Gamblers from UK are the one who should worry because this report is coming out from UK OP did not mentioned in his article whose government implemented this rule, gamblers operator should worry too because they will have less profit and many will not play frequently than they used to be, UK people are to much into gambling that the government have to intervene, and this is not a good intervention.
There are two sides that will be affected actually. 1-Gambling operation is going to reduce their profit significantly. (bad for operators, bad or good for government) 2-Gamblers (bad or good), bad for high roller gamblers, good for addicted gamblers.
well when that happens, the government will control the gambling place because in fact the government cannot control the gambling place, because it is a private business, in several gambling places in Las Vegas and others I see the government does not dare to do this. They can't control but they can regulate as long as the business is legally operating, so it's still the same because if they will not follow the regulation, they will lose their license and they will operate illegally which is risky for them even if you say they are private. |
|
|
|
because the risk can be minimized by the gambler himself, ...
That's not what the government are seeing, the reason why the law is created is because they believe gamblers are not responsible anymore and it has already affected the quality of their lifestyle, so government are making ways for people to live a good lifestyle, and unfortunately, at the expense of everyone as even the responsible gamblers are now affected. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, thank you for participating in the discussion, but I think it's time to close the thread as I am already satisfied with the discussions we made here. Hopefully one day, we will be listed to be one of the luckiest gamblers int he world, we should not lose hope as long as we gamble. TY again.  (locked) |
|
|
|
Gamblers from UK are the one who should worry because this report is coming out from UK OP did not mentioned in his article whose government implemented this rule, gamblers operator should worry too because they will have less profit and many will not play frequently than they used to be, UK people are to much into gambling that the government have to intervene, and this is not a good intervention.
There are two sides that will be affected actually. 1-Gambling operation is going to reduce their profit significantly. (bad for operators, bad or good for government) 2-Gamblers (bad or good), bad for high roller gamblers, good for addicted gamblers.
|
|
|
|
I think 100 Eur is a really low limit but as an idea it is a good one.It is designed to stop people becoming addicted and losing everything in gambling.I am a strong advocate of limiting to a certain amount the maximum money you can spend in a gambling site as it safeguards you for going even deeper.I think major websites have such option but is optional to the player and not mandatory.
As you say major casinos have the option but it's up to the customer if they want to use it or not. While I understand the government would like to regulate this in some way capping the gambler in my opinion would lead to both unhappy casinos owners and gamblers as such. So much so that together they might even conspire against the regulation. There's also the idea that gamblers would gamble at the casinos without this type of restriction since these casinos are online after all. I think the idea overall is OK but in practice I fear it won't do so well. I think it will not be compulsory for major casinos, the name itself implies they are a takers of major bets from gamblers. You can't call it major casino if there's a limit on it that is implemented, you are right, it should be optional, depends on the gamblers only as casinos who like to maximize their profit would not force gamblers to limit their bets, that's insane and against their goal to be more profitable. Gambling capital of the word which is Macau, I think they are the real definition of gambling without limit. https://gamblersdailydigest.com/gambling-capital-of-the-world/It's only one country that limit its gamblers, I'm sure not every government will follow the same regulation, some government were able to educate their people well so they are responsible when they are gambling. There's always a warning that goes " Gambling Responsibly ", if there's a limit, it might be chance because whatever we do, we are just allowed to fixed maximum in a monthly basis, you don't need to to be careful as you are on limit. Honestly, real gamblers are already complaining with this law. |
|
|
|
Gambling sites are good for investing in easy money making ....
It's not called easy money when you are expecting a good profit but you only get few, gambling sites may have the edge over the gamblers but risking a small amount, we should also expect a small profit, this kind of secure investment are low risk with low return as well. Invest at least 1 bitcoin so you'll see a 1% profit a significant return. |
|
|
|
Damn, man. You're giving money to casino and will get it back with some probability. And with some probability will not. you can't call it "investment". This is TRUE gambling, in fact.
Difference between gambling and investing is that in gambling you can't predict outcome with only input data (in investment you're able to do that). There exists only expected value (EV) of your event.
Yeah true. In fact everything related to casino is gambling in a way or another. Investment is unpredictable too and depends from other people dice results. The more they lose the more our profits are better  Which also makes it profitable in some way. How about we call it a combined investment and gambling. The house will win. No doubt. So, I think there is always the larger chance for profit than losing when compared with other investments. True, but we should not only consider the profitability as it's given that sites wins most of the time, we have to evaluate the risk on investing in a site as well, a risk that they might turn into a scam site because it's not new, these possibilities are happening and have happened in the past already. |
|
|
|
When I try to access the bitdubl website a notification appears like this:
We're really sorry but the current design is not compatible with mobile devices.
We're working hard to present it as soon as possible!
Why don't you release it so that support with smartphone devices instead of supporting with smartphones will increase your users?
It looks find in my part. However, I think the 0,10$ is a very small amount the site offers to attract number of investors, can they even make it at least $1 with some strict rules added so it will not be abused. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, little help. My deposit never showed up? I've tried contacting them with no reply, how long does it usually take for reply?
It's small deposit so not too worried but would still like to play ASAP, hopefully before UFC tonight.
