I get a error that says "Users account does not exist, try a different public_id" and this is making me worried, is anyone else having the same problem?
//DeaDTerra
same here. it's happened before, i wouldn't worry too much.
|
|
|
Made a withdrawal request approx 24 hrs ago.. nothing. Only 22 BTC, but where is it?
|
|
|
good work, time to move forward what's new with BMPO?
The pool ops are kind of on the back burner at the moment.
|
|
|
Dividends paid! .0054 per share gross, minus our .0015 fee, .0039 BTC net per share paid to shareholders!
|
|
|
Shareholders could appoint a liquidator(who could I would give power to do the above). But as was mentioned, there doesn't seem to be anything there of any worth. Has anyone calculated the current value of the remaining portfolio?
Nefario
There is 60 BTC of bonds there that are not yet redeemable, if they aren't a scam that is. What I was about to say before my computer froze up on me. I emailed the issuer back when they listed because I wanted more info before I invested. I never got a response, so I wasn't confident enough to buy. The February bonds mature on Feb 8, so we'll know soon. The other issue for a liquidator is knowing which stock belongs to which fund. It looks like Peter was running all the funds out of the one account, so without financial statements we don't know what belongs where. LIF.B was defunct before all this and the holdings do not apply to LIF.M or LIF.CX so, they are all LIF.A I would imagine.
|
|
|
Shareholders could appoint a liquidator(who could I would give power to do the above). But as was mentioned, there doesn't seem to be anything there of any worth. Has anyone calculated the current value of the remaining portfolio?
Nefario
There is 60 BTC of bonds there that are not yet redeemable, if they aren't a scam that is.
|
|
|
Dividends paid! .0055 per share gross, minus our .0015 fee, .0040 BTC net per share paid to shareholders!
|
|
|
Does any one have a trusted list of sites/vendors, that you exchange your BTC to CAD funds?
Thank you
cavirtex
|
|
|
I would like to thank Peter for fulfilling his obligations while winding up his company. I think he was a valuable part of the GLBSE community.
He didn't really fulfil much, he just paid a dividend equal to the amount he was offering for his shares. Which is roughly 15% of what they were the day before he made the announcement, a number alot of us were refusing to take. I BOUGHT some of these shares THAT DAY at 5x as much as he just gave us, due to open orders I had at the time of the announcement. LIF.CX was trading at .5 BTC, a price the fund had set itself artificially and he was paying dividends up until 2 weeks before this crap, suggesting he still had the whole .5 in the coffers, an estimated 1500BTC or so. Now the LIF.A, he claims he got scammed, fine, I don't fully believe it, but it is more believable than LIF.CX, what happened to the that? Zhotuonged? He still won't give us more than 1 line answers that are 85% bullshit. I just got back a whole ~25 BTC from his dividend payment, face value of my shares was ~180 BTC, 85% loss? The last released financials showed ALL funds in a PROFITABLE position, 30 days passes and everything is down 85%, and Peter just says "duurrrr sorrry guys, have a few pennies". Peter - you should make some more dividend payments ASAP, and if you really can't, and the money is all gone, you NEED to tell your shareholders what the fuck happened with some numbers to chew on, instead of this BULLSHIT stance you are taking with us.
|
|
|
Hmmm. LIF.CX deleted. So now there's no way to get even 0.075 BTC for my 50 shares. :-(
I just went to go check but glbse seems to not be responding properly.. Won't load my portfolio, but from the sounds of it i'd be in the same boat. I didn't sell any of my shares for that crap, I think i'd rather take a full loss than justify Peter's actions by selling the shares back to him at that price. Eitherway though, I guess it is a moot point because he flew the coop anyways by the looks of it. Ugh.
