Hi everyone! Our node is having issues and not paying out withdrawals or awarding deposits. We are fixing this now and the backlog of withdrawals will be paid out shortly. Eta 2 hours
Im just wondering myself why do you still insist of not selling the site to someone else that can make diggit into one of the best site again? The site is now nothing more then faucet player and spammer Agree, someone with time to use on site. |
|
|
|
I would support most of the alternatives, what ever you choose or get people voting on.
1. Contunies everything as it is.
2. Changeing clam rules to not allow digging
3. Use a snapshot of clamchain to base a new coin on
Thats all fine for me.
But i think most investors wont support anything when its unknown.
You can also say everything will continue as normal and there will be taken a new snapshot in future a few days before a the new coin will be made.
It can be based on both snapshot or the last one.
Then people can safetly buy clam without worry jd will get a new coin.
Snapshot would have to be in the past to avoid manipulation 2 days or a week before coin was made would be in past when coin was ready. But when saying take snapshot now and not have any real plans yet to make a coin make people not want to buy. And what manipulation you talk about? People buy more clam and price goes up you mean to secure getting the new coin? And after people got new coin clam market will drop far down. |
|
|
|
|
I would support most of the alternatives, what ever dooglus choose or get people voting on.
1. Contunies everything as it is.
2. Changeing clam rules to not allow digging
3. Use a snapshot of clamchain to base a new coin on
Thats all fine for me.
But i think most investors wont support anything when its unknown.
You can also say everything will continue as normal and there will be taken a new snapshot in future a few days before a the new coin will be made.
It can be based on both snapshot or the last one.
Then people can safetly buy clam without worry jd will get a new coin.
|
|
|
|
But when people not know what the owner of jd will do then less will buy it and more people will sell it. I just want a desicion made what jd will do. A couple of pages ago, Dooglus said "I can say that I won't stop Just-Dice accepting CLAM for as long as the site continues to pay for its expenses.". Is that what you're looking for? And if new coin, maybe people will move to new coin , and clam dice maybe wont pay for its expenses. |
|
|
|
I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain.
And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
I like this idea. Then the current rules of CLAM don't change and everyone can change who wants to use the new coin. But the exchange rate of CLAM might drop, because people would assume that some people might cash out to BTC for easy money doubling. If we vote based on how many CLAMs we hold, would be nice if investors at JD could vote, too. What about who buy clam in the future they will not get the "new coin". Most people wont buy anything if not what will happen They can buy whichever coin they want, or both of them, assuming either or both coins still have a market in the future. That is never guaranteed with any coin. I know people can buy whatever they want. But why buy clams that can be change out with other coin. Everyone knows clam value is based on jd. What jd does decide future clam value. But when people not know what the owner of jd will do then less will buy it and more people will sell it. I just want a desicion made what jd will do. Not all this back and forth. Its just meaningless making it more even uncertian about what will happen in the future. |
|
|
|
I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain.
And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
I like this idea. Then the current rules of CLAM don't change and everyone can change who wants to use the new coin. But the exchange rate of CLAM might drop, because people would assume that some people might cash out to BTC for easy money doubling. If we vote based on how many CLAMs we hold, would be nice if investors at JD could vote, too. What about who buy clam in the future they will not get the "new coin". Most people wont buy anything if not what will happen |
|
|
|
Forgive me if I'm not reading this correctly but if you do a 1 for 1 swap at block 730k the digger would still possibly have 500+k coins as you do not know what he's doing with them once they move to polo or jd.
See a couple of posts up - I wasn't considering a "swap" at all. I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain. And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing. The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped. For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin. Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so? Make a new coin based on clam holders it not a bad idea, just when u say u take a snapshot. Then future clam buyers might get 0 for their clam. If u decide to use the snapshot u take for base your new coin if you make a new coin. If u make 2 dicesites or whatever clam will down more. Thats the problem. And it seems like some big investors have made decision based on you saying you take a snapshot even tho you never told you will make new coin. Because whats the point of taking a snapshot if you never plan to make a new coin. Just for fun? Whatever you choose, if its a vote, or keep it like it is or make a new coin, just do it. Its pointless to have endless disqusion without anything done. When a decision is made, people can decide if support it or not. |
|
|
|
|
Dooglus can you make a fast decision so we all can know and not more uncertainty what will happens.
Just make a decison.
|
|
|
|
|
Hot wallet has been empty for 2 days now? I have not got my withdraw
|
|
|
|
Why not implement said Doogcoin alongside Clam on JD, instead of in its place? Kind of like Alex's site where you can gamble a few different crypto's with one common trollbox, etc?
I just spent a few hours away from the computer thinking about things, and came to the same conclusion myself. There's no reason to switch from CLAM to the new coin when we can accept both at the same time. That way people get to lose their balance twice! The Just-Dice codebase isn't set up to handle multiple currencies, but I can simply run two different instances like I did with the original Just-Dice and Doge-Dice sites. If you do that will u give investors choice to trade their clam for same amount moneysupply of doogcoin? |
|
|
|
People dont want buy so long digger still digging. He destroys the clam with use so long time.
Maybe that's the whole point. It could be someone who hates altcoins in general or CLAM in particular. You have talk to him? I think if people will offer him a 300-400 btc wall on polo maybe he will take it. |
|
|
|
Digger should have a clam auction. Just dig up all and sell everything to 0.001-0.002 each clam and sell 10k to each user who want buy. I think many would buy if knew the digger was finnished. People dont want buy so long digger still digging. He destroys the clam with use so long time.
i said something similar since the beginning yet got no support, there is a decent bunch of people that would do the same, yet i think thats useless now, im sure that if each of the ones that wanted this got their buy orders on it would be filled. Okey, lets agree on a price floor. If digger have 350k clam left, we need 350btc with price 0.001. I can do 10% of that so if 9 others can do 10% to. If not get enough funds can set a lower price as floor. Anyone else interested? |
|
|
|
|
Digger should have a clam auction. Just dig up all and sell everything to 0.001-0.002 each clam and sell 10k to each user who want buy. I think many would buy if knew the digger was finnished. People dont want buy so long digger still digging. He destroys the clam with use so long time.
|
|
|
|
Interseting to invest in pocketrocketcasino,
any testimonial from the other user who invested in this site ?
I have invested in PRC long time. I trust the owner Dean. But can never be 100% sure. It is one of the best and most trusted site. Site have been around for a long time now. |
|
|
|
Does bittrex use long time to withdraw crypto? If i wanted slow i would keep using cryptsy.
No. It's better than cryptsy. Make sure if you want to withdraw check this first https://bittrex.com/Status. If wallet ok, you will get your coin immediately. status is green. have waited 4-5 hour on a wd |
|
|
|
|
Does bittrex use long time to withdraw crypto? If i wanted slow i would keep using cryptsy.
|
|
|
|
|
why is there only 54% in coldwallet?
|
|
|
|
I have not get my wd yet and still got more btc to wd. So for me its look like they run of with the money or lost it. I don't think they've run with it, they've made quite a big profit and they have a lot of bitcoin to spare; also they would have had more to gain by keeping the site running. What I think happened is that the owners have abandoned the site for different things, and now since the withdraws aren't working, the owners aren't online to fix it. Too bad, diggit used to be a really good minesweeper site. I would guess they lost more then they got from the site. Site had atleast 500usd(2btc) cost a month. Site profit is 19btc. |
|
|
|
I have not get my wd yet and still got more btc to wd. So for me its look like they run of with the money or lost it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
