system was "designed" to allow anyone with a CPU to participate in the network, incentivizing random_d00d to join the Bitcoin ecosystem. Megafarms broke that. Claiming that megafarms help to secure the network borders on absurd. Concentrating so much hashpower solves a nonexistent problem, while creating a real ones: greater centralization and entities with both financial incentive and capacity to corrupt the network. TL;DR: foxes guarding the chicken coop. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
