Bitcoin Forum
July 08, 2024, 08:15:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 [231] 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 »
4601  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Let's have a little fun then, shall we. on: October 07, 2012, 03:45:03 PM
Out of curiosity, how involved is MP in the asset creation process?

Seeing as how you have to negotiate the listing contract with him, very.

4602  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: MPEx registration fee bumped to 30 BTC. on: October 07, 2012, 03:43:03 PM
Hey, MP, I would be willing to work for bitcoin as your PR person. I would not scare away potential investors by calling them names. How about it?

*Evil cackle*

One does not simply...walk into PR for MPEx.
4603  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GLBSE users: how to continue your relationship with asset issuers on: October 07, 2012, 03:42:17 PM
There are going to be a lot of small entities who are about to get flamed to death and accused of being scammers just because they aren't in the position to immediately return everyones emails, respond to the forum and generally handle this collapse with panache. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people just give up and walk away from their asset holders. Especially if there is a run on assets on small 'companies' that didn't expect it.

This is exactly correct, and one of the main repercussions of the irresponsible way people have behaved YET AGAIN. Yes, all you asshats who were trashing MPEx, I mean you. Yes, all you asshats who asked me "o, what happens if MPEx goes away" and I answered and then you ignored it. And then I said, hey, ask the same of GLBBQ and you ignored that too. And then ranted and raved about how MPEx is a bad system, because it protects us all from exactly this kind of contingency. Not like someone could know better than a bunch of forum retards.

So now, through the sheer unmitigated irresponsibility of "the community" we have this situation called moral hazard: a bunch of people will be legitimately called scammers, but it wouldn't really be legitimate to do anything about it, for the exact quoted reason.

Well done fucking over bitcoin, folks. Keep at it, and then wonder why I call you idiots and why I say you're no part of it. Serious rocket science here.
4604  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: GLBSE Closed. on: October 07, 2012, 03:33:06 PM
Wow. Who saw this coming? Think we will get all of our BTC back?

Quote
Anonim 12/09/01(Sat)16:58 No. 16970
http://polimedia.us/dtng/c/src/134654389322.png
Sep 02 02:59:37 <mircea_popescu> MrTiggr do you have an article on the global scam exchange yet ? you can use this http://polimedia.us/dtng/c/src/134654389322.png
4605  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: otc-rating on: October 07, 2012, 03:21:46 PM

Heh, I had seen that thread but somehow hadn't seen that post.

That makes a good point about how Pirate had a fantastic trust history in the WoT.  So if you look at the types of ratings given they include a bunch of PayPal transactions.  So if you were to do a PayPal transaction with him you probably would have been fine.  Now loaning money to him, or depositing it for impossible gains?   Well, the WoT trust history doesn't replace using your head.

That's exactly correct.

wow...i read that thread and what i thought wot and otc are is a little different.   as much as people like to see that you are rated i thought there was way more accountability and was a great way to tell if someone is trustworthy.

im not bashing the system or anything but it really doesnt mean anything in the big scheme of things huh?

 the more i thought about raising my rating today, the more i thought that buying items from others or lending btc instead of borrowing is probably the better route.

  still a little disappointed that what i assumed was a great way to determine if someone is going to scam you or not,  or a great way to show im trustworthy and get a loan  really doesnt hold the value i thought it did.

  scammers are going to scam regardless and my question about buying a rating was basically confirmed.

  i know as of right now there is no better system  but just shocked so many people put so much faith and emphasis on having a good rating.  im going to work on raising my rating anyway but just a little bummed out it can easily be faked or bought.

  thanks again for the replies

It is a great way, once you know how to use it.
4606  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: What is needed in the Bitcoin economy? on: October 07, 2012, 03:20:25 PM
So you want to be part of the Bitcoin Marketplace, do you?
4607  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer tag: Nefario. on: October 07, 2012, 03:18:02 PM

MatthewH3
- Again here you are giving us the inside scoop???   Also his usename is Nefario.    Also what do you mean by "I think Nafario has contacted all major shareholders and won a motion to stay CEO as well".  It is so interesting you have all this info but the person whole should be making official statements is no where to be found?  

The guy is mostly famous for

from his red star mining thread.
4608  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer tag: Nefario. on: October 07, 2012, 03:11:57 PM

You'd think weapons would be the thing to interest these imaginary "terrorists" the US gov't keeps yakking about to distract everyone from the fact they're eating food their parents wouldn't have fed to stray dogs.

Just a thought.

Few people used The Armory because the majority of users could obtain weapons cheaper, more conveniently and legally elsewhere.  Delivery is the weak point for illegal goods which are physical - it's where the illegal activity is most vulnerable.  Bitcoin is obviously attractive for laundering the proceeds of those illegal activities, though.

