Hello, I am a film music composer, but also a huge fan of crypto-currencies and especially DarkCoin. DarkCoin has inspired me to compose a DarkCoin Anthem and the music was already performed by a huge 100 musicians symphonic orchestra for me. The music theme is really great and will motivate all people who invested in DRK and also their friends once they hear the anthem. It is also against all trolls, who think they can manipulate people to lose their motivation. I will soon upload the music to YouTube, but will need some graphics, images and also a possible 3D video of the DarkCoin logo. I would be happy if somebody will provide me with this media, so I can make a great YouTube presentation of the DarkCoin. Feel free to contact me at tcherkin@gmail.comThanks, Georgii Cerkiin Hi, Thanks for your support of Darkcoin, this is awesome. The 3D video is probably the trickiest, so I've asked on darkcointalk and our reddit thread, posting a link back to here.
|
|
|
DarkCoin has inspired me to compose a DarkCoin Anthem and the music was already performed by a huge 100 musicians symphonic orchestra for me.
http://youtu.be/4wvpdBnfiZo
|
|
|
Before techsolution drowns us in spam again... any good responses to t3a's points? It won't. It requires a hard fork and Bitcoin will not hard fork for DarkSend, nor jeopardize regulation issues.
It doesn't require a hardfork if the coinjoin organizers aren't paid by block reward, but instead by those they are coinjoining for. Or better yet, it would be decentralized and no one would be paid at all. Misbehaving nodes don't get payment. So false.
The reason PoW works so well is because you can prove it. You can say "hey, here is the block header I have and here is it's hash. As you can see, it's hash is below the target, therefore I have created a block". Coinjoin organization is a series of messages. You could (A) have a central authority see if the masternode is facilitating coinjoins and keep a log of behaving masternodes, or you could (B) just trust that the miner is right about whether the masternode was behaving at block X, or you could (C) trust your peers. Option A invokes trust in a central authority, option B allows miners to pay themselves (assuming they're operating as a masternode) every time and option C opens you up to sybil. TL;DR PoR is an oxymoron because you can't construct a proof that you are offering a resource.
|
|
|
Can someone please rebut this, or at least parts of it? It keeps getting mentioned in IRC and trollboxes, apparently smart people are believing it and I can't find any counterproof to point to. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Altcoin#Application_Built_on_top_Of_CryptocurrencyBitcoin is a lot like HTTP. It is an application layer protocol and tools can be built on it (like websites can be built on HTTP). There is a class of cryptocurrencies that promise features like casino websites and exchanges and anonymity protocols to be built on top of them.
When creating a new website, one doesn't make a new protocol unless it is necessary. For example, HTTPS is an encrypted version of HTTP, therefore it is useful and necessary. When creating an app such as "DarkSend", one doesn't need to make a new protocol such as "Darkcoin". This is synonymous to making an HTTPS alternative (eg. HTTPSX) for your new website for encrypted chat and not adding any new security or functionality to HTTPSX.
Because Darkcoin is by far the most popular cryptocurrency of this class, the Darkcoin example will be covered in this section.
The Darkcoin devs created a tool called DarkSend. DarkSend is an implementation of coinjoin (an anonymity feature originally implemented in Bitcoin[4]) which utilizes the Darkcoin network to organize the coinjoins. If DarkSend becomes open source and is useful, it will be ported to Bitcoin with a few small modifications. Currently DarkSend masternodes are paid 10% of the block reward after they hold 1000DRK in order to become a masternode.[5] This is flawed because while purchasing 1000DRK is trustlessly verifiable, a user running a DarkSend masternode isn't trustlessly verifiable. It is also costs bandwidth to run a masternode, therefore there is an incentive to buy 1000DRK and get a chance at the 10% block reward masternodes are being paid, but not actually act as a masternode. For this reason, DarkSend would work better if the masternodes were paid by those they were helping coinjoin, or if there wasn't a masternode at all and everyone collaborated in a decentralized fashion. The better implementation not vulnerable to the attack described is compatible with Bitcoin, therefore, the Darksend protocol serves no purpose.
|
|
|
The poll was too linear for something as wild, bouncy & exponential as DRK. Should maybe be more like... - $1000+
- $500-1000
- $250-500
- $125-250
- $64-125
- $32-64
- $16-32
- $8-16
- $4-8
- $2-4
- $1-2
- Less than $1
|
|
|
Dat 483BTC sell wall oO
That's a buy wall.
|
|
|
Also eduffield could be scrared to go on with his great work with soo much hate around.
Balderdash. If it gets super bad he'll just live in darkcointalk and only come here to post important updates.
|
|
|
I'm pretty mad about this.
Why the huge sell off.
This is why I stopped getting involved with Cryptos for a few months because I am sick of these schemes…
There's always a big crash after the enormous rises. There'll be another crash after the post-fork rocketry. But we always settle higher than before. Darkcoin is a rollercoaster. Just hang on and enjoy the ride.
|
|
|
How is that thread proving anything ? If I create a thread named "techsolution is an idiot" does it prove that you are one ?
Let's find out.
|
|
|
You posted this 3 times in 10 minutes. Quit spamming already, we've all seen it.
|
|
|
Thanks! So one MN currently rewards about 2.3 DRK PER DAY??? This is so insanely profitable it somehow seems to good to be true...Well. I`ll see what my Nodes will do tomorrow. That is quite good. Are there lots of masternodes still waiting to switch on, or can we expect a rush to buy after tomorrow when estimation becomes reality becomes headlines about licence to print money?
|
|
|
You guys are catching a falling knife..
Yeah, this one.
|
|
|
Forgive my noobness - what happens when the master nodes get paid? Huge dump?
Probably quite the opposite, once it's demonstrated that the fork went fine and masternodes become profitable. Probably... but who knows with crypto. Anything could happen.
|
|
|
How True Anonymity Made Darkcoin King of the Altcoins I think "King of the Cryptos" has a much better ring to it... maybe next month.
|
|
|
It's a pretty damn good article as well!
|
|
|
Pioneered by darkcoin, X11 has slowly gained traction in terms of new coin implementation. Darkcoin, along with Hirocoin and québecoin, are perhaps the most notable examples of X11 coins.
That is pretty cool of them. I am still cracking up about BBC discussing Darkcoin hard fork. Who cares about the price, that is the big highlight of the day. I hear you dude, it's f00kin insane. Don't say Quebecoin... X11 or not its still a country shitty coin,Quebecer don't need Quebecoin,they need Bitcoin(or DRK ) It's quoting coindesk. In their original X11 article post they mentioned Hirocoin & Quebecoin but not Darkcoin! Things are different now http://www.coindesk.com/true-anonymity-darkcoin-king-altcoins/
|
|
|
It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
you a right 100% miners on btc-e trollbox talking only about lite. If you don't know, users who are talking about coins that are not represented on the BTC-E get BAN immediately. That can't be right. They've been talking a lot about DRK lately and they weren't all getting banned immediately.
|
|
|
|