|
|
|
I have a well tested hardware project that can display temperature and other analogue/digital sensors on a embedded website, and also send them as a GET request every minute. I call it Stokerbot, since it was originally meant for monitoring Stoker furnace, today it is used for many different things like server rooms, pools, farms, solar heat, etc. These boards are just what you need to monitor your mining rig/door/window/pool/etc ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I have 2 models, S3S and S3XS. Features that they share are.Atmega1284P 40pin DIP based 3x1-wire bus with 9/10 3pin plugs for plug'n'play with cheap DS18B20 probes (ebay etc). Reverse polarity protected. 4 analoge pins 4 digital pins Network bootloader ISP plug TTL serial plug 6pin straight Onboard SystemID (DS2401) and temperature (DS18B20) Uses ENC28J60 for network. Features that set them asideStokerbot S3S.5V logic and inputs, runs off 9-12Vdc 9 temperature connectors 1 LCD connector for serial LCD backpack (LCD Logic) 2 expansion ports with 8pins and 2 power pins each (I2C, etc, not all unused). 2x3 screw terminals for 1-wire besides the 9 connectors Stokerbot S3XS.3V3 logic and inputs, runs off 6-9Vdc 10 temperature sensors 2 onboard LEDs connected to 2 of the digital outputs, red/green. Both boards are based on tuxgraphics code( http://tuxgraphics.org/electronics/), which is opensource GPL. Prices including shipping worldwide Inside EU : S3S:109USD S3XS:69USD Outside EU/EU business : S3S:89USD S3XS:55USD Price converted to BTC at time of order, using mt. gox last S3S ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstokerlog.dk%2Fshop%2Fimages%2FS3S.png&t=663&c=_PfGgtO6w2_KpQ) S3XS ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstokerlog.dk%2Fshop%2Fimages%2FS3XS.png&t=663&c=y_-NJJ61G229pQ) They can both be used with http://stokerlog.dk, however the site is only in Danish for now. SMD is reflow soldered in DIY oven, PTH is hand soldered with temperature controlled iron. Both processes and all components are RoHS. Supply is not endless, I currently have a few of each model in stock. Feel free to ask/comment/etc ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Could this report humidity too out of the box with the right probe?
|
|
|
Hi Nefario - Sign up page seems to be borked today / since the db reset..
|
|
|
![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) at least i got my 4 btc from him. Yep. Peter gave you face value and the rest of us squat though. Still waiting for my orders to be filled Peter.
|
|
|
hey! y u hijacking this thread? ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) we need to whine about our losses and rant against Peter some more. Yeah we do. We should move the convo elsewhere about glbse ui.. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
No offense Nefario, I hope the interface gets better than what the beta is showing..
This is very little improvement than the Ascii like interface of GLBSE Ver1
Unfortunately I have to agree.. I mean the ratings and verification part is cool, but that is just a little added functionality.. UI is not so good. Webclient is actually better.
|
|
|
I already posted a comparison in another thread, but FWIW here it is again: Single 7970: Roadhog2k5's resultsSystem Idle: 270 watts System Mining: 388 watts Mining: 925/150mhz, 865mv, 118 watts 550 MH/s ( 4.66 MH/watt for the card) Single 5970: My results System Idle: 138 watts System Mining: 235 watts Card Mining: 605/166mhz, 900mv, 97 watts 550 MH/s ( 5.67 MH/watt for the card) Of course this is two different systems so the baseline System Idle numbers are different. Theoretically it shouldn't really matter what the idle baseline numbers are, but it would be nice to see a true back-to-back comparison on the same mining box. I don't have any myself but I understand they are in the 200-300 range.. What are your settings on that 5970? How is the world is a dual GPU card only pulling 97 watts? That seems insane...... Crazy undervolt. Kinda interesting, the cores are down at 0.9v What would one expect a 5970 to draw at stock settings? I only ask because I have 12 mining away currently.
|
|
|
I already posted a comparison in another thread, but FWIW here it is again: Single 7970: Roadhog2k5's resultsSystem Idle: 270 watts System Mining: 388 watts Mining: 925/150mhz, 865mv, 118 watts 550 MH/s ( 4.66 MH/watt for the card) Single 5970: My results System Idle: 138 watts System Mining: 235 watts Card Mining: 605/166mhz, 900mv, 97 watts 550 MH/s ( 5.67 MH/watt for the card) Of course this is two different systems so the baseline System Idle numbers are different. Theoretically it shouldn't really matter what the idle baseline numbers are, but it would be nice to see a true back-to-back comparison on the same mining box. What are your settings on that 5970? How is the world is a dual GPU card only pulling 97 watts? That seems insane...... Crazy undervolt. Kinda interesting, the cores are down at 0.9v
|
|
|
|