With child porn, you have a product which can be delivered digitally - the weak link in the chain is payment.  When you can anonymise both payment and delivery, you lessen the risk of detection.

So basically the fearsome terrorists are mostly shut-in wankers of great danger. Oh how the worldview changes by the minute.

Seriously now. What terrorists?
4609  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 07, 2012, 03:07:54 PM
Just gather some private investment and dont allow public trading of the shares. Thats how the company that runs glbse itself functions.

Nice to see you were shitting all over MPEx while being secretly involved with the Global Scam Exchange, you despicable shill you.
4610  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer tag: Nefario. on: October 07, 2012, 12:48:00 AM

Well I do I spoke to him on the phone.  He risks jail time for funding terrorism, money laundering and that's without any tax issues.  Nafario's get out of jail card is that everyone who wants to withdraw coins or shares will have to comply with AML regulations.  He also said he will soon have a way for assets to pay dividends but not trade shares.

Can you, or one of the shareholders, clarify something for the rest of us?

"Risks jail time for funding terrorism, money laundering, etc" could mean that in the process of looking to legitimise GBLSE (and the fact that Nefario has openly posted that intention here implies that he knew GBLSE was not operating legitimately), his lawyer has become aware of how GBLSE was operating and said "holy fuck, close that shit down right now because you're violating AML/CTF laws all over the place and if the authorities find out what you've been doing you could go to jail - and make sure you get user information so that if this blows up at a later date you've covered your ass a bit".

Another option is that the authorities have become aware of GBLSE's activities and directed him to shut down GBLSE or face prosecution.

It's not clear from what's been posted by those who've had contact with Nefario whether the authorities have anything to do with this decision or whether it's a pre-emptive move which came about because when he finally consulted a lawyer about GBLSE, the reality of what he was doing and the risks he was taking finally sunk in for Nefario.  Can you shed any light at all on this?

A third alternative would be that the voices have been asking him to sacrifice a goat (and also close down glbse and spend theymos' unholy money on collectible first edition pet rocks).


This is all "risk profile" stuff.  If you have the stones, by all means, feel free to "invest" with these "people".

The more legitimate information an asset seller provides, the higher the premium they should be able to command.  If it's SLKRD.ETF with nothing behind it but a nom de guerre of "FUCKDAPOLICE", well, good luck on that one.

This is grown up land and you have the right to make choices that I might call completely fucking stupid. (I will, watch me.)

I think that many people on here are actively seeking illegal investments rather than believing that the schemes offered here are in any way legitimate.  Perhaps they believe that there's less risk of being caught if their illegal activity takes place online or perhaps they don't have the real world connections to participate in high return illegal activity, but people were perfectly happy to keep throwing BTC at pirate when it was believed he was using them to launder money for unsavoury clients.  I have no doubt that if someone offered shares in a child porn distribution ring or a cocaine cartel on here there'd be users scrambling to get in on the action.

This theory of yours would probably hold a lot more water if it weren't that the armory (that thing designed by SR to sell weapons, explosives and such) weren't closed for...economic reasons. That's right: nobody wanted to buy them, nobody had them for sale, it wasn't a political problem at all.

You'd think weapons would be the thing to interest these imaginary "terrorists" the US gov't keeps yakking about to distract everyone from the fact they're eating food their parents wouldn't have fed to stray dogs.

Just a thought.
4611  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: otc-rating on: October 07, 2012, 12:44:26 AM
How the WoT works.
4612  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BIP 2112 on: October 07, 2012, 12:02:23 AM
Actually this sounds like an excellent idea. How much sense would it make to further expand it in order to mix bitcoin-securities straight in the blockchain?
4613  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: a few questions about GLBSE on: October 06, 2012, 11:55:08 PM
So, why not just comply  with the SEC and make GLBSE legal? I know  easier said than done, but doable, right?
Not enough: money, brains, business acumen, future revenue, etc. Not doable at all with the current executive team and the current board of directors.


Kramerica Industries!
4614  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Let's have a little fun then, shall we. on: October 06, 2012, 11:45:00 PM
bitcoinbitcoin113 - Nah, you'll get paid at the address of record as shown by this article (so please post it). Trying to keep things manageable.

notme - That works, for a signature. Still need to post your address.
4615  Economy / Securities / Re: The reasons why Bitcoin securities can’t be regulated by the SEC on: October 06, 2012, 10:41:56 PM
I believe US Government might recognize Japan Yen is a currency, while US Goverment does not accept it as payment of taxes.

I also believe, that The Bitcoin Foundation is going to make some kind of a definition of what bitcoin is and that definition is going to be embraced by dozens of most prominent bitcoin businesses making that definition pretty hard to beat. If there is ever going to be lawsuits about these issues, you could bet that goverment is going to use that definition as an argument in the lawsuit if that definition suits their purposes. Now anybody could guess whether Bitcoin Foundation is going to define bitcoins as a currency or "play money" in their mission trying to promote bitcoins to mainstream usage as a more modern currency to replace fiat money.

