Roobet username: Wexnident
Roobet review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3RvdA8fitc&feature=youtu.be

I'd actually think of it as the opposite. The one that got the red card would receive pressure, although they have the decision to defend till their last breath, it's still pressure to play against a full team with one less person. As for the opposing team, the pressure would still stay the same imo, it's not like their goal was changed, they still need to put out 3 points. Though I'm saying this, it's actually highly dependent on the team itself, since as you said, it's a psychological factor.

Like what @KT said, most matches that have red cards just end up with one team attacking and one defending. It becomes a rather stale game where you're just basically watching for the skill of the players and not the result anymore. The market also responds appropriately with that, we all have the statistics and records for most teams and players right now, they could basically respond to red card situations with appropriate results that shouldn't deviate that much. It's not like red card is a new thing, and there are a lot of matches for reference in the past already.

Honestly, even if I am glad that the richest are donating for the cause, I can't help but feel stupid that we're being happy about them dropping some scraps for us to survive. If this doesn't showcase how the relationship between the rich and the poor works, then I don't know what does. Still, not that I'm against them donating, in fact, I'm pretty happy for those that they reach out towards people who are in desperate need right now.
Equity then? That would require a lot of manpower to even take a look at how rich the rich people are, and calculating taxes about that. And I really doubt the government would do that, when they could just pocket a fraction of that for themselves with no problem since they're the ones managing it anyway. What stays inside, stays there after all.

That's why you don't follow any crypto enthusiasts in twitter. Or any other social media for that. Heck, I'd trust answers here than there tbh, since most of them out there are just there to take advantage of Bitcoin for money-making. I'd rather follow accounts that actually bring in some sort of useful info, such as market news or coin movements, my time is a lot more well spent seeing those tweets than seeing a bunch of people tweeting about Bitcoin reaching xxx amount, or I'll do something stupid scenario.
Yeah you can't end that. As much as I would hate to say this, haters (or those that take advantage of it) exist because we, enthusiasts exist. If you want them to completely disappear, then the entire community has to go together with it. Nothing we can do about that.

This one was pretty amazing then. A lot could be obtained here for sources of stories tbh, imagine a 4 way meeting between said groups which govern over their respective people. Standard history right here.
I guess I can't say that Gambling doesn't help you now does it. Not. Yeah it doesn't help you, this man is probably 1 out of a million that got lucky, look at Tesla (reference from this post as well)
Should I try this as well? Gotta find a girlfriend first though.
With the amount they earn from gachas? I doubt they even need gambling casinos tbh. Japanese are legit addicted to gachas, I'm also about to actually.
Nostalgia. I can attest to this since I pretty much spent hours trying to control that bloody ball.
Don't, poll makers would lose their jobs.

I guess Singapore just increased the amount of Singapore by then. Germany just made Singapore make a huge 180 right there.

Ahhh that was fun. Pretty good read, had some fun with it. If there weren't so many, I would've requested adding pics to make the read a tad bit less boring. Still, pretty funny facts out there somehow.

Experience comes with losing, be afraid of when you always win, but don't be afraid when you lose. Those kind of things are what I actually like the most tbh. Winning is nice and all, but really, it just means that you've stopped growing by then, that you've hit a roadblock, but losing? Losing means that there are still countless roads in front of you that you can take. Experience doesn't equate to winning, but mostly to losing, since only losers can see why they lose. Avoiding them is the best way to win after all.


No need to be scared, losing is part of everything, not just trading. I'm pretty sure you've lost countless times before, but you didn't really take that into heart and suffer from it no? Learn from them and make them yours. That's the basics of the basics in learning imo.

You missed the very basic man, read the rules. I mean, the official rules. A lot of people have been hit by those that they themselves haven't really seen, and they didn't know how they got banned even. I'd honestly suggest to post a few every week but mostly lurk daily in the forums to know how everything works. This place ain't like FB where if you get banned, a new account is all you need, a ban means permanent ban, and ban evasion would only lead you to getting banned. Again. You don't really need to force yourself to be creative imo, just post whatever you think that makes sense and is relevant to the topic. A post that contains information that could be helpful would be well-liked no matter what imo.

