Obviously I have thought about this.  It is a very valid conundrum, and a sticking point in many 'consipricy theories.'

I myself have family who are in the industry.  They make good money and I have no indication that they have any awareness of the (proposed) nefarious nature that I am hypothesizing about.  They are aware of their million dollar student loans, and their lack of a 'formal dinning' room in their current house and the consequent need to upgrade for this reason.  They are also proud of their role in serving society though they have a variety of complaints about 'the system.'

I find it quite plausible that a very corrupt and surreptitious system could be operated successfully with perhaps 0.2% of the participants being fully aware of the overall details.  They would just need to be well placed, and the system itself would need to be sufficiently complex (involving, say, media, education, research, and most critically, finance.)  Note that the U.S. maintained an amazing amount of secrecy in the development of the atom bomb.  Were it not for Hiroshima, it probably could be secret until this day (although that total secrecy would defeat the point of it.)

It should be noted that a key element in maintaining a system such as I am describing is gatekeeping (which is why I mentioned it up-thread.)  In this way, even if some participants smell a rat and decide to 'go public', the damage will still be contained and the games can continue.  If one researches this stuff one finds a fair number of medical professional who in fact do bow out and blab.  As long as it is only 'crazy conspiracy theorists' who hear them, the damage is minimal.

Another element is to avoid hurting the 'wrong people'.  We would still be happily injecting babies with significant quantities of mercury were it not for a powerful senator's own grandchild being damaged.  Now we have to dose people at 1/10th the former rate except for the multi-dose flu shot which still delivers a healthy dose through the blood/brain barrier.  With better technology to allow more targeted individual tracking this problem can be minimized.

Sorry you feel that way. But I don't agree that homosexuality is only from modern times, and I don't see how it conflicts with what I said, and it was never my intention and as I said it doesn't conflict with what I said, and I stand by both assertions.

Why must we live in a "dumb everything down for retards or risk being the victim of their tantrums" society.  Somehow the stupid Fucks in our society are being allowed to get away with murder at the expense of the sanity of the intelligent.  Then people whine about mass shootings.

You need better comprehension skills. I said nothing of the sort. Certainly people were homosexual before social media. The OP claimed no women were straight, which is utterly ridiculous.

The women who say they are straight, are straight. There has been so much subliminal, implantation of sexualization of women, for all men and women in everything they watch, the beauty magazines they read, the sexualization of "things" over people, like the picture of breasts is usually combined with sex on tv, movies, etc. These things will create physical reactions in the body when they see these images. It's basic psychology, like Pavlov's dogs. 

Lol,
came true my prediction  earlier than expected.

You don't get millions without being rather canny. All that would happen is that said whale would enrich all the hostile brats who are currently trading by buying all their coins and then they'd turn around and destroy the value of his coins.

That reminds me of someone who was bigging up an alt. He said 'the market cap is so and so. Imagine what would happen if someone put the proceeds of their house sale into it.' Yup. And what if two major holders fancied houses on the back of that rise.

Twenty million new people wanting pin money in coins is vastly more powerful and sustainable than a couple of players with big bucks. That just replicates the same old shit at a higher level and scares away the regular folks it needs.

More than the mass of 70 jupiters.

Yeah, this whole hot fusion deal does seem like a bit of a funding scam. How many billions have they soaked taxpayers from various countries over the last few decades?

However, being the armchair scientist that I am I can see that their design looks good. I think they might actually archive a coefficency of power greater than 1.

Lets wait and see what happens when they flip the switch before rushing to judgment. If they state "next week" when it comes time to fire it up then the German taxpayer knows he's been had...

Many industries such as Banking, Finance, Law will see a big upheaval. The consumers will be big beneficiaries and indeed the poor and marginal sections of the society will reap the benefits of financial and social inclusion in the coming decades. I can barely think of another innovation in Economic and Finance in the last several decades whose influence surpasses the welfare increases that will be engendered by Satoshi Nakamoto's brilliant, path-breaking invention. That is why I am nominating him for the Nobel Prize in Economics.

Most people believe that the 20th century was a death struggle between Communism and Capitalism, and that Fascism was but a hiccup. But today we know better. Communism was a fool's errand. The followers of Marx gone from this earth, but the followers of Hitler abound and thrive. Hitler, however, had one great disadvantage. He lived in a time when Fascism, like a virus... like the AIDS virus... needed a strong host in order to spread. Germany was that host. But Germany did not prevail. The world was too big. Fortunately, the world has changed. Global communications, cable TV, the internet. Today the world is smaller and a virus does not need a strong host in order to spread. The virus... is airborne. One more thing. Let no man call us crazy. They called Hitler crazy. But Hitler was not crazy. He was stupid. You don't fight Russia *and* America. You get Russia and America to fight each other... and destroy each other.

Have enough noobs been shaken out that we can go higher now?

The god x)

Im happy.we should stay in this price range until we.
Rising to 500 afterwards with another but smaller correction then we will leave 500.
Timeframe: 2 weeks max

let me repeat myself --- if things were really so bad, then how come the peg has been kept? just break the peg as a proof of concept and see what happens. don't just spread FUD. I have used nubits for a year now and I have always been able to sell and buy as much as I need to. if there is no liquidity in one exchange then there is liquidity in the other exchange. it works.

what kind of BS topic is this? if you think you can break the peg of 1$ then why don't you do it to prove your point? until CMC shows that NBT is keeping the peg, it doesn't matter what warm air someone blows out of their mouth.

just go to poloniex and see for yourself that there are plenty of buy and sell orders near 1$ price.