I can tell you for sure that any group of people can make whatever association, foundation or whatever else, but any claim that they "speak for" Bitcoin is outright fraudulent (and yes, we might sue if they do).
4616  Economy / Securities / Re: The reasons why Bitcoin securities can’t be regulated by the SEC on: October 06, 2012, 09:52:09 PM
Who is in your counsel and what credentials do they hold? What measures do you have and will have in place to prevent an immediate seizure/closure prior to you fighting your arguments in court?

Pretty much none of your business on the first score. As detailed in the FAQ on the second.

Heh this is basically the same argument the Galactic Nexus Uberplan (GNU) folk favour when deploying Martian BotCoin and similar cryptocurrencies (including the Hacker nation's national currency, Bitcoin, from which the Martians derived the technology) on backwards worlds such as the planet known as Earth during such planets' pre-Milieu transition period.

-MarkM-


Mark baby...when you talk to me I can never make heads or tails of it. S'okay if I just nod?

Thanks for the Great info, I'll use it if I ever have to defend myself.  Cry

Isn't really intended for that use. If you have to defend yourself in court you absolutely should hire a lawyer.

@Everyone: the discussion of the thing itself should really be carried on in the comments section of the article, I don't really have the authority to comment much.
4617  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Let's have a little fun then, shall we. on: October 06, 2012, 09:48:46 PM
Atlas - Thanks!

mlawrence - Post count at the end of the period. You're allowed to change the signature, provided the text remains there at all points.

bitcoinbear - Yep.

notme - The quoted text goes in the signature, the address goes in the post. Check out bitcoinbear above.

TheButterZone - Cool!
4618  Economy / Securities / The reasons why Bitcoin securities can’t be regulated by the SEC on: October 06, 2012, 07:16:34 PM
"As stated in various other venues, MPEx does retain ample counsel. We’ve proactively prepared a defensive litigation plan and written as well as oral arguments in order to be able to defend our position as well as the interests of the larger Bitcoin community in multiple relevant jurisdictions.

After much internal debate, and in the light of recent developments (by which I mean the misguided actions of one patently incompetent and emotionally unstable individual behaving in a manner consistent with mid-age onset schizophrenia) I’ve decided to prepare and release a limited statement detailing in principle our considered position on some matters of interest.

The reasoning is that while it is both unwise and uncommon for legal arguments to be disclosed before actual litigation due to the obvious advantage this confers on the other party, nevertheless it would seem the community could significantly benefit by some general framework to consider things within. In balancing this later need with the former imperative I think MPEx is behaving generously to its environment while at the same time not significantly endangering its own position.

What follows is not a legal document per se, because it has been much abridged, it lacks significant devices, references etc and for this reason it shouldn’t be included in litigation as-is. It would be in the best case an amicus brief."

(Continued...)
4619  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] LIF.A, LIF.B, LIF.CX, and LIF.M on: October 06, 2012, 05:33:27 PM
Interestingly enough, I was researching some companies in the Lansing area earlier this week, and came across one with an address very, very similar to this one, which purports to be a legit company doing business with the automotive industry. The hook is that the president of the company is supposedly named "Satoshi Nakamoto"!

One wonders if perhaps Perp Lambert has branched out into a much larger scale of scam?

I will be taking a field trip for more details soon. I would love to bring a sense of justice to his other scams.