So that was around March? Around the Pandemic crash? Then didn't he already get pretty lucky? Since right now his funds are up by 300% or close to that. Or the decision just started in March, but they still didn't buy then until now? If so, then they've lost out on some potential profit. Still, I gotta say, from a business stand point, the decision seems REALLY risky. If it were a part of their total savings, then sure, but all of them? Not that I'm doubting but Bitcoin is a highly volatile asset. Said decision is really risky since they could potentially lose a lot of their funds if something goes really wrong. But if they were to only invest the savings by that point, and not invest anymore, then it could be helpful. Difficult in the early days, but should be manageable, the problems would decrease though the risk would still stay.

I don't think that's going to happen. Permanently removing fiat means leaving the financial economy on a basically non-transparent situation, where no control could be held over. A lot of issues could prop up, especially from those who don't really know how to manage their finance properly.

4 and 5 are mostly in the beginning stages right now. They could still stop and pretty much remove their effects on the current market. 3 is a given, heck, even I am pretty hyped up with what the halving would bring on the current uptrend of the market. 2 is still at tight ropes right now, especially since if the economy could suddenly bounce back, which is either unlikely or going to take a long time. as for 1, well, they basically have no other choice and path other than that right now. It'd probably be better for them to just let it happen, but by being prepared for it, at least they can minimize their losses. Still though, even with this, other safe haven assets still exists like gold, which is relatively safer so it's still up to debate whether they'd choose Bitcoin over others.

Stock market crashing or not doesn't really matter to Bitcoin tbh. Bitcoin would go to the moon whenever it wants, and there's no need to relate it to what happens on the stock market. I fully believe that Bitcoin would closely move to the moon at the start of the end of the year, though I also believe that the stocks would do everything to come back to where they were pre-pandemic, or even exceed that. If stocks were to continue plummeting at the rate similar to what happened at the start of the pandemic, then that would be quite odd. Most process right now is returning to normal, ever slowly that is, but still returning. That should warrant enough breathing space for companies to slowly recover.

Ehhh? A Great Reset? Tbh, right now? Even with the quarantine period and lockdowns that happened, most people are still going about their lives normally. Heck, even students are going on about e-commerce right now, mostly those that have the opportunity to start one anyway. Why would I even be ready for something pretty much non-existent? People call it the new norms, but really, it's just a matter of time imo for such changes to happen, especially since this "new normal" is just basically us being reliant on technology to achieve what we normally do.

Even if there was a Great Reset, people wouldn't remove themselves from a centralized organization. qol improvements are what centralization offers afterall imo. Decentralization is great, but it's only used in specific situations, and as such, doesn't really warrant the complete overhaul of the centralized government we have right now.

Should I even expect for the country to press legal charges on said company? Most of us are yes, pretty mad at this issue, but really, would our President even bloody care for said issue? I'd already be very glad if he doesn't make a move about this and let others press the charges themselves. Now, I'm just basically wondering, the product has been made since 2018 and as such, how long was such an issue been on? And no one really noticed a thing about it? I mean, not that I'm one to closely check everything on my products, but I at least check the labels thoroughly once when I buy them.

Source on this? The only ones I found were the Mayors pushing for it's ban, and closing the stores in Manila. Articles have stated that they already removed the said Address issue, but Mayors still pushed for closing down stores, as well as telling online e-commerce stores (Shoppee, Lazada) to stop selling their products.

Source: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/08/21/2036808/stalls-selling-manila-province-china-products-padlocked

Isn't the term Bitcoin maximalist, or maximalist used for those that are just heavy headed people that don't really contribute anything but still preach whatever they're rooting for? Not that I'm saying that some maximalists out there are bad, there may be some out there that don't really fit in there but call themselves on though. I'd rather stay in the middle camp tbh, since I know of Bitcoin, and I also know what's good and what's bad with it. Acknowledging them (disadvantages) seems the best way to adopt it after all. Not that I've ever used much coins, I've only used BTC, ETH and Doge after all.

Still, I suppose that maximalist just want Bitcoin to be the only one to exist since they're on that camp. It's like me vs the world, with no compromise needed or available for that matter. Let them exist on their own space though tbh, there's still space for most people to use and acknowledge other useful coins out here.

It is an issue that has been a problem for quite some time now tbh. Normal gambling (online or offline) usually take care of KYC procedures and there's no problem there, but crypto gambling embodies what crypto is for, specifically anonymity. By providing KYC, what's the point of playing on crypto sites? In fact, they'd just be able to connect my identity to my wallet, which is a lot more information than normal KYC on regular casinos. I admit, minors shouldn't be allowed, and there should be somehow a way to prevent them, but KYC on crypto sites? That's a no-no. Let KYC stay on regular casinos, and let crypto casinos stay as they are.