TX: 4690a2b1ea328472eb92211d5978ac377e7ecf21afeb3c8a2b74cb7479d65810
Most chances your deposit is now showing because your Txid showing 10 confirmations so if still its not appearing in your site account then send a message to OP surely he will give you update very quickly. How many confirmation needed before the deposits gets credited into his account? I'm not so aware of the site rules but most sites requires at least 3 confirmation. By the way @BetBTC, do you have some NBA promotion going on or planned? The playoffs will start soon, it would be exciting. |
|
|
|
Lakers vs Portland, which team gonna win?
Majority would say Lakers because they are one of the favorites to win the NBA finals, if Blazers would win, that would be a big success for them because they have a hard time making to the playoffs and upsetting the first 1st seed is something. Lillard deserve some respect, he is like Curry this bubble but their lack of defense might be their big problem in the long run. |
|
|
|
~snip~
@gulfbitscoin, what's up? why do you have to quote the entire update of OP? We can always read that as we have been following this thread from the start. |
|
|
|
|
This is insane, I never thought this would become a law, this is not gambler's friendly.
What they did is they want to limit including those gamblers who are responsible in what they are doing, come one, this is not good for the business TBH.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the payment WOLF.BET and Zwei, see you around.  |
|
|
|
As far as the recent speculations are concerned, this coming November, the bout might be Terrence vs Manny or McGregor vs Manny.
Seriously? I doubt Manny would fight in times of pandemic.. but Terrence vs Manny, should be a good fight, the old man here will again prove that he is only old by age, if he can beat Terrence, that would be another mark 1 to an undefeated boxer. Manny vs McGregor.. not gonna happen probably, unless Manny wants to destroy boxing and throw that respect he got from his millions of fans. |
|
|
|
This is exciting news from the boxing world, Errol Spence Jr is ready to step into the ring again, after a complete
break due to a car accident experienced him. Even though his opponent is Danny Garcia, in my opinion, his boxing ability
technique is still below Errol's, but seeing the conditions a recovering Errol is no guarantee that Danny Garcia will lose.
I predict Danny Garcia will win the fight against Errol Spence Jr.Because there must be a negative effect from the accident.
This is a fight where I see some are favoring Garcia to win, and main reason is the car accident he met before, let's see if that's really going to be a big factor. Anyway, if OP can make a poll, that would be appreciated, I like to vote and I'm sure our fellas here wants the same. |
|
|
|
If this is just an EXHIBITION, then he'd have to finish the 12 rounds all for the PPV. But we don't want that, we want a real knock out.
The match will be settled via TKO or if another fighter isn't able to continue the fight. We will see a TKO here. No judges to score points for decision. Wow... that's a very aggressive prediction, For me, since this is an exhibition fight, I don't want to expect that this fight would end a KO, maybe if there's an adds like a certain fighter win by TKO, that odds is going to be attractive, because I believe it's unlikely to happen although both fighters have power during their prime. im guessing their performance will not be as serious as it is only an exhibition fight. so expecting a KO may not be in the cards here. i dont think bookies will include the odds of KO here. right now, the odds are favouring Tyson in most sportsbookies. so this is a challenge for Jones, can he beat Tyson even if it is just an exhibition fight?? Why not? More odds gives gamblers more options, I'm sure they will include that odds but I don't know what odds they will offer. |
|
|
|
If this is just an EXHIBITION, then he'd have to finish the 12 rounds all for the PPV. But we don't want that, we want a real knock out.
The match will be settled via TKO or if another fighter isn't able to continue the fight. We will see a TKO here. No judges to score points for decision. Wow... that's a very aggressive prediction, For me, since this is an exhibition fight, I don't want to expect that this fight would end a KO, maybe if there's an adds like a certain fighter win by TKO, that odds is going to be attractive, because I believe it's unlikely to happen although both fighters have power during their prime. |
|
|
|
But if you are strict even for a +0.0001 increase odds or want some more betting options (side-bet), you can try Sportsbet and NitrogenSports.
Nitrogensports has limited odds compared to sportsbet, I guess stake would be a good option too if you like more market. But on the latter, you need to activate your 2FA there to initiate withdrawals so you might found it hassle to you although I like that feature and always choose to play there.
I don't have problem with 2FA, it's not really that inconvenient, that's security so it's alright, I'm using AUTHY and it's easy to use.
win streak is over -  ... JAZZ vs MEM went over. Then, I'm back to over and under only.  |
|
|
|
Mike Tyson is a legend and was able to create his name in boxing industry but I don't think that in his return he can outsmart Roy Jones because Jones has a wider experience compare to Mike and his big advantage is that he only retired last 2018.
Compare to Mike that he retired last 2005, the gap of retirement is very long and aside from that Mike is 3 years older compare to Jones.
Therefore in this poll, I will favor Jones over Mike in their upcoming exhibition match if Jones will do his best training to this upcoming match.
True that, but you know, Mike Tyson is more popular that Roy Jones Junior so it's expected that he will win the poll. Not everyone who voted here really gamble in sports, so they surely did not considered the points you shared here. Actually, I will do more research on this fight before I put my bet, but there's no knock down that will happen in this fight, Roy Jones Junior might win. betting odds as of now.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