Well if you're still looking for a trip, PeterLambert is in #bitcoin-assets now,

Quote
Oct 06 20:12:29 <PeterLambert>   bitvps
Oct 06 20:12:31 <rg>   for the next 2 weeks
Oct 06 20:12:38 <mircea_popescu>   rg you noticed i raised it ?
Oct 06 20:12:44 <mircea_popescu>   PeterLambert ?!
Oct 06 20:12:44 <rg>   no i didn't
Oct 06 20:12:48 <PeterLambert>   yes?
Oct 06 20:12:52 <rg>   it was already a rip off
Oct 06 20:12:54 <rg>   you raised it more?
Oct 06 20:12:57 <mircea_popescu>   quite the cheek. how dare you show your face here ?
Oct 06 20:13:01 <mircea_popescu>   rf 30.
Oct 06 20:13:12 <rg>   lol what a scam
Oct 06 20:13:18 <PeterLambert>   I have a face
Oct 06 20:13:30 <mircea_popescu>   PeterLambert you also have a bunch of defrauded investors.
Oct 06 20:13:59 <PeterLambert>   ? maybe they can be included in the glbse shutdown
Oct 06 20:14:06 <mircea_popescu>   maybe you can get fucked.
Oct 06 20:14:16 <PeterLambert>   I never did get any communicatio from nefario
Oct 06 20:14:24 <mircea_popescu>   what is this, you think you run with everyone;'s money, come back a year later all is forgotten ?
Oct 06 20:14:27 <mircea_popescu>   all is not forgotten.
Oct 06 20:15:05 <rg>   what asset was his
Oct 06 20:15:06 <rg>   and what happened
Oct 06 20:15:11 <rg>   i was around a year ago and i dont know who he is
Oct 06 20:15:12 <mircea_popescu>   LIF.x
Oct 06 20:15:19 <mircea_popescu>   back in 2011. first glbse scammer pretty much
Oct 06 20:15:27 <mircea_popescu>   he started the trend.
Oct 06 20:15:40 <assbot>   [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12687 @ 0.00037269 = 4.7283 BTC
Oct 06 20:15:41 <assbot>   [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 413 @ 0.00037545 = 0.1551 BTC
Oct 06 20:15:49 <PeterLambert>   no, I think that title goes to cuddlefish
Oct 06 20:16:14 <rg>   peterlambert have you come to repay your share holders?
Oct 06 20:16:35 <PeterLambert>   Usagi did not learn from my mistakes
Oct 06 20:16:40 <mircea_popescu>   ;;rate PeterLambert -3 the original GLBBQ scammer. Made a bunch of "funds", LIF.*, made all sorts of claims as to their investment policies, ran off.
Oct 06 20:16:41 <gribble>   Error: User doesn't exist in the Rating or GPG databases. User must be GPG-registered to receive ratings.
Oct 06 20:16:49 <PeterLambert>   I have no idea who they are
Oct 06 20:16:54 <mircea_popescu>   gtfo your mistakes.
Oct 06 20:17:08 <mircea_popescu>   i can't believe the nerve of you idiots.
Oct 06 20:17:18 <mircea_popescu>   btc is not for scammers, go back to nigeria or w.e you sprout from.
Oct 06 20:17:21 <rg>   if theres one thing i hate more than curly haired romanians
Oct 06 20:17:24 <rg>   its scammers
Oct 06 20:17:32 <rg>   :-D
Oct 06 20:17:32 <PeterLambert>   so most of the money I lost went to shakaru
Oct 06 20:17:47 <mircea_popescu>   PeterLambert nobody cares.
Oct 06 20:18:00 <PeterLambert>   oh, well nevermind then
Oct 06 20:19:14 <mircea_popescu>   rg https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35775.0 there you have it, in all its splendour
Oct 06 20:19:25 <mircea_popescu>   asshat even deleted his posts, deleted his site, complete and utter scammer.
Oct 06 20:20:18 <PeterLambert>   but no scammer tag?
Oct 06 20:21:14 <mircea_popescu>   apparently you haven't learned from usagi's mistakes either.
Oct 06 20:22:00 <rg>   nice peter
Oct 06 20:22:04 <rg>   how many btc did you steal
Oct 06 20:22:06 <rg>   1200 ?
Oct 06 20:22:21 <rg>   ;;calc 1200 * [ticker --last]
Oct 06 20:22:21 <gribble>   15297.564
Oct 06 20:22:25 <rg>   wow
Oct 06 20:22:30 <rg>   you'd go prison for hat
Oct 06 20:22:31 <rg>   that*
Oct 06 20:22:36 <mircea_popescu>   rg it's not even that. it's the eggregiousness of it. he was like, writing extensively about the various stocks and w/e, analuysing them, bla bla.
Oct 06 20:22:43 <mircea_popescu>   then one day... o sorry, "they were all scams".
Oct 06 20:22:48 <rg>   lol
Oct 06 20:22:56 <rg>   hey we're making 30%/mo on our deposits!
Oct 06 20:22:59 <rg>   oh btw
Oct 06 20:23:02 <rg>   i cant pay you any of it.
Oct 06 20:23:02 <mircea_popescu>   i mean, half the people investing at  that time didn't even do any dd, just went by his bs.
Oct 06 20:23:10 <rg>   that's sad
Oct 06 20:23:16 <rg>   one thing that's good about glbse closing is..
Oct 06 20:23:24 <rg>   unexperienced investors wont be able to make uninfomed decisions
4620  Economy / Securities / Re: GLBSE owners lied to us. How to move forward and fix this? Move to Exchange X? on: October 06, 2012, 05:31:14 PM
like Butterfly Labs does.

Sweet.

Yeah I want to use Open-Transactions for my asset (RSM) if I can figure out how to and its not too difficult for shareholders.

I don't know exactly Open Transactions, but if it requires something like signing documents with PGP, then it is both
1) quite scary the first time you see it
2) easy, after you spend 5 minutes figuring it out with a good howto.

Maybe, having money to recover is just what it takes to push people to make that little mental effort, and move in the realm of serious security at once; so, a great opportunity  Smiley

This.
Pages: « 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 [231] 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!