The most helpful solution here after KYC would mostly fall on parent regulation of their kids tbh. Sadly, that seems different to implement on ALL families out there, since they can't really keep watch of them 24/7.

You should fear the unknown, not the known. Scams, lies and the like are easily recognizable when you know how they work, but if you don't then that's the time that you should stop. The saying that information is power is not a lie, trust in the information you obtained and make judgements based on that. Like the posts you quoted here, information got them to where they are, and by honing that knowledge, they're basically aware of what to do and what not to do. Never be afraid of doing something, be afraid of doing something that you thought you wanted, but wasn't.

PS: Don't YOLO, like seriously. Especially if you're on the edge and would want to go YOLO on something you don't really know. Successful stories of people doing YOLO moments aren't really YOLO, they had substantial information beforehand that helped them such as experience and knowledge, it's basically a calculated risk or something similar.

Robust? A prediction is never robust imo, and never would be. The only way a prediction could actually be solid is if you were from in the future and came back to say that, yes, that would happen. Right statement? No one really knows. There really isn't any right or wrong in predicting anyway, the answer would only be revealed once the situation is over. I'd rather say that I'd want more situations of Bitcoin to actually revolve in adoption, and possibly coordination or at least, acceptance from the respective Government agencies. Especially with how the supply will only go lower for the next decade.

Even if we do say that history repeats itself, the notion of Bitcoin defeating Gold in under 2 decades? Seems quite difficult, or impossible imo. I'm not being doubtful, I'm just looking at it realistically. Even if we do say that Bitcoin is very popular right now, can it sustain it for the next decade? Adding on to that, can even more people join in on the adoption of it? There's a lot of questions involved, so yeah, I really doubt you should trust predictions for over a decade that much.

Well, youtube does accept any videos posted online. The only good thing about this is that they accept reports immediately and move on it to properly remove said scam ads once detected. Might as well just look for extensions that help you block said ads, so that you stop clicking everywhere that may take you somewhere wrong. uBlock Origin and HTTPS everywhere could help in stopping you from going somewhere pretty dangerous.
Well, anyone is free to post their vids on YT. Afaik, they don't really review it properly when it comes to scams and the like? The youtube AI only reviews those that are NSFW, or when it's rated for kids, but it's not, you get a warning or something. That, and copyrighted content.

Where was ransomware included though? Other than that, Binance is welcome to run their project, especially since it aims to counter these malicious groups that basically put a negative bias to the name of Bitcoin. Not to mention that with time, said groups would probably improve and remove traces from their scams, rooting them up early on could prove to be quite helpful.

It's most likely real. Binance was involved, and some investigation by other exchange could easily reveal whether it was true or not, especially since officials of Ukraine were personally involved in the arrest, it's not like they can put false charges for them now can they? Plus, if they had the skill, making everything automated or at least semi should prove to be easy. They probably started it up way back 2018, and officially launched it by that year.

Isn't it totally up to the merchant on how this would happen? Just like how there are rebates on the various services on mobile wallets. It's basically something like a promo, but with Bitcoin, and yes it's possible and could be implemented but as I said, the merchant themselves should decide on whether to do it or not though I doubt it would happen this early, especially since the number of Bitcoin merchants is on the low side.

Still honestly, it should be a separate matter from how Credit card works, even with a rebate system. I believe that it should work on a different notion, completely different from how fiats work, especially since Bitcoin usage isn't really used for everyday transactions. Even if it was adopted in the near future by the majority of the stores, a coexistence with fiat would still probably the best choice imo, with fiat being used for daily needs and Bitcoin for certain occassions.

It's just increased security, not guaranteed. Just like there's no perfect system out there, there's also no perfect defense mechanism out there. It's just that online wallets are more prone to stuff happening that you actually don't know about. Heck, some people don't even know how hacks happen or how your pc gets invaded by a third party. Hardware wallets on the other hand, need physical contact, so people would have to go to your house and rob you, at the very least, you know what they would try to do, plus, robberies are easily discovered with surveillance cams which may prevent such situations from occurring repeatedly. Add that to you not really revealing any info when buying Bitcoin and when moving funds, you're pretty much safe from being robbed by someone who discovered you on the internet.

Hardware wallets are pretty much used for just hodling imo. If I were to frequently have the need to connect it to a device, I'd rather configure a laptop or a pc with my specifications, making it my wallet which I can connect to exchanges now and then and only that, nothing else would probably be done there to prevent myself from being swept up by possible malware/virus.