|
Connection problem on EU node (DDOS ? )...Please remember to set backup pool....
New dedicated server with high performance for EU node in test phase, probably active monday 22/02/2016.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads up windpath - done. +1 Thank you  |
|
|
|
you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core? or need change something on this line? p2pool/p2pool/work.py 372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4), You need to change the version in the line you quoted (372 in work.py) to: version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 0x30000000), or version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 805306368), Both work. Thank you But i'm come back to bitcoin core, to me it seems more efficient at this time compared to classic...you have noticed the same thing? |
|
|
|
you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core? or need change something on this line? p2pool/p2pool/work.py 372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4), |
|
|
|
|
Reset statistics EU node and go back to old server (the new gave too many doa)
|
|
|
|
|
Resettate statistiche nodo EU e ritornato sul vecchio server (il nuovo dava troppi doa)
|
|
|
|
|
Aggiornamenti:
Rimossi i nodi XT
Installato bicoin classic su tutti i nodi
Nuovo server US
|
|
|
|
15/02/2016 change all nodes at bitcoin classic...probably down for some seconds... remember to set backup node ###UPDATE### Restart US Node...done (new server - bitcoin classic) Restart XT Node...done (bitcoin classic) Restart HK Node...done (bitcoin classic) all done |
|
|
|
P.S. Bitcoin core sta ancora sincronizzando la rete,potrebbe essere dovuto a questo?
Si prova a fare una ricerca su un explorer del tuo indirizzo per vedere se ti dà l'importo (esempio https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC ) |
|
|
|
It is the proof of my donation |
|
|
|
What does this mean ? No block found since 3rd February...  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Qué significa esto ? No se han encontrado desde el 3 de febrero de bloque ...: '( I have personally sent bitcoin to the miners active on my nodes. |
|
|
|
谢谢 |
|
|
|
|
XT Germany Node
Nuovo server! NON SERVE CAMBIARE IMPOSTAZIONI
Dettagli:
Nuovo server con ram maggiore è stato configurato. Ma ha un ip diverso, quindi cambierò i dns per permettere ai vostri miner di essere reindirizzati senza dover cambiare nessuna configurazione...e probabilmente senza che ve ne accorgiate.
E' possibile per i primi secondi di ricevere diversi DOA, ma dovrebbe stabilizzarsi in pochissimo tempo. Questo perché vengono inviati vecchi lavori al nuovo server ma la merkel è differente.
Ora cambio dns: 12.00 (GMT+1)
AGGIORNAMENTO
Completato...tutto ok!
|
|
|
|
XT Germany Node New server! NO NEED NEW SETTINGS Details: New server with more ram configured. But it is a different ip, I'll change the dns so your miner will be redirected without having to change settings...and probably do not you notice It's possible in the first seconds receive many DOA, but should settle down in very short time. This is because they are sent old works to the new server but the merkel it's different. Time change dns: 12.00 (GMT+1)(If you have problems set again the miner to xt.warp2pool.eu:9332 and restart ) UPDATECOMPLETED - To see old server statistics http://old.warp2pool.eu:2095 |
|
|
|
Tornando in tema che vps minima servirebbe per dare una mano
Il problema principale è lo spazio. Diciamo che tra OS e chain ti servono almeno 80gb, per stare tranquillo almeno per un pò di tempo sarebbe meglio anche 100gb. La ram penso 1gb sia abbastanza solo per tenere aperto bitcoind, tanto non ti importa avere una bassa latenza se la tua intenzione è solo aiutare. Nei miei nodi ho 8gb di ram ma devo far girare p2pool e mi servono per avere tempi di risposta veloci. Per darti un'idea dei prezzi con crowncloud per una vps simile ti costerebbe circa 7€/mese: OVZ-C-2048 2048 MB/2048 MB 80 GB 4 vCores 2 TB 1 /80 1 Gbit/sec $7/month Los Angeles, CA / Frankfurt, DE Cmq anche con un nodo pruned in futuro potreste aiutare la rete, anche se in modo marginale: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347286.msg13838471#msg13838471If everyone ran in pruned mode then would that be a problem? How would a new node catch up from the beginning? I'm sure it's just that I am missing the obvious point. Sorry to be such a dummy.
Maybe the idea is at least a few nodes will always keep the full history? I am willing to if that helps.
In the future Core will let you choose to "donate x GB to the network", and then you'll store a random range of historical blocks. Then nodes doing an initial sync will have to search out nodes that have the blocks they want from among these nodes storing chunks of the historical chain. It's a bit like how BitTorrent works. |
|
|
|
looks the statistics http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.phpwe had 1700% and 4900% of luck...and sure also 20% of bad luck...in all pools with low hash can happen...but I do not understand why you come here to advise people to use "chinese pool"?... or maybe the answer is this: I know its a noob question but I am new at it.
|
|
|
|
|
mine is a discourse on the btc safety, and I'm sure that many Chinese also appreciate p2pool, only problem is low hash on this moment because many people like you think only of short term profit taking.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
